Evaluation of the Content Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Endocrown

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 314 - 323, 30.12.2024

Öznur Küçük Keleş , Özlem Seçkin Kelten

https://doi.org/10.51122/neudentj.2025.131

Öz

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and validate the popularity, content, reliability, and educational contribution of endocron-related YouTube videos.
Material and Methods: Two researchers systematically searched about endocrown on YouTube on April 10, 2023, by using the terms “endocrown”. The top 250 of the search results were later added to the watchlist. Finally, 30 videos were included for analysis. Time since upload, duration, number of views, likes, number of subscriptions, number of views were recorded. The DISCERN instrument, the benchmarks established by the JAMA and GQS were used to evaluate these 30 videos.
Results: Assumptions were checked and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to examine the differences between the averages of video features according to Global Quality Scores (GQS) and DISCERN scores. According to the results of the analysis, a statistically significant difference was found between the averages of video features according to GQS groups and DISCERN scores (p<0.05). As a result of the analysis, a statistically significant difference was found between the video duration averages according to the JAMA scores (p<0.05). Kendal's Tau correlations were applied to examine the relationships between Youtube features and GQS, DISCERN and JAMA scores. As a result of the analysis statistically significant relationships were found between time and GQS, DISCERN and JAMA scores (0.584, 0.609 and 0.366, respectively).
Conclusions: Despite the limited number of related videos, YouTube has shown similarity in reliability and quality of videos on the topic of endocron. As the duration of the videos increased, their reliability increased.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Endocrown, YouTube, Social Media, Video Analysis, Quality Scores

Endokron ile İlgili YouTube Videolarının İçerik Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı endokronla ilgili YouTube videolarının popülerliğini, içeriğini, güvenilirliğini ve eğitime katkısını değerlendirmek ve doğrulamaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: İki araştırmacı, 10 Nisan 2023'te YouTube'da “endokron” terimini kullanarak sistematik olarak endokron hakkında arama yapmıştır. Arama sonuçlarının ilk 250'si daha sonra izleme listesine eklenmiştir. Son olarak analize 30 video dahil edilmiştir. Yüklemeden bu yana geçen süre, süre, izlenme sayısı, beğeniler, abonelik sayısı, izlenme sayısı kaydedilmiştir. Bu 30 videoyu değerlendirmek için DISCERN aracı, JAMA ve GQS tarafından oluşturulan kriterler kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Varsayımlar kontrol edilmiştir ve Global Kalite Puanları (GQS) ve DISCERN puanlarına göre video özelliklerinin ortalamaları arasındaki farkları incelemek için Kruskal Wallis testleri kullanılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre GQS gruplarına göre video özellikleri ortalamaları ile DISCERN skorlarına arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Analiz sonucunda JAMA skorlarına göre video süre ortalamaları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Youtube özellikleri ile GQS, DISCERN ve JAMA puanları arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek için Kendal's Tau korelasyonları uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda zaman ile GQS, DISCERN ve JAMA puanları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur (sırasıyla 0,584, 0,609 ve 0,366).
Sonuç: İlgili videoların sınırlı sayıda olmasına rağmen YouTube, endokron konusundaki videoların güvenilirliği ve kalitesi açısından benzerlik göstermiştir. Videoların süresi arttıkça güvenilirliği de artmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube, Sosyal Medya, Video Analizi, Kalite Skorları, Endokron

Kaynakça

• Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation. 2019;1:109-14.
• Kaicker J, Dang W, Mondal T. Assessing the quality and reliability of health information on ERCP using the DISCERN instrument. Health Care: Current Reviews. 2013:1-4.
• Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLOS one. 2013;8:82469.
• Springer B, Bechler U, Koller U, Windhager R, Waldstein W. Online videos provide poor information quality, reliability, and accuracy regarding rehabilitation and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2020;36:3037-47.
• Ward B, Lin A, Lin J, Warren C, Mattern P, Paskhover B, et al. YouTube searches for anterior cruciate ligament injury promote biased, low-quality videos. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine. 2020;5:e000131. Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2020;36:233-8.
• Sedrez-Porto JA, da Rosa WLdO, da Silva AF, Münchow EA, Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2016;52:8-14.
• Biacchi GR, Mello B, Basting RT. The endocrown: an alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2013;25:383-90.
• Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry: PPAD. 1995;7:83-94.
• Veselinović V, Todorović A, Lisjak D, Lazić V. Restoring endodontically treated teeth with all-ceramic endo-crowns: case report. Stomatološki glasnik Srbije. 2008;55:54-64.
• Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years-preliminary results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 1999;1.
• Chang C-Y, Kuo J-S, Lin Y-S, Chang Y-H. Fracture resistance and failure modes of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2009;4:110-7.
• Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Apicella D, Valentino B, Ferrari M, Aversa R, et al. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Dental materials. 2006;22:1035-44.
• Biacchi G, Basting R. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Operative dentistry. 2012;37:130-6.
• Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in kyphosis videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43:1334-9.
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-a wakeup call? The Journal of rheumatology. 2012;39:899-903.
• Powell J, Clarke A. The WWW of the World Wide Web: who, what, and why? Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2002;4:4.
• Curran V, Matthews L, Fleet L, Simmons K, Gustafson DL, Wetsch L. A review of digital, social, and mobile technologies in health professional education. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2017;37:195-206.
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. Jama. 1997;277:1244-5.
• Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1999;53:105-11.
• Cassidy J, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy E, Cleary M, Byrne D, Devitt B, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018;26:840-5.
• Brooks F, Lawrence H, Jones A, McCarthy M. YouTube™ as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2014;96:144-6.
• Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health informatics journal. 2015;21:173-94.
• Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2013;19:373-6.
• Garg N, Venkatraman A, Pandey A, Kumar N. Y ou T ube as a source of information on dialysis: a content analysis. Nephrology. 2015;20:315-20.
• Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera M-N, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2018;23:463.
• Menziletoglu D, Guler A, Isik B. Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020;121:661-4.
• Yavuz MC, Buyuk SK, Genc E. Does YouTube™ offer high quality information? Evaluation of accelerated orthodontics videos. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-). 2020;189:505-9.
• Gaş S, Zincir ÖÖ, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;77:1776-83.
• Pons-Fuster E, Ruiz Roca J, Tvarijonaviciute A, López-Jornet P. YouTube information about diabetes and oral healthcare. Odontology. 2020;108:84-90.
• Yilmaz H, Aydin MN. YouTube™ video content analysis on space maintainers. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020;38:34-40.
• Simsek H, Buyuk SK, Çetinkaya E. YouTube™ as a source of information on oral habits. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2020;38:115-8.
• Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national US survey among 1.050 US physicians. Journal of medical internet research. 2003;5:17.
• Lena Y, Dindaroğlu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTube™ video analysis. The Angle Orthodontist. 2018;88:208-14.
• Ustdal G, Guney AU. YouTube as a source of information about orthodontic clear aligners. The Angle Orthodontist. 2020;90:419-24.