Antecedents of Auditing and Reporting Standards’ Strength in Emerging Countries: The Role of Secrecy Culture

Öz

Auditing and reporting standards are indispensable for ensuring transparency, accountability, and comparability in financial markets. They enhance trust among stakeholders, reduce information asymmetry, and support economic integration. This study examines the moderating role of secrecy culture in the relationship between institutional, governance, and economic factors and the Strength of Auditing and Reporting Standards in emerging markets, using Gray's (1988) Secrecy Theory. Countries are grouped by secrecy levels (low, medium, high) to explore cultural, institutional, and governance impacts. The analysis focuses on association rather than causality, acknowledging the cross-sectional nature of the data. Results show that low-secrecy cultures benefit most from corporate governance, while high-secrecy cultures weaken the effectiveness of governance mechanisms. Foreign ownership is positively associated with Strength of Auditing and Reporting Standards, particularly in high-secrecy countries, while foreign market size is negatively associated with it. The findings emphasize the need for tailored policies, with high-secrecy nations requiring external pressures to enhance transparency and accountability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Secrecy Culture
• Strength of Auditing and Reporting Standards (SARS)
• Institutional and Governance Indicators

Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Denetim ve Raporlama Standartlarının Gücünün Belirlenmesinde Öncel Faktörler: Gizlilik Kültürünün Rolü

Öz

Denetim ve raporlama standartları, finansal piyasalarda şeffaflık, hesap verebilirlik ve karşılaştırılabilirliği sağlamak için vazgeçilmezdir. Bu standartlar, paydaşlar arasında güveni artırır, bilgi asimetrisini azaltır ve ekonomik entegrasyonu destekler. Bu çalışma, Gray’in (1988) Gizlilik Teorisi’nden yararlanarak, kurumsal, yönetişim ve ekonomik faktörler ile Denetim ve Raporlama Standartlarının Gücü arasındaki ilişkide gizlilik kültürünün düzenleyici (moderating) rolünü incelemektedir. Ülkeler, kültürel, kurumsal ve yönetişimsel etkileri analiz etmek amacıyla düşük, orta ve yüksek gizlilik düzeylerine göre gruplandırılmıştır. Analiz, verilerin kesitsel yapısı dikkate alınarak nedensellikten ziyade ilişkilere odaklanmaktadır. Bulgular, düşük gizlilik düzeyine sahip kültürlerin kurumsal yönetişimden en fazla faydayı sağladığını, yüksek gizlilik kültürlerinin ise yönetişim mekanizmalarının etkinliğini zayıflattığını göstermektedir. Yabancı sahipliğin, özellikle yüksek gizlilik kültürüne sahip ülkelerde, Denetim ve Raporlama Standartlarının Gücü ile pozitif ilişkili olduğu, yabancı pazar büyüklüğünün ise negatif ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Bulgular, yüksek gizlilik düzeyine sahip ülkelerin şeffaflık ve hesap verebilirliği artırmak için dış baskılara ihtiyaç duyduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gizlilik Kültürü
• Denetim ve Raporlama Standartlarının Gücü
• Kurumsal ve Yönetişim Göstergeleri

Kaynakça

1. Abou Tanos, B.- Farooq, O.- Ahmed, N. (2024). "Secrecy culture and sensitivity of investment to stock prices: Evidence from emerging markets." Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 96, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102045
2. Adela, Vincent- Mac Junior Abeka, George Tackie- Comfort Ama Akorfa Anipa- Deborah Esi Gyanba Mbir, - Cornelius Adorm-Takyi (2022). “Institutional structures and strength of auditing and financial reporting standards in Africa.” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 13(5), 1000–1024.
3. Afrifa, Godfred Adjapong- Ishmael Tingbani, Fred Yamoah- Gloria Appiah (2020). Innovation input, governance and climate change: evidence from emerging countries.” Technological Forecasting And Social Change 161, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.
4. Alessa, N. (2024). "The influence of religion on the strength of auditing and reporting standards. in the ai revolution: Driving business innovation and research." Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. 2, 1017-1033
5. Bertrand, J. - Klein, P.- O. - Pasiouras, F. (2024). "National culture of secrecy and firms’ access to credit." Journal of Banking & Finance, 168, 107277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107277
6. Boolaky, P. K. - Cooper, B. J. (2015). "Comparing the strength of auditing and reporting standards and investigating their predictors in Europe and Asia." Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12058
7. Boolaky, P. K. - Soobaroyen, T. (2017). "Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (ISA): Do institutional factors matter?" International Journal of Auditing, 21(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12081
8. Boolaky, P.- O’Leary, C. (2011). Determining the strength of auditing standards and reporting. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(4), 69–80.

