Determination of the effects of waterlogging stress on some morphological and physiological parameters in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)

Abstract

This study examined the morphological and physiological responses of the Çermik pepper genotype and the Mazamort pepper variety to waterlogging stress. Conducted in a climate chamber under controlled conditions, the experiment included 0(control), 5, 10, and 15 durations of waterlogging applications, with 3 replications and 10 plants per replication. The Çermik genotype showed the highest plant height (46.90 cm) on 15 day under waterlogging, while the Mazamort variety reached 46.93 cm on the same duration. The root collar diameter was highest in the Çermik genotype (5.63 mm) on 5th day of the control, and in the Mazamort variety (6.17 mm) during the 10th and 15th day control. The highest SPAD values were observed on 15th day of waterlogging for both genotypes, with Çermik at 45.37 SPAD and Mazamort at 45.63 SPAD. Fresh weights peaked at 35.90 g for Çermik and 35.95 g for Mazamort on day 15 of the control. Ion leakage patterns differed between the genotypes, with increased leakage in Çermik on 5th and 10th days of waterlogging, while Mazamort showed decreased leakage on the 10th and 15th day of the control. Overall, the Çermik genotype exhibited higher tolerance to waterlogging stress, making it a recommended choice for agriculture in flood-prone areas.

Keywords

• Pepper
• Çermik
• Mazamort
• Global warming

Su baskını stresinin biber bitkisinde (Capsicum annuum L.) bazı morfolojik ve fizyolojik parametreler üzerine etkisinin belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma, Çermik biber genotipi ile Mazamort biber çeşidinin su baskını stresine karşı morfolojik ve fizyolojik tepkilerini incelemiştir. Kontrollü koşullarda iklim odasında yürütülen deneyde 0(kontrol), 5, 10 ve 15 günlük su baskını uygulamaları yapılmış; her uygulama 3 tekerrürlü ve her tekerrürde 10 bitki olacak şekilde tasarlanmıştır. Çermik genotipi, 15 günlük su baskını uygulamasında 46.90 cm ile en yüksek bitki boyuna ulaşırken, Mazamort çeşidi aynı sürede 46.93 cm’ye ulaşmıştır. Kök boğazı çapı bakımından, Çermik genotipinde en yüksek değer 5. gün kontrol grubunda 5.63 mm olarak ölçülmüş; Mazamort çeşidinde ise 10. ve 15. gün kontrol uygulamalarında 6.17 mm’ye ulaşılmıştır. Yaprak klorofil içeriğini yansıtan SPAD değerleri, her iki genotipte de 15. gün su baskını uygulamasında en yüksek seviyeye ulaşmış; Çermik genotipinde 45.37 SPAD, Mazamort çeşidinde ise 45.63 SPAD olarak belirlenmiştir. Taze ağırlık değerleri, 15. gün kontrol uygulamasında Çermik için 35.90 g, Mazamort için ise 35.95 g ile en yüksek düzeyde kaydedilmiştir. İyon sızıntısı verileri genotipler arasında farklılık göstermiştir. Çermik genotipinde 5. ve 10. gün su baskını uygulamalarında iyon sızıntısında artış gözlenirken, Mazamort çeşidinde 10. ve 15. gün kontrol gruplarında sızıntı azalmıştır. Genel değerlendirme sonucunda, Çermik genotipinin su baskını stresine karşı daha yüksek tolerans gösterdiği belirlenmiş olup, bu özelliği sayesinde su baskını riski yüksek alanlarda tarımsal üretim için önerilen bir durum olarak öne çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biber
• Çermik
• Mazamort
• Küresel ısınma

