Productivity as a Goal in the ILO’s Discourse, Policies and Activities: A Historical Review

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 4, 954 - 989, 15.12.2024

Aylin Güler Ünlü

Öz

Productivity has always been a central goal in capitalism, which operates on the basis of the continuity of the capital accumulation process, and in the capitalist production process organized around the exploitation of surplus value. In this article, a historical overview of the discourses, policies and activities focusing on productivty of the International Labour Organization (ILO), which undertakes functions in the field of social policy in the international capitalist system and emphasizes that it carries out these functions with the mission of social justice, is presented. Thus, it is aimed to evaluate the understanding adopted by the organisation. The study, based on an analysis of the ILO’s institutional documents, confirms that the goal of productivity has historically been a fundamental objective for the organization, reveals that economic goals have influenced the organisation’s policy approach framework within a perspective that equates social development with capitalist development. Furthermore, it shows that the policies and activities carried out by the ILO within the framework of these objectives have taken a direction consistent with the principles of capitalist accumulation of the time. Indeed, since its foundation, the ILO has linked the goal of achieving good living and working standards to the goal of increasing productivity in capitalism, in other words, it has been based on the understanding that social progress can only be achieved by meeting the economic needs of the capitalist development model of the period. However, since the years when neoliberal policies became the dominant programme, productivity and economic goals have had significant impacts on the redefinition of social policy and the shaping of social policy practices. Throughout these years, the ILO has increasingly aligned its policies, agenda, and activities with neoliberal approaches while also developing a discourse on the need to ‘balance’ between the economic and the social. In this context, the organisation has promoted flexibility, competitiveness, and productivity in labour markets while asserting that neoliberal policies could be balanced through various social policy practices. In the period leading up to today, when many crises, including the pandemic, have been faced, the ILO has continued to adopt a balance approach while increasing its calls for social justice. However, as the ‘balance’ policies were essentially grounded in advancing the competitive free-market order, and within this framework, the needs of capital have continued to be prioritised over the protection of labour, a process unfolded within the ILO in which the gap between discourses and realities, commitments, and actions has gradually widened.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Policy, International Social Policy, International Labour Organization (ILO), Productivity, Surplus Value

ILO’nun Söylem, Politika ve Faaliyetlerinde Bir Hedef Olarak Verimlilik: Tarihsel Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Sermaye birikim sürecinin sürekliliği temelinde işleyen kapitalizmde ve artı değer sömürüsü etrafında örgütlenen kapitalist üretim sürecinde verimlilik, her daim merkezi bir hedef olmuştur. Bu makalede de uluslararası kapitalist sistemde özellikle sosyal politika alanına dair işlevler üstlenen ve bu işlevleri sosyal adalet misyonuyla yürüttüğünü vurgulayan Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü’nün (International Labour Organization-ILO) verimlilik konusuna yönelen söylem, politika ve faaliyetlerine dair tarihsel bir seyir sunulmuştur. Böylelikle kuruluşun izlediği politika anlayışının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. ILO’nun kurumsal belgelerinin incelenmesine dayanan çalışma, verimlilik hedefinin ILO için tarihsel bir temel hedef olarak öne çıktığını teyit etmiş, kapitalist gelişme ile toplumsal gelişmeyi özdeşleştiren bir bakış açısı ekseninde ekonomik hedeflerin kuruluşun politika anlayışını etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca bu hedefler çerçevesinde ILO’nun yürüttüğü politika ve faaliyetlerin dönemsel kapitalist birikim esaslarıyla uyumlu bir yön aldığını göstermiştir. Nitekim ILO, kuruluşundan itibaren iyi yaşam ve çalışma standartlarına ulaşılması hedefini kapitalizmde verimliliğin artırılması hedefine bağlamış, diğer bir ifadeyle sosyal ilerlemenin ancak dönemin kapitalist birikim sisteminin ekonomik ihtiyaçlarının karşılanmasıyla gerçekleştirilebileceği anlayışına dayanmıştır. Bununla birlikte neoliberal politikaların hâkim program haline gelmeye başladığı yıllardan itibaren verimlilik hedefi ve ekonomik hedefler, sosyal politikanın yeniden tanımlanmasında, sosyal politika uygulamalarının şekillenmesinde ciddi etkilerde bulunmuştur. ILO da bu yıllar boyunca politika, gündem ve faaliyetlerini neoliberal anlayışla giderek daha fazla uyumlu hale getirmiş, bununla birlikte ekonomik ve sosyal olan arasında ‘denge’ gerekliliğine dair bir söylem geliştirmiştir. Bu bağlamda işgücü piyasalarında esneklik, rekabet edebilirlik ve verimliliği artırmayı teşvik ederken, neoliberal politikaların çeşitli sosyal politika uygulamalarıyla dengelenebileceğini iddia etmiştir. Pandemi dâhil pek çok krizle yüzleşilen günümüze uzanan süreçte de ILO, bir taraftan sosyal adalet çağrılarını artırmış bir taraftan da denge yaklaşımına tutunmayı sürdürmüştür. Fakat ‘denge’ politikaları esasen rekabetçi serbest piyasa düzeninin ilerletilmesine dayandırıldığından ve bu çerçevede sermayenin ihtiyaçları emeğin korunmasına göre öncelenmeye devam edildiğinden, ILO’da söylemler ve gerçekler, taahhütler ve icraatlar arasındaki mesafenin giderek açıldığı bir süreç yaşanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Politika, Uluslararası Sosyal Politika, Uluslararası Çalışma Örgütü (UÇÖ), Verimlilik, Artı-Değer

