The Doctrine of Logos in Christianity

Öz

After doctrine of Logos had been discussed by Heraclitus, Plato, Stoics, Philo and Jewish philosophers, it is transferred to the theology and philosophy of Christianity via the Gospel of John. In this article, first, some brief information about historical background of the doctrine has been given. Then, the beings that have been existed before the universe created (Eternal Messiah, Holy Spirit and Logos) in the New Testament were also examined. In this paper, the ideas of early time Christian theologians about the doctrine of Logos and its relation between the trinity also have been shown by classifying their opinions. In conclusion, our findings are presented as a summary and some assessments have been done on the relations of philosophy and theology in Christianity in terms of the doctrine of Logos.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Logos, the Son of God, the Gospel of John, Holy Spirit, trinity

Hıristiyanlıkta Logos Doktrini The Doctrine of Logos in Christianity

Öz

Logos doktrini, Herakleitos, Platon, Stoacılar, Philo ve Yahudi felsefesinde ele alınıp tartışıldıktan sonra, Yuhanna İncili vasıtasıyla Hıristiyan teolojisi ve felsefesine de nüfuz etmiştir. Bu makale, Logos doktrininin tarihi gelişimini kısa bir ön bilgi olarak verdikten sonra, Yeni Ahit’te âlem yaratılmadan önce var oldukları kabul edilen varlıklar (ezelî Mesih, Ruh, Logos) hakkındaki görüşleri ele almaktadır. Makalede ayrıca ilk dönem Hıristiyan yazarların Logos doktrini hakkındaki farklı görüşleri, teslis doktriniyle bağlantılı bir şekilde tasnif edilerek verilmektedir. Sonuç kısmında bulgular kısa bir özet halinde sunulmakta ve Logos doktrini ekseninde Hıristiyanlıkta felsefe-teoloji ilişkileri hakkında değerlendirmeler yapılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Logos, Tanrı Oğlu, Yuhanna İncili, Kutsal Ruh, teslis

Kaynakça

1. Ashwin-Siejkowski, Piotr, The Apostles' Creed: The Apostles' Creed and Its Early Christian Context, London: T&T Clark International, 2009.
2. Aster, Ernst von, İlkçağ ve Ortaçağ Felsefe Tarihi, İstanbul: İm Yayın Tasa- rım, 2005.
3. Athenagoras, A Plea for the Christians, 10, http://www.newadvent.org/ fathers/0205.htm.
4. Aykıt, Dursun Ali, Hıristiyanlığın Öncüsü Olarak İskenderiyeli Philo, İstan- bul: Kitabevi, 2011.
5. Clement, First Epistle, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.ii.ii.xxii.html.
6. Clement, Second Epistle, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/ 2clement-hoole.html.
7. Crossan, D. M., ‚Logos‛, New Catholic Encyclopedia, Second Edition, ed. Thomas Carson & Joann Cerrito, Detroit: Thomson & Gale, 2003, c. 8, s. 758-761.
8. Edwards, M. J., ‚Clement of Alexandria and His Doctrine of the Logos‛, Vigiliae Christianae, 54/2 (2000), pp. 159-177.

9. Harnack, Adolph, History of Dogma, I-VII, London: Williams & Norgate, 1896.
10. Hippolytus, Against Noetus, 10, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0521. htm.
11. Ignatius, Ignatius to the Magnesians, Kirsopp Lake (çev.): The Apostolic Fat- hers I içinde, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.
12. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103230. htm.
13. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, 62, http://www.newadvent.org/ fat- hers/01285.htm.
14. Justin Martyr, First Apology, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0126.htm.
15. Justin Martyr, Second Apology, 6, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0127 .htm.
16. Kelly, J. N. D., Early Christian Doctrines, New York: Harper & Row, Publis- hers, 1960.
17. Kenneth Schenck, A Brief Guide to Philo, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005.
18. Origen, Contra Celsum, İngilizceye çeviren: Henry Chadwick, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
19. Origen, De Principiis, (http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/04121.htm).
20. Pépin, Jean, ‚Logos‛, Encyclopedia of Religion, Second Edition, ed. Lindsay Jones, Detroit: Thomson & Gale, 2005, c. 8, s. 5500-5506.
21. Philo, Allegorical Interpretation, Philo: The Works of Philo Complete and Unab- ridged içinde, İngilizceye çeviri: C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publis- hers, 1999.
22. Philo, On Flight and Finding, Philo: The Works of Philo Complete and Unabrid- ged içinde, İngilizceye çeviri: C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.
23. Philo, Questions and Answers on Genesis, Philo: The Works of Philo Complete and Unabridged içinde, İngilizceye çeviri: C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.
24. Philo, The Special Laws, Philo: The Works of Philo Complete and Unabridged içinde, İngilizceye çeviri: C. D. Yonge, Hendrickson Publishers, 1999.
25. Shepherd of Hermas, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/shepherd. html.
26. Tertullian, Against Hermogenes, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0313 .htm.
27. Tertullian, Against Praxeas, 5, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0317 .htm.
28. Tripolitis, Antonia, Religions of the Hellenistic-Roman Age, Michigan: Wil- liam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002.
29. Wand, J. W. C., A History of the Early Church to A.D. 500, London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1957.
30. Willingale, A. E., ‚Logos‛, The New Bible Dictionary, London: The Inter- Varsity Fellowship, 1962, c. 2, s. 744-745.
31. Wolfson, Harry Austryn, The Philosophy of the Church Fathers, Vol. 1: Faith, Trinity, Incarnation, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956.
32. Wolfson, Harry Austryn, "Clement of Alexandria on the Generation of the Logos", Church History, 20/2 (1951), s. 72-81.