The Relation Between Social Infrastructure and Urban Quality of Life: Araptepe Case Area

Öz

The urban transformation approach, recognized with its economic and physical dimensions before the 1999 earthquake, has been redefined in the context of the emerging "disaster paradigm" following the event. However, in most contemporary applications, urban transformation projects have not been able to transcend beyond the mere renewal of the existing building stock, adhering to a model wherein the importance of social infrastructure and the enhancement of urban quality of life has been relegated to a secondary status. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a spatial and social evaluation of the established relation between the concepts of "urban transformation" and "urban quality of life" as documented in existing literature, with a particular emphasis on the satisfaction derived from the interaction between the environment and its residents. In this context, the study examines the experiences of both the rights holders and the new users who have settled in the Araptepe Urban Transformation Area, located in the Araptepe Region of the Yenikent Neighborhood within the Derince district of Kocaeli province, after the transformation project. This examination is framed within the concept of "urban quality of life" through the utilization of urban infrastructures. The significance of this study lies in its designation as the first research conducted in Kocaeli on the relation between Urban Transformation and Urban Quality of Life, particularly given the limited number of studies addressing this topic nationwide

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Derince-Araptepe
• Urban Transformation
• Social Infrastructures
• Urban Quality of Life
• Satisfaction Survey

Araptepe Örneklem Alanında “Sosyal Altyapı- Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi” İlişkisi

Öz

1999 depremi öncesinde ekonomik ve fiziksel yönleriyle öne çıkan kentsel dönüşüm yaklaşımı, deprem sonrasında “afet” kavramı merkeze alacak şekilde yeniden ele alınmıştır. Ancak, mevcuttaki çoğu uygulamada kentsel dönüşüm projeleri mevcuttaki yapı stokunun yenilenmesinden öteye geçememiş, sosyal altyapı alanlarının ve kentsel yaşam kalitesinin geri plana itildiği bir model halinde sınırlı kalmıştır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı; literatürde yer alan “kentsel dönüşüm” kavramı ile “kentsel yaşam kalitesi” kavramı arasındaki var olduğu bilinen ilişkinin özellikle yaşanılan çevre ile kullanıcı arasındaki ilişkinin memnuniyetini odağa alarak mekânsal ve sosyal değerlendirilmesinin yapılması olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu kapsamda, Kocaeli ili Derince ilçesi Yenikent Mahallesi içerisinde yer alan Araptepe Bölgesi’nde bulunan Araptepe Kentsel Dönüşüm Alanında proje sonrasında yaşamaya başlayan eski hak sahipleri ve yeni kullanıcıların mahalle ölçeğindeki fiziksel çevre deneyimleri kentsel donatı kullanımları üzerinden “kentsel yaşam kalitesi” çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın, ülke genelinde sınırlı sayıda çalışma yapılmış Kentsel Dönüşüm-Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi ilişkisi üzerine Kocaeli genelinde yapılacak ilk çalışma olması kapsamında önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Derince- Araptepe
• Kentsel Dönüşüm
• Sosyal Altyapı
• Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi
• Memnuniyet Anketi

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, Ş. N. (2024). Evaluatıon of the Impact of Urban Regeneratıon Projects on Urban Qualıty of Lıfe through the Urban Regeneratıon Project of Derı̇ce- Araptepe. Master of Science Thesis, Kocaeli University, Institute of Science, Kocaeli, 903366.
2. Ataöv A. & Osmay S. (2007). Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüme Yöntemsel Bir Yaklaşım, METU JFA, 24(2), 57–82. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/50967
3. Aydınlı, H. İ. & Turan, H. (2012). Kuramsal ve Yasal Çerçevede Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüşüm. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2012(28), 61–70.
4. Campbell, A., Converse P. E. & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluation and Satisfaction, New York: Russel.
5. Couch, C. (1990). Urban Renewal: Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
6. Çepni, M. S. & Kutluca, A.K. (2024). Registration of Lands in Order to Issue Business Licenses to Service- Oriented Facilities in Parks and Green Areas, Advances in Geomatics, 02 (01), 70- 85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11314392
7. Dirikoç, A. (2016). Urban regeneration's progress within the scope of legislation in Turkey. Master of Social Science Thesis. Erciyes University, Institute of Social Science, Kayseri, 436837.
8. Donnison, D. (1993). The Challenge of Urban Regeneration for Community Development. Community Development Journal, 28(4), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/28.4.293

9. Görün, M. & Kara, M. (2010). Kentsel Dönüşüm ve Sosyal Girişimcilik Bağlamında Türkiye’de Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesinin Artırılması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 137-164. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12428/836
10. Güzeldağ, F. (2019). Evaluation of urban transformation projects in the context of 'quality of life' Bursa – Soğanli case. Master of Science Thesis, Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, 599486.
11. Karaağaç, E. (2019). The Effect of Social Reinforcement Environments in Areas of Urban Transformation on Urban Life, Afyonkarahisar Misrii Mosque, As an Example of Urban Transformation Area. Master of Science Thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University Institute of Science, İstanbul, 600824.
12. Marans, R. (2012). Quality of Urban Life Studies: An Overview and Implications for Environment- Behaviour Research, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences (2012:35), 9-22.
13. Okumuş, D.E. (2014). Change of Urban Services in Urban Transformation Projects and the Impact to the Urban Quality of Life: The Case of Atasehir Barbaros District. Master of Science Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, 353723.
14. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban Environmental Wellbeing – A Social Geographical Perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003 (65), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
15. Roberts, P. (2000). The Evolution, Definition and Purpose of Urban Regeneration Urban Regeneration Handbook, SAGE Publications, London, 9-36.
16. Salihoğlu, T. & Türkoğlu, H. (2019). Konut Çevresi ve Kentsel Yaşam Kalitesi. Megaron Dergisi, (2019:14), 203-217.
17. Sert, D. (2019). Bagdat Street Urban Transformation Applications and Quality of Life Research. Master of Science Thesis, Doğuş University, Institute of Science, İstanbul, 536427.
18. Tanrıverdi Koç, D. (2022). A review of legislation on urban transformation and zoning applications in Turkey. Master Thesis, İstanbul Okan University, Graduate School of Education, İstanbul, 787279.
19. Law on Amendments to the Municipality Law No. 307 (1963, 22 July). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/11465.pdf
20. Condominium Law No. 634 (1965, 2 July). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/12038.pdf
21. Slum Law No. 775 (1966, 30 July). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/12362.pdf
22. Land Office Law No. 1164 (1969, 10 May). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/13195.pdf
23. Law No. 2981 on Specific Procedures to be Applied to Buildings that Contravene Zoning and Slum Legislation and the Amendment of an Article of the Zoning Law No. 6785 (1984, 8 March). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/18335.pdf
24. Mass Housing Law No. 2985 (1984, 17 March). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/18344.pdf
25. Zoning Law No. 3194 (1985, 9 May). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/18749.pdf
26. The North Ankara Entrance Urban Transformation Project Law No. 5104 (2004, 11 March). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2004/03/20040312.htm#2
27. Metropolitan Municipality Law No. 5216 (2004, 23 July). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/Eskiler/2004/07/20040723.htm#1
28. Conservation by Renovation and Use by Revitalization of the Deteriorated Historical and Cultural Immovable Property Law No. 5366 (2005, 16 June). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/07/20050705-1.htm
29. Municipality Law No. 5393 (2005, 03 July). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/07/20050713-6.htm
30. Transformation of Areas Under Disaster Risk Law No. 6306 (2012, 16 May). Access Address: https://resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/05/20120531-1.htm
31. Tekeli, İ. Güler, Ç., Vazioğlu, S., Algan, N. & Dündar, A.K. (2003). Yaşam Kalitesi Göstergeleri Türkiye İçin Bir Veri Sistemi Önerisi. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporları, 2003(6), Ankara.
32. Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of con cepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18
33. Yıldız, E. (2017). Urban Renewal in Turkey: A Socio-Spatial Analysis in Kocaeli Context. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Institute of Social Science, Bilecik, 466056.