Neoliberal küreselleşme döneminde bağımlılığı yeniden düşünmek: “Büyük kavuşma” mı, bağımlı kalkınma mı?

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 1, 1 - 42, 28.06.2024

Ahmet Çağrı Bartan

Öz

1980’ler itibarıyla ivme kazanan küreselleşme ve neoliberalleşmenin etkisi altında dönüşen dünya ekonomisi, özellikle Uluslararası Siyasal İktisat ve Uluslararası Kalkınma alanlarındaki çalışmalarda bağımlılık tezinin geçerliliğinin sorgulanmasına ve bu konunun giderek marjinalleşmesine yol açmıştır. Bu makale, son dönemde uluslararası yazında yeniden değerlendirilmeye başlanan bağımlılık ilişkilerine güncel olgular ve kuramsal tartışmalar ışığında yaklaşarak konuya günümüze ait, kapsamlı ve yapılandırılmış bir yorum getirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, ilgili Türkçe literatürde doğrudan ve bütüncül biçimde bağımlılığı ele alan çalışmaların halen yetersiz kaldığı vurgulanarak günümüzde bağımlılık ilişkilerinin gelişmekte olan ülkelerdeki kalkınma süreçlerini nasıl şekillendirdiği ele alınmaktadır. Bu bağlamda hızla küreselleşen üretim ve finans ilişkilerinin bağımlılıkların yeniden üretilmesindeki rolüne dikkat çekilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neoliberal Küreselleşme, Bağımlılık, Bağımlı Kalkınma, Büyük Kavuşma, Uluslarası Kalkınma

Kaynakça

• AKÇAY, Ü. (2016), “Küresel Krizin Neresindeyiz?”, Gazete Duvar. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/yazarlar/2016/08/29/kuresel-krizin-neresindeyiz/.
• AKÇAY, Ü. (2020), “Fed’in Acil Faiz İndiriminin Anlamı”, Gazete Duvar. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/yazarlar/2020/03/09/fedin-acil-faiz-indiriminin-anlami/.
• AKÇAY, Ü. ve GÜNGEN, A.R. (2019a), Finansallaşma, Borç Krizi ve Çöküş: Küresel Kapitalizmin Geleceği, İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları.
• AKÇAY, Ü. ve GÜNGEN, A.R. (2019b), "The Making of Turkey’s 2018-2019 Economic Crisis", IPE Working Papers 120/2019, Berlin: Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE). https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ipewps/1202019.html.
• AKYÜZ, Y. (2012), "The Staggering Rise of the South?", ECIDC Report, Geneva: UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ecidc2012_bp1.pdf.
• AKYÜZ, Y. (2013), “Waving or Drowning: Developing Countries after the Financial Crisis”, Economic and Political Weekly, 48(37), 38–48.
• AKYÜZ, Y. (2017), Playing with Fire: Deepened Financial Integration and Changing Vulnerabilities of the Global South, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• AKYÜZ, Y., FLASSBECK, H. ve KOZUL-WRIGHT, R. (2011), “Küreselleşme, Eşitsizlik ve İşgücü Piyasası”, Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar (içinde), Editörler: A.H. Köse, F. Şenses ve E. Yeldan, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, s. 477–515.
• AMIN, S. (1976), Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism, Sussex: The Harvester Press.
• AMIN, S. (1987), “A Note on the Concept of Delinking”, Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 10(3), 435–444. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241067.
• AMIN, S. (2010), The Law of Worldwide Value, New York: Monthly Review Press.
• ANNAN, K., CAMDESSUS, M. ve RUBIN, R. (2008), “Amid the Turmoil, Do Not Forget the Poor”, Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/c9c35622-a6a6-11dd-95be-000077b07658.
• ANTUNES DE OLIVEIRA, F. (2022), "Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism", Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211037341.
• BALDWIN, R. (2016), The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
• BANGA, R. (2013), "Measuring Value in Global Value Chains", Regional Value Chains Background Paper No. RVC-8, Geneva:
• UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/ecidc2013misc1_bp8.pdf.
• BARAN, P.A. ve SWEEZY, P.M. (1968), Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order, New York and London: Modern Reader Paperbacks.