9. Braun, G. P.- Rodriguez, R. P., Jr. (2008). Earnings management and accounting values: A test of gray (1988). Journal of International Accounting Research, 7(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2008.7.2.1
10. Brown, Philip (2011). “International financial reporting standards: What are the benefits?” Accounting And Business Research 41(3), 269–85. doi:10.1080/00014788.2011.569054.
11. Chen, T. T. Y.- Zhang, F. (Frank)- Zhou, G. (Stephen). (2017). "Secrecy culture and audit opinion: Some international evidence." Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(3), 274–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12057
12. Claessens, Stijn- B. Burcin Yurtoglu (2013). “Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey.” Emerging Markets Review 15, 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2012.03.002.
13. El-Helaly, M.- Ntim, C. G.- Soliman, M. (2020). "The role of national culture in international financial reporting standards adoption." Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101241
14. Elmghaamez, I. K.- Elmagrhi, M. H. (2022). "Diffusion theory, transnational antecedents and international standards on auditing adoption around the World." International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 212–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12273
15. Fan, Joseph P. H.- K. C. John Wei- Xinzhong Xu (2011). “Corporate finance and governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research.” Journal of Corporate Finance 17(2):207–14. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.12.001.
16. Geiger, M. - Van der Laan Smith, J. (2010). "The effect of institutional and cultural factors on the perceptions of earnings management". Journal of International Accounting Research, 9(2), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2010.9.2.21
17. Góis, A. D.- de Lima, G. A. S. F., de Sousa, N. A.- Malacrida, M. J. C. (2018). "The Effect of National Culture on the Relationship between IFRS Adoption and the Cost of Equity Capital". Journal of International Accounting Research, 17(3), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-52192
18. Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00200.x
19. Hope, O.- K., Kang, T. - Thomas, W.- Yoo, Y. K. (2008). "Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis". Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(5), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.07.003
20. Houqe, N.- Monem, R. M.- Tareq, M.- Van Zijl, T. (2015). Secrecy and Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Earnings Quality. https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/19254
21. Knechel, W. Robert (2013). “Do auditing standards matter?” Current issues in auditing 7(2), 1–16. doi:10.2308/ciia-50499.
22. l Lam, B. M.- Mo, P. L. L.- Rahman, M. J. (2024). Secrecy culture, client importance, and auditor reporting behavior: An international study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(2), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2022-3763
23. Loy, T. R. (2018). Intelligence, Institutions, A Culture of Secrecy and Earnings Management (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2603226). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2603226
24. Mazboudi, M.- Hasan, I. (2018). "Secrecy, information shocks, and corporate investment: Evidence from European Union countries." Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.11.002
25. Păcuraru-Ionescu, C.P.- Cîmpan, M.- Borlea, S. N. (2023). Determinants of audit quality and connections with economic development and education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 741–751. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0069
26. Papanastasopoulos, G. A. - Tsiritakis, E. (2015). "The accrual anomaly in Europe: The role of accounting distortions." International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.06.006
27. Prabowo, Ronny Usil Sis Sucahyo- Theresia Woro Damayanti Supramono (2021). “Tax enforcement and private firms’ audited financial statements: the moderating role of secrecy culture.” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 12(3), 547–65. doi:10.1108/jaee-01-2021-0014.
28. Sarıdoğan, Ayşe Atılgan (2021). “An empirical analysis for determinants of strength of auditing and accounting standards in the World.” Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy 6(1), 188–93.