Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER

Yıl 2010, Sayı: 13, 164 - 175, 30.08.2010
https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF

Öz

Yazı Hannes Lacher ve Ellen Meiksins Wood arasında ulus- devletlerin kökeni hakkında ikibinli yılların başlarında yapılan bir tartışmaya katkı sunmak amacıyla yazılmıştır. Bu tartışmada Lacher ulus-devlet biçiminin kapitalizme içkin bir nedenselliği yoktur derken, Wood kapitalizmin neden yayıldığı her yerde ulus- devlet formunu da taşıdığının araştırılması gerektiğini söyler. Bu makalede devlet kuramının uzamsallaştırılması ve bu tartışmaya bir katkı olarak ‘seçici geçirgenlik’ kavramı önerilmektedir. Ulus- devletler emek ve sermaye hareketlerini düzenlerlerken her zaman sermayeye daha fazla hareketlilik sağlayacak düzenlemeler getirmişlerdir. Devlet tartışmalarında kapitalizmin uzamsal örgütlenmesinin daha fazla tartışılması gerekmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Aygül, Cenk, “Bölgeler Üzerine Tezler,” Memleket SiyasetYönetim, Sayı 11, 2009, s. 68-87.
  • Albo Greg ve Jane Jenson, “A Contested Concept: The Relative Autonomy of the State,” The New Canadian Political Economy, (Ed. Wallace Clement ve Glen Williams), McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston, 1989.
  • Brenner, Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  • Faist, Thomas, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
  • Hay, Colin, “Marxism and the State,” Marxism and Social Science, (Ed. Andrew Gamble, David Marsh ve Tony Tant), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1999, s. 152-74.
  • Held, David ve Anthony McGrew, Küresel Dönüşümler, Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara, 2008.
  • Hirst, Paul ve Grahame Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • Jessop, Bob, The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
  • Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Polity Press, Londra, 1990.
  • Koffman, Eleonore, “Contemporary European Migrations, Civic Stratification and Citizenship,” Political Geography, 21:8, 2002, s.1035- 54.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s.146-64.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “International Transformation and the New Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a New Political Geography of Capitalism,” Review of International Political Economy, 12:1, 2005, s. 26-52.
  • Larrain, Jorge, Marxism and Ideology, MacMillan, Londra, 1983. Massey, Doreen, Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, Second edition, Routledge, New York, 1995.
  • Panitch, Leo, “The Impoverishment of State Theory,” State Theory Reconsidered: Paradigm Lost, (Ed. Stanley Aronowitz ve Peter Bratsis), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2002, s. 89-104.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Politische Macht und Gesellschaftliche Klassen, Athenaum Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1968.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, NLB, Londra, 1974.
  • Salter, Mark B., Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations,
  • Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 2003.
  • Teschke, Benno, “Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism,” European Journal of International Relations, 8:1, 2002, s. 5-48.
  • Torpey, John, “States and the Regulation of Migration in the Twentieth – Century North Atlantic World,” The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, (Ed. Peter Andreas ve Timothy Snyder), Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2000, s. 31-54.
  • Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • Van, Houtum H. ve M. van der Velde. eds, Borders, Regions and People, Pion, Londra, 2002.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins, “Global Capital, National Scales,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s. 17-39.

Yıl 2010, Sayı: 13, 164 - 175, 30.08.2010
https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aygül, Cenk, “Bölgeler Üzerine Tezler,” Memleket SiyasetYönetim, Sayı 11, 2009, s. 68-87.
  • Albo Greg ve Jane Jenson, “A Contested Concept: The Relative Autonomy of the State,” The New Canadian Political Economy, (Ed. Wallace Clement ve Glen Williams), McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston, 1989.
  • Brenner, Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  • Faist, Thomas, The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
  • Hay, Colin, “Marxism and the State,” Marxism and Social Science, (Ed. Andrew Gamble, David Marsh ve Tony Tant), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1999, s. 152-74.
  • Held, David ve Anthony McGrew, Küresel Dönüşümler, Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara, 2008.
  • Hirst, Paul ve Grahame Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1996.
  • Jessop, Bob, The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1982.
  • Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place, Polity Press, Londra, 1990.
  • Koffman, Eleonore, “Contemporary European Migrations, Civic Stratification and Citizenship,” Political Geography, 21:8, 2002, s.1035- 54.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “Making Sense of the International System: The Promises and Pitfalls of Contemporary Marxist Theories of International Relations,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s.146-64.
  • Lacher, Hannes, “International Transformation and the New Persistence of Territoriality: Toward a New Political Geography of Capitalism,” Review of International Political Economy, 12:1, 2005, s. 26-52.
  • Larrain, Jorge, Marxism and Ideology, MacMillan, Londra, 1983. Massey, Doreen, Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, Second edition, Routledge, New York, 1995.
  • Panitch, Leo, “The Impoverishment of State Theory,” State Theory Reconsidered: Paradigm Lost, (Ed. Stanley Aronowitz ve Peter Bratsis), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2002, s. 89-104.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Politische Macht und Gesellschaftliche Klassen, Athenaum Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1968.
  • Poulantzas, Nicos, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, NLB, Londra, 1974.
  • Salter, Mark B., Rights of Passage: The Passport in International Relations,
  • Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, 2003.
  • Teschke, Benno, “Theorizing the Westphalian System of States: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism,” European Journal of International Relations, 8:1, 2002, s. 5-48.
  • Torpey, John, “States and the Regulation of Migration in the Twentieth – Century North Atlantic World,” The Wall around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe, (Ed. Peter Andreas ve Timothy Snyder), Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2000, s. 31-54.
  • Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
  • Van, Houtum H. ve M. van der Velde. eds, Borders, Regions and People, Pion, Londra, 2002.
  • Wood, Ellen Meiksins, “Global Capital, National Scales,” Historical Materialism and Globalization, (Ed. Mark Rupert ve Hazel Smith), Routledge, Londra, 2002, s. 17-39.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Kamu Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Cenk Aygül Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Ağustos 2010
IZ https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Sayı: 13

Kaynak Göster

APA Aygül, C. (2010). ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, 5(13), 164-175. https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF
AMA 1.Aygül C. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 2010;5(13):164-175. https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF
Chicago Aygül, Cenk. 2010. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5 (13): 164-75. https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF.
EndNote Aygül C (01 Ağustos 2010) ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5 13 164–175.
IEEE [1]C. Aygül, “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”, Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, c. 5, sy 13, ss. 164–175, Ağu. 2010, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF
ISNAD Aygül, Cenk. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim 5/13 (01 Ağustos 2010): 164-175. https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF.
JAMA 1.Aygül C. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim. 2010;5:164–175.
MLA Aygül, Cenk. “ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER”. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, c. 5, sy 13, Ağustos 2010, ss. 164-75, https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF.
Vancouver 1.Cenk Aygül. ULUS-DEVLET FİKRİ ve ULUS-DEVLETLER. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2010;5(13):164-75. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA88LY62FF