• BARTAN, A.Ç. (2020), “Neoliberal Küreselleşmenin Kalkınma Krizi: 21. Yüzyılda Uluslararası İş Bölümü ve Bağımlılık İlişkileri”, Küreselleşmenin Krizi, Pandemi ve Uluslararası Siyaset (içinde), Editörler: E. Uzgören ve D.A. Açar, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, s. 201– 240. https://www.nobelyayin.com/kuresellesmenin-krizi-pandemi-ve-uluslararasisiyaset_16427.html.
• BIELER, A. ve MORTON, A.D. (2018), Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• BIERSTEKER, T. (1978), Distortion of Development? Contending Perspectives on the Multinational Corporation, Cambridge: MIT Press.
• BİRDAL, M. (2018), Bir Krizin Anatomisi: 2008 Krizi ve Dünya Ekonomisinde Dönüşüm, İstanbul: Kor Kitap.
• BORATAV, K. ve ORHANGAZİ, Ö. (2022), “Neoliberal Framework and External Dependency Versus Political Priorities, 2009-2020”, Political Economy of Development in Turkey: 1838 — Present (içinde), Editörler: E. Özçelik ve Y. Özdemir, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 287– 314.
• BUKHARIN, N. (1929), Imperialism and World Economy, International Publishers.
• CAMMACK, P. (2009), “The Shape of Capitalism to Come”, Antipode, 41(1), 262–280.
• CARDOSO, F.H. ve FALETTO, E. (1979), Dependency and Development in Latin America, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
• COGLIANO, J.F., KANEKO, S., VENEZIANI, R. ve YOSHIHARA, N. (2022), “International Exploitation, Capital Export, and Unequal Exchange”, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism (içinde), Editörler: Z. Cope ve I. Ness, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 231–250.
• COPE, Z. (2022), “Imperialism and Its Critics: A Brief Conspectus”, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism (içinde), Editörler: Z. Cope ve I. Ness, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 15–42.
• COPE, Z. ve NESS, I. (ed.) (2022), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism, New York: Oxford University Press.
• DELGADO WISE, R. ve MARTIN, D. (2015), "The Political Economy of Global Labor Arbitrage", Problemos del Desarollo. Revista Latinoamericana De Economía, 46(183). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpd.2015.10.002.
• DOS SANTOS, T. (1970), “The Structure of Dependence”, American Economic Association, 60(2), 231–236.
• DUMÉNIL, G. ve LÉVY, D. (2011), The Crisis of Neoliberalism, Harvard University Press.
• E CASTRO, L.C. (2022), "Brazilian Dependent Capitalism under the Hegemony of Financialized Capital", Latin American Perspectives, 49(2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211053011.
• EMMANUEL, A. (1972), Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade, New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
• ERDÖLEK KOZAL, Ö. (2020), “Wallerstein ve Dünya-Sistem Yaklaşımı: Bir Yeniden Değerlendirme”, Ekonomi-tek, 9(2), 101–127.
• ESCOBAR, A. (1995), Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• ESTEVA, G. (2010), "Development", The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power (içinde), Editör: W. Sachs, New York: Zed Books Ltd, s. 1–23.
• EVANS, P. (1979), Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• EVANS, P. (1994), "Class, State and Dependence in East Asia: Lessons for Latin Americanists", The State: Critical Concepts (içinde), Editör: J. A. Hall, London: Routledge, s. 484–504.
• FARNY, E. (2016), “Dependency Theory: A Useful Tool for Analyzing Global Inequalities Today?”, E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2016/11/23/dependency-theory-a-usefultool-for-analyzing-global-inequalities-today/.
• FINE, B. (2010), “Neoliberalism as Financialisation”, Economic Transitions to Neoliberalism in Middle-income Countries: Policy Dilemmas, Economic Crises, Forms of Resistance (içinde), Editörler: A. Saad-Filho ve G.L. Yalman, London-New York: Routledge, s. 11–23.
• FINE, B., LAPAVITSAS, C. ve PINCUS, J. (2003), “Preface”, Development Policy in the Twenty- First Century: Beyond the post-Washington Consensus (içinde), Editörler: B. Fine, C. Lapavitsas ve J. Pincus, London and New York: Routledge, s. XIV-XX.
• FRANK, A.G. (1966), “The Development of Underdevelopment”, Monthly Review, 18(4), 17–31.
• FRIEDMAN, M. ve FRIEDMAN, R. (1980), Free to Choose: A Personal Statement, New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (HBJ).