Kaynakça

1. Achary, V.M.M., Ram, B., Manna, M., Datta, D., Bhatt, A., Reddy, M.K., & Agrawal P.K. (2017). Phosphite: A novel P fertilizer for weed management and pathogen control. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15, 1493-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12803
2. Arefian, M., & Shafaroudi, S. M. (2015). Physiological and gene expression analysis of extreme chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in response to salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37, 193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-015-1917-5 .
3. Ahmed, S., Nawata, E., Hosokawa, M., Domae, Y., & Sakuratani, T. (2002). Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mung bean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Science, 163, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00080-8 .
4. Akhtar, I., & Nazir, N. (2013). Effect of waterlogging and drought stress in plants. Annual Review Phytopathology, 18, 37–66. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijwres.2013.2.2.11125
5. Anonymous (2023). Biber (Capsicum annum L.) yetiştiriciliği. https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/alata/Belgeler/Digerbelgeler/BiberYeti%C5%9Ftiricili%C4%9FiDKele%C5%9F.pdf
6. Anonymous (2025a). https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/35624166/klasmann-peat-substrates-product-information-foremostco
7. Anonymous (2025b). https://www.perlite.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/perlite-gradation-peat-perlite-mixtures.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
8. Arora, R., Pitchay, D. S., & Bearce, B. C. (1998). Water-stress induced heat tolerance in geranium leaf tissues: A possible linkage through stress proteins? Physiologia Plantarum, 103, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1030104.x

