İki parmak darı (Eleusine coracana L.) genotipinin kuraklığa olan tepkilerinin fide devresinde incelenmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, agronomik özellikler yönünden ümitvar olan iki parmak darı (Eleusine coracana L.) genotipinin (USA-2022/97-97 ve USA-2022/81-81) farklı kuraklık seviyeleri altında çimlenme ve erken dönem fide gelişimi üzerine tepkileri incelenmiştir. Kuraklık stresi, polietilen glikol (PEG-6000) kullanılarak 0 (kontrol), -0.4, -0.8 ve -1.2 MPa osmotik potansiyellerinde oluşturulmuştur. Çimlendirme işlemleri tesadüf parsellerinde bölünmüş parseller deneme desenine göre 5 tekerrürde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Varyans analiz sonuçlarına göre çimlenme gücü ve sürgün kuru ağırlığı hariç tüm özelliklerde genotip (G), uygulama (U) ve G × U etkileşimi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Artan kuraklık şiddeti, her iki genotipte de çimlenme performansı, fide büyümesi ve biyokütle birikimini önemli ölçüde azaltmıştır. Özellikle -1.2 MPa stres seviyesinde çimlenme gücü %39’a kadar düşmüş; sürgün ve kök uzunluğu ile yaş ve kuru ağırlıklarda %50’den fazla azalma meydana gelmiştir. Genotipler karşılaştırıldığında, USA-2022/97-97 genotipi hafif-orta düzey stres koşullarında daha yüksek çimlenme, sürgün ve kök gelişimi değerleri sergileyerek morfolojik açıdan daha stabil bir performans göstermiştir. Kök uzunluğu ve kök biyokütlesinin stres koşullarında daha iyi korunması, kuraklığa adaptasyonda kök sisteminin belirleyici rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, parmak darısında kuraklık toleransının genotipe özgü olduğunu ve erken dönem çimlenme ile fide gelişimine ait fizyolojik ve morfolojik özelliklerin, genotipik farklılıkların ortaya çıkarılmasında seçim kriterleri olarak kullanılabileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çimlenme
• Kuraklık
• Parmak darı
• PEG solüsyonu

Examining in the seedling period of the responses to drought of two finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) genotypes

Öz

In this study, the responses of two promising finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) genotypes (USA-2022/97-97 ve USA-2022/81-81) to different drought stress levels during germination and early seedling growth were investigated. Drought stress was induced using polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) at osmotic potentials of 0 (control), -0.4, -0.8, and -1.2 MPa. Germination experiments were conducted with five replications according to a split-plot experimental design arranged in a randomized complete block design. According to the results of the analysis of variance, genotype (G), treatment (T), and G × T interaction effects were statistically significant for all traits, except for germination percentage and shoot dry weight. Increasing drought severity significantly reduced germination performance, seedling growth, and biomass accumulation in both genotypes. At the highest stress level (-1.2 MPa), germination percentage decreased by up to 39%, while shoot and root length as well as fresh and dry weights were reduced by more than 50%. Comparative evaluation of the genotypes revealed that USA-2022/97-97 exhibited higher germination capacity, shoot growth, and root development under mild to moderate stress conditions, indicating greater morphological stability. The better maintenance of root length and root biomass under drought stress highlights the crucial role of the root system in drought adaptation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Germination
• Drought
• Finger millet
• PEG solution

Kaynakça

1. Ajithkumar, I. P., & Panneerselvam, R. (2014). ROS scavenging system, osmotic maintenance, pigment and growth status of Panicum sumatrense roth. under drought stress. Cell Biochem Biophys, 68(3), 587-95, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-013-9746-x
2. Anonymous, (1996). The Rules: International Rules for Seed Testing: ISTA, Zürih, İsviçre, https://www.seedtest.org/en/publications/international-rules-seed-testing.html Erişim tarihi: 16 Ağustos 2025
3. Anonymous, (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ Erişim tarihi: 16 Ağustos 2025
4. Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2005). Pre-sowing seed treatment—A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Advances in Agronomy, 88, 223-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(05)88006-X
5. Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2007). Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59(2), 206-216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
6. Bagale, S., Rebecca Oiza, E., & Linda Yuya, G. (2025). An overview of root traits and ideotypes for improving crop productivity and addressing agronomic challenges. Rhizosphere, 34, 101105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101105
7. Bandyopadhyay, T., Muthamilarasan, M., & Prasad, M. (2017). Millets for next generation climate-smart agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1266, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01266
