Determination of Yield and Some Quality Components of False Flax [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Genotypes Sown on Different Dates in Autumn

Öz

Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] seeds were grown during the fall season on Konya ecological conditions by using 4 different sowing dates (September 20th, September 30th, October 10th, October 20th in 2015) by using 2 different genotypes (population characterized "Russia" originated genotype; certified variety "Suneson" originated from USA), for the aim of determination of efficiency and some agronomical features. Field experiment was realized by 3 replications according to the Split Plots Design in the 2015-2016 vegetation periods.According to the results, statistically significant differences were obtained for blooming period, vegetation period, height of the plant, number of capsules, height of the first capsule, weight of thousand seeds, oil ratio and resistance to winter for the differences amongst sowing dates. For the differences between genotypes; blooming period, vegetation period and height of the plant, number of main branches, number of capsules, number of seeds per capsule, height of the first capsule, weight of thousand seeds, oil ratio and resistance to winter were significant as well.Present study showed that the Russian genotype with 5.45 g/plant yield and 34.92% oil ratio which was sown on 20th of October is outstanding and therefore it is recommended, also Suneson genotype that was sown on 30th of September determined as promising as well.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz],weight of thousand seeds,oil ratio,seed yield.

Kaynakça

1. Öztürk, A. B. (2016). Bitkisel yağ imalatı sektörü. İktisadi Araştırmalar Bölümü, Türkiye İş Bankası. https://ekonomi.isbank.com.tr/UserFiles/pdf/sr201605_bitkiselyagimalatisektoru.pdf
2. Önder, M. (2013). KOP bölgesinde yeni bir yağ bitkisi Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz.], Ulusal KOP bölgesel Kalkınma Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2013, Konya.
3. Kurt, O. & Seyis, F. (2008) Alternatif Yağ Bitkisi: Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]. OMÜ Zir. Fak. Dergisi 23(2).116-120.
4. Putnam, D. H., Budin J. T., Field L. A. & Breene W. M. (1993). Camelina: A promising low-input oilseed. p. 314-322. In: J. Janick and J.E. Simon (eds.), New crops. Wiley, New York.
5. Zubr J. (1997). Oil-seedcrop; Camelina sativa. Industrial Crops and Products 6, p 113-119.
6. Çoban, F. & Önder, M. (2014). Ekim Sıklıklarının Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Bitkisinde Önemli Agronomik Özellikler Üzerine Etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 1 (2): 50-55.
7. Kahraman, A. (2014). Ekim Zamanlarının Kuru Fasulye Genotiplerinde (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Verim, Verim Unsurları Ve Kalite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Danışman: Prof. Dr. Mustafa ÖNDER. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarla Bitkileri ABD, Konya.
8. Kahraman, A., Uslu, N., Yıldırım, H., Çoban, F., Koç, N., Önder, M. & Özcan, M.M. (2013). A New Plant for Arid and Cold Lands: Camelina (Camelina sativa L.) Crantz. Soil-Water Journal, 2 (2): 2099-2108.

