SOCIAL TRANSFERS AND UNEMPLOYMENT DURATION: AN EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF THE EU AND TURKEY

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 247 - 264, 31.12.2020

Fadime İrem Doğan

https://doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.854363

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study investigates the impact of social transfers on labor force participation in three countries (Turkey,
the Netherlands and Spain) across two different labor markets—namely, Turkey and the EU. In conducting
the comparative analysis, the focus is on impacts across different periods.
Specifically, the study assesses exit from unemployment to employment through an Accelerated Failure
Time (AFT) model, drawing on panel data from the Income and Living Conditions Survey (SILC and EUSILC)
over two periods (2006–09 and 2011–141) broken down by month (i.e. 48 months in each period). In
the 2009-09 period, the empirical results show that in all three countries studied, receipt of social transfers
prolongs the duration of unemployment, except for the Netherlands, where the opposite is true. These
findings regarding social transfers also indicate that the probability of leaving unemployment is higher for
those receiving a variety of transfers (education, disability, old age, survivors, etc.) for all countries in the
2011–14 period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Transfers, Labor Supply, Unemployment Duration, Labor Markets

Kaynakça

• ACEMOGLU, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets.
• AHMAD, N., Svarer, M., & Naveed, A. (2019). The Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes and Benefit Sanctions on Reducing Unemployment Duration. Journal of Labor Research, 1-28.
• AHN, N., & Ugidos‐Olazabal, A. (1995). Duration of unemployment in Spain: Relative effects of unemployment benefit and family characteristics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(2), 249-264.
• AHN, N., De La Rica, S., & Ugidos, A. (1999). Willingness to move for work and unemployment duration in Spain. Economica, 66(263), 335-357.
• ALSASUA, J., Bilbao‐Ubillos, J., & Olaskoaga, J. (2007). The EU integration process and the convergence of social protection benefits at national level. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 297-306.
• ARENDT, J. N., & Kolodziejczyk, C. (2019). The Effects of an Employment Bonus for Long-Term Social Assistance Recipients. Journal of Labor Research, 1-16.
• ARRANZ, J. M., & García-Serrano, C. (2014). Duration and recurrence of unemployment benefits. Journal of Labor Research, 35(3), 271-295.
• AUTOR, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly journal of economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
• BARGAIN, O., & Doorley, K. (2013). Putting structure on the RD design: social transfers and youth inactivity in France.
• BENTOLILA, S., & Blanchard, O. J. (1990). Spanish unemployment. Economic Policy, 5(10), 233-281.
• BOVER, O., Arellano, M., & Bentolila, S. (2002). Unemployment duration, benefit duration and the business cycle. The Economic Journal, 112(479), 223-265.
• BRYNJOLFSSON, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.
• CLEVES, M. (2008). An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. Stata Press.
• CONTINI, B., & Quaranta, R. (2017). Explaining Non-Employment Magnitude and Duration: The Case of Italy.
• COX, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), Vol. 34, No. 2. (1972), pp. 187-220.
• DĂNĂCICĂ, D. E., & Mazilescu, R. (2014). Long-term unemployment spells and exit states of men in Romania and Hungary. Procedia Economics and Finance, 8, 236-245.
• DEVINE, T. J., & Kiefer, N. M. (1991). Empirical labor economics: the search approach. Oxford University Press on Demand.
• DOĞAN, F. İ. (2019). UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND UNEMPLOYMENT DURATION IN FRANCE AND POLAND. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Topluluğu Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi, 27(1), 191-216.
• EDISIS, A. T. (2016). The Effect of Unemployment Insurance on Temporary Help Services Employment. Journal of Labor Research, 37(4), 484-503.
• ESSER, I., Ferrarini, T., Nelson, K., Palme, J., & Sjöberg, O. (2013). Unemployment benefits in EU member states.
• FILIZ, E. S. (2017). The Effect of Unemployment Insurance Generosity on Unemployment Duration and Labor Market Transitions. LABOUR, 31(4), 369-393.
• FORD, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. Basic Books.
• GABRIEL, D., Brigitte, S. C., & Elisabeta, J. (2017). Estimation of Unemployment Duration in Botoşani County Using Survival Analysis. Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences, 17(1).
• GOOS, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. The review of economics and statistics, 89(1), 118-133.
• GRAVERSEN, B. K., & Van Ours, J. C. (2008). How to help unemployed find jobs quickly: Experimental evidence from a mandatory activation program. Journal of Public economics, 92(10-11), 2020-2035.
• HÄGGLUND, A. E., & Bächmann, A. C. (2017). Fast lane or down the drain? Does the occupation held prior to unemployment shape the transition back to work?. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 49, 32-46.
• HAM, J. C. and Rea, A. S. (1987), “Unemployment Insurance and Male Unemployment Duration in Canada,” Journal of Labor Economics, 5, 325-353.
• HECKMAN, J. (1974). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 679-694.
• ISIKHAN, V. (2009). THE ASPECT OF SOCIAL SERVICES IN TURKEY. Serviço Social & Realidade, 17(2), 156-171.
• JENKINS, S. P. (1995), “Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-time Duration Models”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 129-138.
• KEYNES, J. M. (1930). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren, in (JM Keynes). Essays in persuasion.
• KRUEGER, A. B., & Meyer, B. D. (2002). Labor supply effects of social insurance. Handbook of public economics, 4, 2327-2392.
• KRUEGER, A. B., &Pischke, J. S. (1992). The effect of social security on labor supply: A cohort analysis of the notch generation. Journal of labor economics, 10(4), 412-437.
• KUPETS, O. (2006). Determinants of unemployment duration in Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(2), 228-247.
• LACHOWSKA, M., Meral, M., & Woodbury, S. A. (2016). Effects of the unemployment insurance work test on long-term employment outcomes. Labour Economics, 41, 246-265.
• MEYER, B.D. (1990). Unemployment insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58 (4), 757–782.
• MICHAELS, G., Natraj, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2014). Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over twenty-five years. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 60-77.
• MINCER, J. (1958). Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of political economy, 66(4), 281-302.
• MORRISSEY, T. W. (2017). Child care and parent labor force participation: a review of the research literature. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(1), 1-24.
• QI, J. (2009). Comparison of proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models (Doctoral dissertation).
• SCHARPF, F. W. (2002). The European social model. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645-670.
• SIEBERT, H. (1997). Labor market rigidities: at the root of unemployment in Europe. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 37-54.
• SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. (2016). Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Europe, 2016.
• TATSIRAMOS, K., & Ours, J. C. (2014). Labor market effects of unemployment insurance design. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(2), 284-311.
• THEODOROPOULOU, S. (2018). Drifting into Labour Market Insecurity? Labour Market Reforms in Europe after 2010. ETUI Research Paper – Working Paper 2018.03.
• TOHARIA, L., & Jimeno, J. F. (1995). Los hechos básicos del paro. El paro en España,¿ tiene solución. Center for Economic Policy Research.
• WORLD BANK. (2012). World Development Report 2013: Jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9575-2.
• YILDIRIM, J., & Dal, S. (2016). Social Transfers and Labor Force Participation Relation in Turkey: A Bivariate Probit Analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(7), 1515-1527.