Yeniden Biçimlendirilen Mimesis: Britanyalı Kadın Yazarların Eserlerinde Kadın Bedeninin Maddesel Feminist ve Posthümanist Dönüşümleri

Öz

Bu makale, mimesis kavramını feminist kuram, maddesel feminizm ve posthümanizm perspektiflerinden yeniden ele almaktadır. Mimetik olanın artık estetik benzerlik ya da pasif taklitten ibaret değil, dinamik, bedensel ve etik bir oluş hâli olduğunu öne sürmektedir. Platoncu ve Aristotelesçi çerçevelere yerleşmiş klasik, cinsiyetçi ikilikleri sorgulayan çalışma, Irigaray, Cixous, Butler, Barad, Alaimo, Braidotti, Malabou ve Lawtoo gibi düşünürlerin, mimesisi içten-etkiyen, plastik, ilişkisel eğilimler taşıyan duygulanımsal bir bulaş olarak nasıl yeniden kavramsallaştırdıklarını izler. Bu yeniden biçimlendirmelerden hareketle makale, Marie de France ve Norwichli Julian’dan Mary Shelley, Jean Rhys, Virginia Woolf ve Jeanette Winterson’a uzanan Britanyalı kadın yazarların metinlerinden oluşan bir edebî analiz dizisi sunar. Bu analizler, mimesisin bedensel izlekler, etik yankılar ve onto-epistemolojik dönüşümler için nasıl bir zemin haline geldiğini ortaya koyar. Mistik duygulanım, üreme dehşeti, mekânsal sınırlanma, zamansal akışkanlık, travma sonrası uğraklık ve türler arası oluş olarak sıralanabilecek altı tematik küme boyunca, seçili Britanya kadın edebiyatı eserlerinin, gerçekliği temsilî olarak yakalamanın ötesine geçerek bedenlenmeyi nasıl yeniden tahayyül ettikleri gösterilmektedir. Böylelikle, kırılganlık, yanıt verebilirlik ve birlikte-oluş temellerine dayanan bir mimetik etik önerilmekte ve maddesel-feminist edebiyat eleştirisi ile posthümanist düşünceye ilişkin yeni yönelimler sunulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mimesis
• maddesel feminizm
• posthümanizm
• bedensellik
• duygulanımsal ilişkisellik
• Britanya kadın edebiyatı

Mimesis Reconfigured: Material-Feminist and Posthumanist Transformations of the Female Body in British Women Writers

Öz

This article rethinks the concept of mimesis through the lenses of feminist theory, material feminism, and posthumanism. It argues that the mimetic is no longer a matter of aesthetic resemblance or passive imitation but a dynamic, embodied, and ethical mode of becoming. The study, challenging the classical, gendered binaries embedded in Platonic and Aristotelian frameworks, traces how thinkers such as Irigaray, Cixous, Butler, Barad, Alaimo, Braidotti, Malabou, and Lawtoo reconceptualize mimesis as an intra- active, plastic, affective contagion with relational inclinations. Drawing on these reconfigurations, the article offers a constellation of literary analyses from British women writers—ranging from Marie de France and Julian of Norwich to Mary Shelley, Jean Rhys, Virginia Woolf, and Jeanette Winterson— showcasing how mimesis operates as a site of corporeal inscriptions, ethical resonances, and onto- epistemological transformations. Across six thematic clusters—mystical affect, reproductive horror, spatial confinement, temporal fluidity, post-traumatic haunting, and interspecies becoming—the essay demonstrates how British women’s literature mobilizes mimetic processes to reimagine embodiments beyond representational captures. In doing so, it proposes a mimetic ethics grounded in vulnerability, response-ability, and co-becoming, and offers new directions for material-feminist literary criticism and posthumanist thought.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mimesis
• material feminism
• posthumanism
• embodiment
• affective relationality
• British women’s literature

