Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 271 - 281, 25.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1679749

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy, U. (2017). The dried fig management and the potential for new products. Acta Hortic. 1173, 377- 382.Doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.65.
  • Aksoy, U. (2021). Dried fig industry: progress and challenges. Acta Hort. 1310, 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1310.24
  • Arpacı, S., Konak, R., & Çiçek, E. (2018). A national value: Turkish figs. Chronica Horticulturae, 58(2), 15-22.
  • Chessa, I. (1997) Fig. In, Mitra, S. (ed.) Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits(pp: 245–268), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H. and Kader, A.A. (2009) Figs. In: Postharvest Information for Fruits and Fruits. Postharvest Quality Maintenance Guidelines, www.ucanr.edu/sites/kac/files/123822.pdf (accessed 30 October, 2025).
  • Crisosto, C. H., Bremer, V., Ferguson, L., & Crisosto, G. M. (2010). Evaluating Quality Attributes of Four Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars Harvested at Two Maturity Stages. HortSicience, 45(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.4.707
  • Crisosto, C.H., Bremer, V. & Stover, E. (2011) Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Yahia, E.E. (Ed.) Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, (pp: 134-158), Vol 3: Cocona to Mango. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H., Ferguson, L., Preece, J.E., Michailides, T.J., Haug, M.T., López Corrales , M. & Crisosto, G.M. (2017). Developing the California fresh fig industry. Acta Hort. 1173, 285-292. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.49
  • Çalişkan, O. & Polat, A. A., (2008). Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 115, 360–367.
  • Çelikel, F.G. & Karaçalı, I. (1998). Effects of harvest maturity and precooling on fruit quality and longevity of "Bursa Siyah" figs (Ficus carica L.). Acta Hort 480, 283-288. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.480.55
  • FAOSTAT, (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Statistical Data www.faostat.fao. org/) (accessed 29 October 2025).
  • Ferrara, G., Mazzeo, A., Colasuonno, P., and Marcotull, I. (2022). Production and Growing Region. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 47-92), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0003.
  • Gaaliche, B., Trad, M. & Mars, M. (2011b). Effect of pollination intensity, frequency and pollen source on fig (Ficus carica L.) productivity and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 130, 737-742. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.08.032
  • Hong, G., Crisosto, C. & Cantwell, M.I. (2016). Quality and physiology of two cultivars of fresh-cut figs in relation to ripeness, storage temperature and controlled atmosphere. Acta Horticulturae, 1141, 213–220.
  • Işin, F., Çukur, T. & Armağan, G. (2003). An evaluation of dried fig production and marketing in Turkey from dried fig exportation standpoint. Acta Hort. 605, 183-189. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.605.27
  • Jafari, M, López-Corrales, M., Galán, A.J., Galván, A.I., Hosomi, A., Nogata, H., Ikegami, H., Balas, F., Serradilla, M.J., Garza-Alonso, C.A., Yavari, A., Ferguson, L. & Sarkhosh, A. (2022). Orchard Establishment and Management.In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 184- 230), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0008.
  • Morton, J. 1987. Fig. In, Julia F. Morton(Ed) Fruits of warm climates(pp: 47–50), Miami, FL. https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/fig.html(accessed 30 October, 2025)
  • Özbek, S. (1978). Özel Meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Yayınları:128 Ders Kitabı:11. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Ankara. 486 s.
  • Özen, M., Çobanoglu, F., Özkan, R., Kocataş, H., Tan, N., Ertan, B., Şahin, B., Konak, R., Dogan, O., Tutmuş, E., & Şahin, N. (2007). Fig cultivation (Turkey: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock) (in Turkish).
  • Özen, M., Çobanoğlu, F., Özkan, R., Konak, R. & Tutmuş, E. (2009). Effect of drying in tunnel and different harvest methods on some quality parameters and aflatoxin in storage, in sarilop fig cultivar. Paper presented at Fourth International Symposium on Fig, Meknes-Morocco, September 29-October 3, Abstract Book, p.116.
  • Polat ,A.A. and Özkaya, M. (2005). Selection studies on fig in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Pak J Bot 37, 567-74.
  • Polat A. A., Çalışkan O. (2008). Fruit characteristics of table fig cultivars in subtropical climate conditions of Mediterranean region. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 36, 107-15. DOI: 10.1080/01140670809510226
  • Polat A. A. and Siddiq, M. (2012). Fig. In, Siddiq M (Ed), Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging(pp:455-477). John-Wiley Punishing Co., Ames, Iowa, USA,
  • Polat, A. A. (2017) Fig production in Turkey. Journal of Pomology 51, 197–198.
  • Polat, A.A. (2024). Fig industry in Turkey: production and marketing. Acta Hortic., 1405, 201-208
  • Dio: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1405.20
  • Ramezanian, A., Amiri, A. & Crisosto, C.H. (2022). Postharvest Physiology and Physiological Disorders of Fresh Fig Fruits. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 384-397), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0016.
  • Trad, M., Ginies, C., Gaaliche, B., Renard, C.M.G.C. & Mars, M. (2012). Does pollination affect aroma development in ripened fig [Ficus carica L.] fruit? Scientia Horticulturae 134, 93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.11.004
  • Türk, R. (1989). Effects of harvest time and precooling on fruit quality and cold storage of figs (F. carica L. cv. "Bursa Siyahi"). Acta Hort . 258, 279-286. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.258.31
  • Uzundumlu, A. S., Oksuz, M. E. & Kurtoglu, S. (2018). Future of fig production in Turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 15, 138-146.
  • Yilmaz, S., Gozlekçi, S. & Ersoy, N. (2017). A review of fig sector in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 1173, 409-414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.70

