Finansal Küreselleşme ve Ekonomik Büyüme

Öz

Bu çalışma, finansal küreselleşme ve sermaye hesabı serbestleşmesinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini teorik ve ampirik literatür ışığında incelemektedir. Neoklasik teori, serbest sermaye akışlarının yatırımları artıracağını öngörse de, ampirik bulgular genel serbestleşmenin doğrudan büyüme etkilerinin zayıf olduğunu göstermektedir. Buna karşılık, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve hisse senedi piyasası liberalizasyonunun büyümeye net pozitif etkileri vardır. “Yeniden Değerlendirme” paradigmasına göre finansal küreselleşmenin asıl faydası, sermaye birikiminden ziyade kurumsal kalite ve finansal derinlik gibi Toplam Faktör Verimliliğini artıran dolaylı faydalar oluşturmasıdır. Ancak bu faydaların gerçekleşmesi, ülkelerin belirli finansal ve kurumsal eşikleri aşmasına bağlıdır. Aksi halde ani sermaye çıkışları ve krizler yaşanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ayrıca, kontrolsüz sermaye girişlerinin reel döviz kurunu aşırı değerlendirerek rekabet gücüne zarar verdiği ve “asli günah” gibi dış borçlanma kaynaklı yapısal kırılganlıkların sürdüğü eleştirileri tartışılmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, finansal entegrasyon sihirli bir değnek veya tek tip bir reçete değildir ancak doğru sıralama, kurumsal reformlar ve tamamlayıcı politikalarla uygulandığında başarılı olabilecek pragmatik bir araçtır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Finansal Küreselleşme
• Sermaye Hesabı Serbestleşmesi
• Ekonomik Büyüme

Financial Globalization and Economic Growth

Öz

This study examines the effects of financial globalization and capital account liberalization on economic growth in light of theoretical and empirical literature. Although neoclassical theory predicts that free capital flows will increase investments, empirical findings indicate that the direct growth effects of broad liberalization are weak. In contrast, foreign direct investments and equity market liberalization have clear positive effects on growth. According to the "Reappraisal" paradigm, the main benefit of financial globalization is not direct capital accumulation, but rather the generation of indirect benefits such as institutional quality and financial depth that boost Total Factor Productivity. However, the realization of these benefits depends strictly on countries surpassing certain financial and institutional thresholds. Otherwise, sudden capital outflows and crises occur. The article also discusses the criticisms that uncontrolled capital inflows harm competitiveness by overvaluing the real exchange rate, and that structural vulnerabilities stemming from external borrowing, such as "original sin", persist. Ultimately, financial integration is not a magic wand or a one-size-fits-all prescription, but a pragmatic tool that can be successful when implemented with proper sequencing, institutional reforms, and complementary policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Financial Globalization
• Capital Account Liberalization
• Economic Growth

Kaynakça

1. Akisik, O., Gal, G., & Triani, S. (2025). Financial globalization, global accounting standards and economic growth. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104543.
2. Asongu, S. (2014). Financial development dynamic thresholds of financial globalization: evidence from Africa. Journal of Economic Studies, 41(2), 166-195.
3. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C. R., & Lundblad, C. (2005). Does financial liberalization spur growth?. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 3-55.
4. Bertaut, C., Bruno, V., & Shin, H. S. (2025). Original sin redux. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5. Bhagwati, J. (1998). The capital myth: the difference between trade in widgets and dollars. Foreign affairs, 7-12.
6. Bumann, S., Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2013). Financial liberalization and economic growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 33, 255-281.
7. Chang, R., Kaltani, L., & Loayza, N. V. (2009). Openness can be good for growth: The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90(1), 33-49.
8. Edison, H. J., Klein, M. W., Ricci, L. A., & Sløk, T. (2004). Capital account liberalization and economic performance: survey and synthesis. IMF Staff Papers, 51(2), 220-256.

9. Estrada, G. B., Park, D., & Ramayandi, A. (2015). Financial development, financial openness, and economic growth. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series, (442).
10. Gupta, N., & Yuan, K. (2009). On the growth effect of stock market liberalizations. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4715-4752.
11. Henry, P. B. (2007). Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence, and speculation. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(4), 887-935.
12. Hofmann, B., Patel, N., & Wu, S. P. Y. (2022). Original sin redux: a model-based evaluation. Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department.
13. Ing, L. Y., & Rodrik, D. (Eds.). (2025). The new global economic order. Taylor & Francis.
14. Judijanto, L., Utami, E. Y., Setyawasih, R., & Oswari, T. (2023). Exploratory Analysis of Literature on the Impact of Globalization on Finance. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(12), 1562-1571.
15. Kose, M. A., Prasad, E. S., Rogoff, K. S., & Wei, S. J. (2006). Financial globalization: a reappraisal.
16. Kose, M. A., Prasad, E. S., & Taylor, A. D. (2011). Thresholds in the process of international financial integration. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30(1), 147-179.
17. Kose, M. A., Prasad, E. S., & Terrones, M. E. (2009). Does openness to international financial flows raise productivity growth?. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(4), 554-580.
18. Mirjalili, S. H. (2022). Economic Growth, Institutions and Globalization A Critical Review on the Book One Economics, Many Recipe by Dani Rodrik. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 22(5), 133-154.
19. Osada, M., & Saito, M. (2010). Financial integration and economic growth: An empirical analysis using international panel data from 1974-2007. Research and Statistics Department, Bank of Japan, 22(6), 1-24.
20. Özmen, E., & Taşdemir, F. (2025). Structural Domestic Conditions, Regional and International Financial Integrations: Evidence from the MENA. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 21(3), 245-267.
21. Perfeito da Silva, P., & Zucker-Marques, M. (2025). Financial Subordination Goes Digital: Assessing the Drivers of Brazil’s Exchange Rate Instability.
22. Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., Wei, S. J., & Kose, M. A. (2003). Effects of financial globalization on developing countries: some empirical evidence. In India’s and China’s recent experience with reform and growth (pp. 201-228). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
23. Rodrik, D., & Subramanian, A. (2009). Why did financial globalization disappoint?. IMF Staff Papers, 56(1), 112-138.
24. Saha, S. (2025). The effects of financial inclusion and openness on economic growth: evidence from Asian countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 1-14.
25. Santiago, R., Fuinhas, J. A., & Marques, A. C. (2020). The impact of globalization and economic freedom on economic growth: the case of the Latin America and Caribbean countries. Economic Change and Restructuring, 53(1), 61-85.
26. Setianto, R. H., Azman-Saini, W. N. W., & Law, S. H. (2025). Threshold effects of institutional quality on the financial inclusion and stability nexus: International evidence. Borsa Istanbul Review, 25(2), 388-399.
27. Simplice, A. (2012). Financial development dynamic thresholds of financial globalization: evidence from Africa (No. 12/020). African Governance and Development Institute.
28. Tesega, M. (2022). Does Financial Globalization Contribute to Financial Development in Developing Countries? Evidence from Africa. Heliyon, 8(10), 1–7.
29. Uddin, I., & Azam Khan, M. (2024). Global evidence on the impact of globalization, governance, and financial development on economic growth. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 14546-14577.
30. Ying, Y. H., Chang, K., & Lee, C. H. (2014). The impact of globalization on economic growth. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 17(2), 25-34.
31. Yeyati, E. L., & Williams, T. (2014). Financial globalization in emerging economies: much ado about nothing?. Economía, 14(2), 91-131.