9. Yıldırım, H. & Önder, M. (2016). Farklı Gübre Dozlarının Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Bitkisinde Bazı Verim ve Kalite Bileşenlerine Etkileri. Selçuk Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (1): 117-122.
10. Önder, M. (2013). KOP Bölgesinde Tarımı Yapılabilecek Yeni Bir Yağ Bitkisi: Ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]. 1. KOP Bölgesel Kalkınma Sempozyumu, 14-16 Kasım 2013, Konya. Sempozyum Kitabı: 155-160.
11. Kahraman, A. & Önder, M. (2016). Seed color of dry beans and change by sowing times. 2nd International Conference on Science, Ecology and Technology- 14-16 Ekim 2016 (ICONSETE'2016). Proceeding Book, Pp: 417-424.
12. Önder, M. & Kahraman, A. (2016a). A promising plant for bio fuel: Determination of desired characteristics in camelina varieties/1. International Conference on Science, Ecologyand Technology-2016 (ICONSETE'2016). Proceeding Book, Pp: 434-439.
13. Önder, M. & Kahraman, A. (2016b). A promising plant for biofuel: Determination of desired characteristics in camelina varieties/2. International Conference on Science, Ecology and Technology-2016 (ICONSETE'2016). Proceeding Book, Pp: 434-439.
14. Koç, N. (2014). Farklı zamanlarda ekilen ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz]’in verim ve bazı agronomik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst. Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Konya.
15. Bolat, Ç. (2014). Farklı azot ve fosfor dozlarının ketencik (Camelina sativa) Bitkisinin verim ve verim unsurlaruna etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst. Tarla Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Eskişehir.
16. Mason, H. (2011). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation, http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/11StwCamEval.pdf
17. Mason, H. (2010). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation – 2010, http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/10StwdCamVarEval.pdf
18. Agegnehu, M. & Honermeier, B. (1997). Effects of Seeding Rates and Nitrogen Fertilization on Seed Yield, Seed Quality and Yield Components of False Flax [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Die Bodenkultur, 48 (1).
19. Mason, H. (2009a). Yield and Yield Component Responses to Camelina Seeding Rate and Genotype. http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/CroppingSystems/Camelina/09CamSeedingRateGenotype.pdf
20. Atakişi, İ. K. (1991). Yağ Bitkileri Yetiştirme ve Islahı, Trakya Üniv. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak. Yayınları.Tekirdağ, 149-150.
21. Kara, K. (1994). Değişik Sıra Aralık Mesafelerinin Ketenciğin (Camelina sativa) Verim Ve Verim Unsurları Üzerine Etkileri, Tr. J. of Agricultural and Forestry, 18 59-64.
22. Vollmann, J., Damboeck, A., Eckl, A., Schrems, H. & Ruckenbauer, P. (1996). Improvement of Camelina sativa, an underexploited oilseed, p. 357-362. In: J. Janick (ed.), Progress in newcrops, ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
23. Crowley, J. G. & Fröhlich, A. (1999). Evaluation of Camelina sativa as an alternative oilseed crop. (ISBN 1-84170-049-5) Teagasc, Dublin, Irlanda.
24. Akk, E. & Ilumäe, E. (2005). Possibilities Of Growing Camelina sativa In Ecological Cultivation, Estonian Research Institute of Agriculture, Pp: 28-33.
25. Karahoca, A. & Kırıcı, S. (2005). Çukurova Koşullarında Ketencik (Camelina sativa L.)’ de Farklı Azot ve Fosfor Gübrelemesinin Tohum Verimi ve Yağ Oranına Etkileri, Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (2):47-55.
26. Karcauskiene, D. & Koncius, D. (2010). The effect of nitrogen fertilizers, sowing time and seed rate on the productivity of Camelina sativa, Agriculture. vol.97(4). 37-46.
27. Mason, H. (2009b). Statewide Camelina Variety Evaluation, http://ag.montana.edu/nwarc/research/VarietyEvaluation/CanolaandCamelina/09camelinavarietyeval.pdf
28. Sadhuram, Y., Maneesha, K. & Ramana, T. V. (2010). Camelina sativa: A New Crop With Potential Introduced In India, Current Science, 99 (9): 1194-1196.
29. Kumari, A., Mohsin, M., Arya, M.C., Joshi, P.K. & Ahmed, Z. (2012). Effect of Spacing on Camelina sativa: A New Bıofull Crop In Indıa. The Bıoascan An Internatıonal Qaurterly Journal Of Lıfe Scıences 7(4). 575-577.
30. Katar, D., Arslan Y. & Subaşı, İ. (2012b). Ankara Ekolojik Şartlarında Farklı Ekim Zamanlarının Ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) Bitkisinin Verim Ve Verim Unsurları Üzerine Etkisi, Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg. (ISSN: 1300-9036), 43 (1): 23-27.
31. Katar, D., Arslan Y. & Subaşı, İ. (2012c). Kışlık Farklı Ekim Zamanlarının Ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) Bitkisinin Verim ve Verim Öğelerine Etkisi, GOÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1). 105-112.
32. Çoban, F. (2014). Farklı ekim sıklıklarının ketencik [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] bitkisinde bazı verim ve kalite bileşenlerine etkileri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst. Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü, Konya.
33. Gesch, R. W. (2014). Influence of genotype and sowing date on camelina growth and yield in the north central U.S. Industrial Cropsand Products, March 2014, Pages 209–215.
34. İnan, M. & Kırpık, M. (2016). Adıyaman Koşullarında Ketencik (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) Bitkisinin Agronomik Özellikleri ve Yağ Oranının Belirlenmesi., Adıyaman University Journal of Science, 6 (1) (2016) 85-95.
35. Katar, D., Arslan Y. & Subaşı, İ. (2012a). Ankara Ekolojik Koşullarında Farklı Ekim Zamanlarının Ketencik (Camelina Sativa (L.) Crantz) Bitkisinin Yağ Oranı Ve Bileşimi Üzerine Olan Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty)9 (3). 84-90.
36. İncekara, F. (1964). Endüstri Bitkileri ve Islahı Cilt: 2. Yağ Bitkileri ve Islahı. Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Yay. No: 83. İzmir.
37. Rodríguez, M. F., Sánchez-García, A., Salas, J. J., Garcés, R. & Martínez-Force, E. (2013). Characterization of the morphological changes and fatty acid profile of developing Camelina sativa seeds. Industrial Crops and Products, Volume 50, October 2013, Pages 673–679.
38. Sainger M., Jaiwal A, Sainger P. A., Chaudhary D., Jaiwal R. & Jaiwal P. K. (2016). Advances in genetic improvement of Camelina sativa for biofuel and industrial bio-products, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.