SOSYAL POLİTİKA DİSİPLİNİ ÜZERİNDEN KOOPERATİFLERİ YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK

Öz

Son dönemlerde uluslararası ve ulusal platformlarda sıklıkla tartışılan ve uzun bir aradan sonra yeniden gündem oluşturmayı başaran kooperatifçilik hareketi, sosyal politika disiplini içerisindeki yeri ve önemi açısından tekrardan hatırlanmaya başlamaktadır. Kooperatifçilik düşüncesi, üniversitelerde büyük oranda işletme alanının bir dalı olarak sunulmakla birlikte, esasında ele aldığı perspektifle toplumsal kalkınmayı önceleyen yapısı, her alanda tekelleşmeye karşı duruşu ve kooperatifler bünyesinde yer alan geniş halk kesimlerinin sömürülmesine karşı çıkan ilkeleriyle, sosyo ekonomik adaletin sağlanmasında önemli roller oynamaktadır. Bu roller, kooperatifçilik hareketini sosyal politika disiplininin asli bir parçası haline getirmektedir. 1970’li yıllarda sosyal devletin zayıflatılması ve neo-liberal iktisadi söylemlerin giderek büyümesiyle birlikte toplumsal kesimlerin yerel ve küresel ölçekte yaşadığı mülksüzleşme, güvencesizleşme ve proleterleşme sonucunda gözlemlenen sosyo-ekonomik tahribat karşısında kooperatifçilik düşüncesi yeniden gündeme gelmeye başlamaktadır. Bu açıdan bakıldığında neo-liberalizmin yarattığı sosyal tahribatın bir anti-tezi olarak düşünülebilecek kooperatifçilik hareketleri, gelişim gösterdiği 19. yüzyıldan günümüze biriktirdiği deneyimlerden de aldığı derslerle, yeni toplumsal stratejiler ve sınıf temelli ilişki ağları inşa etmeye çalışmaktadır. İlgili çalışma kapsamında sosyal politika disipliniyle olan ilişkisi üzerinden kooperatifçiliği anlamaya çalışmak ve ideal bir kooperatifçilik hareketinin izini sürmeye yönelik tartışmaları derinleştirmek amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Politika
• Sosyal Devlet
• Dayanışma Ekonomisi
• Neo-liberalizm
• Kooperatifçilik

Rethinking Cooperatives Through the Discipline of Social Policy

Öz

The cooperative movement, which has recently been discussed frequently on international and national platforms and has managed to re-emerge on the agenda after a long absence, is being recalled in terms of its place and importance within the discipline of social policy. Although the idea of cooperatives is presented mainly as a branch of business administration in universities, it plays a vital role in ensuring socio-economic justice with its perspective that prioritizes social development, its stance against monopolization in all areas, and its principles that oppose the exploitation of large segments of the population within cooperatives. These roles make the cooperative movement an integral part of the social policy discipline. In the 1970s, with the weakening of the welfare state and the growth of neo liberal economic discourses, the idea of cooperatives began to reappear on the agenda in the face of the socio economic destruction caused by the local and global dispossession, precarization, and proletarianization of social groups. From this perspective, cooperative movements, which can be seen as an antithesis to the social destruction caused by neo-liberalism, are trying to build new social strategies and class-based networks of relations with the lessons they have learned from the experiences they have accumulated since their development in the 19th century. This study aims to understand cooperatives concerning the discipline of social policy and to deepen the debate on tracing an ideal cooperative movement.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social Policy
• Social State
• Solidarity Economy
• Neo-liberalism
• Cooperatives