Fig Production in Türkiye: Varieties, Cultivation, Orchard Management and Processing

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 271 - 281, 25.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1679749

Öz

In the present compilation the current scientific information on Türkiye fig production: varieties cultivation, horticultural requirements, fresh and dry handling; postharvest physiology and storage, fig processing and its processed products was evaluated. Türkiye led fig-producing countries with 356,000 t, accounting for 27.3% of total world production in 2023. Türkiye has a share of about 50-55% in dried fig production and 52-60% in fig exports. Although the number of countries importing Turkish figs is increasing, more than 70% is sent to the EU markets. In Türkiye, the main cultivar for drying is “Sarilop” in which is favored in all fig producing countries for its quality. ‘Bursa Siyahı’ which is also is the most preferred and high quality for fresh fig in the world market with increasing export demand. Fig plants are usually propagated by cuttings. The fig plantations are established by rooted hardwood cuttings with a between and on row spacing ranging from 7x7 or 8x8 m in older low-land orchards to 5x6 or 6 x 6 m on the slopes. Generally, fig trees are trained in “open-centre” system. Table fig varieties are consumed fresh while dried fig varieties are consumed as dried fruit. In addition, some fruits are consumed as processed products such as jam, marmalade or delight etc. Owing to the extreme perishability of fresh fig fruit, the most important fig product offered to consumers is dried fig fruit. For drying of figs, the production protocol is programmed according to the demand, pass through aflatoxin control after storage stage. Figs control at least two times to sort out aflatoxin contaminated dried figs under UV lamps. During this control, other mouldy figs are also removed. Dried fig is processed in different types according to customer request (Lerida, Layer, Chocolate, Premium, Makaroni). After the stem and eye of the best quality figs are cut, they are wrapped individually and presented to customer in its special packaging. Dried figs are packed in various types according to customer’s request. All packed products pass through metal detector control.

Etik Beyan

The study, entitled " Fig Production in Türkiye: Varieties, Cultivation, Orchard Management and Processing ", was conducted in accordance with the relevant scientific, ethical and citation rules. No falsification was made of the collected data, and this study has not been sent to any other academic media for evaluation. As it does not require ethics committee approval, it can be considered to be in accordance with the relevant ethical standards.

