e-GOVERNANCE IN COMBATING CORRUPTION AND SITUATION IN KYRGYZSTAN

Öz

In this study, the contribution of government increasing with each passing day the benefits of e-Governance in the state administration, especially the importance of the fight against corruption will be evaluated. e-Governance in the current situation in Kyrgyzstan, and the steps taken will be given information about the future. With e-governance, citizens will benefit from faster and better quality public services. Citizens will be able to express themselves against improper regulations and arbitrary practices and participation in management by providing a more democratic system are available. In Kyrgyzstan, e-governance in fighting corruption, simple, transparent and accountable to establish a structure has been particularly severe positive returns in recent years. In the fight against corruption, governance and increasing the use of information technology is one of the primary purposes on the recent national strategic plan

Anahtar Kelimeler

• e-Governance, Corruption, Kyrgyzstan

YOLSUZLUKLA MÜCADELEDE e-YÖNETİŞİM VE KIRGIZİSTAN’DAKİ DURUM

Öz

Bu çalışmada, teknolojik gelişmelere paralel şekilde devlet yönetimine katkısı her geçen gün daha da artan e-Yönetişimin devlet yönetiminde sağladığı faydalardan özellikle yolsuzlukla mücadele açısından önemi değerlendirilecek olup, Kırgızistan’da e-Yönetişim konusunda mevcut durum, atılan adımlar ve geleceği konusunda bilgiler verilecektir. e-yönetişim ile vatandaşlar daha hızlı ve daha kaliteli devlet hizmetlerinden faydalanma imkânına kavuşmakta, uygun olmayan düzenlemeler ve keyfi uygulamalar konusunda vatandaşların kendilerini ifade edebildikleri ve yönetime katılımlarını sağlayarak daha demokratik bir sisteme ulaşabilmektedirler. e-Yönetişim yolsuzlukla mücadelede Kırgızistan’da basit, şeffaf ve hesap verebilir bir yapı kurmak üzere özellikle son dönemlerde ciddi olumlu getirileri olmuş, bu yönde son ulusal strateji planında yolsuzlukla mücadelede yönetişim ve bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımının artırılması ilk sıralarda yer alan hedeflerden sayılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• e-Yönetişim, Yolsuzluk, Kırgızistan

Kaynakça

1. Aktan, C. C., (2001), “Siyasal Ahlak ve Siyasal Yozlaşma”, Yolsuzlukla Mücadele Stratejileri, Coşkun Can Aktan (Ed.), Hak-İş Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 51-60.
2. Andersen, T. B. (2009), “e-Government as an anti-corruption strategy”, Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201-210.
3. Andersen, T. B., Bentzen, J., Dalgaard, C. J., ve Selaya, P. (2011), “Does the Internet Reduce Corruption? Evidence from US States and across Countries”, The World Bank Economic Review, lhr025.
4. Backus, M. (2001), “e-Governance and developing countries-introduction and examples”, IICD Research Report No. 3.
5. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., ve Grimes, J. M. (2010), “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: e- government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies”, Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
6. Bhuiyan, S. H. (2011), “Modernizing Bangladesh public administration through e-governance: Benefits and challenges”, Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 54-65.
7. Cisar, O. (2003), “Strategies for using information technologies for curbing public-sector corruption: The case of the Czech Republic (CR)”, Open Society Institute, Budapest. Erişim: 2 Mayıs 2014 http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00001820/01/Cisar.pdf#search='ICTs%20for%20AntiCorruption%20 and%20transparency%20in%20public%20administration
8. Demirel, Demokaan (2010), “Yönetişimde Yeni Boyut: e-Yönetişim”, Türk İdare Dergisi, 466, 65-94.