8. Bartwal, A., & Arora, S. (2017). Drought stress-induced enzyme activity and mdar and apx gene expression in tolerant and susceptible genotypes of Eleusine coracana (L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 53(1), 41-49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9787-0

9. Bhatt, D., Negi, M., Sharma, P., Saxena, S. C., Dobriyal, A. K., & Arora, S. (2011). Responses to drought induced oxidative stress in five finger millet varieties differing in their geographical distribution. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 17, 347-353, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-011-0084-4
10. Bilgili, D., Atak, M., & Mavi, K. (2018). Bazı ekmeklik buğday genotiplerinde NaCI stresinin çimlenme ve fide gelişimine etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 85-96, https://izlik.org/JA97LH63MN
11. Campos, H., Cooper, M., Habben, J. E., Edmeades, G. O., & Schussler, J. R. (2004). Improving drought tolerance in maize: A view from industry. Field Crops Research, 90(1), 19-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003
12. Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F. W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., & Stanca, A. M. (2008). Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research, 105(1–2), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.0047
13. Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought—From genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30(3), 239-264, https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076
14. Comas, L. H., Becker, S. R., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013). Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 442, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00442
15. Dağtekin, Z., Hatipoğlu, R., & Yücel, C. (2020). Çukurova koşullarında bazı parmak darısı (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gertn) getotiplerinin ot verimi ve ot kaliteleri üzerine bir araştırma. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4), 793-807. https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol4iss4pp79-805
16. Devi, P. B., Vijayabharathi, R., Sathyabama, S., Malleshi, N. G., & Priyadarisini, V. B. (2014). Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(6), 1021–1040, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0584-9
17. Dhanda, S. S., Sethi, G. S., & Behl, R. K. (2004). Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190(1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00592.x
18. Farooq, M., Hussain, M., & Siddique, K. H. M. (2014). Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 33(4), 331-349, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.875291
19. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009). Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1), 185-212, https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
20. Fathi, A., & Tari, D. B. (2016). Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. International Journal of Life Sciences, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14509
21. Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004). Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biology, 6(3), 269-279, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820867
22. Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
23. Goron, T.L. and Raizada, M. N. (2015). Genetic diversity and genomic resources available for the small millet crops to accelerate a New Green Revolution. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00157
24. Hatfield, J. L., & Dold, C. (2019). Water-use efficiency: Advances and challenges in a changing climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00103
25. Hema, R., Vemanna, R. S., Sreeramulu, S., Reddy, C. P., Senthil-Kumar, M., & Udayakumar, M. (2014). Stable Expression of mtlD gene ımparts multiple stress tolerance in finger millet. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99110, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099110
26. Hittalmani, S., Mahesh, H., Shirke, M. D., Biradar, H., Uday, G., Aruna, Y., & et al. (2017). Genome and transcriptome sequence of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) provides insights into drought tolerance and nutraceutical properties. BMC Genomics, 18, 465, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3850-z
27. İstanbulluoğlu, A., Başer, İ., & Moray, S. (2023). Deficit irrigation programs effects on yield in millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in thrace region conditions. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 26(2), 307-313. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1007783
28. Jaleel, C. A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq, M., Al-Juburi, H. J., Somasundaram, R., & Panneerselvam, R. (2009). Drought stress in plants: A review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11(1), 100-105.
