Amatör Badminton Oyuncularının Vücut Kompozisyonlarının Sportif Performansa Etkisi: Zonguldak Bölge Şampiyonası

Öz

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı amatör genç badminton oyuncularının vücut kompozisyonu ile sportif performansları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışma 90 sporcu ile gerçekleştirildi. Sporcuların ölçümleri müsabakalar başlamadan Tanita BC-418 Segmental Vücut Analiz Tartısı ile ölçüldü. Araştırmada toplanan verilerin analizi için SPSS 21.0 programından yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan sporcuların kendi aralarındaki badminton müsabaka sonuçlarına göre elde ettikleri dereceler incelenmiştir. Ayrıca tüm sporcuların genel vücut ölçümleri, bacak, kol ve gövdelerinde yağ yüzdesi, yağsız vücut ağırlığı ölçümleri yapılmıştır. Öncelikle sporcuların cinsiyetlerine göre boy, ağırlık ve beden kütle indekslerine bakılmıştır. Daha sonra cinsiyete göre haftalık antrenman saatleri ve antrenman yılları karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan sporcuların %48,9’u kadın, %51,1’i erkektir. Araştırmada 10 farklı ilden kulüplerin sporcuları yer almış olup en az sporcu Karabük ilinden katılmıştır. Sporcuların beden kütle indekslerine bakıldığında %35,6’sı zayıf grupta, %53,3’ü normal ağırlıkta ve %11,1’in ise fazla ağırlıkta olduğu görülmektedir. Sonuç: Elde edilen veriler göre, kadınların toplam vücut yağ yüzdeleri x=26,31 iken erkeklerin yağ yüzdeleri x=18,93 olarak görülmüştür. Kadınların toplam vücut yağ ağırlıkları x=13,57 iken erkeklerin yağ ağırlıkları x=8,99 olarak görülmüştür. Gruplar arasında ortaya çıkan bu farklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı görülmüştür (p<0,05).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Badminton
• Sportfit Performans
• Vücut Kompozisyonu

The Effect of Body Compositions of Amateur Badminton Players on Sports Performance: Zonguldak Regional Championship

Öz

Aim: The aim of the research is to examine the relationship between the body composition and sportive performance of young amateur badminton players. Material and Methods: The study was carried out with 90 athletes. The measurements of the athletes were measured with the Tanita BC-418 Segmental Body Analysis Scale before the competitions started. The analysis of the data collected in the research was evaluated with the SPSS 21.0 program. The scores of the athletes participating in the research according to the results of the badminton competition among themselves were examined. In addition, general body measurements, leg, arm and trunk measurements of all athletes were examined. First of all, height, weight and body mass indexes of the athletes were examined according to their gender. Then, weekly training hours and training years were compared according to gender. Results: 48.9% of the athletes participating in the research are female and 51.1% are male. In the study, athletes from clubs from 10 different cities were included, and at least the athletes were from Karabük. Conclusion: According to the data obtained, while the total body fat percentage of women is x=26.31, the fat percentage of men is x=18.93. While the total body fat weight of the women was x=13.57, the fat weight of the men was determined as x=8.99. These differences between the groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). When the body mass indexes of the athletes are examined, 35.6% are in the underweight group, 53.3% are in normal weight and 11.1% are overweight.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Badminton
• Sports Performance
• Body Composition

Kaynakça

1. 1. Kohl III, H. W., & Cook, H. D. (2013). Physical activity and physical education: Relationship to growth, development, and health. In Educating the student body: Taking physical activity and physical education to school. National Academies Press (US).
2. 2. Tammelin, R., Yang, X., Leskinen, E., Kankaanpaa, A., Hirvensalo, M., Tammelin, T., & Raitakari, O. T. (2014). Tracking of physical activity from early childhood through youth into adulthood. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 46(5), 955-62.
3. 3. Adams, V., Reich, B., Uhlemann, M., & Niebauer, J. (2017). Molecular effects of exercise training in patients with cardiovascular disease: focus on skeletal muscle, endothelium, and myocardium. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 313(1), H72-H88.
4. 4. Halverstadt, A., Phares, D. A., Wilund, K. R., Goldberg, A. P., & Hagberg, J. M. (2007). Endurance exercise training raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lowers small low-density lipoprotein and very low-density lipoprotein independent of body fat phenotypes in older men and women. Metabolism, 56(4), 444-450.
5. 5. Alvarez-Pitti, J., Casajús-Mallén, J. A., Leis-Trabazo, R., Lucía, A., de Lara, D. L., Moreno-Aznar, L. A., & Rodríguez-Martínez, G. (2020). Exercise as medicine in chronic diseases during childhood and adolescence. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 92(3), 173-e1.
6. 6. Gardasevic, J., Bjelica, D., Vasiljevic, I., & Masanovic, B. (2020). Differences in body composition between young soccer players (U19) members of the best soccer clubs in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and North Macedonia. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports, 24(4), 175-180.
7. 7. Borga, M., West, J., Bell, J. D., Harvey, N. C., Romu, T., Heymsfield, S. B., & Leinhard, O. D. (2018). Advanced body composition assessment: from body mass index to body composition profiling. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 66(5), 1-9.
8. 8. Lukaski, H. C., Johnson, P. E., Bolonchuk, W. W., & Lykken, G. I. (1985). Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 41(4), 810-817.

9. 9. Ward, L. C. (2019). Bioelectrical impedance analysis for body composition assessment: reflections on accuracy, clinical utility, and standardisation. European journal of clinical nutrition, 73(2), 194-199.
10. 10. Dey, S.K., Bandyopadhyay A, Jana S, Chatterjee S. Comparison of single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold method for estimation of body fat % in young male Indian athletes. IJFHPE & IG. 2016; 3: 37-55.
11. 11. Ellis, K. J. (2000). Human body composition: in vivo methods. Physiological reviews, 80(2), 649-680.
12. 12. Campos, F. A. D., Daros, L. B., Mastrascusa, V., Dourado, A. C., & Stanganelli, L. C. R. (2009). Anthropometric profile and motor performance of junior badminton players. Brazilian journal of biomotricity, 3(2), 146-151.
13. 13. Faude, O., Meyer, T., Rosenberger, F., Fries, M., Huber, G., & Kindermann, W. (2007). Physiological characteristics of badminton match play. European journal of applied physiology, 100(4), 479-485.
14. 14. Güçlüöver, A., Demirkan, E., Kutlu, M., Ciğerci, A. E., & Esen, H. T. (2012). The comparison of some physical and physiological features of elite youth national and amateur badminton players.
15. 15. Cinthuja, P., Jayakody, J. A. O. A., Perera, M. P. M., Weerarathna, W. V. D. N., Nirosha, S. E., Indeewari, D. K. D. C., ... & Adikari, S. B. (2015). Physical fitness factors of school badminton players in Kandy district. European Journal of Sports and Exercise Science, 4(2), 14-25.
16. 16. Werkiani, M. E., Zakizadeh, B., Golsefidi, F. N., & Rahimi, M. (2012). Review of the effective talent identification factors of badminton for better teaching to success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 834-836.