Kaynakça

• Alston P (2004). ‘Core Labour Standards’ and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law, 15, 457-521.
• Alston P (2005). Facing up to the Complexities of the ILO’s Core Labour Standards Agenda. European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 467-480.
• Alston P ve Heenan J (2004). Shrinking the International Labor Code: An Unintended Consequence of the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work?. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 36, 221-264.
• Baccaro L ve Mele V (2012). Pathology of Path Dependency? The ILO and the Challenge of New Governance. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 65(2), 195-224.
• Brenner R ve Pröbsting M (2011). Marksist Kriz Teorisi ve Kredi Krizi. Çev. S Çakmak Şahin ve A Şen Taşbaşı, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
• Cammack P (2006). The Politics of Global Competitiveness. Manchester Metropolitan University, Papers in the Politics of Global Competitiveness, No: 1, https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/6190/1/The%20Politics%20of%20Global%20Competitiveness.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 01/03/2024.
• Cammack P (2007). Competitiveness and Convergence: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Latin America. Manchester Metropolitan University, Papers in the Politics of Global Competitiveness, No. 5, https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/11064/1/omc.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 01/03/2024.
• Eren Ö (2008). Continuation of the ILO Principles in the 21st Century Trough the Compliance Pull of Core Labor Rights. J. Workplace Rights, 13(3), 303-335.
• Fülbert G (2008). Kapitalizmin Kısa Tarihi. Çev. S Usta, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
• Global Commission on The Future of Work (2019). Work for a Brighter Future, Global Commission on The Future of Work, Geneva: ILO.
• Gökbayrak Ş (2013). Uluslararası ve Küresel Sosyal Politika. İçinde: Sendikacılık Akademisi Ders Notları, Ankara: Türk-İş Yayınları, 195-215.
• Gülmez M (2011). Uluslararası Sosyal Politika. Ankara: Hatiboğlu Yayınları.
• Harvey D (2017). Marx, Sermaye ve İktisadi Aklın Cinneti. Çev. E Soğancılar, İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık.
• Houngbo G F (2021). Vision Statement of Gilbert F. Houngbo Candidate for Director-General of the ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/genericdocument/wcms_818332.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (1920a). The Labour Provisions of the Peace Treaties, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1920/20B09_18_engl.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 26/03/2024.
• ILO (1920b). Minutes of The Second Session of The Governing Body of the International Labour Ofice, Held in Paris, January 26-28, 1920.
• ILO (1920c). Minutes of The Third Session of The Governing Body of the International Labour Ofice, Held in London, March 22-25 1920.
• ILO (1925). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Seventh Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1926). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Eighth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1927). Report of The Director-General Volume II, International Labour Conference Tenth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1932). Report of The Director, International Labour Conference Sixteenth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1933). Report of The Director, International Labour Conference Seventeenth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1934). Report of The Director, International Labour Conference Eighteenth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1937). Report of The Director, International Labour Conference Twenty-Third Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1944). Declaration Concerning The Aims and Pusposes of The International Labour Organizasation, Philadelphia, 10 May, 1944. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_698995.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 01/03/2024.
• ILO (1949). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Second Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1950). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Third Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1951). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Fourth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1952). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Fifth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1953). Report of the Director-General of the International Labour Office, Thirty-Sixth Session, World Labour Report 1953, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1954). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Seventh Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1955). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Eighth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1956). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference Thirty-Ninth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1958). Report of the Director-General to the 42nd Session of the International Labour Conference: The ILO in a Changing World, 1958 Twelfth Report of the International Labour Organisation to the United Nations, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1960). Report of The Director-General Part I: Youth and Work, International Labour Conference Forty-Fourth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1961). Report of The Director-General Part I: Labour Relations, Present Problems and Future Prospects, International Labour Conference Forty-Fifth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1963). Report of The Director-General: Programme and Structure of the ILO, International Labour Conference Forty-Seventh Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1966). Report of The Director-General Part I: Industrialisation and Labour, International Labour Conference Fiftieth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1969). Report of The Director-General Part I: The World Employment Programme, International Labour Conference Fifty-Third Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1970). Report of The Director-General Part I: Poverty and Minimum Living Standarts, The Role of ILO, International Labour Conference Fifty-Fourth Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1985). Report of The Director-General, International Labour Conference 71st Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1986). Report of The Director-General Part I: The Changing World of Work-Major Issues Ahead, International Labour Conference 72nd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1987). Report of The Director-General Part I: Reflections on the Future of Multilateral Co-operation: The ILO Perspective, International Labour Conference 73rd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1988). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1987, International Labour Conference 75th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1989). Report of The Director-General Part I: Recovery and Employment, International Labour Conference 76th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1990). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1989, International Labour Conference 77th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1992). Report of The Director-General Part I: Democratisation and the ILO, International Labour Conference 79th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1993a). Report of The Director-General Part I: Social Insurance and Social Protection, International Labour Conference 80th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1993b). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1992, International Labour Conference 80th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1994a). Report of The Director-General Part I: Defending Values, Promoting Change, Social Justice in a Global Economy-An ILO Agenda, International Labour Conference 81st Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1994b). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1992-93, International Labour Conference 81st Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1995). Report of The Director-General: Promoting Employment, International Labour Conference 82nd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1996). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1994-95, International Labour Conference 83rd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1997a). Report of The Director-General: The ILO, Standard Setting and Globalization, International Labour Conference 85th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1997b). World of Work Magazine, No: 19, March 1997, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/dwcms_080636.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (1998a). ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and Its Follow-Up, International Labour Conference Eighty-sixth Session, 18 June 1998, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc86/com-dtxt.htm. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (1998b). Report of The Director-General: Activities of the ILO 1996-97, International Labour Conference 86th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (1999). Report of The Director-General: Decent Work, International Labour Conference 87th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2001). Report of The Director-General: Reducing the Decent Work Deficit, A Global Challenge, International Labour Conference 89th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2002). Report of The Director-General: ILO Programme Implementation 2000-01, International Labour Conference 90th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2003). Report of The Director-General: Working Out of Poverty, International Labour Conference 91st Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2004). The ILO: What It Is. What It Does., Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---webdev/documents/publication/wcms_082364.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (2005a). Director-General’s Introduction to the International Labour Conference: Consolidating Progress and Moving Ahead, ILC 93-2005/Report I (A), International Labour Conference 93th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2005b). World of Work Magazine, No: 55, December 2005, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/dwcms_080600.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (2006a). Report of The Director-General: ILO Programme Implementation 2004-05, International Labour Conference 95th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2006b). Report of The Director-General: Changing Patterns in the World of Work, International Labour Conference 95th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2007). Director-General’s Introduction to the International Labour Conference: Decent Work for Sustainable Development, ILC 96-2007/Report I (A), International Labour Conference 96th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2008a). ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization, adopted by International Labour Conference 97th Session, 10 June 2008, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2008b). World of Work Magazine, No: 64, December 2008, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_101192.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (2009). Report of The Director-General: Tackling the Global Jobs Crisis, Recovery Through Decent Work Policies, International Labour Conference 98th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2010). Report of The Director-General: Recovery and Growth with Decent Work, International Labour Conference 99th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2011a). Report of The Director-General: A New Era of Social Justice, International Labour Conference 100th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2011b). World of Work Magazine, No: 71, April 2011, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_155286.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• ILO (2013). Report of The Director-General: Towards the ILO Centenary, Realities, Renewal and Tripartite Commitment, International Labour Conference 102nd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2015). Report of The Director-General: The Future of Work Centenary Initiative, International Labour Conference 104rd Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2016). Report of The Director-General: The End to Poverty Initiative, The ILO and the 2030 Agenda, International Labour Conference 105th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2019a). ILO Centenary Declaration for the Future of Work, Adobted at International Labour Conference 108th Session, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_711674.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (2019b). ILO Centenary Outcome Document, International Labour Conference 108th Session, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_700622.