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy, U. (2017). The dried fig management and the potential for new products. Acta Hortic. 1173, 377- 382.Doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.65.
  • Aksoy, U. (2021). Dried fig industry: progress and challenges. Acta Hort. 1310, 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1310.24
  • Arpacı, S., Konak, R., & Çiçek, E. (2018). A national value: Turkish figs. Chronica Horticulturae, 58(2), 15-22.
  • Chessa, I. (1997) Fig. In, Mitra, S. (ed.) Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits(pp: 245–268), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H. and Kader, A.A. (2009) Figs. In: Postharvest Information for Fruits and Fruits. Postharvest Quality Maintenance Guidelines, www.ucanr.edu/sites/kac/files/123822.pdf (accessed 30 October, 2025).
  • Crisosto, C. H., Bremer, V., Ferguson, L., & Crisosto, G. M. (2010). Evaluating Quality Attributes of Four Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars Harvested at Two Maturity Stages. HortSicience, 45(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.4.707
  • Crisosto, C.H., Bremer, V. & Stover, E. (2011) Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Yahia, E.E. (Ed.) Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, (pp: 134-158), Vol 3: Cocona to Mango. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H., Ferguson, L., Preece, J.E., Michailides, T.J., Haug, M.T., López Corrales , M. & Crisosto, G.M. (2017). Developing the California fresh fig industry. Acta Hort. 1173, 285-292. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.49
  • Çalişkan, O. & Polat, A. A., (2008). Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 115, 360–367.
  • Çelikel, F.G. & Karaçalı, I. (1998). Effects of harvest maturity and precooling on fruit quality and longevity of "Bursa Siyah" figs (Ficus carica L.). Acta Hort 480, 283-288. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.480.55
  • FAOSTAT, (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Statistical Data www.faostat.fao. org/) (accessed 29 October 2025).
  • Ferrara, G., Mazzeo, A., Colasuonno, P., and Marcotull, I. (2022). Production and Growing Region. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 47-92), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0003.
  • Gaaliche, B., Trad, M. & Mars, M. (2011b). Effect of pollination intensity, frequency and pollen source on fig (Ficus carica L.) productivity and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 130, 737-742. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.08.032
  • Hong, G., Crisosto, C. & Cantwell, M.I. (2016). Quality and physiology of two cultivars of fresh-cut figs in relation to ripeness, storage temperature and controlled atmosphere. Acta Horticulturae, 1141, 213–220.
  • Işin, F., Çukur, T. & Armağan, G. (2003). An evaluation of dried fig production and marketing in Turkey from dried fig exportation standpoint. Acta Hort. 605, 183-189. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.605.27
  • Jafari, M, López-Corrales, M., Galán, A.J., Galván, A.I., Hosomi, A., Nogata, H., Ikegami, H., Balas, F., Serradilla, M.J., Garza-Alonso, C.A., Yavari, A., Ferguson, L. & Sarkhosh, A. (2022). Orchard Establishment and Management.In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 184- 230), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0008.
  • Morton, J. 1987. Fig. In, Julia F. Morton(Ed) Fruits of warm climates(pp: 47–50), Miami, FL. https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/fig.html(accessed 30 October, 2025)
  • Özbek, S. (1978). Özel Meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Yayınları:128 Ders Kitabı:11. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Ankara. 486 s.
  • Özen, M., Çobanoglu, F., Özkan, R., Kocataş, H., Tan, N., Ertan, B., Şahin, B., Konak, R., Dogan, O., Tutmuş, E., & Şahin, N. (2007). Fig cultivation (Turkey: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock) (in Turkish).
  • Özen, M., Çobanoğlu, F., Özkan, R., Konak, R. & Tutmuş, E. (2009). Effect of drying in tunnel and different harvest methods on some quality parameters and aflatoxin in storage, in sarilop fig cultivar. Paper presented at Fourth International Symposium on Fig, Meknes-Morocco, September 29-October 3, Abstract Book, p.116.
  • Polat ,A.A. and Özkaya, M. (2005). Selection studies on fig in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Pak J Bot 37, 567-74.
  • Polat A. A., Çalışkan O. (2008). Fruit characteristics of table fig cultivars in subtropical climate conditions of Mediterranean region. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 36, 107-15. DOI: 10.1080/01140670809510226
  • Polat A. A. and Siddiq, M. (2012). Fig. In, Siddiq M (Ed), Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging(pp:455-477). John-Wiley Punishing Co., Ames, Iowa, USA,
  • Polat, A. A. (2017) Fig production in Turkey. Journal of Pomology 51, 197–198.
  • Polat, A.A. (2024). Fig industry in Turkey: production and marketing. Acta Hortic., 1405, 201-208
  • Dio: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1405.20
  • Ramezanian, A., Amiri, A. & Crisosto, C.H. (2022). Postharvest Physiology and Physiological Disorders of Fresh Fig Fruits. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 384-397), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0016.
  • Trad, M., Ginies, C., Gaaliche, B., Renard, C.M.G.C. & Mars, M. (2012). Does pollination affect aroma development in ripened fig [Ficus carica L.] fruit? Scientia Horticulturae 134, 93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.11.004
  • Türk, R. (1989). Effects of harvest time and precooling on fruit quality and cold storage of figs (F. carica L. cv. "Bursa Siyahi"). Acta Hort . 258, 279-286. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.258.31
  • Uzundumlu, A. S., Oksuz, M. E. & Kurtoglu, S. (2018). Future of fig production in Turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 15, 138-146.
  • Yilmaz, S., Gozlekçi, S. & Ersoy, N. (2017). A review of fig sector in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 1173, 409-414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.70

