İLKÖĞRETİM MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ STANDART OLMAYAN DÖRT İŞLEM PROBLEMLERİNE GERÇEKÇİ OLMAYAN YANITLAR VERMELERİNİN GERÇEKÇİ NEDENLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Problem türlerinden önemli bir problem türü de standart olmayan dört işlem problemleridir. Bu türden problemler önemli olmalarına rağmen, pek insan bu türden problemlerin çözümlerinde sorunlar yaşamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının standart olmayan problemlere verdikleri gerçekçi olmayan yanıtların nedenlerini ve yaşanılan soruna yönelik olarak çözüm önerilerini belirlemektir. 126 matematik öğretmen adayına 12 tane standart olmayan dört işlem problemi verilmiş ve bunları çözmeleri istenmiştir. Daha sonra bu öğretmen adayları arasından bu türden problemlere gerçekçi yanıtlar veremeyen 12 gönüllü öğretmen adayı ile de klinik görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara bakıldığında, okul kültürü, problem durumunu yorumlama, problem çözme etkinlikleri ile ilgili algı, matematiğe olan inanç, önceki deneyim ve Türkiye’deki sınav sistemi gibi nedenlerden dolayı standart olmayan dört işlem problemlerine gerçekçi olmayan yanıtlar verildiği belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlara bakıldığında gerçekçi problem çözememe nedenlerinin doğrudan problem çözme ile ilgili nedenler ve doğrudan problem çözme ile ilgili olmayan nedenler olduğu göze çarpmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adayı,problem çözme,standart olmayan dört işlem problemi

THE REALISTIC REASONS FOR UNREALISTIC SOLUTIONS OF PRE-SERVICE PRIMARY SCHOOL MATHEMATICS TEACHERS IN NON-STANDARD WORD PROBLEMS: THE EXAMPLE FROM TURKEY

Öz

Non-standard word problems are very imporatant mathematical problems. Although its importance many people have issues about that kind of problems. In this study it was aimed to find out the reasons of future mathematics teacher students unrealistic solutions in solving non-standard word problems and their suggestions for overcoming this issue. A paper-pencil test consisting of 12 non-standard problems were implemented 126 pre-service primary school mathematics teachers and based on their solutions, after main data collection task-based interviews were conducted with 12 teacher trainees volunteered. According to the findings of the study culture of schooling, interpretation of problem situation, perceptions of problem solving activities, beliefs in mathematics, previous experience and Turkish exam system were found to be the main reasons for not excluding reality while solving non-standard word problems. According to results of the study it can be concluded that the reasons for unrealistic solutions were related problem solving process and not related problem solving process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pre-service primary school mathematics teacher,problem solving,nonstandard word problem

Kaynakça

1. Artut, P. D. and Tarım, K. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının rutin olmayan sözel problemleri çözme süreçlerinin incelenmesi.(Investıgatıon of the prospective teachers’ problem solving process in the nonroutine word problems . Uludag University Education Faculty Journal 12, no.1: 53-70.
2. Chapman, O. (2003). Teachers' conceptions of mathematical word problems: A Basis for professional development. Paper presented at the 27th international group for the psychology of mathematics education conference held Jointly with the 25th PME-NA conference, July 13-18, in Honolulu, USA.
3. Gay, L.R., Mills, G.,E. and Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th Edt.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
4. Goldin,G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, ed. A. E. Kelly and R. A. Lesh, 517-545. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
5. Gravemeijer, K. (1997). Commentary solving word problems: A case of modelling?. Learning and Instruction 7, no.4:389-397.
6. Greer, B. (1993). The modelling perspective on wor(l)d problems. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12: 239-250.
7. Souviney, R. J. (1994). Learning to teach mathematics. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs: Macmillan Publishing Company.
8. Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E. and Lasure, S. (1994). Realistic considerations in mathematical modelling of school arithmetic word problems. Learning and Instruction. 4:273-294.

9. Verschaffel, L, De Corte,,E. and Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modelling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4: 339-359.
10. Wyndhamn, J. and Saljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning. A study of children’s mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4:361-382.
11. Yoshida, H., Verschaffel, L. and De Corte, E. (19979. Realistic considerations in solving problematic word problems: Do Japanese and Belgian children have the same difficulties? Learning and Instruction. 7, no.4:329-338.