Terör Örgütü Mensuplarına Yönelik Radikalleşmeden Arındırma Süreçleri ve DDR Modelinin Analizi: Endonezya JI Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma, terör örgütü mensuplarına yönelik radikalleşmeden arındırma ile ilgili kavram ve süreçleri analitik olarak tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Betimsel analiz ve vaka çalışması gibi nitel araştırma yöntemlerini kullanan bu makale, radikalleşmeden arındırma programları ve süreçlerine ilişkin mevcut tartışmaları incelemektedir. Radikalleşmeden arındırma, doğası gereği zorlu bir süreç olmasına rağmen küresel ve bölgesel terörizm olgusunun yükseldiği günümüz bağlamında önemli bir kavram olarak görülmektedir. Zira terörizmin temel nedenlerinden birisi radikalleşmedir ve ancak radikalleşmeden arındırma çabalarıyla terörist faaliyetler önemli ölçüde engellenebilir. Dünya çapındaki sayısız örnek radikalleşme sürecinin ele alınmadığı ve terör örgütü mensuplarının şiddetten uzaklaştırılması için çaba sarf edilmediği takdirde terörizmin gelişmeye devam edebileceğini göstermiştir. Bu makale ilk olarak radikalleşmenin kavramsal çerçevesini ve ilgili terimleri ayrıntısıyla ortaya koymakta ve radikalleşme ile radikalleşmeden arındırma arasındaki kavramsal ilişkiyi tanımlamaktadır. Daha sonra, radikalleşmeden arındırma süreci için önerilen bir çerçeve olan silahsızlanma, silahlı örgütün dağıtılması ve yeniden entegrasyon (Disarmament - Demobilization - Reintegration / DDR) modelini incelemektedir. Makalenin vaka çalışması bölümünde Endonezya’da uygulanan radikalleşmeden arındırma yöntemleri detaylandırılmakta ve bu yöntemlerin yaklaşımı ve etkinliği derinlemesine analiz edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, radikalleşmenin teorik ve pratik yönlerinin kapsamlı bir incelemesini sunarak, radikalleşmeyle mücadele etmek ve sürdürülebilir kamu düzenini teşvik etmek için gerekli stratejilerin daha geniş bir şekilde anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Terörizm
• Kriz ve Çatışma Yönetimi
• DDR Modeli
• Güvenlik Çalışmaları
• Radikalleşmeden Arındırma
• Radikalleşme

Deradicalization Processes of Terrorist Organization Members and the Analysis of DDR Model: The Case of JI in Indonesia

Öz

The aim of this study is to analytically discuss the concepts and processes related to the deradicalization of terrorist organization members within the broader term “deradicalization”. Exploiting qualitative research methods such as descriptive analysis and case study, this article examines the current debates on deradicalization programs and processes. Despite being an inherently challenging process, deradicalization is seen as a significant concept in the current context of rising global and regional terrorism. The main reason for this is that radicalization lies at the root of terrorism and only through deradicalization efforts can terrorist activities be prevented once and for all. While military strategies play an important role in the broader concept of counterterrorism, numerous examples from around the world have demonstrated that terrorism can continue to flourish if radicalization is not addressed and efforts are not made to divert terrorist organization members away from violence. This article first outlines the conceptual framework of radicalization and related terms and defines the conceptual relationship between radicalization and deradicalization. It then examines a proposed framework for the deradicalization process: the disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) model. The case study section of the article details the deradicalization methods applied in Indonesia and analyzes their approach and effectiveness in depth. By providing a comprehensive review of the theoretical and practical aspects of radicalization, this study aims to contribute to a broader understanding of the strategies necessary to counter radicalization and promote sustainable peace.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Terrorism
• Crisis and Conflict Management
• Deradicalization
• DDR Model
• Security Studies

Kaynakça

1. Agastia, I. G. B. D., Perwita, A. A. B., & Subedi, D. B. (2020). Countering violent extremism through state-society partnerships: a case study of de-radicalisation programmes in indonesia. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 15(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2020.1722317
2. Altier, M. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., ve Horgan, J. G. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology. Journal of peace research, 51(5), 647-661.
3. Anastasia, I. K. (2023). Study Of Deradicalization And Disengagement Of Former Terrorism Convicts As An Effort To Prevent Terrorism For National Resilience. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management. 3(1), 163-179.
4. Ashour, O. (2009). The de-radicalization of Jihadists: Transforming armed Islamist movements. Routledge.
5. Asrori, S., Jamilah, J., ve Ismail, M. (2020). The challenge of radicalization and deradicalization in prison; a review on social dynamics prison officers and terrorist inmates. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-11-2019.2293531
6. Banholzer, L. (2013). When Do Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Programs Succeed?. Demobilization and Reintegration Programs Succeed.
7. Barrelle, K. (2015). Pro-integration: disengagement from and life after extremism. Behavioral sciences of terrorism and political aggression, 7(2), 129-142.
8. Bintarsari, N. K. (2022). Countering terrorism in Indonesia: a study of policy in counter-terrorism measures of the Indonesia National Counter-terrorism Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme/BNPT), Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School-Newark. BNPT. (2013). National Rehabilitation Guidelines for Terrorism Perpetrators and Families Volume 1. Jakarta: The National Anti-Terror Agency.