Türkiye'de İncir Üretimi: Çeşitler, Yetiştiricilik, Bahçe Yönetimi ve İşleme

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 271 - 281, 25.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1679749

Öz

Mevcut derlemede, Türkiye incir üretimi hakkında güncel bilimsel bilgiler: yetiştiricilik, yıllık bakım işlemleri, taze ve kuru tüketim; hasat sonrası fizyolojisi ve depolama, incir işleme ve işlenmiş ürünleri hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Türkiye, 2023 yılında toplam dünya üretiminin %27,3'ünü karşılayarak 356.000 ton incir üreten ülkeler arasında başı çekmektedir. Türkiye, kuru incir üretiminde yaklaşık %50-55, incir ihracatında ise %52-60 paya sahiptir. Türk incirini ithal eden ülke sayısı artmakla birlikte, %70'ten fazlası AB pazarlarına gönderilmektedir. Türkiye'de kurutma için kullanılan ana çeşit, kalitesi nedeniyle tüm incir üreten ülkelerde tercih edilen, “Sarılop” çeşididir. Dünya pazarında artan ihracat talebiyle taze incir için en çok tercih edilen ve kaliteli olan ‘Bursa Siyahı’dır. İncir bitkileri genellikle çeliklerle çoğaltılır. İncir bahçeleri, taban arazilerde 7x7 veya 8x8 m'den yamaçlarda 5x6 veya 6 x 6 m'ye kadar değişen sıra arası ve sıra üzeri mesafelerde köklenmiş odunsu çeliklerle tesis edilir. İncir ağaçlarına genellikle “goble” terbiye sistemi verilir. Sofralık incir çeşitleri taze olarak tüketilirken, kuru incir çeşitleri kurutulmuş meyve olarak tüketilir. Ayrıca bazı meyveler reçel, marmelat veya lokum gibi işlenmiş ürün olarak tüketilir. Taze incir meyvesinin son derece çabuk bozulabilmesi nedeniyle tüketiciye sunulan en önemli incir ürünü kuru incir meyvesidir. İncirlerin kurutulması için üretim protokolü talebe göre programlanmakta, depolama aşamasından sonra aflatoksin kontrolünden geçirilmektedir. İncirler, en az iki kez UV lamba altında aflatoksin bulaşmış kuru incirleri ayıklamak için kontrol edilmektedir. Bu kontrol sırasında diğer küflü incirler de ayıklanmaktadır. Kuru incir müşteri talebine göre farklı tiplerde (Lerida, Layer, Chocolate, Premium, Makaroni) işlenmektedir. En kaliteli incirlerin sapı ve gözü kesildikten sonra tek tek sarılarak özel ambalajında müşteriye sunulmaktadır. Kuru incirler müşteri talebine göre çeşitli tiplerde paketlenmektedir. Paketlenen tüm ürünler metal dedektör kontrolünden geçmektedir.