• GHOSH, B.N. (2001), Dependency Theory Revisited, London and New York: Routledge.
• GÜLALP, H. (1998), “The Eurocentrism of Dependency Theory and the Question of ‘Authenticity’: A View from Turkey”, Third World Quarterly, 19(5), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599814118.
• INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION (ILO). (2022), Datasets: Average Monthly Earnings of Employees by Sex and Economic Activity - Annual. https://www.ilo.org/shinyapps/bulkexplorer1/?lang=en&id=EAR_4MTH_SEX_ECO_CUR_ NB_A.
• HARRISON, A. ve SEPÚLVEDA, C. (2011), "Learning from Developing Country Experience: Growth and Economic Thought Before and After the 2008–09 Crisis", Policy Research Working Paper 5752, Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3554/WPS5752.pdf?sequence =1&isAllowed=y.
• HELD, D. ve MCGREW, A. (2003), "The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction", The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (içinde), Editörler: D. Held ve A. McGrew, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• HERATH, D. (2008), “Development Discourse of the Globalists and Dependency Theorists: Do the Globalisation Theorists Rephrase and Reword the Central Concepts of the Dependency School?”, Third World Quarterly, 29(4), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802052961.
• HIGGINBOTTOM, A. (2013), “The Political Economy of Foreign Investment in Latin America: Dependency Revisited”, Latin American Perspectives, 40(3), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X13479304.
• HIGGINBOTTOM, A. (2018), “A Self-Enriching Pact: Imperialism and the Global South”, Journal of Global Faultlines, 5(1–2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.5.1-2.0049.
• HIGGINBOTTOM, A. (2023), “Superexploitation and the Imperialist Drive of Capitalism”, Monthly Review, 74(11), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-074-11-2023-04_3.
• HUNTINGTON, S.P. (1971), “The Change to Change: Modernization, Development, and Politics”, Comparative Politics, 3(3), 283–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/421470.
• JESSOP, B. (2018), “The World Market, ‘North-South’ Relations, and Neoliberalism”, Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 29, 207–228. http://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/22453.
• KARAÇİMEN, E. (2019), “Nuray Ergüneş ve Türkiye’de Finansallaşma”, Gazete Duvar. https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/kitap/2019/07/05/nuray-ergunes-ve-turkiyedefinansallasma/.
• KARAŞ, G. (2017), “Bağımlılık Teorisi Perspektifinden DTÖ Kapsamındaki Korumacılık Politikası Araçlarının Kullanımı”, International Journal of Public Finance, 2(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.356692.
• KATZ, C. (2022), Dependency Theory after Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Latin American Critical Thought, Culture, Power, and History, Leiden-Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047417088_023.
• KIELY, R. (2015), The BRICS, US “Decline” and Global Transformations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• KIELY, R. (2017), “Dependency and World-Systems Perspectives on Development”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies, (April 2019), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.142.
• KVANGRAVEN, I.H. (2019), “Samir Amin: A Pioneering Marxist and Third World Activist”, Development and Change, 51(2), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12562.
• KVANGRAVEN, I.H. (2020), “Beyond the Stereotype: Restating the Relevance of the Dependency Research Programme”, Development and Change, 52(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12593.
• LAPAVITSAS, C. (2012), “Introduction: A Crisis of Financialisation”, Financialisation in Crisis (içinde), Editör: C. Lapavitsas, Leiden-Boston: Brill, s. 1–12.
• LAPAVITSAS, C. (2013), “The Financialization of Capitalism: ‘Profiting Without Producing’”, City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 17(6), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.853865.
• LARRAIN, J. (1989), Theories of Development: Capitalism, Colonialism and Dependency, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• LENIN, V.I. (1999), Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, Resistance Books.
• LEVY, M. (1967), Social Patterns and Problems of Modernization, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• LEVY YEYATI, E. ve WILLIAMS, T. (2012), “Emerging Economies in the 2000s: Real Decoupling and Financial Recoupling”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(8), 2102–2126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.05.005.
• LI, M. (2021), “China: Imperialism or Semi-Periphery?”, Monthly Review, 73(3), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-073-03-2021-07_4.
• LI, M. (2022), “The Capitalist World System and Economic Imperialism in East Asia”, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism (içinde), Editörler: Z. Cope ve I. Ness, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 455–474.
