DEVRİM ve DEĞİŞİMİ ANLAMAYA YÖNELİK BİR YÖNTEM: TARİHSEL SOSYOLOJİ

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 12, 29 - 42, 15.03.2007

İrfan Haşlak

Öz

Tarihsel gerçekleri sosyolojinin temel kavramları ve hayal gücüyle yorumlama amacında olan tarihsel sosyolojinin bir yöntem olarak en çok yaralanıldığı konular dönüşüm ve özelikle de devrimlerdir. 1960’lardan sonra özellikle bu yöntemi benimseyerek geçmişte gerçekleşmiş dönüşümler üzerinde araştırma yapan tarihçi ve sosyologların sayısında önemli artış olmuştur. Çağdaş kurum ve uygulamaları anlamanın en tutarlı yolunun bunları yaratan nedenlere karşılaştırmalı olarak bakmanın daha anlamlı olacağı, değişik örneklerle ve özellikle Barrington Moore örneğinde vurgulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tarihsel sosyoloji, dönüşüm, devrim

Kaynakça

• Abrams, P.(1982), Historical Sociology, London: Open Books.
• Anderson, P.(1974a), Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism, London: Verso
• Anderson, P.(1974b), Lineages of the Absolutist State, London: Verso
• Beynon, H.(1992), “Class and Historical Explanation”, M. L. Bush (Edt), Social Orders & Social Classes in Europe since 1500: Studies in Social Stratification, New York: Longman
• Bloch, M.(1961), Feudal Society, Social Classes and Political Organization, London: Rout-ledge& Kegan Paul.
• Braudel, F. (1973), The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, London: William Collins
• Braudel, F.(1980), On History, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
• Burke, P. (1980), Sociology & History, London: Allen &Unwin.
• Cipollo, C.(Edt.) (1973), Introduction to the Industrial Revolution, London: Fontana
• Elias, N.(1969), The Court Society, Oxford: Basil Blackwell
• Fox-Genovese, E.& Genovese, Eugene D.(1976), “ The Political Crisis of Social History, a Marxist Perspective”, Journal of social History, X.
• Fukuyama, F.(1989), “The End of History”, The National Interest.
• Giddens, A.(1979), Central Problems in Social Theory, London: Macmillan.
• Giddens, A.(1991), Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber, Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
• Held, D. & Thompson, J.B.(Edt). (1989), Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Gid-dens and his Critics, Cambridge: cambridge University Press.
• Hermassi, E.(1976), “Toward a Comparative Study of Revolutions”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XVIII.
• Hobsbawm, E.(1986), The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848, London: Sphere Books.
• Kaye, Harvey J.(1984), The British Marxist Historiand, Cambridge: Polity.
• Mann, M.(1993), The Sources of Social Power, Vol. II: The Rise of Classes and Nation States, 1960-1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Marx, K.(1977), Selected Writings, Edt. D. McLellan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mennel, S.(1989), Norbert Elias: Civilization and The Human Self-İmage, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Moore, B.(1958), Political Power and Social Theory, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Presss.
• Moore, B.(1967), Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Harmondsworth:Penguin
• Saville, John (1991), “The Communist Experience: A Personal Appraisal”, R. Miliband and Panitch(Edit), The Socialist Register, London: Merlin Press.
• Sewell, William H.(1990), E.P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge: Polity.
• Skocpol, T.(1979), States and Social Revolutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Skocpol, T.Somers, M. (1980), “The Use of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XXII.
• Skocpol, T.(Edt.), (1999), Tarihsel Sosyoloji, Bloch’tan Wallerrstein’e Görüşler ve Yöntem-ler, Çeviren Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları
• Smith, D. (1991), The Rise of Historical Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Sztompka, P.(1986), “ The Renaissance of Historical Orientation in Sociology”, International Sociology, I Woodward, C. Vann (1967), “Comparative Political History”, Yale Review, LVI
• Zeldin, T.(1976), “Social History and Total History”, Journal of Social History, X