Boşluk Oranının Farklı Siltlerin Likit Limit Değerleri üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışmada farklı silt türü zeminlerin likit limit değerleri Casagrande ve koni penetrometre deneyleri ile farklı boşluk oranı değerleri için belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, zeminlerin boşluk oranının likit limit değerleri üzerinde önemli ölçüde etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Boşluk oranı etkisi ve operatöre bağımlı etkinin minimize edilmesi için koni penetrasyon deneyinin Casagrande deneyine kıyasla avantajlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Boşluk oranı ve likit limit değerleri arasındaki ilişki zeminlere göre farklılık göstermektedir. Bu sebeple boşluk oranı değişime bağlı likit limit değerinin kestirimine yönelik genel bir bağıntının kullanımı önerilmemiştir. Bunun yerine, boşluk oranındaki değişim için zeminlerin ayrı olarak test edilmesi önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Likit limit,Atterberg limitleri,Boşluk oranı,Zemin sınıflama,Zemin testleri

Kaynakça

1. Alikonis, A., 1995. Ground compaction zone of structures and structural strength of soil, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 1(2), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3846/13921525.1995.10531513
2. Anbazhagan, P., Uday, A., Moustafa, S.S.R., Al-Arifi, N.S.N., 2017. Soil void ratio correlation with shear wave velocities and SPT N values for Indo-Gangetic basin, Journal of Geological Society of India, 89, 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0621-z
3. Andrade F.A., Al-Qureshi H.A., Hotza, D., 2011. Measuring the plasticity of clays: A review, Applied Clay Science, 51, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2010.10.028
4. ASTM International, 2010. ASTM D854-10: Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, 2010 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. ASTM International, 2010. ASTM D4318-10: Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, 2010 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
6. ASTM International, 2019. ASTM D2216 – 19: Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass. 2019 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
7. Atterberg, A. 1911. Die Plastizität der Tone, Internationale Mitteilungen für Bodenkunde 1, 10–43
8. Barounis, N., Philpot, J., 2018. Estimation of in-situ water content and void ratio using CPT for saturated sands, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT'18), Eds: Hicks, M.A., Pisanò, F., Peuchen, J., 21-22 June, 2018, Delft, The Netherlands, CRC Press, pp. 129-135

9. Bensoula, M., Missoum, H., Bendani, K., 2018. Liquefaction potential sand-silt mixtures under static loading. Revista de la Construccion, 17(2), 196-208. doi: 10.7764/RDLC.17.2.196
10. British Standards Institute, 1975. Methods of Test for Soils for Engineering Purposes, London
11. British Standards Institute, 1990. BS 1377-2 Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes: Classification Tests, London
12. Casagrande, A., 1932. Research on the Atterberg limits of soils, Public Roads, 13 (3), 121-136.
13. Casagrande, A., 1958. Notes on the Design of the Liquid Limit Device, Geotechnique, 8, 84-91
14. Clayton, C.R.I., Jukes, A.W., 1978. A One Point Cone Penetrometer Liquid Limit Test?, Geotechnique, 28, 469-472, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1978.28.4.469
15. Duncan, J.M., Wright, S.G., Brandon, T.L., 2014. Soil Strength and Slope Stability, John Wiley & Sons, United States, New Jersey.
16. Fiegel, G.L., Kutter, B.L., 1994. Liquefaction Mechanism for Layered Soils, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120, Paper no: 737. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:4(737)
17. Hansbo, S., 1957. A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall cone test, Royal Swedish Geotechnical Institute
18. Henniche, A., Belkacemi, S., 2018. Numerical Simulation to Select Proper Strain Rates during CRS Consolidation Test, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 62(2), 404-412. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.9650
19. International Organization for Standardization, 2017. ISO 17892-6:2017: Geotechnical investigation and testing - Laboratory testing of soil - Part 6: Fall cone test. Genava, Switzerland.
20. Kheirbek-Saoud, S., Fleureau, J., 2012. Liquefaction and post-liquefaction behaviour of a soft natural clayey soil. Geomechanics and Engineering, 4(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2012.4.2.121
21. Li, Y., 2013. Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behavior of composite soils, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 72, 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0482-7
22. Moradi, G., Sotoubadi, M.H., Khatibi, B.R., 2014. The influence of overburden pressure on liquefaction potential, Turkish Journal of Engineering & Environmental Sciences, 38, 323-337.
23. Mujtaba, H., Farooq, K., Sivakugan, N., Das, B.M., 2018. Evaluation of relative density and friction angle based on SPT-N values, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 572-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1899-5
24. Santana, T., Candeias, M., 2018. Effect of Void Ratio on K0 of a Sand by Means of Triaxial Stress-Path Testing, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 36, 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0324-7
25. Sharma, B., Sridharan, A., 2018. Liquid and plastic limits of clays by cone method, International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 9:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0092-0
26. Sherwood, P.T., Ryley, M.D., 1970. An investigation of a cone-penetrometer method for the determination of the liquid limit, Géotechnique, 20(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1970.20.2.203
27. Stanchi, S., Catoni, M., D'Amicoa, M.E., Falsone, G., Bonifacio, E., 2017. Liquid and plastic limits of clayey, organic C-rich mountain soils: Role of organic matter and mineralogy, Catena, 151, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.12.021
28. Standards Council of Canada (SCC), 2006. CAN/BNQ 2501-092/2006: Soils-determination of liquid limit by the Swedish fall cone penetrometer method and determination of plastic limit, National Standard of Canada, Ottawa, Ont.
29. Turkish Standards Institution (TSE), 2006. TS 1900-1: İnşaat Mühendisliğinde Zemin Laboratuvar Deneyleri, TSE, Bakanlıklar, Ankara
30. Ukritchon, B., Keawsawasvong, S., 2018. A new design equation for drained stability of conical slopes in cohesive-frictional soils, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(2), 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.10.004
31. Wasti, Y., 1987. Liquid and Plastic limits as determined from the fall cone and the Casagrande methods, ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 10(1), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10135J
32. Wasti, Y., Bezirci, M.H., 1986. Determination of the Consistency Limits of Soils by the Fall Cone Test, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 23, 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-033
33. Yilmaz, Y., Kheirjouy, A.B., Akgungor, A.P., 2016. Investigation of the Effect of Different Saturation Methods on the Undrained Shear Strength of a Clayey Soil Compacted with Standard and Modified Proctor Energies, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 60(3), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.8891
34. Zhai, J., Cai, X., 2018. Strength Characteristics and Slope Stability of Expansive Soil from Pingdingshan, China, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 3293619, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3293619.
35. Zhang, L.L., Fredlund M.D., Fredlund D.G., Lu, H., Wilson, G.W., 2015. The influence of the unsaturated soil zone on 2-D and 3-D slope stability analyses, Engineering Geology, 193, 374-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.011
36. Zhang, Q., Upadhyaya, S.K., Liaoa, Q., Li, X., 2018. Determination of in-situ engineering properties of soil using an inverse solution technique and limited field tests, Journal of Terramechanics, 79, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.07.001
37. Zhang, W., Goh, A.T.C., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Xiao, Y., 2015. Assessment of soil liquefaction based on capacity energy concept and multivariate adaptive regression splines, Engineering Geology, 188, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.009