• LINGARD, B. ve OZGA, J. (2007), “Globalisation, Education Policy and Politics”, The Routledge Falmer Reader in Education Policy and Politics (içinde), Editörler: B. Lingard ve J. Ozga, London-New York: Routledge, s. 65–82.
• LOXLEY, J. ve CAMPBELL, B.K. (1989), “Introduction”, Structural Adjustment in Africa (içinde), B.K. Campbell ve J. Loxley, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• MARINI, R.M. (2021), Bağımlılığın Diyalektiği, Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
• MILANOVIC, B. (2012), "Global Inequality: From Class to Location, from Proletarians to Migrants", Global Policy, 3(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2012.00170.x.
• MUSTHAQ, F. (2021), "Dependency in a Financialised Global Economy", Review of African Political Economy, 48(167), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2020.1857234.
• NEWMAN, S. (2022), “Global Value Chains and Global Value Transfer”, The Oxford Handbook of Economic Imperialism (içinde), Editörler: Z. Cope ve I. Ness, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 213–230.
• O’NEILL, J. (2001), "Building Better Global Economic BRICs", Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper No 66, London: Goldman Sachs Research Group. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/build-better-brics.pdf.
• O’NEILL, J. (2011), The Growth Map: Economic Opportunity in BRICs and Beyond, New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
• ÖNİŞ, Z. ve AYSAN, A.F. (2000), “Neoliberal Globalisation, the Nation-state and Financial Crises in the Semi-periphery: A Comparative Analysis”, Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590013260.
• ÖNİŞ, Z. ve GÜVEN, B.A. (2011), “The Global Economic Crisis and the Future of Neoliberal Globalization: Rupture Versus Continuity”, Global Governance, 17(4), 469–488. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23104287.
• ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). (2010), Perspectives on Global Development 2010: Shifting Wealth, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/perspectives-on-global-development2010_9789264084728-en#page17.
• ORHANGAZİ, Ö. (2019), “Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yapısal Sorunları, Finansal Kırılganlıklar ve Kriz Dinamikleri”, Mülkiye Dergisi, 43(1), 111–137.
• ORHANGAZİ, Ö. ve SEDA-IRIZARRY, I.J. (2010), “The Role of Finance in the Latest Capitalist Downturn”, Solidarity Economy I: Building Alternatives for People and Planet (içinde), Editörler: E. Kawano, T.N. Masterson, ve J. Teller-Elsberg, Amherst: Center for Popular Economics, s. 65–74.
• OSORIO, J. (2013), “The Latin American Debate: Dependent Capitalism, Superexploitation, and Revolution”, Social Justice, 40(4), 5–24.
• ÖZDEMİR, Y. ve ÖZÇELİK, E. (2022), “Political Economy of Global Capitalism: A Framework for Turkey’s Dependent Development, 1838-2020”, Political Economy of Development in Turkey: 1838 — Present (içinde), Editörler: E. Özçelik ve Y. Özdemir, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 1–46.
• PAINCEIRA, J.P. (2012), “Developing Countries in the Era of Financialisation: From DeficitAccumulation to Reserve-Accumulation”, Financialisation in Crisis (içinde), Editör: C. Lapavitsas, Leiden-Boston: Brill, s. 185–216. https://doi.org/13604819708900050.
• PETRAS, J. (1981), “Dependency and World System Theory: A Critique and New Directions”, Latin American Perspectives, 8(3/4), 148–155.
• POLANYI LEVITT, K. (2008), "W. Arthur Lewis: Pioneer of Development Economics", UN Chronicle, 45(1), 45–46.
• PRÖBSTING, M. (2013), The Great Robbery of the South: Continuity and Changes in the SuperExploitation of the Semi-Colonial World by Monopoly Capital Consequences for the Marxist Theory of Imperialism, Vienna: Revolutionary Communist International Tendecy (RCIT).
• REYES, G.E. (2001), “Four Main Theories of Development: Modernization, Dependency, WorldSystems, and Globalization”, Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 4(2), 1–16.
• RICCI, A. (2018), “Unequal Exchange in the Age of Globalization”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 51(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613418773753.
• RIST, G. (2008), The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith, New York: Zed Books Ltd.
• ROSTOW, W.W. (2004), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• RUDRA, N. (2008), Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• RUTHERFORD, D. (2005), Routledge Dictionary of Economics, London-New York: Routledge.
