Special Education Pre-service Teachers' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Technology: A Metaphor Study

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to determine the metaphorical perceptions of prospective special education teachers about artificial intelligence technology. The research was carried out using phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research methods. The participant group consists of 149 pre-service teachers who are studying at Anadolu University Faculty of Education, Special Education Teacher Education programme and who volunteered to participate in the study. The data of the study were collected online and face-to-face through forms prepared by the researcher. The collected data were analysed by content analysis method. As a result of the analysis, 94 different metaphors obtained from 149 pre-service teachers were grouped into six categories, taking into account their reasoned explanations. The findings show that the majority of pre-service special education teachers' perceptions of artificial intelligence technology are positive.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• artificial intelligence
• artificial intelligence in education
• pre-service special education teachers
• perception of artificial intelligence
• metaphor analysis

Özel Eğitim Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapay Zekâ Teknolojisine İlişkin Algıları: Bir Metafor Çalışması

Öz

Bu araştırmada özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ teknolojisine ilişkin metaforik algılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenoloji deseni kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcı grubu Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Öğretmenliği Programında öğrenim görmekte olan ve katılımcı olmak için gönüllü 149 öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri, araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan formlar aracılığıyla çevrim içi ve yüz yüze toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler, içerik analizi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda 149 öğretmen adayından elde edilen 94 farklı metafor, gerekçeli açıklamaları da göz önünde bulundurularak altı kategoride toplanmıştır. Bulgular, özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının büyük çoğunluğunun yapay zekâ teknolojisine ilişkin algılarının olumlu olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• yapay zekâ
• eğitimde yapay zekâ
• özel eğitim öğretmen adayları
• yapay zekâ algısı
• metafor analizi

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu araştırma herhangi bir fon almamıştır.

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışmada Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etiği Yönergesi’nde belirtilen kurallara uyulduğunu ve bilimsel araştırma ve yayın etiğine aykırı eylemlere dayalı hiçbir işlem yapmadığımızı beyan ederiz. Aynı zamanda tüm yazarların çalışmaya katkıda bulunduğu, yazarlar arasında herhangi bir çıkar çatışmasının bulunmadığını, tüm etik ihlallerde tüm sorumluluğun makale yazarlarına ait olduğunu beyan ederiz.

Kaynakça

1. Akinwalere, S. N., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015
2. Ali, S., DiPaola, D., Lee, I., Sindato, V., Kim, G., Blumofe, R., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Children as creators, thinkers and citizens in an AI-driven future. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100040
3. Altun, M. (2003). Edebi sanatlar: Klasik edebiyat bilgisi (belagat) bağlamında anlam. http://www. dilbilimi.net/edebi_sanatlar.pdf
4. Alvari, G., Furlanello, C., & Venuti, P. (2021). Is smiling the key? Machine learning analytics detect subtle patterns in micro-expressions of infants with ASD. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(8), Article 1776. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081776
5. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198-204. https:// www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/718
6. Bozkurt, A., Junhong, X., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Boyerd, G., Smith, M. S., Lawson, J., Siegel, B., Beirne, E., True, J., Misra, K., Sukhpal, S., Shonfeld, M., & Romero-Hall, E. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130. https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
7. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Honeychurch, S., Boyerd, G., Smith, M. S., Lawson, J., Siegel, B., Beirne, E., True, J., Misra, K., & Asino, T. I. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487-513. https://doi.org/10.55982/ openpraxis.16.4.777
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Erkan Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (Ed.’ler). (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (24. bs.). Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık.