Etik Beyan

"Türkiye'de İncir Üretimi: Çeşitler, Yetiştiricilik, Bahçe Yönetimi ve İşleme" başlıklı çalışma, ilgili bilimsel, etik ve atıf kurallarına uygun olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplanan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış olup, bu çalışma değerlendirme amacıyla başka hiçbir akademik ortama gönderilmemiştir. Etik kurul onayı gerektiren bir çalışma değildir.

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy, U. (2017). The dried fig management and the potential for new products. Acta Hortic. 1173, 377- 382.Doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.65.
  • Aksoy, U. (2021). Dried fig industry: progress and challenges. Acta Hort. 1310, 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1310.24
  • Arpacı, S., Konak, R., & Çiçek, E. (2018). A national value: Turkish figs. Chronica Horticulturae, 58(2), 15-22.
  • Chessa, I. (1997) Fig. In, Mitra, S. (ed.) Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits(pp: 245–268), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H. and Kader, A.A. (2009) Figs. In: Postharvest Information for Fruits and Fruits. Postharvest Quality Maintenance Guidelines, www.ucanr.edu/sites/kac/files/123822.pdf (accessed 30 October, 2025).
  • Crisosto, C. H., Bremer, V., Ferguson, L., & Crisosto, G. M. (2010). Evaluating Quality Attributes of Four Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars Harvested at Two Maturity Stages. HortSicience, 45(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.4.707
  • Crisosto, C.H., Bremer, V. & Stover, E. (2011) Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Yahia, E.E. (Ed.) Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, (pp: 134-158), Vol 3: Cocona to Mango. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H., Ferguson, L., Preece, J.E., Michailides, T.J., Haug, M.T., López Corrales , M. & Crisosto, G.M. (2017). Developing the California fresh fig industry. Acta Hort. 1173, 285-292. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.49
  • Çalişkan, O. & Polat, A. A., (2008). Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 115, 360–367.
  • Çelikel, F.G. & Karaçalı, I. (1998). Effects of harvest maturity and precooling on fruit quality and longevity of "Bursa Siyah" figs (Ficus carica L.). Acta Hort 480, 283-288. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.480.55
  • FAOSTAT, (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Statistical Data www.faostat.fao. org/) (accessed 29 October 2025).
  • Ferrara, G., Mazzeo, A., Colasuonno, P., and Marcotull, I. (2022). Production and Growing Region. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 47-92), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0003.
  • Gaaliche, B., Trad, M. & Mars, M. (2011b). Effect of pollination intensity, frequency and pollen source on fig (Ficus carica L.) productivity and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 130, 737-742. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.08.032
  • Hong, G., Crisosto, C. & Cantwell, M.I. (2016). Quality and physiology of two cultivars of fresh-cut figs in relation to ripeness, storage temperature and controlled atmosphere. Acta Horticulturae, 1141, 213–220.
  • Işin, F., Çukur, T. & Armağan, G. (2003). An evaluation of dried fig production and marketing in Turkey from dried fig exportation standpoint. Acta Hort. 605, 183-189. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.605.27
  • Jafari, M, López-Corrales, M., Galán, A.J., Galván, A.I., Hosomi, A., Nogata, H., Ikegami, H., Balas, F., Serradilla, M.J., Garza-Alonso, C.A., Yavari, A., Ferguson, L. & Sarkhosh, A. (2022). Orchard Establishment and Management.In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 184- 230), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0008.
  • Morton, J. 1987. Fig. In, Julia F. Morton(Ed) Fruits of warm climates(pp: 47–50), Miami, FL. https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/fig.html(accessed 30 October, 2025)
  • Özbek, S. (1978). Özel Meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Yayınları:128 Ders Kitabı:11. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Ankara. 486 s.
  • Özen, M., Çobanoglu, F., Özkan, R., Kocataş, H., Tan, N., Ertan, B., Şahin, B., Konak, R., Dogan, O., Tutmuş, E., & Şahin, N. (2007). Fig cultivation (Turkey: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock) (in Turkish).
  • Özen, M., Çobanoğlu, F., Özkan, R., Konak, R. & Tutmuş, E. (2009). Effect of drying in tunnel and different harvest methods on some quality parameters and aflatoxin in storage, in sarilop fig cultivar. Paper presented at Fourth International Symposium on Fig, Meknes-Morocco, September 29-October 3, Abstract Book, p.116.
  • Polat ,A.A. and Özkaya, M. (2005). Selection studies on fig in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Pak J Bot 37, 567-74.
  • Polat A. A., Çalışkan O. (2008). Fruit characteristics of table fig cultivars in subtropical climate conditions of Mediterranean region. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 36, 107-15. DOI: 10.1080/01140670809510226
  • Polat A. A. and Siddiq, M. (2012). Fig. In, Siddiq M (Ed), Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging(pp:455-477). John-Wiley Punishing Co., Ames, Iowa, USA,
  • Polat, A. A. (2017) Fig production in Turkey. Journal of Pomology 51, 197–198.
  • Polat, A.A. (2024). Fig industry in Turkey: production and marketing. Acta Hortic., 1405, 201-208
  • Dio: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1405.20
  • Ramezanian, A., Amiri, A. & Crisosto, C.H. (2022). Postharvest Physiology and Physiological Disorders of Fresh Fig Fruits. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 384-397), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0016.
  • Trad, M., Ginies, C., Gaaliche, B., Renard, C.M.G.C. & Mars, M. (2012). Does pollination affect aroma development in ripened fig [Ficus carica L.] fruit? Scientia Horticulturae 134, 93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.11.004
  • Türk, R. (1989). Effects of harvest time and precooling on fruit quality and cold storage of figs (F. carica L. cv. "Bursa Siyahi"). Acta Hort . 258, 279-286. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.258.31
  • Uzundumlu, A. S., Oksuz, M. E. & Kurtoglu, S. (2018). Future of fig production in Turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 15, 138-146.
  • Yilmaz, S., Gozlekçi, S. & Ersoy, N. (2017). A review of fig sector in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 1173, 409-414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.70

