Açıkta yetiştirilen böğürtlen çeşitlerinde biyostimülant uygulamalarının bitki, verim ve bazı geleneksel meyve kalite özellikleri üzerindeki etkisi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 938 - 951, 31.12.2025

Onur Gökçek , Kazim Gunduz

https://doi.org/10.37908/mkutbd.1771822

Öz

Bu araştırma 2021-2022 yetiştirme sezonunda Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (MTÜ), Ziraat Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümünde, açık alanda dört böğürtlen çeşidi (Chester, Jumbo, Bursa 2 ve Navaho) ile kontrol, yapraktan Kitosan (CHI), Glisin betain (GB); (Y_CHI-GB), topraktan Myo-inisitol (MI), yapraktan Kitosan (CHI) ve Glisin betain (GB); (T_MI+Y_CHI-GB), topraktan myo-inisitol (MI); (T_MI), yapraktan Kitosan (CHI); Y_CHI, yapraktan Glisin betain (GB); (Y_GB) uygulamaları kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada böğürtlen çeşitlerinde bitki başına verim, bitkisel özellikler ile bazı meyve kalite özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bitki başına verim en yüksek uygulamalardan Y_CHI-GB ve T_MI+Y_CHI-GB’den alınırken (1418.8 ve 1310.8 g/bitki), çeşitlerden Navaho’dan (1508.1 g/bitki) elde edilmiştir. Meyve ağırlığı bakımından çeşitlerden Jumbo, SÇKM içerikleri bakımından Navaho çeşidi ön plana çıkmıştır. Çalışmada biyostimülant uygulamalarının bariz bir şekilde kontrol uygulamasından daha iyileştirici özelliğe sahip olduğu dikkati çekmiştir. İncelenen özellikler bakımından uygulamalar toplam varyansın % 53,4’ünü oluştururken, çeşitler % 33,5’ini karşılamıştır. Çalışmada açıkta yetiştirilen böğürtlenlerde incelenen özellikler üzerinde özellikle uygulamalar ve çeşit etkinliğinin olduğu belirgindir. Sonuçlar, bitki ve meyve kalite özellikleri üzerine uygun çeşit ve biyostimülant kullanımı ile abiyotik stres şartlarının minimize edilebileceği aynı zamanda meyve kalite kaybını önlemek bakımından da önemli olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Böğürtlen , Biyostimülant , Meyve kalite , Bireysel şeker , Üzümsü meyve

Proje Numarası

2021/11

Effects of biostimulant applications on plant, yield, and some traditional fruit quality characteristics in some blackberry varieties grown in open fields

Öz

This research was carried out in the 2021-2022 growing season in the Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Turgut Ozal University (MTU), Malatya in the open field using four blackberry cultivars (Chester, Jumbo, Bursa 2 and Navaho) with control, foliar Chitosan (CHI), Glycine betaine (GB); (Y_CHI-GB), soil Myo-inisitol (MI), foliar Chitosan (CHI) and Glycine betaine (GB); (T_MI+Y_CHI-GB), soil myo-inisitol (MI); (T_MI), foliar Chitosan (CHI); Y_CHI, foliar Glycine betaine (GB); (Y_GB). In the study, yield per plant, vegetative characteristics and some fruit quality traits of blackberry cultivars were evaluated.
The highest yield per plant was obtained from the treatments Y_CHI-GB and T_MI+Y_CHI-GB (1418.8 and 1310.8 g/plant), while the Navaho variety (1508.1 g/plant) was obtained. Jumbo was the most prominent variety in terms of fruit weight, and Navaho was the most prominent variety in terms of TSS content. The study noted that biostimulant treatments were significantly more effective than the control treatment. Treatments accounted for 53.4% of the total variance in the studied traits, while cultivars accounted for 33.5%. The study clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of treatments and cultivars on the traits examined in open-field-grown blackberries. The results suggest that the use of appropriate cultivars and biostimulants on plant and fruit quality can minimize abiotic stress conditions and is also important for preventing fruit quality loss.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Blackberry , Biostimulant , Fruit quality , Individual sugar , Berry fruit

Etik Beyan

This article does not require ethical approval because it does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Destekleyen Kurum

BAP 2021/11

Proje Numarası

2021/11

Teşekkür

This study was supported by Malatya Turgut Ozal University BAP unit as a Postgraduate Thesis project numbered 2021/11.