9. Doğan, K. C., ve Ustakara, F. (2013), “Kamuda Bir Yapılanma Dönüşümü Olarak e-Devlet ve e-Yönetişim İlişkisi Üzerine.”, Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies Küresel İktisat ve İşletme Çalışmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 3, 1-12.
10. Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı 2007-2013; (2007), “Kamuda İyi Yönetişim”, DPT Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Ankara.
11. DPT, (2007), “Kamuda İyi Yönetişim”, Özel İhtisas Raporu, 9.Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013), Yayın No: DPT 2721, Ankara.
12. Eigen, P. (1995), “Bündnispartner im Kampf gegen internationale Korruption”, International Conference “Korruption in Deutschland” of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Berlin, 16–17 February.
13. Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014), “e-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation”, World Development, 57, 114-126.
14. Erdal, M. (2002), “Elektronik Bilgi Çağında Kamu Yönetimi ve Bir Yerel Yönetim Uygulaması”, I. Ulusal Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Bildiriler Kitabı, 10-11 Mayıs, ss.165-181, Kocaeli.
15. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, (2012), “Kyrgyz Republic Country Assessment”. http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/transition/assessments/kyrgyzrepublic.pdf 122-123.
16. Finger, Matthias ve Gaëlle Pecoud (2003), “From e-Government to e-Governance? Towards a model of eGovernance”, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 1(1), 1-10. Gordon, Thomas F. (2012), “eGovernance and its Value for Public Administration”,
17. http://www.lefis.org/outcomes/proposals/technical_archivos/legal_knowledge_based_systems_ for_%20egovernance_and%20_public_administration.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.06.2014)
18. Kaufmann, D. (1997), “Corruption: The Facts”, Foreign Policy, No: 107, pp. 114131.
19. Klitgaard, R. (1988), “Controlling corruption”, In Goudie, A. W., & Stasavage, D. (1997); “Corruption: The Issues”, OECD Development Center. Working Paper No. 122. Erişim: 04 Mayıs 2014 http://www.oecd.org/dev/poverty/1849511.pdf.
20. Klitgaard, R. (1995), “National and international strategies for reducing corruption”, Presented to OECD Symposium On Corruption And Good Governance, Paris. In Goudie, A.W., and D. Stasavage (1997), “Corruption: The Issues”, OECD Development Center. Working Paper No. 122. Erişim: 4 Mayıs 2014 from: http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/sites/default/files/pp- corruption1finished.pdf.
21. Klitgaard, R. (1996), “Bolivia: Heating sick institutions in La Paz”, In Patrick, M. (Ed.). “Governance and the economy in Africa: Tool for analysis and reform of corruption”, College Park, Md.: Center for Institution Reform and the Informal Sector. In Tangkitvanich, S. “Designing e-government Services to Combat Corruption in Developing Countries”, The ASEM Conference on Globalisation and ICT. 10– 12 March 2003, Malmö and Helsingborg, Sweden Session IIB, March 1. Thailand Development Research Institute, Thailand. Erişim: 18 Mayıs 2014 http://www.iked.org/Publications%20-%20ASEM.html
22. Kanungo, V. (2004), “Citizen Centric e-Governance in India: Strategies for Today, Vision for Future. New Delhi: Society for Promotion of e-Governance”.
23. Kyrgyzstan Security Newswire, 2012, “Shadow economy accounts for 39% of Kyrgyz GDP. http://www.universalnewswires.com/centralasia/kyrgyzstan/security/viewstory.aspx?id=13361
24. Mahmood, R. (2004), “Can information and communication technology help reduce corruption? How so and why not: Two case studies from south Asia”, Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 3(3): 347–373.
25. Morgan, A. L. (1998), “Corruption: Causes, Consequencesa and Implications”, The Asia Foundation Working, Paper Series, No: 9, October.
26. Nichol, J. (2012), “Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests”, Congressional Research Service 7- 5700, Erişim: 10 Mayıs 2014, http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/97-690.pdf.