• SAAD-FILHO, A. (2021), Growth and Change in Neoliberal Capitalism: Essays on the Political Economy of Late Development, Leiden-Boston: Brill.
• SEKHRI, S. (2009), “Dependency approach: Chances of Survival in the 21st Century”, African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(5), 242–252. http://www.academicjournals.org/ajpsir/PDF/Pdf2009/May/Sekhri.pdf.
• ŞENSES, F. (2004), “Neoliberal Küreselleşme Kalkınma için Bir Fırsat mı, Engel mi?”, ERC Working Paper 04/09, Ankara: Middle East Technical University Economic Research Center (ERC). https://erc.metu.edu.tr/en/system/files/menu/series04/0409.pdf.
• SMITH, J. (2016), Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capitalism’s Final Crisis, New York: Monthly Review Press.
• SOMEL, C. (2003), “Estimating the Surplus in the Periphery: An Application to Turkey”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(6), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/27.6.919.
• SOMEL, C. (2007), “Surplus Allocation and Development under Global Capitalism”, Neoliberal Globalization as New Imperialism: Case Studies on Reconstruction of the Periphery (içinde), Editörler: A.H. Köse, F. Şenses, ve E. Yeldan, New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., s. 77–100.
• SPRINGER, S., BIRCH, K. ve MACLEAVY, J. (2016), “An Introduction to Neoliberalism”, The Handbook of Neoliberalism (içinde), Editörler: S. Springer, K. Birch, ve J. Macleavy, New York and London: Routledge, s. 1–14.
• SUNKEL, O. (1969), “National Development Policy and External Dependence in Latin America”, The Journal of Development Studies, 6(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220386908421311.
• TARHAN, A. (2013), “Financial Crises and Center-Periphery Capital Flows”, Journal of Economic Issues, 47(2), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624470214.
• TAUSCH, A. (2010), “Globalisation and Development: The Relevance of Classical ‘Dependency’ Theory for the World Today”, International Social Science Journal, (61), 467–488.
• TAUSS, A. (2012), “Contextualizing the Current Crisis: Post-fordism, Neoliberal Restructuring, and Financialization”, Colombia Internacional, (76), 51–79.
• TAYMAZ, E. ve VOYVODA, E. (2022), “From Domestic to Global Crisis: Turkey During the 20012009 Period”, Political Economy of Development in Turkey: 1838 — Present (içinde), Editörler: E. Özçelik ve Y. Özdemir, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 257–286.
• THE STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT PARTICIPATORY REVIEW INTERNATIONAL NETWORK (SAPRIN) (2004), Structural Adjustment: The SAPRI Report, London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.
• TIPPS, D.C. (1973), “Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of National Societies: A Critical Perspective”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007039.
• TURHAN, R. (2018), “The Effect of Dependency Theory on Discussions of ‘Underdevelopment’ in Turkey”, Philosophy of Globalization (içinde), Editörler: R. Concha, D. Brauer ve J. Rohbeck, Berlin: De Gruyter, s. 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110492415-020.
• TREACY, M. (2022), "Dependency Theory and the Critique of Neodevelopmentalism in Latin America", Latin American Perspectives, 49(1), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211066531.
• VERNENGO, M. (2006), “Technology, Finance, and Dependency: Latin American Radical Political Economy in Retrospect”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613406293220.
• WAINER, A. ve BELLONI, P. (2022), "Balance-of-Payments Constraints as the Key to Dependency: The Case of Argentina", Latin American Perspectives, 49(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211069556.
• WALLERSTEIN, I. (2004), World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
• WILLIAMSON, J. (2005), “The Strange History of the Washington Consensus”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2), 195–206.
• YELDAN, A.E. (1995), “Surplus Creation and Extraction Under Structural Adjustment: Turkey, 1980-1992”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 27(2), 38–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661349502700202.
• YELDAN, E. (2022), “The Era of Speculation-Led Growth and the 2001 Crisis, 1990-2001”, Political Economy of Development in Turkey: 1838 — Present (içinde), Editörler: E. Özçelik ve Y. Özdemir, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 227–256.
• YELDAN, E. (2011), “Neoliberalizmin İdeolojik Bir Söylemi Olarak Küreselleşme”, Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar (içinde), Editörler: A.H. Köse, F. Şenses, ve E. Yeldan, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, s. 429–453.