Kaynakça

1. Acar, Erhan (2019), Çalışma Hayatında Özyönetim Deneyimleri: Kazova Örneği, (İstanbul: Sosyal Araştırmalar Vakfı).
2. Alvaredo, Facundo, Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman (2018), “World Inequality Report: Executive Summary”, (Paris: World Inequality Lab), https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-english.pdf.
3. Araujo, Angela Maria Carneiro (2012), “Companies Recovered by Workers: The Cases of the Catande Plant and Flasko”, XXX. International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), (May 23-26, 2012, San Francisco, California).
4. Aybay, Rona (2005), Sosyalizmin Öncülerinden Robert Owen: Yaşamı-Eylemi-Öğretisi, Gözden Geçirilmiş 1. Baskı, (İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları).
5. Aykaç, Aslıhan (2018), Dayanışma Ekonomileri: Üretim ve Bölüşüme Alternatif Yaklaşımlar, (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları).
6. Aysu, Abdullah (2021), “Yemek Yemek Politik Bir İştir: Tarımda Kooperatifçilik”, Şahin, Çağatay Edgücan (Der.), 21. Yüzyıl Türkiye’sinde Tarım ve Kooperatifler: Teori-Pratik- Vizyon, (İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları): 15-47.
7. Azzellini, Dario (2015), “Contemporary Crisis and Workers’ Control”, Azzellini, Dario (Ed.), An Alternative Labour History: Worker Control and Workplace Democracy, (London: Zed Books Ltd.): 67-99.
8. Azzellini, Dario (Ed.) (2017), Emeğin Alternatif Tarihi: İşçi Denetimi ve İşyeri Demokrasisi, (Çev. Yahya Deniz), (İstanbul: Amara Yayıncılık).