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (2019c). Report of the Committee of the Whole: Summary of Proceedings, International Labour Conference 108th Session, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_711582.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (2020a). A Policy Framework for Tackling the Economic and Social Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis, Policy Brief, May 2020, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_745337.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (2020b). The ILO’s Strategic Plan for 2022-25, Governing Body 340th Session, October–November 2020, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2021a). Resolution Concerning a Global Call to Action for a Human-Centred Recovery from the COVID-19 Crisis That is Inclusive, Sustainable and Resilient, International Labour Conference 109th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2021b). Resolution Concerning the Second Recurrent Discussion on Social Protection (Social Security), International Labour Conference 109th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2021c). Report of The Director-General: Work in the Time of COVID, International Labour Conference 109th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2022a). ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and its Follow-up, Adopted at the 86th Session of the International Labour Conference (1998) and amended at the 110th Session (2022), Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_716594.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 04/03/2024.
• ILO (2022b). Report of The Director-General: The Least Developed Countries: Crisis, Structural Transformation and the Future of Work, International Labour Conference 110th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2023a). The Director-General’s Programme and Budget Proposals for 2024-25, Governing Body 347th Session, 13-23 March 2023, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2023b). Report of The Director-General: Advancing Social Justice, International Labour Conference 111th Session, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO (2023c). Update on the Global Coalition for Social Justice, GB.349/INS/4, Governing Body 349th Session, 30 October-9 November 2023, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO, About The ILO, https://www.ilo.org/about-ilo#howitworks. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, Albert Thomas, Director of the International Labour Organization, 1919-1932. https://www.ilo.org/resource/albert-thomas. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, Future of Work Issue Briefs, https://www.ilo.org/topics/future-work/future-work-issue-briefs, Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, History of The ILO, https://libguides.ilo.org/c.php?g=657806&p=5050816. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, History of The ILO. https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/history/lang--en/index.htm. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, ILO Meetings and Documents. https://libguides.ilo.org/documentation. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, ILO’nun Görevleri ve Hedefleri. https://www.ilo.org/tr/resource/ilonun-gorevi-ve-hedefleri. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, Kurumsal İnternet Sitesi. https://www.ilo.org. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, Labordoc - The ILO Institutional and OA Repository. https://labordoc.ilo.org/discovery/search?vid=41ILO_INST:41ILO_V2. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• ILO, Mission and Impact of the ILO. https://www.ilo.org/about-ilo/mission-and-impact-ilo. Son erişim tarihi, 06/12/2024.
• İleri H (2014). Verimlilik, Verimlilik İle İlgili Kavramlar ve İşletmeler Açısından Verimliliğin Önemi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 1(2), 9-24.
• Jacobson H K (1960). The USSR and ILO. International Organization, 14(3), 402-428.
• Kott S (2019). ILO: Social Justice in a Global World? A History in Tension. İçinde: C Gironde ve G Carbonnier (der), The ILO @ 100: Addressing the Past and Future of Work and Social Protection, Boston: Brill, 21-39.
• Marx K (1997). Kapital: Birinci Cilt. Çev. A Bilgi, 5. Baskı, Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
• Maul D (2019). The International Labour Organization: 100 Years of Global Social Policy, Geneva: ILO.
• Maupain F (2005). Revitalization Not Retreat: The Real Potential of the 1998 ILO Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers’ Rights. The European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 439-465.
• McBride S ve Merolli J (2013). Alternatives to Austerity? Post-crisis Policy Advice from Global Institutions. Global Social Policy, 13(3), 299-320.
• Polanyi K (2000). Büyük Dönüşüm: Çağımızın Siyasal ve Ekonomik Kökenleri. Çev. A Buğra, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Robinson W I (2022). Küresel Polis Devleti. Çev. A E Pilgir, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Saad-Filho A (2023). Kriz Çağı: Neoliberalizm, Demokrasinin Çöküşü ve Pandemi. Çev. Ş Alpagut, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
• Silva V (2022). The ILO and the Future of Work: The Politics of Global Labour Policy. Global Social Policy, 22(2), 341-358.
• Somavia J (1999). Address by Mr. Juan Somavia, Secretary-General of the International Labour Conference, 87th Session, 1 June 1999, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/ilc/ilc87/a-somavi.htm. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• Somavia J (2005). Jobs and the Millennium Generation: Working out of Poverty. World of Work Magazine, No: 55, December 2005, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/dwcms_080600.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• Standing G (2008). The ILO: An Agency for Globalization?. Development and Change, 39(3), 355-384.
• Vosko L F (2002). ‘Decent Work’ The Shifting Role of the ILO and the Struggle for Global Social Justice. Global Social Policy, 2(1), 19-46.
• World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (2004). A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All, Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2004/104B09_19_engl.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 02/03/2024.
• WTO (World Trade Organization) (1996). Singapore Ministerial Declaration, Adopted on 13 December 1996. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/singapore_declaration96_e.pdf. Son erişim tarihi, 28/03/2024.