9. Brailey, M., Ismail, N. H., & Amir, I. (2023). "hearts, hands and heads": exploring the relationship between disengagement and deradicalization through counter violent extremism project implementation in indonesia. Muslim Politics Review, 2(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v2i1.140
10. Bjørgo, T. (2011). Dreams and disillusionment: Engagement in and disengagement from militant extremist groups. Crime, law and social change, 55(4), 277-285.
11. Cardenas, J., Pérez, N. S., & Triana, S. (2016). Different paths to peace building: A comparative analysis of DDR programs in Colombia and the Province of Aceh, Indonesia. In Handbook of Research on Transitional Justice and Peace Building in Turbulent Regions (pp. 374-396). IGI Global.
12. Della Porta, D., ve LaFree, G. (2012). Guest editorial: Processes of radicalization and de-radicalization. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 6(1), 4-10.
13. Edwards, W. ve Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute Evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Gill, P., Bouhana, N., & Morrison, J. (2015). Individual disengagement from terrorist groups. Terrorism and political violence, 243-257.
15. Gossman, P. (2009). Transitional Justice and DDR: The Case of Afghanistan. International Center for Transitional Justice Research Brief. June. Available at: http://www. ictj. org/static/Publications/Gossman_Af_ResearchBriefDDR_re2009. Pdf
16. Hilmy, M. (2013). The politics of retaliation: the backlash of radical islamists to the deradicalization project in indonesia. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 51(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.511.129-158
17. Horgan, J. (2004). The psychology of terrorism. Routledge.
18. Horgan, J. (2009a). Disengaging from terrorism. The faces of terrorism: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 257-276.
19. Horgan, J. G. (2009b). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. Routledge.
20. Horgan, J., ve Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists?: Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and political violence, 22(2), 267-291.
21. Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Demobilization and Reintegration. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 531-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707302790
22. Hwang, J. C. (2018). Why terrorists quit: The disengagement of Indonesian jihadists. Cornell University Press. Ike, T. J., Singh, D., Jidong, D. E., Murphy, S., & Ayobi, E. E. (2021). Rethinking reintegration in nigeria: community perceptions of former boko haram combatants. Third World Quarterly, 42(4), 661-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1872376
23. Ilyas, M. and Athwal, R. (2021). De-radicalisation and humanitarianism in indonesia. Social Sciences, 10(3), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030087
24. Indrawan, J. ve Aji, M. (2019). The effectiveness of national agency for combating terrorism’s deradicalization program toward terror convicts in indonesia. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 9(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v9i2.571
25. IPAC (2024).“An Indonesian Deradicalisation Program That Works”, IPAC Report No: 92, https://understandingconflict.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/dashboard/IPAC-Report-92-An-Indonesian-Deradicalisation-Program-that-Works-rev.pdf.pdf.
26. Ismail, N. H. (2023). Indonesia's detachment 88–a model for countering extremism. RSIS Commentaries, 148-23.
27. Knight, M. (2008). Expanding the DDR model: Politics and organizations. Journal of Security Sector Management, 6(1), 1-19.
28. Koehler, D. (2016). Understanding deradicalization: Methods, tools and programs for countering violent extremism. Taylor & Francis.
29. Kruglanski, A., Gelfand, M., Bélanger, J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., ve Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: how significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163
30. Marsden, S. V. (2017). Reintegrating extremists: Deradicalisation and desistance. Springer.
31. McQuinn, B. (2023). Study of deradicalization and disengagement of former terrorism convicts as an effort to prevent terrorism for national resilience. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i1.526
32. Milla, M., Hudiyana, J., ve Arifin, H. (2019). Attitude toward rehabilitation as a key predictor for adopting alternative identities in deradicalization programs: an investigation of terrorist detainees’ profiles. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12380
33. Muggah, R. (2005). No Magic Bullet: A Critical Perspective on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration and Weapons Reduction in Post-Conflict Contexts. The Round Table, 94(379), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358530500082684 Muggah, R. (Ed.). (2009). Security and post-conflict reconstruction. New York: Routledge.
34. Muggah, R. (2010). Innovations in disarmament, demobilization and reintegration policy and research-Reflections on the last decade. NUPI Working Paper.
35. Muggah, R. and O’Donnell, C. (2015). Next generation disarmament, demobilization and reintegration. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.fs