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 271 - 281, 25.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1679749

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aksoy, U. (2017). The dried fig management and the potential for new products. Acta Hortic. 1173, 377- 382.Doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.65.
  • Aksoy, U. (2021). Dried fig industry: progress and challenges. Acta Hort. 1310, 157-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1310.24
  • Arpacı, S., Konak, R., & Çiçek, E. (2018). A national value: Turkish figs. Chronica Horticulturae, 58(2), 15-22.
  • Chessa, I. (1997) Fig. In, Mitra, S. (ed.) Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits(pp: 245–268), CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H. and Kader, A.A. (2009) Figs. In: Postharvest Information for Fruits and Fruits. Postharvest Quality Maintenance Guidelines, www.ucanr.edu/sites/kac/files/123822.pdf (accessed 30 October, 2025).
  • Crisosto, C. H., Bremer, V., Ferguson, L., & Crisosto, G. M. (2010). Evaluating Quality Attributes of Four Fresh Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars Harvested at Two Maturity Stages. HortSicience, 45(4), 707–710. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.4.707
  • Crisosto, C.H., Bremer, V. & Stover, E. (2011) Fig (Ficus carica L.). In: Yahia, E.E. (Ed.) Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, (pp: 134-158), Vol 3: Cocona to Mango. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
  • Crisosto, C.H., Ferguson, L., Preece, J.E., Michailides, T.J., Haug, M.T., López Corrales , M. & Crisosto, G.M. (2017). Developing the California fresh fig industry. Acta Hort. 1173, 285-292. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.49
  • Çalişkan, O. & Polat, A. A., (2008). Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 115, 360–367.
  • Çelikel, F.G. & Karaçalı, I. (1998). Effects of harvest maturity and precooling on fruit quality and longevity of "Bursa Siyah" figs (Ficus carica L.). Acta Hort 480, 283-288. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.480.55
  • FAOSTAT, (2025). Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Statistical Data www.faostat.fao. org/) (accessed 29 October 2025).
  • Ferrara, G., Mazzeo, A., Colasuonno, P., and Marcotull, I. (2022). Production and Growing Region. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 47-92), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0003.
  • Gaaliche, B., Trad, M. & Mars, M. (2011b). Effect of pollination intensity, frequency and pollen source on fig (Ficus carica L.) productivity and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae 130, 737-742. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.08.032
  • Hong, G., Crisosto, C. & Cantwell, M.I. (2016). Quality and physiology of two cultivars of fresh-cut figs in relation to ripeness, storage temperature and controlled atmosphere. Acta Horticulturae, 1141, 213–220.
  • Işin, F., Çukur, T. & Armağan, G. (2003). An evaluation of dried fig production and marketing in Turkey from dried fig exportation standpoint. Acta Hort. 605, 183-189. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.605.27
  • Jafari, M, López-Corrales, M., Galán, A.J., Galván, A.I., Hosomi, A., Nogata, H., Ikegami, H., Balas, F., Serradilla, M.J., Garza-Alonso, C.A., Yavari, A., Ferguson, L. & Sarkhosh, A. (2022). Orchard Establishment and Management.In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 184- 230), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0008.
