Sağlık Çalışanlarının Psikolojik Güvenlik Seviyelerinin Örgütsel Adalet Algıları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, sağlık çalışanlarının psikolojik güvenlik düzeylerinin örgütsel adalet algılarına olan etkisini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, gönüllü olarak katılan 271 sağlık profesyonelinden oluşan bir örneklemi kapsamaktadır. Veriler online olarak toplandı. Veri toplama aracı olarak, psikolojik güvenlik ve örgütsel adalet ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Demografik değişkenlere dayalı olarak çalışanların psikolojik güvenlik ve örgütsel adalet algılarındaki farklılıkları belirlemek için t-testleri ve ANOVA testleri uygulanmıştır. Ayrıca, psikolojik güvenliğin örgütsel adalet algısı üzerindeki etkisini incelemek için regresyon analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Verilerin analizi, SPSS paket programında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, sağlık çalışanlarının psikolojik güvenlik algılarının ortalamanın üzerinde olduğunu ve medeni durum, cinsiyet veya yaşa bağlı olarak değişmediğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca, çalışanların örgütsel adalet algıları ortalamanın biraz altında olup kurum türüne bağlı olarak değişmediği tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma aynı zamanda, sağlık çalışanlarının psikolojik güven algıları ile örgütsel adalet arasında, alt boyutlarıyla birlikte anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sağlık yöneticileri ve insan kaynakları profesyonelleri, çalışanların psikolojik güvenliğini desteklemek ve adalet algılarını iyileştirmek için stratejiler geliştirmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sağlık Çalışanları
• Güven
• Etik
• Adalet

THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGİCAL SAFETY LEVELS OF HEALTH WORKERS ON THEİR PERCEPTİON OF ORGANİSATİONAL JUSTİCE

Öz

This study aims to determine the impact of psychological safety levels on healthcare workers' perceptions of organisational justice. The sample consists of 271 healthcare professionals who voluntarily participated in the study. Data were collected online. The study employed a questionnaire as a data collection tool and measured psychological safety and organisational justice using appropriate scales. To determine differences in perceptions of psychological safety and organisational justice among employees based on demographic variables, t-tests and ANOVA tests were conducted. Additionally, regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of psychological safety on organisational justice perception. The data was analysed using the SPSS software package. The study found that the psychological safety perceptions of healthcare workers were above average and did not vary based on marital status, gender, or age. Additionally, employees' perceptions of organizational justice were slightly below average and did not vary based on the type of institution. The study also revealed a significant relationship between the psychological safety perceptions of healthcare workers and organizational justice, including its sub-dimensions. Health managers and human resources professionals should develop strategies to support employees' psychological safety and improve their perceptions of justice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Healthcare Workers
• Trust
• Ethics
• Justice

Kaynakça

1. Abbasoğlu, Ş. (2015). Perceptions of Organizational Justice in Employees and the Impact of Organizational Justice on Employee Job Motivation: “An Example of a State Hospital” [Master’s Thesis, Atılım University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business Management]. Ankara.
2. Adams, T.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Adrances in Experitnental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
3. Aggarwal, A., Nobi, K., & Rastogi, S. (2020). Linking structural empowerment and distributive justice to employee’s behavioral and attitudinal consequences: Testing the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), 1-17.
4. Akman, F. (2017). Nurses’ Perceptions of Organizational Justice and the Impact of Organizational Justice on Job Motivation in Healthcare Institutions; Field Study in Private Hospitals [Master’s Thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management]. Istanbul.
5. Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
6. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68.
7. Beugre, C.D. (2007). A Cultural Perspective of Organizational Justice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
8. Brown, S.P. & Leigh, T.W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358–368.

9. Carmeli, A., Brueller, D., & Dutton, J.E. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26, 81-98.
10. Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115–135.
11. Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 3-56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Doğangün, Ş. (2020). Perceptions of Organizational Justice and the Impact of Organizational Justice on Job Motivation in Employees: A Study in Istanbul [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Aydın University, Department of Business Management, Business Main Branch]. Istanbul.
13. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
14. Edmondson, A.C. (2006). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R.M. Kramer & K.S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches. New York: Russell Sage.
15. Ertuklu, H.V., Kayacan, M., & Özdemir, H.Ö. (2019). A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Safety and Counterproductive Work Behaviors among Healthcare Workers. Journal of Social, Humanitarian, and Administrative Sciences, 2(3), 166-179.
16. Filiz, M. (2020). A Systematic Review of Studies Investigating the Relationship between Leadership and Organizational Commitment in Healthcare Institutions. Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Dicle University, 10(20), 276-296.
17. Filiz, M. (2022). Analysis of Studies on Determining Whistleblowing Tendencies of Healthcare Workers through a Systematic Review Method. International Journal of Social Sciences, Artvin Çoruh University, 8(1), 74-86.
18. Filiz, M. (2023). The Mediating Role of Ethical Culture and Psychological Safety in Determining the Impact of Healthcare Workers’ Organizational Trust and Organizational Support Perceptions on Whistleblowing Tendency [Doctoral Thesis, Düzce University, Graduate School of Education]. Düzce.
19. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resources management. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
20. Gürbüz, S., & Mert G.S. (2009). Application of the Organizational Justice Scale: An Empirical Study in the Public Sector. Public Administration Journal, 42(3), 117-139.
21. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Research Methods in Social Sciences-Philosophy-Method-Analysis (5th Edition), Ankara: Seçkin Publications.
22. Herrenkohl, R.C., Judson, G.T., & Heffner, J.A. (1999). Defining and measuring employee empowerment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 373-389.
23. Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: The importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 107-117.
24. Huseman, R., Hatfield, J., & Miles, E. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222-234.
25. Ingrid, M.N., & Edmondson, A.C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in healthcare teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941-966.
26. Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
27. Kelekçioğlu, L., & Alper Ay, F. (2022). The Impact of Perceived Organizational Justice on Whistleblowing Intentions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Field Study on Hospital Employees. Journal of Social, Humanitarian, and Administrative Sciences, 5(1), 44-65.
28. Kılıç, N.Ç. (2021). The Impact of Ethical Leadership on Employee Voice: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Master’s Thesis, Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
29. Kilmann, R.H., Saxton, M.J., & Serpa, R., et al. (Eds.). (1988). Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
30. Korkmazer, F., & Pirol, M. (2021). The Impact of Justice on Organizational Deviant Behaviors: A Hospital Example. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration, 24(1), 43-62.
31. Lee, E. M., Park, S.Y., & Lee, H.J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724.
32. Leroy, H., Dierynck, B., Anseel, F., Simons, T., Halbesleben, J. R., & McCaughey, D. (2012). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: A team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1273-1281.
33. Li, N., & Yan, J. (2009). The effects of trust climate on individual performance. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 3(1), 27–49.
34. Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.
35. Lok, P., Westwood, R., & Crawford, J. (2005). Perceptions of organizational subculture and their significance for organizational commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(4), 490-514.
36. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
37. Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725. https://doi.org/10.2307/259200
38. Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535.
39. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.
40. O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D.J. (1996). Organization-motivated agression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review, 21, 225-253.
41. Schein, E. H. (1993). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room. Sloan Management Review, 34, 85–92.
42. Schmiesing, R. J., Safrit, R. D., & Gliem, J. A. (2003). Factors affecting OSU extension agents’ perceptions of organizational justice and job satisfaction. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 10(2), 25–35.
43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
44. Yener, S. (2014). Exploration of the Mediating Role of Psychological Safety Perception in the Relationship between Shared Leadership Behavior and Turnover Intention in Private Secondary Education Institutions. Doctoral Thesis, Istanbul, Haliç University, Institute of Social Sciences.
45. Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(59), 425-436.