9. Chatterjee, J., & Dethlefs, N. (2023). This new conversational AI model can be your friend, philosopher, and guide... and even your worst enemy. Patterns, 4(1), Article 100676. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676
10. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
11. Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B., Turner, L. A., & Christensen, L. B. (2020). Research methods, design, and analysis (12th global ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://students.aiu.edu/ submissions/profiles/resources/onlineBook/c9w8W6_Research_Methods-_Design-_and_ Analysis-_Global_Edition.pdf
12. Çırak Kurt, S. (2022). Nitel veri analizi. S. Şen, & İ. Yıldırım (Ed.’ler), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri (3. bs, ss. 461-485) içinde. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
13. Erdoğan, Ş., & Bozkurt, E. (2023). Fizik öğretmen adaylarının “yapay zekâ” kavramına ilişkin algılarının incelenmesi: Bir metafor çalışması. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 7(2), 152-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.51117/metder.2023.41
14. Griffen, B., Lorah, E. R., Caldwell, N., Hantula, D. A., Nosek, J., Tincani, M., & Lemley, S. (2023). The effects of artificial ıntelligence on ımplementors’ fidelity of ınstructional strategies during handwashing acquisition in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-023-09937-1
15. Hopcan, S., Polat, E., Ozturk, M. E., & Ozturk, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in special education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7335-7353. https://doi.org /10.1080/10494820.2022.2067186
16. Karoğlu, A. K., Bal, K., & Çimşir, E. (2020). Toplum 5.0 sürecinde Türkiye’de eğitimde dijital dönüşüm. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.32329/ uad.815428
17. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press. Küçükkara, M. F., Ünal, M., & Sezer, T. (2024). Okul öncesi eğitimi öğretmenlerinin yapay zekâya ilişkin görüşleri. Temel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.55008/ te-ad.1431142
18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. Liao, M., Duan, H., & Wang, G. (2022). Application of machine learning techniques to detect the children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, Article 9340027. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9340027
19. Lim, E. M. (2024). Metaphor analysis on pre-service early childhood teachers’ conception of AI (Artificial Intelligence) education for young children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101455
20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
21. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
22. Moridian, P., Ghassemi, N., Jafari, M., Salloum-Asfar, S., Sadeghi, D., Khodatars, M., Shoeibi, A., Khosravi, A., Ling, S., Subasi, A., Abdulla, S., Alizadehsani, R., Gorriz, J., & Acharya, U., (2022). Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 15, Article 999605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.999605
23. Nemorin, S., Vlachidis, A., Ayerakwa, H. M., & Andriotis, P. (2023). AI hyped? A horizon scan of discourse on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) and development. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2095568
24. Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
25. Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020 Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
26. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (Ed.). (2021). Artificial intelligence a modern approach. (3rd ed.). Pearson. Saban, A., & Ersoy, A. (2023). Nitelikli bir nitel araştırmacı olmak. A. Saban, & A. Ersoy (Ed.’ler), Eğitimde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (4. bs, ss. 311-354) içinde. Eğiten Yayıncılık.
27. Sağdıç, Z. A., & Sani Bozkurt, S. (2020). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu ve yapay zekâ uygulamaları. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(3), 92-111. https:// dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/56234/745260
28. Sağdıç, A., Elumar Efe, E., & Sani Bozkurt, S. (2024). GenAI, robots, and inclusive special education: Autism spectrum disorder in the age of generative AI. In R. C. Sharma, & A. Bozkurt. (Eds.), Transforming education with generative AI (pp. 309-326). IGI Global. https://doi. org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0120-3.ch016
29. Shinde, P. P., & Shah, S. (2018). A review of machine learning and deep learning applications. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), 1-6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697857
30. Tilwani, D., Bradshaw, J., Sheth, A., & O’Reilly, C. (2023). ECG recordings as predictors of very early autism likelihood: A machine learning approach. Bioengineering, 10(7), 827. https:// doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070827
31. Tlili, A., Altinay, F., Huang, R., Bozkurt, A., Burgos, D., Shehata, B., Altinay, Z., Wang, H., & Sani- Bozkurt, S. (2024). Trends of artificial intelligence in special education and their relation to the sustainable development goals: Where are we now and where are we heading?. In D. Burgos, J. W. Branch, A. Tlili., R. Huang, M. Jemni, C. M., Stracke, C., de la Higuera, C.-K. Looi, & K. Berrada (Eds.), Radical solutions for artificial intelligence and digital transformation in education: Utilising disruptive technology for a better society (pp. 27-45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8638-1_3
32. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
33. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433-460. https://doi. org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
34. UNESCO. (2024). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 4). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ pf0000391219
35. Voss, C., Schwartz, J., Daniels, J., Kline, A., Haber, N., Washington, P., Tariq, Q., Winograd, T., Philips, J. M., Feinstein, C., Winograd, T., & Wall, D. P. (2019). Effect of wearable digital intervention for improving socialization in children with autism spectrum disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 173(5), 446-454. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamapediatrics.2019.0285
36. Wang, C. P., Tsai, C. H., & Lee, Y. L. (2022). Requesting help module interface design on key partial video with action and augmented reality for children with autism spectrum disorder. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8527. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178527
37. Xue, M., & Zhu, C. (2009). A study and application on machine learning of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 272- 274). https://doi.org/10.1109/JCAI.2009.55
38. Yan, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, X. (2024). Metaphorical conceptualizations of generative artificial intelligence use by Chinese university EFL learners. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1430494. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1430494
39. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
40. Zawacki Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi. org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
41. Zhang, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Study on artificial intelligence: The state of the art and future prospects. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, Article 100224. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224