A Study of the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20 in the Context of Synoptic Problem

Öz

Sinoptik Problem Tartışmaları Bağlamında Markos 16:9-20'nin Sıhhati Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Öz

Markos İncili'nin sonu (Markos 16:9-20) Yeni Ahit çalışmalarında tartışılan önemli pasajlardan biridir. İsa'nın dirildikten sonra öğrencilerine görünmesi ve göğe yükselişinden önce son sözlerinin nakledildiği bu son on iki cümle Sina kodeksi (IV. yüzyıl) başta olmak üzere bazı Grekçe, Latince, Süryanice ve Ermenice yazmalarda bulunmamaktadır. Yani Markos İncili 16:8'de bitmektedir. Bazı Grekçe yazmalarda ise Markos İncili farklı bir sona sahiptir. Meselenin tarihi incelendiğinden sorunun en azından IV. asırdan beri bilindiği görülmektedir. Ancak bu mesele modern dönemlere kadar geleneksel inanç çerçevesinde çözülmüştür. XIX. asırdan itibaren bu konu tarihsel eleştiri metodolojisiyle Kutsal Kitap uzmanları tarafından tartışılmış ve farklı çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur. Makalenin amacı Markos İncili'nin son on iki cümlesiyle ilgili tartışmaları sinoptik problem çerçevesinde ele almak, çözüm önerilerini tahlil ve tenkit etmektir. Araştırma metin ve kaynak tenkidi çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Bu araştırmayla İncillerin orijinalliği ve insan müdahalesinden korunmuş olup olmadığı tartışmalarına katkı sağlaması hedeflenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Markos 16:9-20
• İlk-Markos Hipotezi
• Kaynak Eleştirisi
• Markos İncili
• Sinoptik Problem

Kaynakça

1. Aland, Kurt ve Barbara Aland. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, Second Edition, trans. Erroll F. Rhodes. Grand Rapids/Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995.
2. Augustin. "Harmony of the Gospels." trans. S.D.F. Salmond, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, First Series, Vol. 6 içinde, ed. Philip Schaff, 77-236. Grand Rapids/Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1996.
3. Barton, George A.. "The Question of 'Ur-Marcus' Once More." Journal of Biblical Literature 48, no. 3/4 (1929): 239-247.
4. Bellinzoni, Arthur J.. "Introduction." The Two-Source Hypothesis: A Critical Appraisal içinde, ed. Arthur J. Bellinzoni, 3-19. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1985.
5. Bentley, Jerry H.. Humanists and Holy Writ: New Testament Scholarship in the Renaissance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1983.
6. Brown, Raymond E.. An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday, 1997.
7. Brown, Raymond E. ve Thomas Aquinas Collins. "Church Pronouncements." The New Jerome Biblical Commentary içinde, ed. Raymond E. Brown ve diğerleri, 1166-1174. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1990.
8. Bundy, Walter E.. Jesus and the First Three Gospels: An Introduction to the Synoptic Tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955.

