Medya ve İletişim Araştırmalarının Küresel Gündemle Uyumu: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Öz

Transhümanizm, otonom sistemlerin hayatımızı nasıl değiştireceği gibi konular bilim çevrelerinde tartışılmaktayken; savaş suçları, nükleer tehdit-ler, kuraklık ve açlık gibi kavramlar, şiddet ve suçun yaygınlaşması ve diğer sorunlar insanlığın bugününü ve geleceğini tehdit etmeye devam etmekte-dir. Böyle bir ortamda, bugün geldiği konum itibariyle tüm sosyal olguların merkezinde olan medya ve iletişim alanındaki bilimsel çalışmaların küresel literatürdeki odak noktaları bu çalışmanın sorunsalıdır. 2023-2024 yıllarında Web of Science ve Scopus dizinlerinde taranmakta olan araştırma makalele-ri üzerinde performans haritası ve bilimsel haritalamadan oluşan bibliyo-metrik analiz yapılmış, veriler sözkonusu iki yılın uluslararası gündemiyle kıyaslanarak sosyal bilimlerin sosyal sorunların çözümündeki yeri tartışma-ya açılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, özellikle iletişim araştırmaları alanında çalışan bilim insanları için uluslararası literatürün mevcut durumuna ilişkin bir şablon ortaya koymakta; epistemoloji, bilim iletişimi ve uluslararası gün-demin herhangi bir yapısıyla ilgilenen sosyal bilimciler için bilimin küresel sorunlara çözüm sunma olgusuna yönelik bir persektif sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İletişim Araştırmaları
• Medya
• Küresel Gündem
• Bilim İletişimi
• Bibliyomet-rik Analiz
• Web of Science
• Scopus

The Alignment of Media and Communication Researches with the Global Agenda: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

In the global agenda, while answers are being sought to issues such as transhumanism and how autonomous systems will change our lives; concepts like war crimes, nuclear threats, drought and hunger, and the escalation of all forms of violence and crime, etc., still threaten humanity's present and future. In such an environment, the focal points of scientific studies on media and communication, which are at the centre of all social phenomena today, are the subject of this study. In the years 2023-2024, bibliometric analysis consisting of performance mapping and scientific mapping was conducted on research articles indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, and the data were compared with the international agenda of those two years to discuss the role of social sciences in solving social issues. The findings particularly provide a template for scientists working in the field of communication studies regarding the current state of international literature; they offer a perspective on whether global science can provide solutions to global issues for all social scientists interested in any structure of epistemology, science communication, and the international agenda.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Communication Studies
• Media
• Global Agenda
• Science Communication
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Web of Science
• Scopus

Kaynakça

1. Allagui, Ilhem - Kuebler, Johanne. “The Arab Spring and the role of ICTs| introduction”. International Journal of Communication 5 (2011), 8.
2. Almasri, Hamdan vd. “A Developed Systematic Literature Review Procedure With Application in the Field of Digital Transformation”. Studies of Applied Economics 39/4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i4.4559
3. Anadolu Ajansı. “Dünyada 2023 böyle geçti”. 26 Aralık 2023. Erişim 12 Ocak 2025. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/dunyada-2023-boyle-gecti/3091731
4. Anadolu Ajansı. “Dünyada 2024 böyle geçti”. 26 Aralık 2024. Erişim 12 Ocak 2025. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/dunyada-2024-boyle-gecti/3433719
5. Araújo, Rita. “Who Wants to be a Journalist? Journalists’ Exposure to Violence on the Job”. Journalism Practice, 1-15.
6. Archambault, Éric vd. “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”. Journal of the American society for information science and technology 60/7 (2009), 1320-1326.
7. Arslan. “UNICEF Sözcüsü James Elder, Gazze’de ‘çocuklara karşı savaş’ yaşandığını söyledi”. Haber Ajansı. Anadolu Ajansı. 21 Mart 2024. Erişim 28 Aralık 2024. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/unicef-sozcusu-james- elder-gazzede-cocuklara-karsi-savas-yasandigini-soyledi/3170314
8. BBC Türkçe. “2023: Bu yıl Türkiye’de ve dünyada neler oldu?” 29 Aralık 2023. Erişim 12 Ocak 2025. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/c1ryqvgzd41o