Kaynakça

1. Ağın, Başak. “Mansplaining, Gaslighting, and Microaggression: Lord Byron’s Anger in Jeanette Winterson’s Frankissstein.” Forthcoming.
2. ———, and Şafak Horzum. “An Implosive Introduction: Haunted Experiences, Affective Assemblages, and Collective Imaginings.” In Posthuman Pathogenesis: Contagion in Literature, Arts, and Media, edited by Başak Ağın and Şafak Horzum. Routledge, 2023.
3. ———, and Şafak Horzum. “Diseased Bodies Entangled: Literary and Cultural Crossroads of Posthuman Narrative Agents.” SFRA Review 51, no. 2 (2021): 150–157.
4. Akkülah Doğan, Emine. “The Paradox of Free Women in Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook.” DTCF Journal 61, no. 1 (2021): 454–471. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2021.61.1.18
5. Alaimo, Stacy. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana University Press, 2010.
6. Alderman, Naomi. The Power. Penguin Books, 2017.
7. Altın, Merve. “Breaking the Silence: Woman as a Subject in Pat Barker’s The Silence of the Girls.”
8. DTCF Journal 61, no. 2 (2021): 841–863. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2021.61.2.9

9. Aristotle. Generation of Animals. Translated by A. L. Peck. Harvard University Press, 1953.
10. ———. The Poetics. Edited and translated by S. H. Butcher. Macmillan, 1898.
11. Bağırlar, Belgin. “Winterson’s Cyborg Dream in Frankissstein.” Söylem: Journal of Philology 6, no. 3 (2021): 701–711.
12. Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.
13. Barker, Pat. The Silence of the Girls. Penguin Books, 2019.
14. Bayram, Aslı. “The Matter of Bodies: Ableist Bodies, Disablement and Disembodiment in Sylvia Plath’s ‘Lady Lazarus’ and Madeline Miller’s ‘Galatea’.” Maltepe University Journal of English Language 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–13.
15. Baysal, Alev. “Batılılar Gözüyle Harem: Gerçek ve Fantezi.” Turkish Studies 4, no. 1-I (2009): 591–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.560
16. Baysal, Kübra. “(De)Monopolisation of the Female Body in Aphra Behn’s Play, The Forc’d Marriage.” The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies 15, no. 92 (2022): 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.64771
17. ———. “Im/Possibility of Female Empowerment in Eliza Haywood’s Novel Love in Excess or, the Fatal Inquiry and Elizabeth Inchbald’s Novel A Simple Story.” DTCF Journal 58, no. 1 (2018): 973–991. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.1.45
18. Behn, Aphra. Oroonoko. Edited by Joanna Lipking. W. W. Norton, 1997.
19. ———. The Rover. Edited by Robyn Bolam. A & C Black, 1995.
20. Braidotti, Rosi. Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press, 2011.
21. ———. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.
22. Brontë, Anne. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. Edited by Herbert Rosengarten. Oxford University Press, 1993.
23. Brontë, Emily. Wuthering Heights. Wordsworth, 2000.
24. Burney, Fanny. Evelina, or a Young Lady's Entrance into the World. J. M. Dent, 1958.
25. Burney, Frances. Journals and Letters. Penguin Books, 2001.
26. Butler, Judith. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” Routledge, 2011.
27. ———. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1999.
28. Carter, Angela. The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories. Penguin Books, 1993.
29. ———. The Passion of New Eve. Virago Press, 1992.
30. Cavarero, Adriana. Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude. Translated by Amanda Minervini and Adam Sitze. Stanford University Press, 2016.
31. Cavendish, Margaret. Observations upon Experimental Philosophy. Edited by Eileen O’Neill. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
32. ———. The Blazing World and Other Writings. Edited by Kate Lilley. Penguin Books, 2004.
33. Cixous, Hélène. “The Laugh of the Medusa.” Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1, no. 4 (1976): 875–893.
34. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Edited by Adam Roberts. Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
35. Çokay Nebioğlu, Rahime. “A Feminist Post-Narratological Inquiry into Angela Carter’s ‘The Company of Wolves’.” Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları 19 (2019): 325–337.