  • Morton, J. 1987. Fig. In, Julia F. Morton(Ed) Fruits of warm climates(pp: 47–50), Miami, FL. https://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/fig.html(accessed 30 October, 2025)
  • Özbek, S. (1978). Özel Meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Yayınları:128 Ders Kitabı:11. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi. Ankara. 486 s.
  • Özen, M., Çobanoglu, F., Özkan, R., Kocataş, H., Tan, N., Ertan, B., Şahin, B., Konak, R., Dogan, O., Tutmuş, E., & Şahin, N. (2007). Fig cultivation (Turkey: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock) (in Turkish).
  • Özen, M., Çobanoğlu, F., Özkan, R., Konak, R. & Tutmuş, E. (2009). Effect of drying in tunnel and different harvest methods on some quality parameters and aflatoxin in storage, in sarilop fig cultivar. Paper presented at Fourth International Symposium on Fig, Meknes-Morocco, September 29-October 3, Abstract Book, p.116.
  • Polat ,A.A. and Özkaya, M. (2005). Selection studies on fig in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Pak J Bot 37, 567-74.
  • Polat A. A., Çalışkan O. (2008). Fruit characteristics of table fig cultivars in subtropical climate conditions of Mediterranean region. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 36, 107-15. DOI: 10.1080/01140670809510226
  • Polat A. A. and Siddiq, M. (2012). Fig. In, Siddiq M (Ed), Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, Postharvest Physiology, Processing and Packaging(pp:455-477). John-Wiley Punishing Co., Ames, Iowa, USA,
  • Polat, A. A. (2017) Fig production in Turkey. Journal of Pomology 51, 197–198.
  • Polat, A.A. (2024). Fig industry in Turkey: production and marketing. Acta Hortic., 1405, 201-208
  • Dio: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1405.20
  • Ramezanian, A., Amiri, A. & Crisosto, C.H. (2022). Postharvest Physiology and Physiological Disorders of Fresh Fig Fruits. In, Sarkhosh A., Yavari A. and Ferguson L.(Eds). The Fig: Botany, Production and Uses (pp: 384-397), CABI International, UK. DOI: 10.1079/9781789242881.0016.
  • Trad, M., Ginies, C., Gaaliche, B., Renard, C.M.G.C. & Mars, M. (2012). Does pollination affect aroma development in ripened fig [Ficus carica L.] fruit? Scientia Horticulturae 134, 93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j. scienta.2011.11.004
  • Türk, R. (1989). Effects of harvest time and precooling on fruit quality and cold storage of figs (F. carica L. cv. "Bursa Siyahi"). Acta Hort . 258, 279-286. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.258.31
  • Uzundumlu, A. S., Oksuz, M. E. & Kurtoglu, S. (2018). Future of fig production in Turkey. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 15, 138-146.
  • Yilmaz, S., Gozlekçi, S. & Ersoy, N. (2017). A review of fig sector in Turkey. Acta Hortic. 1173, 409-414. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1173.70
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Meyve Yetiştirme ve Islahı
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Atila Aytekin Polat 0000-0002-5701-4767

Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Nisan 2025
Kabul Tarihi 25 Kasım 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Polat, A. A. (2025). Fig Production in Türkiye: Varieties, Cultivation, Orchard Management and Processing. Manas Journal of Agriculture Veterinary and Life Sciences, 15(2), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.53518/mjavl.1679749