29. Kadam, N. N., Tamilselvan, A., Lawas, L. M. F., Quinones, C., Bahuguna, R. N., Thomson, M. J., Dingkuhn, M., Muthurajan, R., Paul, C. S., Xinyou, Y., & Jagadish, K. S. V. (2015). Genetic control of plasticity in root morphology and anatomy of rice in response to water deficit. Plant Physiology, 174(4), 2302-2315, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00500
30. Kang, J., Peng, Y., & Xu, W. (2022). Crop root responses to drought stress: molecular mechanisms, nutrient regulations, and ınteractions with microorganisms in the rhizosphere. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(16), 9310, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169310
31. Keba, W., Tolemariam, T., & Mohammed, A. (2022). Evaluation of grain/seed yield and yield components of finger millet and three vetch species intercropped at various seeding ratios at Bako, Ethiopia. Advances in Agriculture, 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1608499
32. Krishna, S. S., Reddy, Y. A. N., & Kumar, R. L. R. (2021). Assessment of traits for grain yield under drought in finger millet. Plant Physiology Reports, 26(1), 84-94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-020-00561-1
33. Kumar, A., Kaur, A., Gupta, K., Gat, Y., & Kumar, V. (2021). Assessment of germination time of finger millet for value addition in functional foods. Current Science, 120(2), 406-413, https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v120/i2/406-413
34. Liaqat, W., Barutçular, C., Altaf, M.T., & Baloch, F.S. (2025). Integrating millets into modern agriculture: a strategic pathway to advancing sustainability, climate resilience, and nutritional security. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 13(2), 529-538. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i2.529-538.7273
35. Lobell, D. B., Hammer, G. L., Chenu, K., Zheng, B., McLean, G., & Chapman, S. C. (2015). The shifting influence of drought and heat stress for crops in northeast Australia. Global Change Biology, 21(11), 4115-27, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13022
36. Madhavilatha, L., & Subba Rao, M. (2015). Performance of elite finger millet cultures for grain yield, yield influencing traits and blast tolerance. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 5(1), 111-114, https://doi.org/10.5555/20153179416
37. Michel, B. E., & Kaufmann, M. R., 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 51(5), 914-916, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.51.5.914
38. Mishra, A. K., & Singh, V. P. (2010). A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391(1-2), 202-216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012
39. Mude, L. N., Mondam, M., Vijayalakshmi, G., Sivakumar Pinjari, O. B., Reddy, Y.A.N., & Khan, P. S. S. V. (2020). Morpho-physiological and biochemical changes in finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] under drought stress. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 26(11), 2151-2171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00909-9
40. Mukami, A., Ngetich, A., Mweu, C., Oduor, R. O., Muthangya, M., & Mbinda, W. M. (2019). Differential characterization of physiological and biochemical responses during drought stress in finger millet varieties. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 25(4), 837-846, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00679-z
41. Muthamilarasan, M., & Prasad, M. (2015). Advances in setaria genomics for genetic improvement of cereals and bioenergy grasses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 128(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2399-3
42. Mwangoe, J., Kimurto, P., & Ojwang, P. (2022). Identification of drought tolerant finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) lines based on morpho-physiological characteristics and grain yield. African Journal of Plant Science, 16, 47-60, https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2022.2225
43. Nirmalakumari, A., & Vetriventhan, M. (2010). Characterization of foxtail millet germplasm collections for yieldcontributing traits. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(2), 140-147.
44. Ozturk, A., Erdem, E., Aydin, M., & Karaoglu, M. M. (2021). The effects of drought after anthesis on the grain quality of bread wheat depend on drought severity and drought resistance of the variety. Cereal Research Communications, 50, 105-116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-021-00155-z
45. Rakkammal, K., Maharajan, T., Shriram, R. N., Jeevan Ram, P. S., Ceasar, S. A., & Ramesh, M. (2023). Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) genotypes exposed to short-term drought stress induced by PEG-6000. South African Journal of Botany, 155, 45-59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2023.01.053
46. Ramakrishna, C., Singh, S., Raghavendrarao, S., & et al. (2018). The membrane tethered transcription factor EcbZIP17 from finger millet promotes plant growth and enhances tolerance to abiotic stresses. Scientific Reports, 8, 2148, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19766-4
47. Sankar, B., Jaleel, C. A., Manivannan, P., Kishorekumar, A., Somasundaram, R., & Panneerselvam, R. (2007). Drought-induced biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. Acta Botanica Croatica, 66(1), 43-56.
