Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 30 Haziran 2017
PDF İndir
EN TR

Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample

Öz

School gardens are the spaces that affect the growth and development of children and the teenagers with their recreational, social, ecological and psychological importance. Since the children and the teenagers spend the majority of their daily lives at schools and in school gardens, the design of these gardens is as important as the indoor designs.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the current status of the landscape of the school gardens considering the sample schools located in İzmit, central district of Kocaeli province. For this purpose, a total of 49 school gardens, 30 of which belong to primary schools and 19 to high schools and their equivalents, have been studied and evaluated in terms of space use profiles, landscape design components and vegetal components. While proportional range method has been used in the analysis of the space use at schools, frequency analysis method has been utilised in the analysis of the data relating the landscape components and the vegetal components.  According to the results derived from the study it has been determined that landscape design of the school gardens is ignored. It has also been determined that the rates related to space use are far below the standards when compared with the developed countries. Green space use has been observed only in 43.33 % of the primary schools and 57.89 % of high schools and their equivalents. When considered in terms of green space use, it has been specified that the difference between the school with the largest green area and the school with the least green area is 313 times higher in primary schools and 57 times higher in high schools and their equivalents. Plant diversity, on the other hand, on existing green spaces has been determined to be quite poor. Grass areas and flower beds are scarcely used. 93.34 % of the primary schools, where children at play age are trained, do not have playgroups. Similarly, 47 % of the high schools and their equivalents do not have multifunctional   playgrounds suitable for basketball and volleyball games.

As a result of the study, it has been suggested that the school gardens should be regarded as a part of education and training; a uniform standard should be adopted in the organisation of spaces and components in order to ensure that all students have equal access to education and training opportunities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Acar, Cengiz, Trabzon ve Yöresinde Yetişen Doğal Bazı Yerörtücü Bitkilerin Peyzaj Mimarlığında Değerlendirilmeleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Doktora Tezi, K.T.Ü., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 1997, Trabzon.
  2. Acar, Habibe, Çocuk Oyun Alanlarında Kullanıcıların Bitki Tercihlerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma: Trabzon Kenti Örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, K.T.Ü., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2003, Trabzon.
  3. Akdoğan, Günel, Beş Büyük Şehirde Çocuk Oyun Alanları, Okul Bahçeleri ve Spor Alanlarının Yeterlilikleri ve Planlama Prensipleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, A.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 522, Sayfa Sayısı 84, 1972. Ankara.
  4. Aksu, Özge Volkan, Demirel, Öner, Trabzon Kenti ilköğretim okul bahçelerinde tasarım ve alan kullanımları. SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 12: 40-46, 2011.
  5. Bell, Anne C., Dyment, Janet E, Grounds for Action. Promoting Physical Activity Through School Ground Greening in Canada. Evergreen, Canada, 61p. 2006.
  6. Bradley, Lucy Kennedy, Tierra Buena, TheCreation of Urban Wildlife Habitat in An Elementary School in The Inner City. Children’sEnvironments, Volume 12, Issue 2, p. 102-110, U.S.A. 1995.
  7. Brand 1997-2001; Plant Uconn database of trees, shrubs and vines. http://www.hort.uconn.edu (Date of Access: 21.09. 2016, Access hours: 09:00-19:00)
  8. Collyer Cam, Irvine Steve, Grounds For Learning. Stories and Insights From Six Canadian School Ground Naturalization Initiatives. Canada, 32s. 2001.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mimarlık

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Aysun Çelik
ULUDAG UNIV
Türkiye

Elvan Ender
ULUDAG UNIV
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Aralık 2016

Kabul Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çelik, A., & Ender, E. (2017). Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, 2(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.26835/my.281506
AMA
1.Çelik A, Ender E. Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample. MY. 2017;2(1):105-120. doi:10.26835/my.281506
Chicago
Çelik, Aysun, ve Elvan Ender. 2017. “Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample”. Mimarlık ve Yaşam 2 (1): 105-20. https://doi.org/10.26835/my.281506.
EndNote
Çelik A, Ender E (01 Haziran 2017) Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample. Mimarlık ve Yaşam 2 1 105–120.
IEEE
[1]A. Çelik ve E. Ender, “Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample”, MY, c. 2, sy 1, ss. 105–120, Haz. 2017, doi: 10.26835/my.281506.
ISNAD
Çelik, Aysun - Ender, Elvan. “Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample”. Mimarlık ve Yaşam 2/1 (01 Haziran 2017): 105-120. https://doi.org/10.26835/my.281506.
JAMA
1.Çelik A, Ender E. Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample. MY. 2017;2:105–120.
MLA
Çelik, Aysun, ve Elvan Ender. “Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample”. Mimarlık ve Yaşam, c. 2, sy 1, Haziran 2017, ss. 105-20, doi:10.26835/my.281506.
Vancouver
1.Aysun Çelik, Elvan Ender. Evaluations on The Landscapes of School Gardens: İzmit Central District of Kocaeli Province Sample. MY. 01 Haziran 2017;2(1):105-20. doi:10.26835/my.281506

16299  16302  16303  18949   21920   30985 30986

download  downloaddownload