36. de Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. Edited and translated by H. M. Parshley. Jonathan Cape, 1953.
37. de France, Marie. “Laüstic.” In The Lais of Marie de France, translated by Robert Hanning and Joan Ferrante, 155–159. Baker Academic, 2008.
38. ———. “Yonec.” In The Lais of Marie de France, translated by Robert Hanning and Joan Ferrante, 137–152. Baker Academic, 2008.
39. Dryden, John. Essays: Volume I. Edited by W. P. Ker. Clarendon Press, 1900.
40. Ekmekçi, Çelik. “A Feminist Critique of Body in Philosophy and Sociology.” KARE BAKEA Special Issue (2020): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.760154
41. Elizabeth I. “Speech to the Troops at Tilbury.” In The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 8th ed., edited by Stephen Greenblatt, vol. 1. W. W. Norton, 2006.
42. ———. “The ‘Golden Speech’.” In The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 8th ed., edited by Stephen Greenblatt, vol. 1. W. W. Norton, 2006.
43. Griffith, Nicola. Ammonite. Grafton, 1993.
44. Grosz, Elizabeth. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Allen & Unwin, 1994.
45. Hadikoesoemo, Niki. “Exhibition/Exposition: Irigaray and Lacoue-Labarthe on the Theaters of Mimesis.” In Homo Mimeticus II: Re-Turns to Mimesis, edited by Nidesh Lawtoo and Marina Garcia-Granero. Leuven University Press, 2024.
46. Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton University Press, 2002.
47. Haywood, Eliza. Love in Excess; or, the Fatal Inquiry. Edited by David Oakleaf. Broadview, 1994.
48. Horzum, Şafak. “Symbiotic Adaptation in Posthuman Feminist Environs: Viral Becomings in Nicola Griffith’s Ammonite.” In Posthuman Pathogenesis: Contagion in Literature, Arts, and Media, edited by Başak Ağın and Şafak Horzum. Routledge, 2023.
49. Irigaray, Luce. Key Writings. Edited by Luce Irigaray. Continuum, 2004.
50. ———. Speculum of the Other Woman. Translated by Gillian C. Gill. Cornell University Press, 1985.
51. ———. This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke. Cornell University Press, 1985.
52. Jones, Gwyneth. Life. Aqueduct Press, 2004.
53. Julian of Norwich. Revelations of Divine Love. Translated by Barry Windeatt. Oxford University Press, 2015.
54. Karabulut, Tuğba. “An Ecofeminist Analysis of Mary Shelley’s Mathilda: The Female Narrator Writing Her Own Taboo Fiction.” Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences 25, no. 3 (2023): 994–1007. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1260838
55. Kempe, Margery. The Book of Margery Kempe. Translated by Anthony Bale. Oxford University Press, 2015.
56. Lawtoo, Nidesh. Homo Mimeticus: A New Theory of Imitation. Leuven University Press, 2022.
57. ———. “Posthumanism and Mimesis: An Introduction.” Journal of Posthumanism 2, no. 2 (2022): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v2i2.2242
58. ———. “The Human Chameleon: Zelig, Nietzsche and the Banality of Evil.” Film-Philosophy 25, no. 3 (2021): 272–295. https://doi.org/10.3366/film.2021.0176
59. ———. “The Mimetic Condition: Theory and Concepts.” CounterText 8, no. 1 (2022): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/count.2022.0254
60. ———. The Phantom of the Ego: Modernism and the Mimetic Unconscious. Michigan State University Press, 2013.
61. ———. “The Plasticity of Mimesis.” MLN 132, no. 5 (2017): 1201–1224.
62. Lessing, Doris. The Golden Notebook. Harper Perennial, 1972.
63. Malabou, Catherine. What Should We Do with Our Brain?. Translated by Sebastian Rand. Fordham University Press, 2008.
64. ———, and Nidesh Lawtoo. “Plasticity and Mimesis: Three Metamorphoses. A Dialogue.” Philosophy Kitchen: Journal of Contemporary Philosophy 22 (2025): 211–242. https://doi.org/10.13135/2385-1945/12037
65. Melikoğlu, Esra. “Reiteration of Jane Eyre’s Search for the Feminine Subject in Atkinson’s Crime Fiction.” IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies 3, no. 1 (2023): 58–70.
66. ———. “The Armada Portrait: Costume and the Body Politic.” Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 16 (2004): 1–10.
67. Metinoğlu, Niğmet. “A Posthuman View of The Blazing World.” IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13 (2022): 569–578. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.1210802