9. Burgon, John W.. The Last Twelve Verses of the Gospel According to S. Mark. Oxford: James Parker And Co., 1871.
10. Calvin, John. Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists: Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Vol. 1-3, trans. William Pringle. Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society, 1845-1846.
11. Cranfield, C. E. B.. The Gospel According to Saint Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
12. Danker, Frederick William ve Kathryn Krug. The Concise Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
13. Dungan, David L.. A History of the Synoptic Problem: The Canon, the Text, the Composition, and the Interpretation of the Gospels. New York: Doubleday, 1999.
14. Duygu, Zafer. İnciller Güvenilir Metinler midir?: Metodolojik ve Karşılaştırmalı Analizler. İstanbul: Düşün Yayıncılık, 2020.
15. Evans, Craig A.. "The Life of Jesus." Handbook to Exegesis of the New Testament içinde, ed. Stanley E. Porter, 427-475. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
16. Eusebius. "Church History." , trans. Arthur Cushman McGiffert, Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Vol. 1 içinde, ed. Philip Schaff ve Henry Wace, 81-403. Grand Rapids/MI: WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1991.
17. Goodspeed, Edgar J.. "The Original Conclusion of the Gospel of Mark." The American Journal of Theology 9, no:3 (Jul. 1905): 484-490.
18. Hall, Basil. "Biblical Scholarship: Editions and Commentaries." The Cambridge History of the Bible: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day içinde, ed. S. L. Greenslade, 38-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
19. Harman, Ömer Faruk. "Kitâb-ı Mukaddes." TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, Cilt 26, 75-76. Ankara: 2002.
20. Hawkins, John C.. Horae Synopticae: Contributions to the Study of the Synoptic Problem, Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1909.
21. Honoré, A. M.. "A Statistical Study of the Synoptic Problem." Novum Testamentum 10, Fasc. 2/3 (Apr.-Jul. 1968): 95-147.
22. Iverson, Kelly R.. "A Further Word on Final Γάρ (Mark 16:8)." The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 68, no. 1 (January 2006): 79-94.
23. Kümmel, Werner Georg. Introduction to the New Testament, trans. Howard C. Kee. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1975.
24. MacDonald, Dennis R.. Homeros Destanları ve Markos İncili, çev. Selen Ak. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları, 2018.
25. Mann, C. S.. Mark: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday, 1986.
26. Martin, Ralph P.. New Testament Foundations: A Guide for Christian Students, Vol. 1: The Four Gospels. Grand Rapids/Michigan: WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1975.
27. Marxsen, Willi. Introduction to the New Testament: An Approach to its Problems, trans. G. Buswell. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983. Metzger, Bruce M.. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. London: United Bible Societies, 1971.
28. Metzger, Bruce M. ve Bart D. Ehrman. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
29. Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th Revised Edition, ed. Kurt Aland ve diğerleri. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.
30. Oliver, Harold H.. "The Epistle of Eusebius to Carpianus: Textual Tradition and Translation." Novum Testamentum 3, Fasc. 1/2 (Jan. 1959): 138-145.
31. O'Neill, J. C.. "The Study of the New Testament." Nineteenth Century Religious Thought in the West içinde, ed. Ninian Smart ve diğerleri, 143-178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
32. Ottley, R. R.. "εϕοβουντο γαρ Mark xvi 8." The Journal of Theological Studies 27, no: 108 (July 1926): 407-409.
33. Pamir, Dominik. (çev.) Katolik Kilisesi Din ve Ahlak İlkeleri. İstanbul: Yaylacık Matbaacılık, 2000.
34. Parker, D. C.. The Living Text of the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
35. Patton, Carl S.. "Two Studies of the Gospel of Mark." The Harvard Theological Review 6/2 (Apr. 1913): 229-239.
36. Perkins, Pheme. "The Synoptic Gospels and Acts of the Apostles: Telling the Christian Story." The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation içinde, ed. John Barton, 241-258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
37. Renan, Ernest. Havariler, çev. Ziya İshan. İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1948.
38. Reventlow, Henning G.. History of Biblical Interpretation, Volume 3: Renaissance, Reformation, Humanism, trans. James O. Duke. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2010.
39. Simon, Richard. Critical History of the Text of the New Testament, trans. Andrew Hunwick. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
40. Stein, Robert H.. "The Ending of Mark." Bulletin for Biblical Research 18/1 (2008): 79–98.
41. Streeter, Burnett Hillman. The Four Gospels: A Study of Origins, Revised Fourth Impression. London: Macmillan and Co., 1930.
42. Stoldt, Hans-Herbert. History and Criticism of the Marcan Hypothesis, trans. Donald L. Niewyk. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1980.
43. Sutcliffe, E. F.. (trans.) "The Replies of the Pontifical Biblical Commission on Questions of Sacred Scripture." Erişim 8 Ocak 2022. http://www.catholicapologetics.info/scripture/oldtestament/commission.htm.
44. Taylor, Vincent. The Gospel According to St. Mark, Second Edition. London: Macmillan, 1984.
45. Telford, W.R.. The Theology of the Gospel of Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
46. Trocmé, Etienne. The Formation of the Gospel According to Mark, trans. Pamela Gaughan. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1975.
47. Van der Horst, P. W.. "Can a Book End with ΓΑP? A Note on Mark XVI. 8." The Journal of Theological Studies 23, no. 1 (April 1972): 121-124.
48. Williams, Joel F.. "Literary Approaches to the End of Mark's Gospel." Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 42/1 (1999): 20-35.
49. Williamson, Peter S.. Catholic Principles for Interpreting Scripture. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 2001