Constructing Religion as an Anthropological Category

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 103 - 137, 01.01.2007

Talal Asad

Öz

This article tries to sketch the emergence of religion as a modern historical object for a wider outlining the genealogy of religion. Thus the ways in which the theoretical search for an essence of religion invites us to separate it conceptually from the domain of power is examined. This is tried to be made by exploring a universalist definition of religion offered by an eminent anthropologist, namely Clifford Geertz’s Religion as a Cultural System. The aim of this article is to try to identify some of the historical shifts that have produced our concept of religion as the concept of a trans-historical essence. One of the basic argument suggested here is that socially identifiable forms, preconditions, and effects of what was regarded as religion in the medieval Christian epoch were quite different from those so considered in modern society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Antropology of religion, religion as a cultural system, religion in modern period.

Antropolojik Bir Kategori Olarak Dinin İnşası

Öz

Bu makale daha geniş bir dinin soy kütükleri tasarımı çerçevesi için, dinin modern tarihsel bir nesne olarak ortaya çıkışını resmetmeye çalışıyor. Böylece dine bir öz bulma yolundaki teorik çabanın, dini, iktidar alanından kavramsal olarak ayırmak için başvurduğu yöntemler sorgulamaya tabi tutulmaktadır. Bu da, meşhur bir antropolog Clifford Geertz’in “Kültürel Sistem Olarak Din” esprisi altında teklif edilen evrenselci din tanımını incelemek suretiyle yapılacaktır. Temel argüman ortaçağ Hıristiyanlığı döneminde din telakki edilen şeye dair toplumsal düzeyde saptayabileceğimiz formlar, önkoşullar ve etkiler ile modern dönemde din telakki edilenlerin aslında son derece farklı olgular olduklarıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Din antropolojisi, kültürel bir sistem olarak din, modern dönemde din.

Kaynakça

• Asad, T.. 1986b. ʺMedieval Heresy: An Anthropological View.ʺ Social History 11, no. 3.
• Auerbach, E. 1953. Mimesis. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Autiero, A. 1987. ʺThe Interpretation of Pain: The Point of View of Catholic Theology.ʺ In Pain: A Medical and Anthropological Challenge, edited by J. Brihaye et al. New York: Springer-Verlag.
• Baker, D. 1972. ʺVir Dei: A Secular Sanctity in The Early Tenth Century.ʺ In Popular Belief and Practice, edited by C. J. Cuming and D. Baker. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Bettenson, H., cd. 1956. The Early Christian Fathers. London: Oxford Univ.Press.
• Brown, P. 1967. Augustine of Hippo. London: Faberand Faber. Brown, P.. 1981. The Cult of the Saints: Its Rise and Function in Latin Christianity. London: SCM.
• Chadwick, H. 1967. The Early Church. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
• Chadwick, 0.1964. The Reformation. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
• Chenu, M-D. 1968. Nature, Man, and Society in the Twelfth Century: Essays on Theological Perspectives in the Latin West. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
• Collingwood, R. G. 1938. The Principles of Art. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Douglas, M. 1975. Implicit Meanings. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dumont, L. 1971. ʺReligion, Politics, and Society in the Individualistic Universe.ʺ Proceedings of the Royal A nthropolqgical Institute for 1970.
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1956. NuerReligion. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1965. Theories ofPrimitive Religion. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Finucane, R. C. 1977. Miracles and Pilgrims: Popular Beliefs in Medieval England. London: Dent.
• Coulanges, Fustel de. 1873. The Ancient City: A Study on the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome. Boston: Lothrop, Lee and Shepherd.
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
• Geertz, C. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
• Geertz, C. 1983. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
• Harre, R. 1981. ʺPsychological Variety.ʺ In Indigenous Psychologies, edited by P. Heelas and A. Lock. London: Academic Press.
• Harrison, P. 1990. ʺReligionʺ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Knowles, M. D.,. 1963. The Monastic Order in England: 94.0-1216. 2d cd. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Kroeber, A. L., and C. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Papers of the Peabody Museum, vol. 47, no. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Peabody Museum.
• Lienhardt, G. 1961. Divinity and Experience. Oxford: Clarendon. Luijpen, W. A. 1973. Theology as Anthropology. Pittsburgh: Duquesnc Univ. Press.
• Maclntyre, A. 1971. Against the Self-images of the Age. London: Duckworth.
• McNeill, J. T, and H. M. Gamer, eds. 1938. Medieval Handbooks of Pennine New