ŞEBEKE KURAMLARINA ELEŞTİREL BİR YAKLAŞIM

Yıl 2006, Sayı: 1, 143 - 153, 30.06.2006

Cenk Aygül

Öz

Bu yazıda şebeke kuramları eleştirel olarak incelenmektedir. Şebeke
kuramlarının önümüzdeki dönemde Türkiye’de daha fazla yayılacağından
hareketle, bu kuramların dayandığı temel düşünceler tartışılmakta ve
şebekelerin pazar ve hiyerarşilere alternatif yeni bir toplumsal eşgüdüm getirdiği
iddialarına dikkatli yaklaşmak gerektiği belirtilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

şebeke toplumu, şebeke kuramları, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Amin, A. ve Robins K., “The Re-emergence of Regional Economies? The Mythical Geography of Flexible Accumulation,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 8, 1990, s. 7–34.
• Amin, Ash, “Big Firms Versus the Regions in the Single European Market,” Cities and Regions in the New Europe, (Ed. Mick Danford ve Grigoris Kafkalas), London: Belhaven Press, 1992, s. 127–49.
• Amin, Ash, “Spatialities of Globalization,” Environment and Planning A, Vol. 34, 2002, s. 385– 99.
• Amin, Ash ve Nigel Thrift, “Neo-Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16:4, 1992, s. 571–87.
• Ansell, Chris, “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe,” Governance, 13:3, 2000, s. 303–33.
• Baker, Peter, “Spatial Outcomes of Capital Restructuring: ‘New Industrial Spaces’ as a Symptom of Crisis, not Solution,” Review of Political Economy, 8:3, 1996, s. 263–78.
• Blatter, Joachim, “Beyond Hierarchies and Networks: Institutional Logics and Change in Transboundary Spaces,” Governance, 16:4, 2003, s. 503–26.
• Brenner, Neil, “Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality and Geographical Scale in Globalization Studies,” Theory and Society, Vol. 28, 1999, s. 39–78.
• Brenner, Neil, “Globalization as Reterritorialization: The Rescaling of Urban Governance in the European Union,” Urban Studies, 36:3, 1999, s. 431–51.
• Brenner, Neil, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
• Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000.
• Cooke, Philip, “Policy Networks, Innovation Networks and Regional Policy: A Review of the Literature and an Example from South Wales,” Policy Networks and European Structural Funds, (Ed. Hubert Heinelt ve Randall Smith), Avebury: Aldershot, 1996, s. 26–45.
• Cox, Kevin R., “Spaces of Independence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics,” Political Geography, 17:1, 1997, s. 1-23.
• Hay, Colin, “The Tangled Webs we Weave: The Discourse, Strategy and Practice of Networking,” Comparing Policy Network Approach, (Ed. David Marsh), Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998, s. 33–51.
• Jessop, Bob, “The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development,” International Social Science Journal, no: 155, 1998, s. 29–45.
• Jessop, Bob, “Informational Capitalism and Empire: The PostMarxist Celebration of US Hegemony in a New World Order,” Studies in Political Economy, no: 71/2, 2003–2004, s. 39–58.
• Jessop, Bob, “The European Union and Recent Transformations in Statehood,” published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancester LA14YL, UK at http://www.com.lanc.ac.uk/sociology/papers/jessop-eu-transformations-statehood.pdf , 2005.
• Faludi, Andreas, “The European Spatial Development Perspective – What Next?” European Planning Studies, 8:2, 2000, s. 237–50.
• Hardt, Michael ve Negri Antonio, Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. Lefebvre, Henri, “Reflections on the Politics of Space,” Radical Geography: Alternative Viewpoints on Contemporary Social Issues, (Ed. Richard Peet), London, Maaroufa, 1978, s. 339–52.
• Leitner, Helga, “The Politics of Scale and Networks of Spatial Connectivity,” Scale and Geographic Inquiry, (Ed. Eric Sheppard ve Robert B. McMaster), Malden: Blackwell, 2004, s. 236–55.
• Leitner, Helga, Claire Pavlik ve Eric Sheppard, “Networks, Governance and the Politics of Scale: Inter-Urban Networks and the EU,” Geographies of Power: Placing Scale, (Ed. Andrew Herod ve Melissa W. Wright), Oxford: Blackwell, 20002, s. 275–303.
• Marin Bernd ve Renate Mayntz, “Introduction: Studying Policy Networks,” Policy Networks, Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, (Ed. Bernd Marin ve Renate Mayntz), Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 1991, s. 11–23.
• Marsh, David, “The Development of the Policy Network Approach,” Comparing Policy Network Approach, (Ed. David Marsh), Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998, s. 3–17.
• Marsh, David ve R.A.W. Rhodes, “Policy Communities and Issue Networks,” Policy Networks in British Government, (Ed. R.A.W. Rhodes ve David Marsh), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, s. 249–68.
• Murdoch, Jonathan, “The Spaces of Actor-Network Theory,” Geoforum, 29:4, 1998, s. 357–74.
• Rhodes, R.A.W. ve David Marsh, “Policy Networks in British Politics: A Critique of Existing Approaches,” Policy Networks in British Government, (Ed. R.A.W. Rhodes ve David Marsh), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, s. 1–26.
• Smith, C., “Flexible Specialization, Automation and Mass Production,” Work Employment and Society, Vol.3, 1989, 203-20.
• Swyngedeouw, Erik, “The Mammon Quest. ‘Glocalisation’ Interspatial Competition and the Monetary Order: The Construction of New Scales,” Cities and Regions in the New Europe, (Ed. Mick Dunford ve Grigoris Kafkalas), eds. London: Belhaven Press, 1992, s. 39-67.
• Thompson, Grahame, Between Hierarchies and Markets: The Logic and Limits of Network Forms of Organization, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Williams, K., Cutler T., Williams J. ve Haslam J., “The End of Mass Production?” Economy and Society, Vol.16, 1987, s. 405–39.