27. Palvia, Shailendra C. Jain ve Sushil S. Sharma (2007), “e-Government and e-Governance: Definitions/Domain Framework and Status around the World”, Foundation of e-government, 5th International Conference on e-governance (ICEG), 28-30 December 2007, Hyderabad, 1-12.
28. Pardhasaradhi, Y., ve Reddy, M. V. R. (2013), “Fostering e-Governance to fight Corruption: The Indian Experience”. 한국행정학회 추계학술발표논문집, 2013(단일호), 1131-1143.
29. Pathak, R. D., Singh, G., Belwal, R., ve Smith, R. F. I. (2007), “e-Governance and Corruption-developments and Issues in Ethiopia”, Public Organization Review, 7(3), 195-208.
30. PwC, (2013), “Identifying and. Reducing. Corruption in. Public Procurement in the EU”. Erişim: 1 Mayıs 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/documents/anti-fraud-policy/research-and- studies/identifying_reducing_corruption_in_public_procurement_en.pdf
31. Ricks, S. (1995), “Economic analysis of economic crime with special reference to corruption and bribery”, Berlin: VWF.
32. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978), “Corruption: A study in political economy”, New York: Academic Press.
33. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1994), “Reducing bribery in the public-sector”, In Duc, V. T. (Ed), “Corruption and democracy: Political institutions, processes and corruption in transition states in east-central Europe and in the former Soviet Union”, In Goudie, A.W., and D. Stasavage. (1997), “Corruption: The Issues”, OECD Development Center. Working Paper No. 122. Erişim: 4 Mayıs 2014 http://www.oecd.org/dev/poverty/1849511.pdf.
34. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999), “Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Rose-Ackerman. S. (2004), “The challenge of poor governance and corruption”, Copenhagen Consensus Challenge Paper. Erişim: 17 Haziran 2014 http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/sites/default/files/pp-corruption1finished.pdf.
36. Roy, A., ve Karforma, S. (2011). “Risk and Remedies of e-governance Systems”, Oriental Journal of Computer Science & Technology (OJCST), 4(02), 329-339.
37. Saatçıoğlu, Cem (2010), “Yerel Yönetimlerde Bilgi Sistemleri ve Teknolojileri: İstanbul Örneği”, 8. Uluslararası Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, 28-31 Ekim 2010, İstanbul, 237-256.
38. Shleifer, A. and R. W. Wishny, (1993), “Corruption”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Sayı: 108, No: 3, pp. 599-617.
39. Siddique, W. ve Khan, M. N. A., (2012), “From Governance to e-Governance: A Way Forward.”, Adv. Eng. Tec. Appl. Vol.1 No. 1 (2012) 14-19.
40. Singh, A., Jaın-Chandra, S. ve Mohommad, A. (2012), “Inclusive Growth, Institutions, and the Underground Economy”, IMF Working Paper, Erişim: 12 Mayıs 2014, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp1247.pdf
41. Tangkitvanich, S. (2003), “Designing e-government services to combat corruption in developing countries”. The ASEM Conference on Globalisation and ICT. 10–12 March 2003, Malmö and Helsingborg, Sweden. Erişim: 3 Mayıs 2014 http://www.iked.org/Publications%20-%20ASEM.html
42. Tanzi, V. (1998), “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures”, IMF Staff Papers, Sayı: 45, No: 4, pp. 559-594.
43. Tejasvee, Sanjay; S. S. Sarangdevot; Devendra Gahlot; Shruti Sandal (2010), “e-Governance and Effective Deliverance of Information and Services to Citizens Architecture”, International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(4), 298-302.
44. Uçkan, Ö. (2003), “e-Devlet, e-Demokrasi ve e-Yönetişim Modeli: Bir İlkesel Öncelik Olarak Bilgiye Erişim Özgürlüğü”, Aylık Strateji ve Analiz e-Dergisi, 5, 1-19.
45. Veraanki, M. (2009), “Egovernance Is Good Governance: A Case of India”, eTransformation in Public Administration: From eGovernment to eGovernance, The Prooceedings of International Conference on eGovernment Sharing Experiences, Turksel Kaya Bensghir (Ed.), 8-9 December Antalya, TODAİE Presswork No: 53, 280-291.
46. Yıldırım, M. (2010), “e-Devlet ve Yurttaş Odaklı Kamu Yönetimi”, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara. Web Adresleri: www.ipaidabribe.com www.worldbank.org
47. www.transparency.org www.ey.com
48. www.internetworldstats.com www.quandl.com