BÖLGELER ÜZERİNE TEZLER

Öz

Yazıda yeni bölgeci yazının genel bir özetinin yanısıra eleştirel bir değerlendirilmesi sunulmaktadır. Yeni bölgecilik yazınının farklı kurumsal kökenlerden gelen bir yazın olduğu, muğlak bir kavramsallaştırmasının olduğu, bilimsel olmaktan çok politik bir programa sahip olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Yeni bölgecilik yazınındaki hakim ama birbiriyle çatışan öğeler olan şebeke/ ağbağ ve ölçek kavramsallaştırmalarının ulus-devleti yadsımakta ortak oldukları ancak her ikisinin de toplumsal olaylara tek taraflı olarak baktıkları ve uzamsal olanın indirgemeci bir bakışını önerdikleri söylenmektedir. Yazı uzamsal konuların daha fazla çalışılması gerektiği tespiti ile bitmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeni bölgecilik
• ağbağ
• ölçek
• uzam
• küreyerelleşme

Kaynakça

1. Alonso William, “Deindustrialization and Regional Policy”, Deindustrialization and Regional Economic Transformation: The Experience of the United States, (Ed. Lloyd Rodwin - Hidehiko Sazanami), Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1989, s. 221-37.
2. Amin Ash, “Regions Unbound: Towards a New Politics of Place”, Geografiska Annaler B, 86:1, 2004, s. 33-44.
3. Amin Ash ve Nigel Thrift, “Neo-Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16:4, 1992, s. 571-87.
4. Amin Ash, Doreen Massey ve Nigel Thrift, The ‘Regional Problem’ and the Spatial Grammar of British Politics, 2003, http://eprints.dur.ac.uk/archive/00000674/01/Amin_regional.pdf
5. Anderson James ve Liam O’Dowd “Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance”, Regional Studies, 33:7, 1999, s.593-604.
6. Ansell Chris, “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe”, Governance, 13:3, 2000, s. 303-33.
7. Blatter Joachim, “Debordering the World of States? Towards a Multi-Level System in Europe and a Multi-Polity System in North America?”, European Journal of International Relations, 7:2, 2001, s. 175-209.
8. Blatter Joachim, “Beyond Hierarchies and Networks: Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces”, Governance, 16:4, 2003, s. 503-26.