48. Sehgal, A., Sita, K., Siddique, K. H. M., Kumar, R., Bhogireddy, S., Varshney, R. K., Hanumantha Rao, B., Nair, R. M., Prasad, P. V. V., & Nayyar, H. (2018). Drought or/and heat-stress effects on seed filling in food crops: Impacts on functional biochemistry, seed yields, and nutritional quality. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01705
49. Seki, M., Umezawa, T., Urano, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2007). Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 10(3), 296-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.014
50. Sharma, P. C., Singh, D., Sehgal, D., Singh, G., Hash, C. T., & et al. (2014). Further evidence that a terminal drought tolerance QTL of pearl millet is associated with reduced salt uptake. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 102, 48-57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.01.013
51. Sharma, T., Thakur, N., Sharma, J., & Kumari, M. (2023). Millets: for food and nutritional security. Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews Journal, 421-430, https://doi.org/10.58321/AATCCReview.2023.11.04.421
52. Sharp, R. E., Poroyko, V., Hejlek, L. G., Spollen, W. G., Springer, G. K., Bohnert, H. J., & Nguyen, H. T. (2004). Root growth maintenance during water deficits: Physiology to functional genomics. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(407), 2343-2351, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh276
53. Shoaib, M., Banerjee, B. P., Hayden, M., Kant, S. (2022). Roots' drought adaptive traits in crop ımprovement. Plants (Basel), 11(17), 2256, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172256
54. Tardieu, F. (2012). Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: Just design the right drought scenario. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(1), 25-31, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err269
55. Upadhyaya, H. D., Dwivedi, S. L., Sharma, S., & et al. (2014). Enhancement of the use and impact of germplasm in crop improvement. Plant Genetic Resources, 12(1), 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262114000458
56. Upadhyaya, H. D., Ramesh, S., Shivali, S., Singh, S. K., Varshney, S. K., Sarma, N. D. R. K., Ravishankar, C. R., Narasimhudu, Y., Reddy, V. G., Sahrawat, K. L., Dhanalakshmi, T. N., Mgonja, M. A., Parzies, H. K., Gowda, C. L. L., & Singh, S. (2011). Genetic diversity for grain nutrients contents in a core collection of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) germplasm. Field Crop Research, 121, 42-52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.017
57. Vadez, V., Hash, T., Bidinger, F. R., & Kholova, J. (2012). II 1.5 Phenotyping pearl millet for adaptation to drought. Frontiers in Physiology, 3, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00386
58. Varshney, R. K., Singh, V. K., Kumar, A., Powell, W., & Sorrells, M. E. (2018). Can genomics deliver climate-change ready crops. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 45, 205-2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.007
59. Varshney, R., Shi, C., Thudi, M., & et al. (2017). Pearl millet genome sequence provides a resource to improve agronomic traits in arid environments. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 969-976, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3943
60. Venuprasad, R., Lafitte, H. R., & Atlin, G. N. (2012). Response to direct selection for grain yield under drought stress in rice. Crop Science, 47(1), 285-293. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.03.0181
61. Wambi, W., Otienno, G., Tumwesigye, W., & Mulumba, J. (2021). Genetic and genomic resources for finger millet improvement: opportunities for advancing climate-smart agriculture. Journal of Crop Improvement, 35(2), 204–233, https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2020.1808133
62. Wilhite, D., & Pulwarty, R.S. (2017). Drought and Water Crises: Integrating Science, Management, and Policy, Second Edition (1st ed.).CRC Press, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1201/b22009
63. Yamaguchi, M., & Sharp, R. E. (2010). Complexity and coordination of root growth at low water potentials: Recent advances from transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(4), 590-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02064.x
64. Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Gong, Z., & Zhu, J. K. (2022). Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nature Reviews Genetics, 23, 104-119, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0