9. Ashraf, M., & Rehman, H. (1999). Interactive effects of nitrate and long-term waterlogging on growth, water relations, and gaseous exchange properties of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Science, 144, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00055-2 .
10. Aydoğan, Ç., & Turhan, E. (2012). Su basması stresi ve geri kazanım uygulamasının bazı taze fasulye genotipleri üzerine etkileri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, (1), 41–51.
11. Bailey-Serres, J., & Voesenek, L. A. (2008). Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752 .
12. Collaku, A., & Harrison, S. A. (2002). Losses in wheat due to waterlogging. Crop Science, 42, 444–450. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.4440 .
13. Colmer, T. D., & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. (2009). Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Functional Plant Biology, 36, 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09144 .
14. Çelik, G. (2010). Bazı taze fasulye genotiplerinde kök bölgesinde oluşan su fazlalığına toleransın belirlenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
15. Çelik, G., & Turhan, E. (2011). Genotypic variation in growth and physiological responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings to flooding. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(38), 7372–7380.
16. Dennis, E. S., Dolferus, R., Ellis, M., Rahman, M., Wu, Y., Hoeren, F. U., & Peacock, W. J. (2000). Molecular strategies for improving waterlogging tolerance in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51(342), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.342.89
17. Else, M. A., Janowiak, F., Atkinson, C. J., & Jackson, M. B. (2009). Root signals and stomatal closure in relation to photosynthesis, chlorophyll a fluorescence and adventitious rooting of flooded tomato plants. Annals of Botany, 103, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn208 .
18. Huang, B. R., Johnson, J. W., Nesmith, S., & Bridges, D. C. (1994). Growth, physiological and anatomical responses of two wheat genotypes to waterlogging and nutrient supply. Journal of Experimental Botany, 45(271), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.2.193 .
19. Kozlowski, T. T. (1984). Plant responses to flooding of soil. Bioscience, 34(3), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/1309751 .
20. Kumutha, D., Ezhilmathi, K., Sairam, R. K., Srivastava, G. C., Deshmukh, P. S., & Meena, R. C. (2009). Waterlogging induced oxidative stress and antioxidant activity in pigeonpea genotypes. Biologia Plantarum, 53(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-009-0011-5 .
21. Li, C., Jiang, D., Wollenweber, B., Li, Y., Dai, T., & Cao, W. (2011). Waterlogging pretreatment during vegetative growth improves tolerance to waterlogging after anthesis in wheat. Plant Science, 180(5), 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.01.009 .
22. Luo, F.-L., Nagel, K. A., Scharr, H., Zeng, B., Schurr, U., & Matsubara, S. (2011). Recovery dynamics of growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate accumulation after de-submergence: a comparison between two wetland plants showing escape and quiescence strategies. Annals of Botany, 107, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq212 .
23. Mensah, J. K., Obadoni, B. O., Eruotor, P. G., & Onome-Irieguna, F. (2006). Simulated flooding and drought effects on germination, growth, and yield parameters of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 5(13), 1249–1253. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB06.139 .
24. Nakayama, N., & Komatsu, S. (2008). Water uptake by seeds in yellow-seeded soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) cultivars with contrasting imbibition behaviors. Plant Production Science, 11(4), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.11.415 .
25. Nishiuchi, S., Yamauchi, T., Takahashi, H., Kotula, L., & Nakazono, M. (2012). Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice. Rice, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-2 .
26. Olgun, M., Kumlay, A.M., Adıgüzel, M.C., & Çağlar, A. (2008). The effect of waterlogging in wheat (T. aestivum L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B–Soil and Plant Science, 58(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710701794024 .
27. Panozzo, A., Dal Cortivo, C., Ferrari, M., Vicelli, B., Varotto, S., & Vamerali, T. (2019). Morphological changes and expressions of AOX1A, CYP81D8, and putative PFP genes in a large set of commercial maize hybrids under extreme waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00062 .
28. Parelle, J., Brendel, O., Bodénès, C., Berveiller, D., Dizengremel, P., Jolivet, Y., & Dreyer, E. (2006). Differences in morphological and physiological responses to waterlogging between two sympatric oak species (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl., Quercus robur L.). Annals of Forest Science, 63(8), 849–859. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006068
29. Pociecha, E., Koscielniak, J., & Filek, W. (2008). Effect of root flooding and stage of development on the growth and photosynthesis of field bean (Vicia faba L. minor). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 30, 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-008-0151-9 .
30. Rao, R., Li, Y., Bryan, H.H., Reed, S.T., & D’Ambrosio, F. (2002). Assessment of foliar sprays to alleviate flooding injury in corn (Zea mays L.). Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 115, 208–211.
31. Samad, A., Meisner, C.A., Saifuzzaman, M., & Van Ginkel, M. (2001). Waterlogging tolerance. In: Reynolds, M.P., Ortiz, J.I., Monasterio, A., & McNab, A. (Eds.), Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding (pp. 136–144). CIMMYT, Mexico.
32. Sanatombi, K. (2025). A comprehensive review on sustainable strategies for valorization of pepper waste and their potential application. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 24(1), e70118.
33. Singer, S.M., Helmy, Y.I., Karas, A.N., & AbouHadid, A.F. (1996). Growth and development of bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under water-stress. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, 31, 241–250. http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=CI020849 .
34. Tsukahara, H., & Kozlowski, T.T. (1986). Effect of flooding and temperature regime on growth and stomal resistance of Betula platyphylla var. japonica seedlings. Plant and Soil, 92(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/14.3.251 .
35. Türkeş, M. (2001). Küresel iklimin korunması, iklim değişikliği çerçeve sözleşmesi ve Türkiye. Tesisat Mühendisliği, TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası, 61, 14–29. İstanbul.
36. Villarreal-Navarrete, A., Fischer, G., Melgarejo, L. M., Correa, G., & Hoyos-Carvajal, L. (2014). Growth response of the cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) to waterlogging stress and Fusarium oxysporum infection. In XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014), 1178, pp. 161–168.
37. Wang, W., Vinocur, B., Shoseyov, O., & Altman, A. (2004). Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science, 9(5), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006 .
38. Xiao, Y., Jie, Z., Wang, M., Lin, G., & Wang, W. (2009). Leaf and stem anatomical responses to periodical waterlogging in simulated tidal floods in mangrove (Avicennia marina) seedlings. Aquatic Botany, 91, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.07.001 .
39. Yang, W. C., Lin, K. H., Wu, C. W., Chang, Y. J., & Chang, Y. S. (2020). Effects of waterlogging with different water resources on plant growth and tolerance capacity of four herbaceous flowers in a bioretention basin. Water, 12(6), 1619.
40. Yetisir, H., Caliskan, M., Soylu, S., & Sakar, M. (2006). Some physiological and growth responses of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] grafted onto Lagenaria siceraria to flooding. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.06.010 .
41. Yiu, J. C., Liu, C. W., Kuo, C. T., Tseng, M. J., Lai, Y. S., & Lai, W. J. (2008). Changes in antioxidant properties and their relationship to paclobutrazol-induced flooding tolerance in Welsh onion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88, 1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3209 .
42. Zheng, C., Jiang, D., Liu, F., Dai, T., Jing, Q., & Cao, W. (2009). Effects of salt and waterlogging stresses and their combination on leaf photosynthesis, chloroplast ATP synthesis, and antioxidant capacity in wheat. Plant Science, 176(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.015 .
43. Zhou, J., Qi, A., Zhang, Y., Wan, S., & Qin, P. (2012). Adventitious root growth and relative physiological responses to waterlogging in the seedlings of seashore mallow (Kosteletzkya virginica), a biodiesel plant. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(1), 73–80.