Teknoloji Toplumlarında Teknoloji, Eğitim ve Politika Sibernetiği

Yıl 2020, , 562 - 572, 27.01.2020

Hüseyin Tolu

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.537122

Öz

Sosyal sibernetik, güdümleme ve kontrol kavramıdır ve
teknolojik toplum içinde yeniden doğdu ve yeni şekillere uyandırıldı.
Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, sosyal sibernetik yönetişiminim küresel politik
ekonomideki teknoloji, eğitim ve politikaya yönelik hareketliliğine
odaklanmaktadır. Bu makale, temel sosyal sibernetik ile ilgili olarak
teknolojik gelişmenin politik ve felsefi tarihi yoluyla, demokratik ilkelerin
halkın güdümleme ve kontrolü amacıyla küresel ve uygunsuz bir şekilde reddedilip
reddedilmediğini tartışmaktadır. Bu makale, demokratik uluslararası ilişkiler
kisvesi altında var olan bir tür çoğulcu teknokrattık yönetişim kurulmasının
devam etmesi için düzenlenen bu yeni tekniklerin kullanımının arkasındaki
gerekçelerini araştırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Sibernetik, Teknoloji Sosyolojisi, Eğitim Yönetişimi

Cybernetics of Technology, Education and Politics in Technological Societies

Öz

Social cybernetics is the concept
of manipulation and control, and it has been reincarnated and awakened into new
shapes within technological society. This study thereby focuses on the mobility
of the governance of social cybernetics upon technology, education, and
politics in the global political economy. This paper addresses the fundamental
social cybernetics concerns through the political and philosophical history of
technological development to argue whether or not the democratic principles
have been globally and inappropriately rejected for the purpose of manipulation
and control of the public. This paper inquiries into the background and
reasoning behind the use of these new techniques, which have been orchestrated
for the persistence of establishing a form of plutocratic technocratic
governance existing under the guise of democratic international
relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Cybernetics, Sociology of Technology, Governance of Education

Kaynakça

• Ball, J. Stephen, (2008), New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education, Political Studies: 56, 747–765.
• Banathy, H. Bala, (1996), Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. New York: Plenum
• Bernays, Edward, (1928), Propaganda, Routledge.
• Bingham, Tom, (2010, June 1), Lord Bingham: The Rule of Law, Retrieved from https://itc2u.wordpress.com/2012/06/01/lord-bingham-the-rule-of-law/
• Boyd, M. Gary, (1977), Towards a formalisation of educational cybernetics. In Rose, J. & Biliciu, C. (Eds.), Modern trends in cybernetics and systems, Vol. III (pp. 15-2 1). New York, NY: Springer.
• Bunge, Mario, (1977), Towards a technoethics. Monist, 60(1), 96-107.
• Butler, Samuel, (1863), The Book of the Machines, Dodo Press
• Caplan, Bryan, (2001), Rational Ignorance versus Rational Irrationality, Kyklos, 54(1), 3-26.
• Chomsky, Noam, (1989), Necessary Illusion thought Control in Democratic Societies, Digital processing by The Electric Book Company 20 Cambridge Drive, London SE12 8AJ, UK.
• Chomsky, Noam, (2017), Chomsky: How the U.S. Developed Such a Scandalous Health System, Retrieved from https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/noam-chomsky-united-states-health-system-scandalous
• Dale, Roger, and Robertson, Suzan. (2007), Beyond Methodological ‘Isms’ in Comparative Education in an Era of Globalisation, in A. Kazamias and R. Cowan (eds) Handbook on Comparative Education Netherlands: Springer.
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. (1972), Capitalism and Schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press.
• Dewey, John, (1980), The Middle Works, 1899-1924, SIU Press.
• Digitalright (2017, September 29), Russia threatens Facebook over data localization, Spain orders companies to censor Catalan referendum content, U.S. and EU complete first annual Privacy Shield review. Retrieved from https://rankingdigitalrights.org/2017/09/29/corporate-accountability-news-highlights-russia-threatens-facebook-data-localization/
• Durkheim, Emile, (1897/1951/2005), Suicide: A study in Sociology. (Translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson) New York: Free Press; Taylor & Francis e-Library.
• Ellul, Jacques, (1964), The Technological Society, Trans. John Wilkinson. New York: Knopf, 1964. London: Jonathan Cape, 1965. Rev. ed.: New York: Knopf/Vintage, 1967.
• Gerovitch, Slava, (2002), From Newspeak to Cyberspeak. A history of Soviet Cybernetics. Cambridge,
• Giddens, Anthony, (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford University Press
• Green, J. Edward, (2016), Liberalism and the Problem of Plutocracy, Constellations, 23(1), 84-95.
• Kline, R. Ronald, (2015), The Cybernetics Moment. Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
• Haraway, Donna, (1985), A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century, Socialist Review.
• Heidegger, Martin, (1977), The Question Concerning Technology, pp 3–35.
• Heims, J. Steve, (1991), Constructing a Social Science for Postwar America. The Cybernetics Group, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Luppicini, Rocci, (2010), Technoethics and the evolving knowledge society. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
• Morozov, Evgeny, (2011), The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate The World. London: Penguin Group.
• Norris, Pippa, (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, Oxford.
• Oppenheimer, Todd, (2004), The Flickering Mind: Saving Education from the False Promise of Technology, Random House Publishing Group.
• Osho. (2009). The Supreme Science, Osho
• Mead, Margaret, (1968), ‘Cybernetics of Cybernetics’, in Purposive Systems: Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium of the American Society for Cybernetics, ed. H. von Foerster et al., Spartan Books, New York, pp.1-11.
• Medina, Eden, (2011), Cybernetic Revolutionaries: Technology and Politics in Allende's Chile, MIT Press.
• Raz, Joseph, (1979), The authority of law: Essays on law and morality, Oxford Scholarship (2010).
• Rawls, John, (1999), A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Smith, Alastair, and Mesquita, Bruce Bueno, (2012). The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics, Public Affairs,
• Sir Woolf, Harry, (2004), Lord Woolf Squire Centenary Lecture: The Rule of Law and a Change in Constitution (transcript), Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge.
• Svolik, W. Millan, (2009), Power Sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, No. 2, Pp. 477–494
• Tiqqun. (2010). The Cybernetic Hypothesis. The Anarchist Library Anti-Copyright, Retrieved from http://klausgauger.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/tiqqun-the-cybernetic-hypothesis.pdf.
• Zinn, Howard, (1997/2009), The Zinn Reader: Writings on Disobedience and Democracy. New York: Seven Stories Press.