Kaynakça

• Ağaoğlu, Y.S., Eyduran, P.S., & Eyduran, E. (2007). Comparison of some pomological characteristics of blackberry cultivars grown under Ayaş conditions. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, 13 (1), 69-74.
• Akbulut, M., Kaplan, N., Macit, İ., & Özdemir, C. (2003). Determination of suitable blackberry cultivars for Samsun Çarşamba Plain conditions. In Proceedings of the National Kiwi and Berry Fruits Symposium (pp. 357-360). Ordu, Turkey.
• Altunbaş, F., & Pırlak, L. (2020). Adaptation of some blackberry varieties in Konya ecological conditions. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 34 (1), 1-6.
• Avcı, S. (2013). Adaptation of some blackberry cultivars to Malatya ecological conditions (Master’s thesis). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Science, Department of Horticulture.
• Cangi, R., & İslam, A. (2003). Adaptation of some blackberry cultivars to the ecological conditions of Ordu. In Proceedings of the National Kiwi and Berry Fruits Symposium. Ordu, Turkey.
• Demirsoy, L., Demirsoy, H., Bilgener, Ş., Öztürk, A., Ersoy, B., Çelikel, G., & Balcı, G. (2006). Blackberry cultivar adaptation studies conducted in Samsun. In Proceedings of the 2nd National Small Fruits Symposium (pp. 237-244). Tokat, Turkey.
• Esmek, İ., Kızılcı, G., Karadoğan, B., & Karadoğan, N.N. (2011). Adaptation of some blackberry cultivars to the Erzincan region. [HTML document].
• Finn, C.E., & Clark, J.R. (2017). Cultivar development and selection. In Blackberries and their hybrids (pp. 63-92). Springer.
• Gerçekçioğlu, R. (1999). A study on the selection of naturally grown blackberries (Rubus fructicosus L.) in the Tokat region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23, 977-981.
• Göktaş, A., Demirtaş, İ., & Atasoy, A. (2006). Adaptation of some blackberry and currant cultivars to the Eğirdir region. In Proceedings of the 2nd National Small Fruits Symposium (pp. 151-156). Tokat, Turkey.
• Gündüz, K., & Özbay, H. (2018). The effects of genotype and altitude of the growing location on physical, chemical, and phytochemical properties of strawberry. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42 (3), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1707-66
• Gündüz, K., & Özdemir, E. (2014). The effects of genotype and growing conditions on antioxidant capacity, phenolic compounds, organic acids, and individual sugars of strawberry. Food Chemistry, 155, 298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.01.055
• Hummer, K.E., & Janick, J. (2009). Rosaceae: Taxonomy, economic importance, genomics. In K.M. Folta & S.E. Gardiner (Eds.), Genetics and genomics of Rosaceae (pp. 1-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77491-6_1
• İslam, A., Çelik, H., Aydın, E., & Yıldız, A. (2009). Adaptation of some blackberry cultivars to the ecological conditions of Hayrat (Trabzon). In International Conference on Organic Agriculture in Scope of Environmental Problems (February 3-7). Famagusta, Cyprus.
• Kurt, H., Turan, A., & Ruşen, M. (2003). Adaptation of some raspberry and blackberry cultivars to the ecological conditions of Giresun. In Proceedings of the National Kiwi and Small Fruits Symposium (pp. 365-371). Ordu, Turkey.
• Özdemir, E., Ayanoğlu, H., Gündüz, K., & Bayazıt, S. (2005). Determination of vegetative and fruit characteristics of some thornless blackberry genotypes in Hatay (Turkey). International Journal of Fruit Science, 5 (2), 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J492v05n02_08
• Strik, B.C., Clark, J.R., Finn, C.E., & Bañados, M.P. (2007). Worldwide blackberry production. HortTechnology, 17 (2), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.17.2.205
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK). (2024). Crop production statistics. https://tuik.gov.tr
• Türemiş, N. (2002). Cultivated blackberry growing. Ekin Bulletin, 8, 10-12.
• Yılmaz, K.U., Zengin, Y., Ercisli, S., Serce, S., Gunduz, K., Sengul, M., & Asma, B.M. (2009). Some selected physico-chemical characteristics of wild and cultivated blackberry fruits (Rubus fruticosus L.) from Turkey. Romanian Biotechnological Letters, 14 (1), 4152-4163.
• Zhao, H., Wu, Y., Wu, W., Li, W., & Jin, Y. (2023). Screening and evaluation of excellent blackberry cultivars and strains based on nutritional quality, antioxidant properties, and genetic diversity. Plants, 12 (16), Article 2939. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12162939