9. Azzellini, Dario and Immanuel Ness (Eds.) (2021), Yönetim Bizde Mülkiyet Bizde: Paris Komünü’nden Günümüze İşçi Denetimi, (Çev. Ed. Çağatay Edgücan Şahin), (İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları).
10. Bayat, Assef (1987), Workers and Revolution in Iran: A Third World Experience of Workers’ Control, London: Zed Books.
11. Bernstein, Eduard (1993), “The Tasks and Opportunities of Social Democracy”, Tudor, Henry (Ed.), Bernstein: The Preconditions of Socialism (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 98-188.
12. Birchall, Johnston (2004), Cooperatives and the Millennium Development Goals, (Geneva: International Labour Office, Cooperative Branch & Policy Integration Department).
13. Calvert, Hubert (1959), The Law and Principles of Co-operation, (Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Company).
14. Chomsky, Noam (2013), Anarşizm Üzerine, (Çev. Tamer Tosun), (İstanbul: Agora Kitaplığı).
15. CICOPA (2011), “World Standards of Social Cooperatives”, http://tinyurl.com/2resuu8v, (Brussels: International Organisation of Industrial and Service Cooperatives): 1-5.
16. Coopermondo (2022), “Chi Siamo & Vision e Mission”, http://www.coopermondo.it/chi-siamo/; http://www.coopermondo.it/mission-vision/.
17. Daudi, Philippe and Richard Sotto (1986), “European Cooperations in Transition-The Metamorphosis of Homo Cooperativus”, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 3 (1), s. 65–85.
18. Defourny, Jacques and Marthe Nyssens (2013), “Social Co-operatives: When Social Enterprises Meet the Co- operative Tradition”, Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2 (2), s. 11-33.
19. Defourny, Jacques and Patrick Develtere (1999), “The Social Economy: The Worldwide Making of a Third Sector”, Defourny, Jacques, Patrick Develtere and Bénédicte Fonteneau (Eds.), Social Economy – North and South, (Trans. Stuart Anthony Stilitz), (Leuven: Hoger Instituut voor de Arbeid – Katholieke Universiteit Leuven): 17-47.
20. Dobrohoczki, Robert (2006), “Cooperatives as Social Policy Means for Creating Social Cohesion in Communities”, Journal of Rural Cooperation, 34 (2), s. 139-159.
21. Dolgoff, Sam (Ed.) (1974) The Anarchist Collectives: Workers’ Self-management in the Spanish Revolution (1936- 1939), (New York: Free Life Editions, Inc.).
22. EC (2015), A Map of Social Enterprises and Their Eco-Systems in Europe: Synthesis Report, (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).
23. Fairbairn, Brett (1994), “The Meaning of Rochdale: The Rochdale Pioneers and the Co- operative Principles”, Occasional Paper Series: #94.02, (Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan, Centre for the Study of Co- operatives).
24. Fairbnb.coop (2021), “About Us & Our Manifesto”, https://fairbnb.coop/about-fairbnb/; https://fairbnb.coop/manifesto-/.
25. Fındıkoğlu, Ziyaeddin Fahri (1967), Kooperasyon Sosyolojisi: Nazari ve Tatbiki Kooperatifçilik Denemesi, (İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Yayınları).
26. Geray, Cevat (2014), Kooperatifçilik, Birinci Basım, (Ankara: Nika Yayınevi).
27. Gürler, Deniz (2022), “Fabrika Kapanmaları Sonucu Karşılaşılan İşsizlik Riskine İşçi Sınıfının Bir Yanıtı Olarak “Geri Kazanılmış İşletmeler”, Çalışma ve Toplum, 73 (2), s. 979-1016.
28. Gürler, Deniz (2023), İşçi Denetimi Mücadelesi: İşgal, Direniş, Üretim! (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları).
29. Güven, Sami (1995), Sosyal Politikanın Temelleri, (Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi).
30. Güven, Sami (1998), Türkiye’de Sosyal Sorunlar ve Sosyal Politikalar, (Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi).
31. Harman, Chris (2016), Halkların Dünya Tarihi: Taş Devri’nden Yeni Binyıla, (Çev. Uygur Kocabaşoğlu), 5. Basım, (İstanbul: Yordam Kitap).
32. Holyoake, George Jacob (1893), The History of the Rochdale Pioneers (1844-1892), 10th ed., rev. & enl., (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.).
33. Holyoake, George Jacob (1908), The History of Co-Operation (1817-1906), Revised and Completed, (London: T. Fisher Unwin).
34. ICA (2015), Guidance Notes to the Co-operative Principles, (Brussels: International Cooperative Alliance).
35. ICA (2018), “Cooperative Identity, Values & Principles”, https://www.ica.coop/en/cooperatives/cooperative- identity.
36. ILO (1952), An Introduction to Co-Operative Practice, (Geneva: International Labour Office).
37. İhtiyaç Haritası (2020), Sosyal Kooperatif Geliştirme Programı: İhtiyaç Analizi Raporu, (İstanbul: İhtiyaç Haritası).
38. Joad, Cyril Edwin Mitchinson (1966), Sosyalizm-Sendikalizm-Komünizm-Anarşizm, (Çev. Oya Sencer ve Muzaffer Sencer), (İstanbul: Habora Kitabevi).
39. Jossa, Bruno (2005), “Marx, Marxism and the Cooperative Movement”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29 (1), s. 3-18.
40. Kasmir, Sharryn (2016), “The Mondragon Cooperatives and Global Capitalism: A Critical Analysis”, New Labor Forum, 25 (1), s. 52–59.
41. Koray, Meryem (2020), Sosyal Politika, Güncellenmiş 6. Baskı, (Ankara: İmge Kitabevi).
42. Kunhu, T. Shemeera (2011), “Co-Operative Theory, Principles & Practice”, Study Material-Core Course-V. Semester, (Malappuram/Kerala: University of Calicut School of Distance Education), s. 1-49.
43. Laidlaw, Alexander Fraser (1981), 2000 Yılında Kooperatifler, (Çev. Haluk Uzel), (Ankara: Yol-Koop Yayınları). Le Public Space (2021), “Who are We?”, https://www.lepublicspace.co.uk/venue.
