Extensive Writing in Tertiary Education

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 207 - 228

Behçet Erden , Perihan Korkut

https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.1509720

Öz

The current study seeks to find out whether Extensive Writing (EW) practices has an effect on attitudes of students towards writing and if their attitudes towards writing differ by gender. The study was conducted with two groups of intermediate level English language preparatory class students at a state university in Turkey. In the study, explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research was used for data collection and analysis procedures. In order to collect data, a four-week research lesson cycle was planned. Together with learners’ written works, a questionnaire and learning reflection questions were used. The findings of the study revealed a notable improvement of writing performance in the experimental group. As for gender differences in attitudes and writing scores, there appeared significant differences in test scores of the control group, with males outperforming females. In the experimental group, however, there was no indication of gender-based difference neither in test scores nor in their attitudes regarding writing. By analyzing learning reflection questions, it was concluded that the participants were mostly positive about this new practice. These findings collectively suggest that while observable gains in writing skills are evident, the treatment did not have an effect on gender-related differences in writing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

L2 Writing, Extensive Writing, Writing Attitude, Gender and Writing

Üniversite Eğitiminde Kapsamlı Yazma

Öz

Mevcut çalışma, Kapsamlı Yazma (KY) uygulamalarının öğrencilerin yazmaya yönelik tutumları üzerinde bir etkisi olup olmadığını ve yazmaya yönelik tutumlarının cinsiyete göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını bulmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, Türkiye'de bir devlet üniversitesinde orta düzeyde İngilizce hazırlık sınıfında öğrenim gören iki grup öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada, veri toplama ve analiz prosedürleri için karma yöntem araştırmalarının açıklayıcı ardışık tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Veri toplamak için dört haftalık bir araştırma ders döngüsü planlanmıştır. Öğrencilerin yazılı çalışmalarıyla birlikte bir anket ve öğrenme yansıtma soruları kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, deney grubunda yazma performansında dikkate değer bir iyileşme olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Tutumlar ve yazma puanlarındaki cinsiyet farklılıklarına gelince, kontrol grubunun test skorlarında erkeklerin kadınlardan daha iyi performans gösterdiği önemli farklılıklar ortaya çıkmıştır. Ancak deney grubunda, ne test skorlarında ne de yazmaya ilişkin tutumlarında cinsiyete dayalı bir fark belirtisi bulunamamıştır. Öğrenme yansıtma soruları analiz edilerek, katılımcıların bu yeni uygulama konusunda çoğunlukla olumlu oldukları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu bulgular toplu olarak, yazma becerilerinde gözlemlenebilir kazanımlar olduğu halde, uygulamanın yazma becerisindeki cinsiyete bağlı farklılıklar üzerinde bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İkinci Dilde Yazma, Kapsamlı yazma, yazmaya karşı tutum, Cinsiyet ve Yazma

Kaynakça

• Bonzo, J. D. (2008). To assign a topic or not: Observing fluency and complexity in intermediate foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, 41(4), 722-735. DOI:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03327.x
• Brown, H. D. ve Abeywickrama, P. (2004). Language assessment. Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Buhrke, L., Henkels, L., Klene, J. ve Pfister, H. (2002). Improving Fourth Grade Students' Writing Skills and Attitudes. Camarata, S. ve Woodcock, R. (2006). Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females. Intelligence, 34(3), 231-252. DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2005.12.001
• Creswell, J. W. ve Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
• Creswell, J. W. ve Creswell, J. D. (2014). The selection of a research approach. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2014, 3-24.
• Çakır, İ. (2010). Why is writing skill difficult to gain in foreign language teaching. Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 28, 165-176.
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. Oxford University Press, USA. DOI:10.1093/oso/9780195120165.001.0001
• Erdogan, T. (2013). The effect of creative drama method on preservice classroom teachers' writing skills and attitudes towards writing. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 38(1), 45-61. DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n1.5
• Gibb, S. J., Fergusson, D. M. ve Horwood, L. J. (2008). Gender differences in educational achievement to age 25. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 63-80. DOI: 10.1177/000494410805200105
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Second language writing online: An update. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 1–15. DOI: 10125/44574
• Graham, S. ve Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
• Haneda, M. (2007). Modes of engagement in foreign language writing: An activity theoretical perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(2), 297327. DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.64.2.297
• Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. London: Longman
• Harris, K. R., Schmidt, T. ve Graham, S. (1998). Every child can write:
• Strategies for composition and self-regulation in the writing process. Advances in teaching and learning, 2, 131-167.
• Heaton, H. ve Pray, P. (1982). Writing anxiety: Reasons and reduction techniques. Wisconsin English Journal, 24(3), 2-7.
• Heilenman, L. (1991). Writing in foreign language classrooms: process and reality. In: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 273-288). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781410609427
• Kamari, E., Gorjian, B. ve Pazhakh, A. (2012). Examining the effects of gender on second language writing proficiency of Iranian EFL students: Descriptive vs. opinion one-paragraph essay. Advances in Asian Social Sciences (AASS), 3(4), 217-226.
• Leki, I. (2001). Material, educational, and ideological challenges of teaching EFL writing at the turn of the century. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 197-209.
• Li, J., Link, S. ve Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 27, 1-18. DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
• Paker, T. ve Erarslan, A. (2015). Attitudes of the preparatory class students towards the writing course and their attitude-success relationship in writing. Journal of Language and linguistic Studies, 11(2), 1-11.
• Peterson, S. (2000). Fourth, sixth, and eighth graders' preferred writing topics and identification of gender markers in stories. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 79-100. DOI: 10.1086/499660
• Piltch, Charles. (1979). Problems with Freewriting [microform] / Charles Piltch. [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse
• Raimes, A. (2002). Ten steps in planning a writing course and training teachers of writing. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 306-314. DOI:10.1017/cbo9780511667190.043
• Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT journal, 61(2), 100-106. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccm002
• Sarkhoush, H. (2013). Relationship among Iranian EFL Learners' Self-efficacy in Writing, Attitude towards Writing, Writing Apprehension and Writing Performance. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(5). DOI: 10.4304/jltr.4.5.1126-1132
• Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL quarterly, 27(4), 657-677. DOI: 10.2307/3587400
• Silva, T. ve Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Writing. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 251-266). London: Arnold.
• Soori, A. ve Zamani, A. A. (2012). Language features in the writing of male and female students in English and Persian. European Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 324-329.
• Sun, Y. C. (2010). Extensive writing in foreign‐language classrooms: A blogging approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 327-339. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2010.498184
• Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language teaching, 33(4), 203-223. DOI: 10.1017/s0261444800015688
• Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511732997
• Zemelman, S., Daniels, H. ve Hyde, A. A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools.
• Zhang, W. L. (2016). A Peer Response Writing Activity for College Level Japanese Classes. Japanese Learning and Research, 182, 86-91.