36. Muhyiddin, M., & Priyanto, S. (2023). Deradicalization Narratives from Former Convicts in the Digital Space: Sofyan Tsauri’s YouTube Channel Analysis. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 13(01), 1-23.
37. Muluk, H., Umam, A., ve Milla, M. (2019). Insights from a deradicalization program in indonesian prisons: the potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12392
38. Nivette, A., Echelmeyer, L., Weerman, F., Eisner, M., ve Ribeaud, D. (2021). Understanding changes in violent extremist attitudes during the transition to early adulthood. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 38(4), 949-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09522-9
39. Önenli Güven, M. (2023). İstihbarat ve Terörizmle Mücadelede Radikalleşmeden Dönüş. İstihbarat Çalışmaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 221-244.
40. Pelletier, P. ve Drozda‐Senkowska, E. (2020). Virtual reality as a tool for deradicalizing the terrorist mind: conceptual and methodological insights from intergroup conflict resolution and perspective-taking research. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology, 26(4), 449-459. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000442
41. Porto, J. G., Parsons, I., ve Alden, C. (2007). From Soldiers to Citizens: The Social, Economic and Political Reintegration of UNITA Ex-combatants. Institute for Security Studies Monographs, (130).
42. Prasetya, A. ve Meliala, A. (2021). Desistance from terrorism a new hope for the quit from terrorism program indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 04(10). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-53
43. Rabasa, A., Pettyjohn, S. L., Ghez, J. J., ve Boucek, C. (2010). Deradicalizing islamist extremists. RAND Corp Arlington VA National Security Research Div.
44. Reinares, F. (2011). Exit from terrorism: A qualitative empirical study on disengagement and deradicalization among members of ETA. Terrorism and Political Violence, 23(5), 780-803.
45. Reiter, J., Doosje, B., & Feddes, A. R. (2020). Radicalization and deradicalization: a qualitative analysis of parallels in relevant risk factors and trigger factors.. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yne3v
46. Saleh, M. (2022). The religious leaders' view on deradicalization efforts through the islamic educational institutions and anti-terrorism law in yogyakarta. Progresiva Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 11(01), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v11i01.21834
47. Silke, A. (2008). Holy Warriors: Exploring the Psychological Processes of Jihadi Radicalization. European Journal of Criminology, 5(1), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370807084226
48. Subagyo, A. (2021). The implementation of the pentahelix model for the terrorism deradicalization program in indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1964720
49. Subedi, D. B. (2014). Conflict, combatants, and cash: Economic reintegration and livelihoods of ex-combatants in Nepal. World Development, 59, 238-250.
50. Sukabdi, Z. A. (2015). Terrorism in indonesia: a review on rehabilitation and deradicalization. Journal of Terrorism Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.1154
51. Suratman, Y. P. (2018). The effectiveness of de-radicalization program in southeast asia: does it work? the case of indonesia, malaysia, and singapore. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 5(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v5i2.4302
52. Syafiq, M., Alfithon, A. M., Cherney, A., & Louis, W. R. (2024). Self-compassion as a factor in the deradicalisation of extremist offenders. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 18, 18344909231225300.
53. Taskarina, L. ve Nuri, W. (2021). Dreaming of the peaceful ways: an evaluation of the indonesian deradicalisation program. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 25, 687-700. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v25i1.5092
54. Ulyana, A. ve Riyansyah A. (2021). “De-radicalization Program: The Case Study of Indonesia”. International Journal of Business Economics and Social Development”. 2(2), 78-88.
55. Widya, B., Syauqillah, M., & Mr., S. Y. (2020). The involvement of ex-terrorist inmates and combatants in the disengagement from violence strategy in indonesia. Journal of Terrorism Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/jts.v2i2.1022
56. Wright, S. A. (1988). Leaving new religious movements. Issues, theory, and research. Falling from the faith. Causes and consequences of religious apostasy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
57. Yumitro, G. ve Abhiyoga, N. (2022). Multiculturalism education as the social approach for deradicalization program in indonesia. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38, 124-134. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7763
58. Yumitro, G., Febriani, R., Roziqin, A., & Abiyogha, N. (2022). Deradicalization programs in indonesia: bibliometric analysis of international publication trends from 1980 to 2022. Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.21924/chss.2.1.2022.31