İngilizcenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretildiği Ortamda Ortaya Çıkan Kültürlerarası Kimlik

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 26 - 37, 10.05.2018

Mehmet Çelik

https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.350562

Cited By: 1

Öz

Makale, kültürlerarası
kimliğin ortaya çıkması için kişilerin illa kültürlerarası deneyimi yaşamasına
gerek olmadığını savunur. Yazar tarafından geliştirilen anket İngilizce öğrenen
19-23 yaşları arasındaki 227 Türk katılımcıya uygulanmıştır. 37 maddelik
anketten ve mülakatlardan elde edilen bulgular göstermektedir ki katılımcılarda
kısmen farklı bir kimlik oluşmuştur ve İngilizce, sosyalleşme ve kültürlerarası
iletişimde yeni deneyimlere kapı aralayan bir servet ve pasaporttur. Son olarak
makale, dili öğrenilen toplumun içinde bulunmadan da kültürlerarası kimlikten
söz edilebileceğini belirtir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

yabancı dil öğrenimi, birinci dil kültürü, ikinci dil kültürü, kültürlerarası kimlik, hayali toplumda vatandaşlık

Emerging Intercultural Identity in the Turkish EFL Context

Öz

The paper argues that for individuals to develop
intercultural identity, they do not necessarily need to experience
intercultural experiences. A questionnaire devised by the author is
administered to 227 Turkish learners of English aged 19-23. The findings of
self-reported responses to a 37-item questionnaire as well as the qualitative
data reveal that learners feel they have a slightly different identity and that
English is an asset, a passport to a world of new experiences in socialization
and cross-cultural communication.  The
paper concludes that it is legitimate to speak of intercultural identity in the
absence of direct contact with L2 community.

Anahtar Kelimeler

foreign language learning, L1 culture, L2 culture, intercultural identity, membership in imagined community

Kaynakça

• Brown, H.D. 1986. Learning a second culture. In J.M. Valdes (Ed.), Culture bound: Bridging the culture gap in language teaching (p. 33-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Canagarajah, A. S. 2006. TESOL at forty: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40, 9-34.
• Fishman, J.A. 1995. On the limits of ethnolinguistic democracy. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & R. Philipson (Eds.), Linguistic human rights: Overcoming linguistic discrimination (pp. 49-62). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Gardner, R.C. & Smythe, P.C. 1975. Motivation and second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 218-230.
• Giles, H. & Johnson, P. 1987. Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69-99.
• Hall, S. 1992. The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held and T. McGrew (eds.) Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with the Open University. 274–316.
• He, A. W. 1995. Co-constructing institutional identities: The case of student counselees. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 213-231.
• Kim, Y.Y. 2008. Intercultural personhood: Globalization and a way of being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 359-368.
• Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kramsch, C. 1997. The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M.Byram and M. Fleming (Eds.) Language Learning in Intercultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lambert, W. E. 1963. Psychological approaches to the study of language. Modern Language Journal, 47, 114-121.
• Norton, B. 1997. Language, identity and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 409-430.
• Ochs, E. 1993. Constructing social identity: a language socialization perspective. Reearch on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 287–306
• Pavlenko, A. 1998. Second language learning by adults: Testimonies of bilingual writers. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9, 3-19.
• Pavlenko, A. 2002. Poststructuralist approaches to the study of social factors in L2. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters, pp. 277-302.
• Peirce, B. N. 1995. Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9-31.
• Schechter, S.R. & Bayley, R. 1997. Language socialization practices and cultural identity: Case studies of Mexican-descent families in California and Texas. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 513- 541.
• Schumann, J. H. 1978. The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. C. Gingras (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, 27-50, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
• Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209-239.
• Tajfel, H. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
• Tajfel, H. 1981. Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Uchida, Y. & Duff, P. A. 1997. The negotiation of teachers’ sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 451-486
• Weinreich P. 2009. ‘Enculturation’, not ‘acculturation’: conceptualizing and assessing processes in migrant communities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations.