Yapısal Atıkların Belgelendirilmesi Bağlamında Literatür Araştırmasına Dayalı Çalışma

Öz

Günümüzde en büyük çevre sorunlarından biri olan yapısal atıklar, yaşam alanlarını hem çevresel hem de ekonomik açıdan olumsuz bir şekilde etkilemeye devam etmektedir. Son yıllarda, yapı sektöründe sürdürülebilirlik hedefleri doğrultusunda döngüsel ekonomi kavramı üzerine yapılan araştırmalar artış göstermiştir. Bu araştırmaların yapısal atıkların potansiyel kullanımını daha verimli hale getireceği düşünülmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, yapısal atıkların döngüsel ekonomi kapsamında değerlendirilme potansiyelini mevcut çalışmalar üzerinden araştırmak ve atık belgeleme için kavramsal çerçeveyi belirlemektir. Bu kapsamda, konu ile ilgili çalışma sayısının fazla olduğu 2018-2024 yılları arasında yayımlanan makaleler, uygunluk kriterine göre sistematik olarak taranmış ve bu çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi yapılmıştır. Döngüsel ekonomi ve yapısal atık yönetimi analize göre; atık yönetimi süreçleri, atık verilerinin analizi, yapı malzemelerinin kullanımı, paydaşların katkısı ile politikalar ve düzenleyici çerçeve olmak üzere beş temel kategoriye ayrılmıştır. Her bir kategoride, mevcut araştırma ve belgeleme uygulamalarını değerlendirmek için içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma, yapısal atık belgeleme çalışmalarının çoğunun tasarım ve yıkım aşamalarına yoğunlaştığını ve veri toplama ve izleme için teknolojik uygulamalara daha fazla odaklanıldığını vurgulamaktadır. Mevcut yaklaşım, yapı üretim sürecinde atık bilgilerini sağlamak için teknolojik araçları desteklemektedir. Çalışma, yapısal atıkların kaydedilmesini sağlayacak bir belgeleme yöntemini modellemek için bir veri seti geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapısal Atık
• Belgelendirme
• Döngüsel Ekonomi

A Study Based on Literature Research in the Context of Documentation of Construction and Demolition Waste

Öz

Construction and demolition (C&D) waste, currently one of the biggest environmental problems, continues to negatively affect living spaces both environmentally and economically. In recent years, research on the concept of circular economy has increased in line with sustainability goals in the building sector. It is thought that these studies will make the potential use of C&D waste more efficient. The aim of the study is to investigate the potential of evaluating C&D waste within the scope of circular economy through existing studies and to determine the conceptual framework for waste documentation. In this context, articles published between 2018 and 2024, a period with a high number of studies on the topic, have been systematically screened based on suitability criteria, and a bibliometric analysis of these studies has been conducted. The analysis categorizes circular economy and C&D waste management into five key areas: waste management processes, analysis of waste data, use of building materials, contribution of stakeholders and policies and regulatory framework. Each category is analyzed through content analysis to assess current research and documentation practices. The study emphasizes that the majority of C&D waste documentation efforts are concentrated on the design and demolition phases, with a growing focus on technological applications for data collection and tracking. The current approach supports technological tools to provide waste information in the building production process. The study aims to develop a dataset for modeling a documentation method that will enable the recording of C&D waste.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste
• Documentation
• Circular Economy

Kaynakça

1. Abarca-Guerrero, L., Lobo-Ugalde, S., Mendez-Carpio, N., Rodriguez-Leandro, R., & Rudin-Vega, V. (2022). Zero Waste Systems: Barriers and Measures to Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste. Sustainability, 14(22), 15265. doi: 10.3390/su142215265
2. Akanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Oyedele, L. O., Omoteso, K., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, A.O., Delgado, J.M.D., & Owolabi, H.A. (2019). Disassembly and Deconstruction Analytics System (D-Das) for Construction in A Circular Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 386-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.172
3. Akinade, O., & Oyedele, L.O. (2019). Integrating Construction Supply Chains Within a Circular Economy: An Anfis-Based Waste Analytics System (A-Was). Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 863-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.232
4. Aldebei, F., & Dombi, M. (2021). Mining the Built Environment: Telling the Story of Urban Mining. Buildings, 11(9), 388. doi:10.3390/buildings11090388
5. Antunes, A., Silvestre, J., Costa, H., do Carmo, R., & Julio, E. (2024). Reducing the Environmental Impact of the End-of-Life of Buildings Depending on Interrelated Demolition Strategies, Transport Distances and Disposal Scenarios. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, 108197. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108197
6. Arora, M., Raspall, F., Cheah, L., & Silva, A. (2019). Residential Building Material Stocks and Component-Level Circularity: the Case of Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 239-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.199
7. Arora, M., Raspall, F., Fearnley, L., & Silva, A. (2021). Urban Mining in Buildings for a Circular Economy: Planning, Process and Feasibility Prospects. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 174,105754. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105754
8. Atta, I., Bakhoum, E.S., & Marzouk, M.M. (2021). Digitizing Material Passport For Sustainable Construction Projects Using Bim. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, 103233. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103233

9. Bao, Z., Lu, W., Chi, B., Yuan, H., & Hao, J. (2019). Procurement Innovation for a Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: Lessons Learnt From Suzhou, China. Waste Management, 99,12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.031
10. Bao, Z., & Lu, W. (2020). Developing Efficient Circularity for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Fast Emerging Economies: Lessons Learned From Shenzhen, China. Science of the Total Environment, 724, 138264. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138264
11. Bao, Z., Lu, W., & Hao, J. (2021). Tackling the "Last Mile" Problem in Renovation Waste Management: A Case Study in China. Science of the Total Environment, 790, 148261. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148261.
12. Bendix, P., Achenbach, H., Weisshaupt, P., Eckert, D., Oehme, I., & Berg, H. (2022). Circular Economy For Durable Products and Materials: The Recycling of Plastic Building Products in Germany-Status Quo, Potentials and Recommendations. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 24(4), 1432-1443. doi:10.1007/s10163-022-01406-9
13. Berge, S., & von Blottnitz, H. (2022). An Estimate of Construction and Demolition Waste Quantities and Composition Expected in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 118, 14-18. doi: 10.17159/sajs.2022/12485
14. Callegher, C.Z., Grazieschi, G., Wilczynski, E., Oberegger, U.F., & Pezzutto, S. (2023). Assessment of Building Materials in the European Residential Building Stock: An Analysis at EU27 Level. Sustainability, 15(11), 8840. doi:10.3390/su15118840
15. Caro, D., Lodato, C., Damgaard, A., Cristóbal, J., Foster, G., Flachenecker, F., & Tonini, D. (2024). Environmental and Socio-Economic Effects of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling in the European Union. Science of the Total Environment, 908,168295. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168295
16. Chen, K., Wang, J., Yu, B., Wu, H., & Zhang, J. (2021). Critical Evaluation of Construction and Demolition Waste and Associated Environmental Impacts: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125071
17. Cheng, B., Huang, J., Guo, Z., Li J., & Chen, H. (2023). Towards Sustainable Construction Through Better Construction and Demolition Waste Management Practices: A Swot Analysis of Suzhou, China. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), 2614-2624. doi:10.1080/15623599.2022.2081406
18. Choudhary, S., Kaur, H., Tripathi, B., & Chandra, T. (2022). Strategies For Efficient Handling and Economic Circularity for Construction and Demolition Waste in India. World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposıum, Prague, Czech Republic, 2928(1), 130011, 5-9 September. doi:10.1063/5.0170603
19. Colorado, H.A., Muñoz, A., & Monteiro, S.N. (2022). Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: a Case Study of Colombia. Sustainability, 14(12), 7225. doi:10.3390/su14127225
20. Condotta, M., & Zatta, E. (2021). Reuse of Building Elements in the Architectural Practice and the European Regulatory Context: Inconsistencies and Possible Improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128413. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128413
21. Dodampegama, S., Hou, L., Asadi, E., Zhang, G., & Setunge, S. (2024). Revolutionizing Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting: Insights from Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Applications. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 202, 107375. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107375
22. Doğdu, G., & Alkan, S. N. (2023). Deprem Sonrası Oluşan İnşaat ve Yıkıntı Atıklarının Değerlendirilmesi: 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 38-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3139935
23. EC, (2015). Closing the Loop- An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels: European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:8a8ef5e8-99a0-11e5-b3b7 01aa75ed71a1.0012.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
24. Elshaboury, N., & AlMetwaly, W. M. (2023). Modeling Construction and Demolition Waste Quantities in Tanta City, Egypt: A Synergistic Approach of Remote Sensing, Geographic Information System, and Hybrid Fuzzy Neural Networks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(48), 106533-106548. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29735-8
25. EMF, (2013). Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/towards-the-circular-economy-vol-1-an-economic-and-business-rationale-for-an
26. Eze, E. C., Aghimien, D.O., Aigbavboa, C.O., & Sofolahan, O. (2022). Building Information Modelling Adoption for Construction Waste Reduction in the Construction Industry of a Developing Country. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(6), 2205-2223. doi:10.1108/ECAM-03-2022-0241
27. Ferronato, N., Fuentes, S., Rocio, C., Guisbert, L., Edith, G., Conti, F., & Torretta, V. (2023). Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling in Developing Cities: Management and Cost Analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 24377-24397. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23502-x
28. Fonseca, F. C., Carcel-Carrasco, J., Martinez-Corral, A., Kaur, J., & Millan, J. L. (2023). Diagnosis of the Economic Potential within the Building and Construction Field and its Waste in Spain. Buildings,13(3), 685. doi:10.3390/buildings13030685
29. Fufa, S. M., Fjellheim, K., Venås, C., Vevatne, J. T., Kummen, T. M., & Henke, L. (2023). Waste Free Construction Site–a Buzzword, Nice to Have or More. Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, 200149. doi: 10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200149
30. Gambato C., Guante Henriquez L., Zerbi S., Frontini F., & Mosca, C. (2023). DeCO-Guidelines for the Deconstruction of Recent Buildings. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 2600(19), 192012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2600/19/192012
31. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
32. Gerding, D.P., Wamelink, H., & Leclercq, E.M. (2021). Implementing Circularity in he Construction Process: A Case Study Examining the Reorganization of Multi-Actor Environment and the Decision-Making Process. Construction Management and Economics, 39(7), 617–635. doi:10.1080/01446193.2021.1934885
33. Ghaffar, S.H., Burman, M., & Braimah, N. (2020). Pathways to Circular Construction: An Integrated Management of Construction and Demolition Waste for Resource Recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118710. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710
34. Giustiniani, E., Gimenez, L., & Semmartin, M. (2023). Residents' Perception and Environmental Assessment of a Waste Recycling Centre: A Case Study of Buenos Aires City (Argentina). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 25113-25131. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03672-5.
35. Guo, J., Fishman, T., Wang, Y., Miatto, A., Wuyts, W., Zheng, L., Wang, H., & Tanikawa, H. (2021). Urban Development and Sustainability Challenges Chronicled by a Century of Construction Material Flows and Stocks in Tiexi, China. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(1),162-175. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13054.
36. Hahladakis, J. N., John, N., Purnell, P., & Aljabri, H.M.S.J. (2020). Assessing the Role and Use of Recycled Aggregates in the Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Waste Via a Mini-Review and a Case Study. Waste Management & Research, 38(4), 460-471. doi:10.1177/0734242X19897816
37. Han, D.C., Kalantari, M., & Rajabifard, A. (2024). The Development of An Integrated Bim-Based Visual Demolition Waste Management Planning System for Sustainability-Oriented Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, 119856. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119856.
38. Honic, M., Kovacic, I., Aschenbrenner, P., & Ragossnig, A. (2021). Material Passports For the End-of-Life Stage of Buildings: Challenges and Potentials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319,128702. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128702.
39. Huang, B., Wang, X., Kua, H., Geng, Y., Bleischwitz, R., & Ren, J. (2018). Construction And Demolition Waste Management in China Through the 3r Principle. Resources Conservation and Recycling,129, 36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029
40. Illankoon, C., & Vithanage, S.C. (2023). Closing The Loop in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review on The Development of Circular Economy. Journal of Building Engineering,76, 107362. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107362
41. Iodice, S., Garbarino, E., Cerreta, M., & Tonini, D. (2021). Sustainability Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste Management Applied to an Italian Case. Waste Managament. 128, 83-98. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.03.
42. Jayasinghe, L.B., & Waldmann, D. (2020). Development of a Bim-Based Web Tool as a Material and Component Bank for a Sustainable Construction Industry. Sustainability, 12(5), 1766. doi: 10.3390/su12051766.
43. Jorgensen, S., Pedersen, L.J.T., & Skard, S. (2023). Resource Accounting For A Circular Economy: Evidence From A Digitalised Waste Management System. Accounting Forum, 47(4), 553-582. doi:10.1080/01559982.2023.2166001
44. Kakkos, E., Heisel, F., Hebel, D.E., & Hischier, R. (2020). Towards Urban Mining-Estimating the Potential Environmental Benefits by Applying an Alternative Construction Practice. A Case Study from Switzerland. Sustainability, 12(12), 5041. doi:10.3390/su12125041
45. Karaçor, Z., Küçüksucu, M., & Konya, S. (2020). Türkiye’de Çevre Ekonomisi, Atık Yönetimi ve Döngüsel Ekonominin Analizi. Doç. Dr. F. Sayın (Ed.), Döngüsel Ekonomi Makro ve Mikro İncelemeler içinde (s.143-180). Ankara: Nobel.
46. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
47. Koc, K., Durdyev, S., Tleuken, A., Ekmekcioglu, O., Mbachu, J., & Karaca, F. (2023). Critical Success Factors For Construction Industry Transition to Circular Economy: Developing Countries’ Perspectives. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(12), 4955-4974. doi:10.1108/ECAM-02-2023-0129.
48. Kocak, A.B., Soyluk, A., & Ayçam, I. (2024). The Environmental Impact of Reusing Post-Earthquake Demolition Waste: İskenderun Case Study. Gazi University Journal of Science, 37(3), 1042-1054. doi:10.35378/gujs.1363134
49. Lam, P.T.I., Yu, A. T. W., Wu, Z.Z., & Poon, C. S. (2019). Methodology For Upstream Estimation of Construction Waste For New Building Projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230(2019), 1003-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.183
50. Li, C.Z., Zhao, Y., Xiao, B., Yu, B., Tam, V.W.Y., Chen, Z., & Ya, Y. (2020). Research Trend of the Application of Information Technologies in Construction and Demolition Waste Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121458. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121458
51. Lin, K., Zhao, Y., Zhou, T., Gao, X., Zhang, C., Huang, B., & Shi, Q. (2023). Applying Machine Learning to Fine Classify Construction and Demolition Waste Based on Deep Residual Network and Knowledge Transfer. Environment Development and Sustainability, 25(8), 8819-8836. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02740-6
52. Liu, Y., Li, J., Chen, W.Q., Song, L., & Dai, S. (2022). Quantifying Urban Mass Gain and Loss by a Gis-Based Material Stocks and Flows Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(3), 1051-1060. doi:10.1111/jiec.13252
53. Maged, A., Elshaboury, N., & Akanbi, L. (2024). Data-Driven Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Generation Using Limited Datasets in Developing Countries: An Optimized Extreme Gradient Boosting Approach. Environment Development and Sustainability. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04814-z
54. Mahinkanda, M. M. M.P., Paniagua, J. J. O., Rameezdeen, R., Chileshe, N., & Gu, N. (2023). Design Decision-Making For Construction Waste Minimisation: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings, 13(11), 2763. doi:10.3390/buildings13112763
55. Mahpour, A. (2023). Building Maintenance Cost Estimation and Circular Economy: The Role of Machine-Learning. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 37, e00679. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat. 2023.e00679
56. Material Economics, (2018). The Circular Economy a Powerful Force for Climate Mitigation. https://www.sitra.fi/app/uploads/2018/06/the-circular-economy-a-powerful-force-for-climate-mitigation.pdf
57. Meng, X. H., Das, S., & Meng, J. Y. (2023). Integration of Digital Twin and Circular Economy in the Construction Industry. Sustainability, 15(17), 13186. doi:10.3390/su151713186
58. Minunno, R., O'Grady, T., Morrison, G.M., & Gruner, R.L. (2020). Exploring Environmental Benefits of Reuse And Recycle Practices: A Circular Economy Case Study of A Modular Building. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 160, 104855. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104855.
59. Mohammadiziazi, R., & Bilec, M.M. (2022). Building Material Stock Analysis is Critical for Effective Circular Economy Strategies: A Comprehensive Review. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 2(3), 032001. doi:10.1088/2634-4505/ac6d08
60. Mohammadiziazi, R., & Bilec, M.M. (2023). Quantifying and Spatializing Building Material Stock and Renovation Flow for Circular Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389,135765. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135765
61. Moschen-Schimek, J., Kasper, T., & Huber-Humer, M. (2023). Critical Review of the Recovery Rates of Construction and Demolition Waste in the European Union – An Analysis of Influencing Factors in Selected EU Countries. Waste Management, 167(2023), 150-164. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.05.020
62. O'Grady, T., Minunno, R., Chong, H.Y., & Morrison, G.M. (2021). Design For Disassembly, Deconstruction and Resilience: A Circular Economy Index For the Built Environment. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105847. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105847
63. Omer, M., Wang, Y.C., Roma, M.Q., Bedrich, S., Nezerka, V., Ferriz-Papi, J., Moros Montanes, J.J., & Ortiz, I. D. (2024). Development of a 3D Digital Model of End-of-Service-Life Buildings for Improved Demolition Waste Management Through Automated Demolition Waste Audit. Environments, 11(7), 138. doi: 10.3390/environments11070138
64. Ortlepp, R., Gruhler, K., & Schiller, G. (2018). Materials in Germany's Domestic Building Stock: Calculation Model and Uncertainties. Building Research and Information, 46(2), 164-178. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1264121
65. Panizza, R.O., & Bakht, M.N. (2024). Building Stock as a Future Supply of Second-Use Material – A Review of Urban Mining Methods. Waste Management Bulletin, 2(2), 19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.wmb.2024.03.001
66. Papamichael, I., Voukkali I., Loizia, P., & Zorpas, A. A. (2023). Construction and Demolition Waste Framework of Circular Economy: A Mini Review. Waste Management & Research, 41(12),1728-1740. doi:10.1177/0734242X231190804
67. Pitti, A.R., Espinoza, O., & Smith, R. (2020). The Case For Urban and Reclaimed Wood in the Circular Economy. Bioresources, 15(3), 5226-5245. doi:10.15376/biores.15.3.5226-5245
68. Ramos, M., Paiva, A., & Martinho, G. (2024). Understanding the Perceptions of Stakeholders on Selective Demolition. Journal of Building Engineering, 82, 108353. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108353.
69. Ratnasabapathy, S., Alashwal, A., & Perera, S. (2021). Exploring the Barriers for Implementing Waste Trading Practices in the Construction Industry in Australia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 559-576. doi:10.1108/BEPAM-04-2020-0077
70. Rose, C.M., & Stegemann, J.A. (2018). From Waste Management to Component Management in the Construction Industry. Sustainability, 10(1), 229. doi:10.3390/su10010229
71. Saez, P.V., Barbero-Alvarez, M.A., Porras-Amores, C., Alonso, M.A., & Torres, A.G. (2023). Design and Validation of a Mobile Application for Construction and Demolition Waste Traceability. Buildings,13(8),1908. doi:10.3390/buildings13081908
72. Saka, A.B., Olaore, F.O., & Olawumi T.O. (2019). Post-Contract Material Management and Waste Minimization: An Analysis of the Roles of Quantity Surveyors. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology,17(4), 793-807. doi:10.1108/JEDT-10-2018-0193
73. Santos, G., Esmizadeh, E., & Riahinezhad, M. (2024). Recycling Construction, Renovation, and Demolition Plastic Waste: Review of the Status Quo, Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 32(2), 479-509. doi:10.1007/s10924-023-02982-z
74. Shooshtarian, S., Maqsood, T., Wong, P.S.P., Khalfan, M., & Yang R.J. (2021). Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry. Sustainability, 13(2), 620. doi:10.3390/su13020620
75. Shooshtarian, S., Hosseini, M.R., Kocaturk, T., Arnel, T., & Garofano, N.T. (2022). Circular Economy in the Australian AEC Industry: Investigation of Barriers and Enablers. Building Research and Information, 51(1), 56-68. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2022.2099788
76. Sivashanmugam, S., Rodriguez, S., Rahimian, F.P., Elghaish, F., & Dawood, N. (2023). Enhancing Information Standards for Automated Construction Waste Quantification and Classification. Automation in Construction, 152, 104898. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104898
77. SKD, (2024). Kentsel Dönüşüm, Deprem ve Olası Diğer Afetler Sonucunda Oluşacak Yıkıntı Atıklarının Yönetimi Rehberi. https://www.skdturkiye.org/files/yayin/yikinti-atiklari-yo-netimi-rehberi-10-mayis-2024-low.pdf
78. Şahmaran, M., & Özçelik, E. (2023). Deprem Atıklarının Yönetimi Kapsamında Ülkemizden Mevcut En İyi Çevresel Uygulamalar. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi, 335-364. doi: 10.53478/TUBA.978-625-8352-57-3.ch17
79. Temelli, U.E., Sezgin, N., Cumalı B.Ö. (2023). Afet Zamanlarında İnşaat Yıkıntı Atıklarının Belirlenmesi ve Atıkların Değerlendirilmesi: Kahramanmaraş Depremi Örneği. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 8(2), 225-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.1286631
80. Tirado, R., Aublet, A., Laurenceau, S.M., Louerat, M., & Habert, G. (2021). Component-Based Model for Building Material Stock and Waste-Flow Characterization: A Case in the ile-de-France Region. Sustainability,13(23), 13159. doi:10.3390/su132313159
81. UNEP, (2023). Global Status Report Buildings and Construction, Beyond Foundations Mainstreaming Sustainable Solutions to Cut Emissions from the Buildings Sector. https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2024 11/global_status_report_buildings_construction_2023.pdf
82. UNEP, (2024). Global Waste Management Outlook 2024, Beyond an Age of Waste. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/44939/global_waste_management_outlook_2024.pdf?sequence=3
83. Usha, I.R., Akvan, G., & Ho, O.T. (2023). The Transition to a Circular Built Environment in Australia: An Analysis of the Jurisdictional Policy Framework. Environmental Policy and Law, 53(4), 233-246. doi:10.3233/EPL-220073
84. Wang, J.J., Wei, J.J., Liu, Z.S., Huang, C., & Du, X.L. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment of Building Demolition Waste Based on Building Information Modeling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, 106095. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106095
85. Wang, S.Q., Wu, Q.Q., & Yu, J.P. (2024). Bim-Based Assessment of the Environmental Effects of Various End-of-Life Scenarios for Buildings. Sustainability, 16(7), 2980. doi: 10.3390/su16072980
86. Wu, H., Zuo, J., Yuan, H.P., Zillante, G., & Wang, J.Y. (2020). Cross-Regional Mobility of Construction and Demolition Waste in Australia: An Exploratory Study. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 156,104710. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104710
87. Wu, P.Y., Mjornell, K., Mangold, M., Sandels, C., & Johansson, T. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach to Assess the Risk of Encountering Hazardous Materials in the Building Stock Based on Environmental Inventories. Sustainability,13(14), 7836. doi: 10.3390/su13147836
88. Wu, Z., Yu, A.T. W., Shen, L., & Liu, G. (2014). Quantifying Construction and Demolition Waste: An Analytical Review. Waste Management, 34(9),1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.010
89. Vahidi, A., Gebremariam, A.T., Di Maio, F., Meister, K., Koulaeian, T., & Rem, P. (2024). Rfid-Based Material Passport System in a Recycled Concrete Circular Chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 140973. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140973
90. Van den Berg, M., Voordijk, H., & Adriaanse, A. (2020). Recovering Building Elements for Reuse (or not)-Ethnographic Insights into Selective Demolition Practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120322. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120332
91. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: VOSviewer, A Computer Program For Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
92. Yıldız, A. (2022). Bir Araştırma Metodolojisi Olarak Sistematik Literatür Taramasına Genel Bakış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 367-386. doi:10.18037/ausbd.1227366
93. Yu, Y., Yazan, D.M., Junjan, V., & Lacob, M.E. (2022). Circular Economy in the Construction Industry: A Review of Decision Support Tools Based on Information & Communication Technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349,131335. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131335
94. Zaman, A.U., Arnott, J., Mclntyre, K., & Hannon, J. (2018). Resource Harvesting Through a Systematic Deconstruction of the Residential House: a Case Study of the 'Whole House Reuse' Project in Christchurch, New Zealand. Sustainability, 10(10), 3430. doi: 10.3390/su10103430
95. Zhu, H., Liou, S.R., Chen, P.C., He, X.Y., & Sui, M.L. (2024). Carbon Emissions Reduction of A Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on A Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials. Sustainability,16(5), 1729. doi:10.3390/su16051729
96. Zito, S.V., Irassar, E.E., Rahhal, V.F., & Chini, A.R. (2023). Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste as Supplementary Cementing Materials in Eco-Friendly Concrete. Recycling, 8(4), 54. doi:10.3390/recycling8040054
97. URL-1: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/17037circulaireeconomie_en.pdf Erişim tarihi: 23/01/2023, saat:01:46.
98. URL-2: https://donguselekonomiplatformu.com/hakkimizda.html Erişim tarihi: 30/12/2022, saat 21:38.
99. URL-3: https://dongusel.csb.gov.tr/ Erişim tarihi: 15/01/2023, saat:01:41.
100. URL-4: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram Erişim tarihi: 17/08/2024, saat 18:00.
101. URL-5: https://www.vosviewer.com/ Erişim tarihi: 22/06/2024, saat 16:20.
102. URL-6: https://circulareconomy.europa.eu/platform/sites/default/files/emf_completing_the_picture.pdf Erişim tarihi: 18/06/2024, saat:21:46.
103. URL-7: https://www.eu2020.de/blob/2429166/156d2d98b66b2ff28b6990161eed91e9/12-17-kreislaufwirtschaftsaktionsplan-bericht-de-data.pdf Erişim tarihi: 17/07/2024, saat:01:34.
104. URL-8: https://madaster.com/our-purpose/ Erişim tarihi: 23/06/2024, saat:15:28.
105. URL-9: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Construction_full_report__.pdf Erişim tarihi: 25/06/2024, saat:00:40.