EXPLAINING THE ARAB REVOLUTION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST: FROM AN IDENTITYCENTRED REACTION TO A POSITIVE INVOLVEMENT

Öz

This article is a treatise on the Arab revolution from the aspect of globalization as an inconsistent process. It postulates that the inconsistent character of current globalization has exacerbated the conditions of the occurrence of the Arab spring, while explaining why the Middle East in general has not been able to successfully integrate into it, within a core-periphery paradigm. The methodology referred to involves the projection on the level of real politics, of both macro and micro levels analysis of such a paradigm. In this sense, on the level of macro economics, US power politics, in its privileged relationship with the Arab authoritarian states, implies a geopolitical and geo-economic dominance supporting the status quo resulting from its global core situation. From the level of micro economic analysis, on the other hand, the core-periphery paradigm has also remained within the domestic scale of those Arab states, given their unequal distribution of resources and leaving behind the alienated populations from having any input into domestic governance. The analyses of Islamic responses to globalization in the Middle East, promises therefore a long term perspective to explain the Arab revolution, beyond the short term and spontaneous character, as attributed to it. Such long term perspective also explains the importance of this article. On the other hand, as regards Islamic identity affirmation in the light of globalization, as contrary to the preceding pejorative and reactive Islamic stance in relation to those unequal global patterns, the Arab revolution reveals rather an interactive, positive response to them, which underlines again the relevance of this article. Furthermore, as regards Islam and globalization, it is indicated that it is the capacity of Islam’s selective accommodation of globalization, which has made possible the Arab revolution. Consequently, the article defends that such original response, which made the Arab revolution possible, has evolved within a doctrinal effort for a new Islamic reinterpretation which would be progressive and democratic, as suits the universal values already found in Islam

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Globalization, Arab Spring, Islam, US, Core, Periphery, Culture, Democracy

EXPLAINING THE ARAB REVOLUTION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBALIZATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST: FROM AN IDENTITYCENTRED REACTION TO A POSITIVE INVOLVEMENT

Öz

Bu makalede, Arap devrimi, küreselleşmenin istikrarsız niteliği ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Genelde Orta Doğu’nun başarılı bir şekilde küreselleşmeyle bütünleşemediği gerçeği, makalede küreselleşmenin merkez-çevre sorunsalı açısından anlatılmaktadır. Arap baharının oluşumunun koşulları da, bu tarz bir merkez-çevre sorunsalı içerisinde incelenmektedir. Başvurulan yöntem böyle bir sorunsalın, makro ekonomik ve mikro ekonomik düzlemlerdeki analizini içermekte ve böyle bir ekonomik analizin reel politik alandaki izdüşümlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Makro ekonomik açı- dan, ABD’nin, küre üzerindeki merkez konumundan kaynaklanan güç siyaseti, bu ülkenin Arap otoriter devletleriyle olan ayrıcalıklı ilişkisinde, statükocu bir jeopolitik ve jeoekonomik hâkimiyeti de beraberinde getirmiştir. Diğer yandan, mikro ekonomik analiz açısından, kaynakların eşitsiz dağılımı ve ulusal hükümette söz hakkından geri bırakılmış yabancılaşmış nüfuslar dikkate alındığında, yukarıda belirtilen merkez-çevre sorunsalı, Orta Doğu ülkelerinin genelinde ve Arap devletlerinin ulusal düzleminde de kendini göstermektedir. Dolayısıyla, Arap Devrimi, Orta Doğu’da küreselleşmenin merkez-çevre sorunsalına yönelik İslami cevaplar açısından ele alındığında, bu devrime yüklenen kısa vadeli ve anlık karakterin ötesinde, uzun vadeli bir perspektif içerisinde işlenmeyi gerektirmektedir. Böyle bir uzun vadeli perspektif, bu makalenin de önemini açıklamaktadır. Diğer yandan, Islami kimlik taleplerinin, bu istikrarsız küresel yapılarla olan ilişkisinde, önceki pejoratif ve tepkili Islami duruşun aksine, Arap devrimi, eskisinden farklı, interaktif ve olumlu bir İslami cevabı içermektedir. Makalenin bir diğer önemi, bu son noktada yatmaktadır. Açıkçası, İslam ve küreselleşmeyle ilgili olarak, böyle bir olumlu etkileşimin, yani İslam’ın küreselleşmenin bazı özelliklerini kendine olumlu olarak çevirebilmesinin, Arap devrimini olanaklı kıldığı belirtmektedir. Sonuç olarak, makale, Arap devriminin; İslam’da zaten var olan evrensel değerlere uygun düşecek, yeni ve ilerlemeci, demokratik bir yorum doğrultusunda, doktrinal bir İslami çaba içerisinde geliştiğini savunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• küreselleşme, Arap baharı, İslam, ABD, merkez, çevre, kültür, demokrasi, ekonomik

Kaynakça

1. ABDUH, Muhammad; Al A’mal Al-Kâmila, (Complete Works), Beirut, Al Mu°assasa Al-‘Arabiyya li Al-Nashr, 1980.
2. AFRICAN BANK OF DEVELOPMENT, Poverty and inequalities in Tunisia, Morocco and Mauritania, Economic Briefs, 2011, www.afb.org (18.08.2012).
3. AL-QARADAWI, Yusuf; Al-Muslimunwa al-Awlamah, (Moslem and Globalization), Cairo, Dar-al al-Misriyya, 2000.
4. AL-SADR, Muhammad Baqir; Iqtisâduna (Our Economy), Beirut, Dar al-Ta’âruf li al-Matbû’ât, date of last publication unknown.
5. AYUBI, Nazih; Over-Stating the Arab State: Politics and Society in the Middle East, London, I. B. Tauris, 1999.
6. BHAGWATI, Jagdish; In Defense of Globalization, New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.
7. BEN BARKA, Mokhtar; La Droite Chrétienne Américaine: Les Evangélistes à la Maison Blanche, Paris, Ed. Privat, 2006.
8. CHARAFFEDDINE, Fahime; Idéologies et Culture dans le Monde Arabe et Musulman, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1993.

9. CHOMSKY, Naom –McChesney, Robert W. ; Profit Over People: Neoliberalism & Global Order, New York, Toronto, London, Seven Stories Press, 2011.
10. COX, R. W.; “Globalization, Multilateralism, and Democracy”, Approaches to World Order, Eds.: R. W. Cox - T. J. Sinclair, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 524- 536.
11. DAVIES, James; “Towards a Theory of Revolution”, American Sociological Review, 1962, Vol. 27, pp. 5-18.
12. DOBRY, Michel; Sociologie des Crises Politiques, 3ème édition, Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale de Science Politique, 2009.
13. DUSSOY, Gerard; Les Théories Géopolitiques – Traité de Relations Internationales (1), Paris, L’Harmattan, 2006.
14. DUWIDAR, Muhammad; Al-Ittijâh Al-Ray’I li Al-Iqtisâd Al-Misri, (The Rental Trend of the Egyptian Economy), Alexandria, 1982.
15. ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Carribian), “Vulnerability of Devoloping Countries”, Delibrations of 29th Session on the Issues of Globalization and Development, 6-12 May 2002, http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/globdevtoc.htm (06.11.2011).
16. EL-SAID, Hamed and HARRIGAN, Jane; “Globalization, International Finance, and Political Islam in the Arab World”, The Middle East Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, Summer 2006, pp. 444-466.
17. FILIU, Jean Pierre; La Révolution Arabe: Dix Leçons sur le Soulèvement Démocratique, Paris, Fayard, 2011.
18. FRIEDEN, J. A. - Rogowski R.; “The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview”, Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Eds.: R. O. Keohane - H. V. Milner, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 25-47.
19. GAFFNEY, Henry. H.; “Globalization and U.S. Navy Forces”, Center for Strategic Studies, July 2002, p.12. http://www.cna.org/newsevents/conferences/conf2_pdfs/crm_d5743.a1.pdf (01/03/2008).
20. GUILLEN, Mauro F.; “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive of Feeble? A Critique of Six Key Debates in the Social Science Literature”, A Working Paper of the Regionald H. Jones Center, commissioned by the Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 27, 2001, pp. 235-260.
21. HAYEK, Friedrich; The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
22. HAYNES, Jeff K.; “Transnational Religious Actors and International Politics”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2001, pp. 143-158.
23. HENRY, Clement; “A Clash of Civilizations”, Harvard International Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, Spring 2003, pp. 60-65.
24. HUBBEL, Stephen; “The Containment Myth: US Middle East Policy in Theory and Practice1, Middle East Report, Vol. 28, No. 208, Fall 1998, pp. 8-11.
25. HUNTINGTON, Samuel P.; The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century; Norman and London, University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
26. IKENBERRY, G. John; “Just like the Rest”, Foreign Affairs, March-April 1997, pp. 162-163.
27. INTERNATIONAL LABOR ORGANIZATION, Tunisia: Executive Summary and Policy Recommandations, 2011.
28. ISMAEL, Jacqueline S. and ISMAEL, Tareq Y.; “Globalization and the Arab World in the Middle East Politics: Regional Dynamics in Historical Perspective”, Arab Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, Summer 1999, pp. 129-144.
29. IVEKOVI, Ivan; “Some Notes on Developmental Violence in the Middle Easat and North Africa”, Globalization and State in the Middle East, Ed.: Aini Linjakumpu, Finland: TAPRI Net Series, No.1, 2003, pp. 7-27.
30. JISI, Wang; “Conflits de civilisations : fondement théorique et significations pratiques”, Cultures et Conflits, Vol. 19, No. 20, automne/hiver 1995, pp. 73-106.
31. KAMRAVA, Mehran; “Structural Impediments to Economic Globalization in the Middle East”, Middle East Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, Winter 2004, pp. 96-112.
32. KEGHIDA, Sami; The Impact of News Television on Arab Opinion and Politics : Al Jazeera and its Effects, Weapon of Mass Democratization or Weapon of Mass Destruction, Ph.D dissertation submitted in 2006, Centre d’EtudesDiplomatiques et Stratégiques, Paris, 2006.
33. LARSSON, Thomas; The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization, Washington, D.C., Cato Institute, 2001.
34. LEVIN, Mark; “Chaos and Globalization in the Middle East”, Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2005, pp. 394-411.
35. LINJAKUMPU, Aini; “The Challenge of Islamism to Middle Eastern Statehood”, Globalization and State in the Middle East, Ed.: Aini Linjakumpu, Finland: TAPRI Net Series, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-6.
36. LIPSET, S. M.; “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 59, 1994, pp. 2-13.
37. LOONEY, Robert; “Political Economy of the Middle East”, Middle East Policy, Vol. 15, No. 3, Fall 2008, pp. 163-167.
38. LUST-OKAR, Ellen - ZERHOUNI, Saloua; Political participation in the Middle East, Boulder, London, Lynne Rienner Publisher, 2008.
39. LUHAN, Mc. Marshal - R. POWERS Bruce; The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century, New York: Oxford University Press, September 1992.
40. MERMIER, Franck - GUAAYBESS, Tourya; Mondialisation et Nouveaux Medias Dans l’Espace Arabe, Paris, Maisonneuve et Larose, Maisons de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée, 2003.
41. MULLER, Edward N.; “Economic Determinants of Democracy”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 60, No. 6, 1995, pp. 966-982.
42. NAJAR, Fauzi; “The Arabs, Islam and Globalization”, Middle East Polociy, Vol. 12, No. 3, Fall 2005, pp. 91-106.
43. NIVA, S.; “Between Clash and Cooptation: US Foreign Policy and the Spectre of Islam”, Middle East Report, Vol. 28, No. 208, Fall 1998, pp. 26-29.
44. NOHRA, Fouad (dir.) ; Politiques Educatives, Emancipation Humaine et Inégalités Sociales Dans les Pays en Développement, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2010
45. NOHRA, Fouad ; “Jordanie, Egypte, Yémen, l’ingénierie constitutionnelle de l’élite au pouvoir face à la dynamique oppositionnelle”, Enjeux Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, Dir.: Pascal Chaigneau, Paris, Economica, 2010, pp. 130-146.
46. NOHRA, Fouad; “La pensée politique arabe moderne et l’exigence démocratique ou l’Europe libérale comme miroir de la référence islamique ” Vers un monde nouveau, Mélanges, textes et documents offerts au Professeur Edmond Jouve, Tome 1, Ch.3, Bruxelles, Editions Bruylant, 2010.
47. NOHRA, Fouad ; “L’islam est-il totalitaire ? ”, Panoramiques, 2001, No. 50, pp. 165-172.
48. NOLAND, Marcus and PACKO, Howard; “Islam Globalization and Economic Performance in the Middle East”, SAIS Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, Summer 2004, pp. 105-116.
49. ÖNİŞ, Ziya; “Neoliberal Globalization and the Democracy Paradox: The Turkish General Elections”, Journal of International Affairs, Fall 2000, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 283-306.
50. PERTHES, Volker; “Points of Differences and Cases for Cooperation: European Critique of US Middle East Policy”, Middle East Report, Vol. 28, No. 208, Fall 1998, pp. 30-32.
51. PERTHES, Volker; “The Private Sector, Economic Liberalization, and the Prospects of Democratization: The Case of Syria and Some other Arab Countries”, Democracy without Democrats? The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World, Ed.: GhassanSalame, London and New York, I. B. Tauris, 1994, pp. 243-267.
52. PISCATORI, H. James; “Order, Justice and Political Islam”, Order and Justice in International Relations, New York, Oxford University Press, 2003.
53. POLLIN, Robert; Contours of Descent: U.S. Economic Fractures and the Landscape of Global Austerity, New York: Verso, 2003.
54. PRIVATIZATION COORDINATION SUPPORT UNIT: Privatization in Egypt, Quarterly Review, Carana Corporation, Report provided in April-June 2002, for the United States Agency for International Development.
55. QUTB, Sayyid; Al- ‘Adâla Al-Ijtimâ’iya Fi al-Islâm (Social Justice in Islam), Cairo, Dâr alShurûq, 1986.
56. RAIMBAUD, Michel ; “Dynamique et Bilan de l’Insurrection Libyenne”, Enjeux Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, Dir.: Pascal Chaigneau, Paris, Economica, 2012, pp. 210-225.
57. RICHARDS, Alan - WATERBURY, John; A Political Economy of the Middle East, 3rd edition, Waterburry, Westview Pres, 2008.
58. RUBENSTEIN, Richard E. - CROCKER, Jarle; “Challenging Huntington”, Foreign Policy, No. 96, Fall 1994, pp. 113-128.
59. SALAME, Ghassan ; Démocraties sans Démocrates, Les Expériences d’Ouverture dans le Monde Arabe et Musulman, Paris, Fayard, 1994.
60. SEN, Amartya K.; Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco, CA, Holden-Day, 1970.
61. SHARIATI, Ali; Marxism and Other Western Fallacies, Berkley, Mirzan Press, 1980.
62. STIGLITZ, Joseph; Globalization and its Discontents, London, Penguin Books, 2002.
63. SULLIVAN, Paul; “Globalization: Trade and Investment in Egypte, Jordan, and Syrie since 1980”, Arab Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, Summer 1999, pp. 35-73.
64. TAYARA, Bassam ; Le Printemps Arabe Décodé : La Face Cachée des Révoltes, Beirut, Al Bouraq, 2011.
65. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE FOR TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT: 2012 World Investment Report, Toward A New Generation of Investment Policies, United Nations, 2012.
66. (UNESCO) UNITED NATIONS EDUCATION SCIENCE AND CULTURE ORGANIZATION, The Futures of Cultures, Paris, 1994.
67. (UNDP) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: Development Challenges for the Arab Region 2- Food Security and Agriculture, UNDP, 2009.
68. VINOKUR, Annie ; “De la Scolarisation de Masse à la Formation tout au Long de la Vie : Essai sur les Doctrines Educatives des Organisations Internationales », Education et Sociétés, 2003, No. 12, pp. 91-104.
69. VIOTTI, Paul R. - KAUPPI, Mark V.; International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism and Beyond, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1998.
70. WHITEHEAD, L.; Three International Dimensions of Democratization, The International Dimensions of Democratization, Ed.: L. Whitehead, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 3-24.
71. WORLD BANK, Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002.
72. ZOGBY, James J.; What Arabs Think: Values, Biliefs and Concerns, Report of Zogby International, commissioned by the Arab Thought Foundation, New York, Utica, 2002.