9. Boyer Robert, “Capital-Labor Relations in OECD Countries: From the Fordist Golden Age to Contrasted National Trajectories”, Capital, the State and Labor: A Global Perspective, (Ed. J, Schor - J, Il-You), Aldershot, Edward Elgar, 1995.
10. Brenner Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.
11. Castells Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1996.
12. Collinge Chris, “The Difference between Society and Space: Nested Scales and the Returns to Spatial Fetishism”, Environment and Planning: Society and Space, 23:2, 2005, s. 189-206.
13. Cooke Philip, “Policy Networks, Innovation Networks and Regional Policy: A Review of the Literature and an Example from South Wales”, Policy Networks and European Structural Funds,
14. (Ed. Hubert Heinelt - Randall Smith), Avebury, Aldershot, 1996, s. 26-45.
15. Ganster Paul, Alan Sweedler, James Scott ve Wolf Dieter Eberwein, Borders and Border Regions in Europe and North America, San Diego, San Diego State University Press, 1997.
16. Hadjimichalis Costis, “The End of Third Italy as We Knew it?”, Antipode, 38:1, 2006, s.82-106.
17. Held David ve Anthony McGrew, Küresel Dönüşümler, Ankara, Phoenix Yayınları, 2008.
18. Hudson Ray, “Fuzzy Concepts and Sloppy Thinking: Reflections on Recent Developments in Critical Regional Studies”, Regional Studies, 37:6&7, 2003, s.741-46.
19. Kohler-Koch Beate, “European Networks and Ideas: Changing National Policies”, European Integration Online Papers, 6:6, 2002, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2002-006a.htm.
20. Latour Bruno, “On Actor-Network Theory A Few Clarifications”, Soziale Welt, 47:4, 1997, s.369- 81.
21. Leborgne Daniele ve Alain Lipietz , “How to Avoid a Two-Tier Europe”, Labour and Society, 15: 2, 1990, s.177-98.
22. Leborgne Daniele ve Alain Lipietz, “Conceptual Fallacies and Open Questions on Post-Fordism”,
23. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, (Ed. M. Storper - A. J. Scott), Londra, Routledge, 1992, s.332-48.
24. Lefebvre Henri, “Reflections on the Politics of Space”, Radical Geography: Alternative Viewpoints on Contemporary Social Issues, (Ed. Richard Peet), Londra, Maaroufa, 1978, s.339-52.
25. Lipietz Alain, “The Regulation Approach and Capitalist Crisis: An Alternative Compromise for the 1990s”, Cities and Regions in the New Europe, (Ed. Mick Dunford ve Grigoris Kafkalas), Londra, Belhaven Press, 1992, 309-34.
26. Lipietz Alain, “The New Core-Periphery Relations: The Contrasting Examples of Europe and America”, The State and the Economic Process, (Ed. C.W.M. Naastepad ve Servas Storm), Londra, Edward Elgar, 1996, 112-50.
27. Marks Gary, François Nielsen, Leonard Ray ve Jane E. Salk, “Competencies, Cracks, and Conflicts: Regional Mobilization in the European Union”, Comparative Political Studies, 29:2, 1996, s.164-92.
28. Markusen Ann, “Regionalism and the Capitalist State: The Case of the United States”, Kapitalistate, 7/9:7, 1978, s.39-62.
29. Markusen Ann, “Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies”, Regional Studies, 37:6&7, 2003, s.701-17.Marston Sally, John Paul Jones III, ve Kevin Woodward, “Human Geography without Scale”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30:4, 2005, s. 416-32.
30. Mény Yves ve Vincent Wright, “General Introduction”, Centre-Periphery Relations in Western Europe, (Ed. Yves Mény - Vincent Wright), Herts, Allen and Unwin, 1985, s.1-10.
31. Ohmae Kenichi, The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economics, New York, The Free Press, 1995.
32. Ohmae Kenichi, “The Rise of the Region State”, Regions and Regionalism in Europe, (Ed. Michael Keating), Cheltenham, Elgar, 2004, s.78-87.
33. Perkmann Markus, “The Emergence and Governance of Euroregions: The Case of the EUREGIO on the Dutch-German Border”, Euroregions: Experiences and Lessons, Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus, University of Barcelona, 15-16 December, 2005.
34. Piore M. ve C. Sabel, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York, Basic Books, 1984.
35. Poulantzas Nicos, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London, NLB, 1974.
36. Scott Allen J., “Globalization and the Rise of City-regions”, European Planning Studies, 9:7, 2001, s.815-26.
37. Sharpe L. J. , “The European Meso: An Appraisal,” Rise of Meso Government in Europe, (Ed. L. J. Sharpe), Londra, Sage, 1993, s.1-39.
38. Swyngedeouw Erik, “The Mammon Quest ‘Glocalisation’ Interspatial Competition and the Monetary Order: The Construction of New Scales”, Cities and Regions in the New Europe, (Ed. Mick
39. Dunford - Grigoris Kafkalas), Londra, Belhaven Press, 1992, s.39-67.
40. Tekeli İlhan, Türkiye’de Bölgesel Eşitsizlik ve Bölgesel Planlama Yazıları, İstanbul, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 2008.
41. Thrift Nigel, Knowing Capitalism, Londra, Sage, 2005.
42. Van Houtum H. ve M. van der Velde, Borders, Regions and People, Londra, Pion Limited, 2000.
43. Walker Richard A., “Two Sources of Uneven Development under Advanced Capitalism: Spatial Differentiation and Capital Mobility”, The Review of Radical Political Economics, 10:3, 1978, s. 28-39.