Araştırma Makalesi

‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz

Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2 28 Aralık 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

‘Sacred Space: A Phenomenological Approach

Öz

Relationship between spaces and human beings is shaped in terms of

passages between perspectives and not in terms of spatial (geometric and

geographic) differences or divisibility. Accordingly, the distinctive aspect

of ‘sacred space’ is the existence of representation which paves a way to a

consciousness of sacred as ‘the nearest and most distant’ at the same time.

Hence sacred space reveals itself as an experience of temporality of passages

between virtually limitless perspectives of this event of representation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Bürge, S. R.. “Angels, Ritual and Sacred Space in Islam”, Comparative Islamic Studies, 221-245 https://is.muni.cz/el/1423/podzim2014/SAN215/um/43687364/Burge_2009.pdf (08.11.2017).
  2. Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism”, trans. Frank A. Capuzzi, http://pacificinstitute.org/pdf/Letter_on_%20Humanism.pdf
  3. Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume LXXXIX, s. 21-39, http://onlinelibrary.
  4. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00242.x/epdf (09.12.2017)
  5. Kaern, Michael (trans.). “The Bridge and The Door By Georg Simmel”, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 1994, ss. 407-412. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02393338.pdf (08.11.2017).
  6. Lang, Uwe Michael. “What Makes Architecture “Sacred”?” Logos 17:4 Fall 2014, ss. 45-49.
  7. Nicholson, Graeme. “The Ontological Difference” American Philosophical Quarterly,, Vol. 33/4, 1996,ss. 357-374, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20009875.pdf (09.12.2017)
  8. Rots, Aike P. “The “Rediscovery of “Sacred Space” in Contemporary Japan: Intrinsic Quality or Discursive Strategy?” http://publications.nichibun.ac.jp/region/d/NSH/series/symp/2014-03-31/s001/s010/pdf/article.pdf (08.11.2017).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

28 Aralık 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

13 Eylül 2017

Kabul Tarihi

30 Eylül 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Tatar, B. (2017). ‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Milel ve Nihal, 14(2), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607
AMA
1.Tatar B. ‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Milel ve Nihal. 2017;14(2):8-22. doi:10.17131/milel.377607
Chicago
Tatar, Burhanetti. 2017. “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal 14 (2): 8-22. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607.
EndNote
Tatar B (01 Aralık 2017) ‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Milel ve Nihal 14 2 8–22.
IEEE
[1]B. Tatar, “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”, Milel ve Nihal, c. 14, sy 2, ss. 8–22, Ara. 2017, doi: 10.17131/milel.377607.
ISNAD
Tatar, Burhanetti. “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal 14/2 (01 Aralık 2017): 8-22. https://doi.org/10.17131/milel.377607.
JAMA
1.Tatar B. ‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Milel ve Nihal. 2017;14:8–22.
MLA
Tatar, Burhanetti. “‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz”. Milel ve Nihal, c. 14, sy 2, Aralık 2017, ss. 8-22, doi:10.17131/milel.377607.
Vancouver
1.Burhanetti Tatar. ‘Kutsal Mekan’: Fenomenolojik Bir Analiz. Milel ve Nihal. 01 Aralık 2017;14(2):8-22. doi:10.17131/milel.377607

Cited By