68. Miller, Alyson. “‘Day of the Girls’: Reading Gender, Power, and Violence in Naomi Alderman’s The Power.” College Literature 47, no. 2 (2020): 398–433. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2020.0016
69. Montagu, Lady Mary Wortley. The Turkish Embassy Letters. Edited by Teresa Heffernan and Daniel O'Quinn. Broadview, 2013.
70. Navalón Guzmán, Corpus. “Reclaiming Queer Time: Queer Temporalities in Ali Smith’s ‘How to Be Both’.” Forum for Contemporary Issues in Language and Literature 4 (2023): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.34739/fci.2023.04.06
71. Özyurt Kılıç, Mine. “Demythologizing Business: Angela Carter’s Representation of Motherhood.” Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences 28, no. 3 (2017): 94– 103.
72. ———. “Demythologizing History: Jeanette Winterson’s Fictions and His/tories.” Feminismo/s 4 (2004): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2004.4.10
73. ———. “Transgressing Gender Boundaries: The Function of the Fantastic in Jeanette Winterson’s The PowerBook.” English Studies 89, no. 3 (2008): 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138380802011925
74. Plath, Sylvia. “Three Women: A Poem for Three Voices.” Hello Poetry. Accessed July 04, 2025. https://hellopoetry.com/poem/three-women
75. Plato. “Ion.” In Selected Dialogues of Plato, edited by Hayden Pelliccia and translated by Benjamin Jowett, 1–24. Modern Library, 2001.
76. ———. The Republic. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Vintage, 1991.
77. Ramachandran, V. S. The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Quest for What Makes Us Human. W. W. Norton, 2011.
78. Reis, Huriye. “Kitaplarda Kadın Olmak: Chaucer ve Ortaçağ İngiliz Edebiyatında Kadın Söyleminin Sorunsallığı.” Turkish Studies 4, no. 1-I (2009): 487–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.555
79. ———. “‘[S]che was evry aferd’: Pilgrimage and Medieval Women in The Book of Margery Kempe.” Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters 22, no. 2 (2005): 151–161.
80. Rhys, Jean. Wide Sargasso Sea. W. W. Norton, 1982.
81. Sarmaşık, Naile. “Identity, Displacement, and Alienation in Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea and Voyage in the Dark.” Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature 5, no. 1 (2023): 8–16.
82. Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. Tor Books, 1989.
83. Sidney, Philip. A Defence of Poetry. Edited by Jan van Dorsten. Oxford University Press, 1973. Smith, Ali. How to Be Both. Pantheon Books, 2014.
84. Vural Özbey, Kübra. “The Spiritual Development of a Medieval Woman: The Book of Margery Kempe.” Ortaçağ Araştırmaları Dergisi 5, no. 1 (2022): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.48120/oad.1089803
85. Winterson, Jeanette. Frankissstein: A Love Story. Knopf, 2019.
86. ———. Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. Vintage, 2001.
87. ———. Sexing the Cherry. Vintage, 1991.
88. ———. The Stone Gods. Penguin Books, 2008.
89. ———. Written on the Body. Vintage, 1993.
90. Woolf, Virginia. A Room of One’s Own. Edited by David Bradshaw and Stuart N. Clarke. Wiley, 2015.
91. ———. Orlando: A Biography. Penguin Books, 1974.
92. ———. To the Lighthouse. Hogarth Press, 1927.
93. Wordsworth, William. “Preface.” In Lyrical Ballads, by William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, edited by R. L. Brett and A. R. Jones. Methuen, 1965.
94. Wulf, Christoph. “Mimesis and the Process of Becoming Human: Performativity, Repetition and Practical Knowledge.” CounterText 8, no. 1 (2022): 46–60. https://doi.org/10.3366/count.2022.025
95. Yazgünoğlu, Kerim Can. “Posthuman ‘Meta(l)morphoses’ in Jeanette Winterson’s The Stone Gods.” Ecozon@ 7, no. 1 (2016): 144–160. https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2016.7.1.986
96. Yıldız Çiçekçi, Nazan. “A Studio of Her Own: A Self Behind the Canvas in The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.” International Journal of Language Academy 12, no. 1 (2024): 289–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijla.75229
97. Yılmaz, Hakan. “A Romance World of Their Own: Generic and Patriarchal Boundaries Unsettled in Evelina and The Female Quixote.” DTCF Journal 61, no. 1 (2021): 147–166. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2021.61.1.6