AB’nin Güney Komşuları ile İlişkileri: Göçün Güvenlikleştirilmesi ve Sivil Topluma Etkiler

Öz

Avrupa Birliği’nin (AB) güney komşularına yönelik politikası, kapsamındaki ülkelerin ihtiyaçlarına göre farklılaştırılmış politikalar, teknik ve mali yardım öngören “Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası” kapsamında ele alınmaktadır. “Arap Baharı” gelişmeleri ile 2011 ve sonrasında 2015 yıllarında revize edilen “Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası” göç ve terörizm nedeniyle giderek daha fazla önem kazanmaya devam etmektedir. AB’nin güney komşularına yönelik politikasının göç ve terörizm gibi “tehditler” nedeniyle “güvenlik” odaklı tartışmalara neden olduğu bir dönemde, AB’nin, üçüncü ülkelerle ilişkilerinde öncelikli yer tutan ve bölgedeki otoriter yönetimler altında çeşitli kısıtlar yaşayan sivil topluma yönelik yaklaşımı önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada AB’nin güney komşularına yönelik politikasında göçü güvenlikleştirmesinin, bölgedeki sivil toplum kuruluşları nezdinde etkileri, gerçekleştirilen faaliyetler, bu faaliyetlerin sonuçları incelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası,sivil toplum kuruluşları,Güney Komşuları,Göç,Güvenlik,Lübnan,Tunus

Kaynakça

1. Aliyev, H. (2016). “Assessing the European Union’s Assistance to Civil Society in Its Eastern Neighbourhood: Lessons from the South Caucasus”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24:1, 42-60.
2. Annd-Arab NGO Network For Development, (2016). “Red Lines for the European Neighbourhood Policy Implementation”. http://www.solidar.org/system/downloads/attachments/000/000/465/original/ANNDedit_ENP_red_lines_final.pdf?1469695669. Erişim Tarihi: 1 Eylül 2018.
3. Awad, A.M. (2016). The New ENP Framework: An Imbalanced Partnership, KEHYS, (The Finnish NGDO Platform to the European Union).
4. Bogdan, N. B. (2011). “The Role of Civil Society in EU Migration Policy: Perspectives on the European Union’s Engagement in its Neighbourhood”. Migration Policy Institute.
5. Chaaban, J., Chalak, A., Ismail, T. and Khedr, S. (2018). “Analysing Migration Policy Frames of Lebanese Civil Society Organizations”. MEDRESET Working papers, No:19.
6. Council of the EU (2016). “EU and Lebanon adopt partnership priorities and compact”. Press Release, 665/16.
7. Dandashly, A. (2015). “The EU Response to Regime Change in the Wake of the Arab Revolt: Differential Implementation”. Journal of European Integration, 37:1, 37-56.
8. Dandashly, A. (2018). “EU democracy promotion and the dominance of the security–stability nexus”. Mediterranean Politics, 23:1, 62-8.

9. Euromed Migration, (2015).”EUROMED Migration IV”. Info Sheet.
10. European Commission (2011). “A New Response to a Changing Neighbourhood, A Review of European Neighbourhood Policy”, Joint Communication by the High Representative of the Union For Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0303&from=EN. Erişim Tarihi: 16 Eylül 2018.
11. European Commission (2015). “Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2014”. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels.
12. European Commission. (2016). “European Neighbourhood Policy”. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/overview_en. Erişim Tarihi: 16 Eylül 2018.
13. European Commission, Lebanon & Jordan. (2016). “European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations”. https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/countries/lebanon_en.https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/countries/jordan_en. Erişim Tarihi: 1 Eylül 2018.
14. European Commission, Tunisia. (2016). https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/neighbourhood/countries/tunisia_en. Erişim Tarihi: 15 Eylül 2018.
15. European Commission. (2017). “Report on the Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Review”. Joint Report to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of Regions. Brussels.
16. Goulordava, K. (2018). “Lebanon-EU Relations and the Way Forward: Qualitative Research Findings with Key Stakeholders in Lebanon”, MEDRESET Working Papers, No:12.
17. Hollis, R. (2012). “No friend of democratization: Europe's role in the genesis of the Arab Spring”. International Affairs, 88(1), pp. 81-94.
18. Jaulin, T. (2010). “The Impact of EU Migration Policy in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean”, International IDEA.
19. Lappalainen, R. (2016). Introduction, EU as a neighbour: Views from civil society, KEHYS, (The Finnish NGDO Platform to the European Union).
20. Leonard, S. (2011). “EU border security and migration into the European Union: FRONTEX and securitisation through practices”. European Security, Volume 19, p. 231-254.
21. Olcay, O.A., Icduygu, A. (2012). “Mapping Civil Society in the Middle East: The Cases of Egypt, Lebanon and Turkey”. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 39:2, 157-179.
22. Pace, M. (2009). “Paradoxes and contradictions in EU democracy promotion in the Mediterranean: the limits of EU normative power”. Democratization, 16:1, 39-58.
23. Roman, E. (2018). “Reversing the Perspective: How European Stakeholders React to Migration Policy Frames of Southern Mediterranean Counterparts”. MEDRESET Working Papers, No: 18.
24. Roman, E., Pastore F. (2018). “Analysing Migration Policy Frames of Tunisian Civil Society Organizations: How do they evaluate EU Migration policies?”. MEDRESET Working Papers, No: 14.
25. Romeo, I. (1998). “The European Union and North Africa: Keeping the Mediterranean ‘safe’ for Europe”. Mediterranean Politics, 3:2, 21-38.
26. Seeberg, P. (2009). “The EU as a realist actor in normative clothes: EU democracy promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy”. Democratization, 16:1, 81-99.
27. Seeberg, P. (2017). “The Syrian refugees in Lebanon and the EU-Lebanon Partnership Compact, -New Strategies, Old Agendas”. Centre for Mellemoststudier, Syddansk University, News Analysis.
28. Yazgan, H. (2015). Rubicon’u Geçmek? Onuncu Yılında Avrupa Komşuluk Politikası”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt:11, Sayı:42, s.103-131.