Araştırma Makalesi

Effects of exposure to 2G/3G cell phone radiation on in vitro fertilization, subsequent development and sex distribution of bovine embryos

Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2 17 Ağustos 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

Effects of exposure to 2G/3G cell phone radiation on in vitro fertilization, subsequent development and sex distribution of bovine embryos

Abstract

During the thousand years of human evolution, the male to female ratio was practically equal, but it has recently changed in some way. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones on in vitro fertilization, embryo growth, and sex differentiation in cattle embryos. MII oocytes obtained from ovaries taken from slaughterhouse were used as research material. Gametes were exposed to electromagnetic fields by having a mobile phone inside the incubator that would periodically ring. On days 7 and 8, blastocyst development stages and embryo cleavage rates were evaluated. Additionally, the rates of cleavage for different time intervals after in vitro fertilization were noted. The sex determination of the embryos produced in vitro was determined by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). As a result, it was found that exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields could mainly reduce blastomere count, embryo diameter, and embryo quality rather than a having major adverse effect on the development of cattle embryos. Additionally, it was shown that exposure to electromagnetic fields appears to drastically reduce the chances of male survival.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Antonopoulos, A., Yang, B., Stamm, A., Heller, W.D., & Obe, G. (1995). Cytological effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on human lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research, 346 (3), 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(95)90047-0
  2. Arav, A., Aroyo, A., Yavin, S., & Roth, Z. (2008). Prediction of embryonic developmental competence by time-lapse observation and 'shortest-half' analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 17 (5), 669-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60314-8
  3. Auger, N., Joseph, D., Goneau, M., & Daniel, M. (2011). The relationship between residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines and adverse birth outcomes. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65 (1), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.097709
  4. Baste, V., Moen, B.E., Oftedal, G., Strand, L.A., Bjørge, L., & Mild, K.H. (2012). Pregnancy outcomes after paternal radiofrequency field exposure aboard fast patrol boats. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 54 (4), 431-438. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182445003
  5. Boni, R., Cuomo, A., & Tosti, E. (2002). Developmental potential in bovine oocytes is related to cumulus-oocyte complex grade, calcium current activity, and calcium stores. Biology of Reproduction, 66 (3), 836-842. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.3.836
  6. Buchner, K., Eger, H., & Hopper, J. (2014). Reduzierte Fruchtbarkeit und vermehrte Missbildungen unter Mobilfunkstrahlung- Dokumentation aus einem landwirtschaftlichen Nutzbetrieb. Umwelt - Medizin – Gesellschaft, 27 (3), 182-191.
  7. Gardner, D.K., Lane, M., & Schoolcraft, W.B. (2000). Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF. Human Reproduction, 15 (6), 9-23.
  8. Grant, G., Cadossi, R., & Steinberg, G. (1994). Protection against focal cerebral ischemia following exposure to a pulsed electromagnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics, 15 (3), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250150305

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hayvansal Üretim (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

30 Temmuz 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Ağustos 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Kasım 2022

Kabul Tarihi

11 Nisan 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Güzey, Y. Z., & Önal, A. G. (2023). Effects of exposure to 2G/3G cell phone radiation on in vitro fertilization, subsequent development and sex distribution of bovine embryos. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(2), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1205044

22740137731737513771 13774 15432 1813713775 14624 15016 i2or 1857924881