44. Lebowitz, Michael A. (2008), Bugünden Kuralım: 21. Yüzyıl İçin Sosyalizm, (Çev. Pelin Üçer ve İbrahim Akbulut), (İstanbul: Yordam Kitap).
45. Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich (2017), Lenin 2017: Hatırlamak, Tekrarlamak ve Kafa Yormak, (Çev. Akın Emre Pilgir), (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları).
46. Lima, Jacob Carlos (2007), “Workers’ Cooperatives in Brasil: Autonomy vs Precariousness”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 28 (4), s. 589-621.
47. Luxemburg, Rosa (1993), Sosyal Reform mu, Devrim mi?, (Çev. Nihal Yılmaz), (İstanbul: Belge Yayınları).
48. Magnani, Esteban (2009), The Silent Change: Recovered Businesses in Argentina, (Trans. Steve Herrick), (Buenos Aires: Editorial Teseo).
49. Marx, Karl (1894), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Vol. III: The Process of Capitalist Production as a Whole, (Ed. Friedrich Engels), (New York: International Publishers).
50. Marx, Karl (2017), Hayalet-Seçme Yazılar, (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları).
51. Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (2017), Gotha ve Erfurt Programları Üzerine, (Çev. Erkin Özalp), (İstanbul: Yordam Kitap).
52. Mondragon (2023), “About Us (Cooperation, Worldwide, Different, Future)”, https://www.mondragon- corporation.com/en/about-us#global.
53. Mülayim, Ziya Gökalp (1975), Genel ve Tarımsal Kooperatifçilik, Birinci Basım, (Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi).
54. Nasioulas, Ioannis (2012), “Social Cooperatives in Greece: Introducing New Forms of Social Economy and Entrepreneurship”, International Review of Social Research, 2 (2), s.151-171.
55. Ofeil, Kwadwo Ansah (2005), “Participative Schemes and Management Structures of Ghanaian Co-operatives”, Journal of Co-operative Studies, 38 (3), s. 14–26.
56. Palomino, Hector, Ivanna Bleynat, Silvia Garro and Carla Giacomuzzi (2010), “The Universe of Worker- Recovered Companies in Argentina (2002-2008): Continuity and Changes Inside the Movement”, Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture and Action, 4 (1), s. 252-287.
57. Polanyi-Levitt, Kari (1994), “Karl Polanyi as Socialist.”, McRobbie, Kenneth (Ed.), Humanity, Society and Commitment: On Karl Polanyi, (Montreal: Black Rose Books): 115-134.
58. Politzer, Georges, (1969), Marksist Felsefe Dersleri, (Çev. Galip Üstün), (İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar).
59. Potter, Beatrice (1891), The Co-Operative Movement in Great Britain, 1st ed., (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.). Rocker, Rudolf (2000), Anarko-Sendikalizm, (Çev. H. Deniz Güneri), (İstanbul: Kaos Yayınları).
60. Satgar, Vishwas (2007), “Cooperative Development and Labour Solidarity: a Neo-Gramscian Perspective on the Global Struggle Against Neoliberalization”, Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, Capital et Société, 40 (1/2), s. 56-79.
61. Satt, Ehud (2007), “Introducing Differential Wage Rates in the Kibbutz Economy: Is it the End of the Kibbutz? Theory and New Data”, Novkovic, Sonja and Vania Sena (Eds.), Cooperative Firms in Global Markets (Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 10), (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited): 79-107.
62. SEWA (2020), “Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA) & SEWA’s Vision”, https://www.sewa.org/; https://www.sewa.org/sewas-11-questions/.
63. Shaffer, Jack (1999), Historical Dictionary of the Cooperative Movement, (London: The Scarecrow Press Inc.). Siriani, Carmen (1990), İşçi Denetimi ve Sosyalist Demokrasi: Sovyet Deneyimi, (Çev. Kumru Başoğlu), (İstanbul: Belge Yayınları).
64. SSCB Bilimler Akademisi Kolektifi (2008), Karl Marx Biyografi, (Çev. Ertuğrul Kürkçü), 3. Baskı, (İstanbul: Sorun Yayınları).
65. Starke, Peter (2006), “The Politics of Welfare State Retrenchment: A Literature Review”, Social Policy & Administration, 40 (1), s. 104-120.
66. Şahin, Çağatay Edgücan ve Kerem Gökten (2013), “Latin Amerikan Özyönetim Pratiklerinden İnsan Odaklı Bir Esnekleşme Beklenebilir Mi?”, Çalışma ve Toplum, 2013 (2), s. 119-145.
67. Talas, Cahit (1992), Türkiye’nin Açıklamalı Sosyal Politika Tarihi, Birinci Basım, (Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi).
68. Thomas, Antonio (2004), “The Rise of Social Cooperatives in Italy”, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15 (3), s. 243-263.
69. Timm, Uwe (1999), “Neyse Ki Özgürlüğe Doğru Gidiliyor: Özelleştirme Üzerine Liberter Perspektifler”, Degen, Hans-Jürgen (Ed.), Anarşizmin Bugünü: Tavırlar, (Çev. Neşe Ozan), (İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları): 29- 60.
70. TÜSEV (2023), “Sosyal Girişim Nedir?”, http://sosyalgirisim.org/sosyalgirisim.org/content/detail30ba.html?cid=10. Utting, Peter (2016), “Mainstreaming Social and Solidarity Economy: Opportunities and Risks for Policy Change”, (Geneva: United Nations Task Force on Social and Solidarity Economy), http://base.socioeco.org/docs/paper-mainstreaming-sse-12-november- 2016-edit-untfsse.pdf, s. 1-17.
71. Wanyama, Fredrick Ouma, Patrick Develtere and Ignace Pollet (2009), “Reinventing The Wheel? African Cooperatives in a Liberalized Economic Environment”, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80 (3), s. 361–392.
72. Yeğin, Metin (2006), Patronsuzlar, (İstanbul: Versus Kitap).
73. Yi, Ilcheong (2023), "Chapter 53: Social policy", Yi, Ilcheong (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Social and Solidarity Economy, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing): 416-424.