9. BBC Türkçe. “2024’te neler oldu, BBC Türkçe’de en çok hangi haberler okundu?” 28 Aralık 2024. Erişim 12 Ocak 2025. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/articles/c878py37xd3o
10. Cappella, Joseph N. “Vectors into the Future of Mass and Interpersonal Communication Research: Big Data, Social Media, and Computational Social Science: Vectors into the Future”. Human Communication Research 43/4 (Ekim 2017), 545-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12114
11. Carlsson, Ulla. “Media and Mass Communication Research Past, Present and Future: Reflections from a Nordic Horizon.” Nordicom Review 28 (2007).
12. Curran, James. “The New Revisionism in Mass Communication Research: A Reappraisal”. European Journal of Communication 5/2 (Haziran 1990), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323190005002002
13. Deuze, M. “On the ‘grand narrative’ of media and mass communication theory and research: a review”. El profesional de la información. https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.ENE.05
14. Donthu, Naveen vd. “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines”. Journal of Business Research 133 (2021), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
15. Ellegaard, Ole - Wallin, Johan A. “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?” Scientometrics 105/3 (01 Aralık 2015), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
16. Farmer, P. “Social Inequalities and Emerging Infectious Diseases”. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2/4 (1996), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0204.960402
17. Gomes, Joseneide dos Santos vd. “Impact of Human and Social Sciences on Combat to Covid-19 in Brazil and Angola”. Revista Observatório 6/2 (2020), a2en. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2020v6n2a2en
18. Hosie, Alison - Lamb, Michele. “Human Rights and Social Policy: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Research and Its Use as Evidence in the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights in Scotland”. Social Policy and Society 12/2 (Nisan 2013), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746412000395
19. Huang, Zhen. “Introducing Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence to Humanities and Social Sciences: Why Is It Possible and What Can Be Done?” TEM Journal, 1863-1870. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem114-54
20. Lee, Keeheon vd. “Subject–Method Topic Network Analysis in Communication Studies”. Scientometrics 109/3 (Aralık 2016), 1761-1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2135-7
21. Lewandowska, Anna vd. “Competitiveness and innovation of small and medium enterprises under Industry 4.0 and 5.0 challenges: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis”. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 18/4 (30 Aralık 2023), 1045-1074. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.033
22. Logan, Robert A. “Science Mass Communication: Its Conceptual History”. Science Communication 23/2 (Aralık 2001), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001023002004
23. Marini, M. “Educational technology research trends: A bibliometrics analysis and visualization”. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (Turcomat) 12/6 (2021), 2695-2701.
24. Maxwell, K. vd. “How clean is clean: A review of the social science of environmental cleanups”. Environmental Research Letters 13/8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad74b
25. Mifsud, Mari Lee. “To the Humanities: What Does Communication Studies Give?” Review of Communication 19/2 (03 Nisan 2019), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2019.1599411
26. Moon, K. - Blackman, D. “A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists”. Conservation Biology 28/5 (2014), 1167-1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326
27. Ognyanova, Katya. “Rebooting Mass Communication”. The Oxford Handbook of Networked Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190460518.013.5
28. Palinkas, Lawrence A. vd. “Operationalizing Social Work Science Through Research–Practice Partnerships: Lessons From Implementation Science”. Research on Social Work Practice 27/2 (Mart 2017), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516666329
29. Potgieter, Cheryl - Bob, Urmilla. “Gender Justice, Social Cohesion, the Social Sciences and Covid-19: Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education”, 147-161. https://doi.org/10.52779/9781991201195/09
30. Prasad, Monica. “Problem-Solving Sociology”. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 47/4 (Temmuz 2018), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118779810
31. Ralph, Alisha - Arora, Akarsh. “A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature on Youth Unemployment”. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 17/6 (13 Kasım 2023), 1338-1367. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-04-2022-0062
32. Riley, William T vd. “Twenty-Five Years of the National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research”. Translational Behavioral Medicine 10/5 (12 Ekim 2020), 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa016
33. Roychowdhury, Koel vd. “Mapping the Research Landscape of Covid-19 from Social Sciences Perspective: A Bibliometric Analysis”. Scientometrics 127/8 (Ağustos 2022), 4547-4568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022- 04447-x
34. Rubin, Alan M. - Haridakis, Paul M. “Mass Communication Research at the Dawn of the 21st Century”. Annals of the International Communication Association 24/1 (Ocak 2001), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11678982
35. Shapira, Philip vd. “Social Science Contributions Compared in Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology”. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2/1 (02 Ocak 2015), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1002123
36. Shelton, Rachel C. vd. “Future Perfect? The Future of the Social Sciences in Public Health”. Frontiers in Public Health 5 (10 Ocak 2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00357
37. Trump, Benjamin D vd. “A Critical Juncture for Synthetic Biology: Lessons from Nanotechnology Could Inform Public Discourse and Further Development of Synthetic Biology”. EMBO Reports 19/7 (Temmuz 2018). https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201846153
38. Verma, Surabhi - Gustafsson, Anders. “Investigating the Emerging COVID-19 Research Trends in the Field of Business and Management: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach”. Journal of Business Research 118 (Eylül 2020), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
39. Wang, Qi. “A Bibliometric Model for Identifying Emerging Research Topics”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69/2 (Şubat 2018), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23930
40. Watts, Duncan J. “Should Social Science Be More Solution-Oriented?” Nature Human Behaviour 1/1 (10 Ocak 2017), 0015. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0015
41. Weiss, Carol H. - Lindblom, Charles E. “Research Should Supplement, Not Supplant, Lay Inquiry”. Educational Researcher 21/7 (Ekim 1992), 38. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176362
42. Western, Mark. “We need more solution-oriented social science: On changing ourframes of reference and tackling big social problems”. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
43. Zhang, Jun vd. “Data-Driven Computational Social Science: A Survey”. Big Data Research 21 (Eylül 2020), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100145
44. Zolfaghari, Zahra vd. “Direct Air Capture from Demonstration to Commercialization Stage: A Bibliometric Analysis”. International Journal of Energy Research 46/1 (Ocak 2022), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7203
45. Zupic, Ivan - Čater, Tomaž. “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization”. Organizational Research Methods 18/3 (Temmuz 2015), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629