Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach

Sayı: Özel Sayı 3 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach

Öz

This study evaluates how well OECD countries (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) balance innovation, quality of life, and environmental sustainability while accounting for per capita CO₂ emissions and cost-of-living pressures. Using 2022–2024 data, Global Innovation Index, Environmental Performance Index, and Quality-of-Life Index are benefit criteria; CO₂ emissions and Cost of Living Index are cost criteria. Weights are derived objectively by CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC); compromise ranking is obtained via VIšekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) (v=0.5). Finland, Netherlands, Sweden, Estonia, and Denmark achieve the best overall performance, whereas innovation leaders United States (32nd), Israel (35th), and Australia (34th) rank low due to high carbon intensity and affordability issues. Results show that trade-offs between innovation-driven growth and socio-environmental goals are largely policy-dependent, with the Nordic-Continental European model offering the most successful integrated approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Innovation, Industrialization, Sustainable Development, VIKOR

Kaynakça

  1. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Deaton, A., & Roulet, A. (2016). Creative destruction and subjective well-being. American Economic Review, 106(12), 3869–3897. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150949
  2. Amin, F., Dong, Q.-L., Grzybowska, K., Ahmed, Z., & Yan, B.-R. (2022). A novel fuzzy-based VIKOR–CRITIC soft computing method for evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052827
  3. Block, S., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., Wendling, Z. A. (2024). 2024 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. https://epi.yale.edu/
  4. Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf E., Becker, W., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Quadrelli, R., Risquez Martin, A., Taghavi-Moharamli, P., Köykkä, J., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Brandao De Melo, J., Oom, D., Branco, A., San-Miguel, J., Vignati, E., GHG emissions of all world countries, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2023, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/9816914
  5. Dang, V. T., & Dang, W. V. (2020). Multi-criteria decision-making in the evaluation of environmental quality of OECD countries: The entropy weight and VIKOR methods. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2019-0101
  6. Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rex013
  7. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
  8. Easterlin, R. A. (2017). Paradox lost? Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(4), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000068
  9. Girardi, G. C., Rubbo, P., Broday, E. E., Arnold, M., & Picinin, C. T. (2024). Comparative analysis between quality of life and human labor in countries belonging to G7 and BRICS blocks: Proposition of discriminant analysis model. Economies, 12(5), Article 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12050124
  10. Global Carbon Project. (2024). Global carbon budget 2024 (Version 1.0) [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2024

Kaynak Göster

APA
Unanoglu, M. (2025). Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, Özel Sayı 3, 279-298. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.1830836
AMA
1.Unanoglu M. Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. 2025;(Özel Sayı 3):279-298. doi:10.33203/mfy.1830836
Chicago
Unanoglu, Murat. 2025. “Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach”. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, sy Özel Sayı 3: 279-98. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.1830836.
EndNote
Unanoglu M (01 Aralık 2025) Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları Özel Sayı 3 279–298.
IEEE
[1]M. Unanoglu, “Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach”, Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, sy Özel Sayı 3, ss. 279–298, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.33203/mfy.1830836.
ISNAD
Unanoglu, Murat. “Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach”. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. Özel Sayı 3 (01 Aralık 2025): 279-298. https://doi.org/10.33203/mfy.1830836.
JAMA
1.Unanoglu M. Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. 2025;:279–298.
MLA
Unanoglu, Murat. “Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach”. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları, sy Özel Sayı 3, Aralık 2025, ss. 279-98, doi:10.33203/mfy.1830836.
Vancouver
1.Murat Unanoglu. Evaluating Innovation, Quality of Life and Sustainability in OECD Countries: A Vikor Approach. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları. 01 Aralık 2025;(Özel Sayı 3):279-98. doi:10.33203/mfy.1830836