A New Look At Mathematical Literacy: Techno-Mathematical Literacy

Öz

Due to the changing living conditions, with the development of technology, mathematical literacy cannot meet the necessary needs in some subjects.In order to meet these needs, a new literacy was needed. As this literacy, techno-mathematical literacy has emerged. Techno-mathematical literacy can be defined as the combination of mathematical, statistical and technological skills that people need. The study aims to introduce techno-mathematical literacy and its basic concepts in Turkish and make a general evaluation. The lack of Turkish resources on techno-mathematical literacy necessitated the preparation of this study. It is thought that defining the concept of techno-mathematical literacy, which is a new concept in the literature, will create awareness on the subject both in the education system and employers, and in academics working in the literature

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mathematics
• Technology
• Literacy
• Techno-mathematical literacy.

Matematik Okuryazarlığına Yeni Bir Bakış: Tekno-Matematiksel Okuryazarlık

Öz

Değişen yaşam şartlarından dolayı teknolojinin gelişmesiyle birlikte matematik okuryazarlığı bazı konularda gerekli ihtiyacı karşılayamamaktadır. Bu ihtiyaçların karşılanabilmesi için yeni bir okuryazarlığa gerek duyulmuştur. Bu okuryazarlık olarak da tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlık ortaya çıkmıştır. Tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlık insanların ihtiyaç duydukları matematiksel, istatiksel ve teknolojik becerilerin kombinasyonu olarak tanımlanabilir. Çalışma yabancı literatürde yer alan tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlık ve temel kavramlarını Türkçede tanıtmayı ve genel bir değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlığı konusunda Türkçe kaynak bulunmaması, bu çalışmanın hazırlanmasını zorunlu kılmıştır. Literatürde yeni bir kavram olan tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlık kavramını tanımlaması gerek eğitim sistemi ve işverenler gerekse alan yazında çalışma yürüten akademisyenlerde konu ile ilgili farkındalık yaratacağı düşünülmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Matematik
• Teknoloji
• Okuryazarlık
• Tekno-matematiksel okuryazarlık
• Mathematics
• Technology
• Literacy
• Techno-mathematical literacy.

Kaynakça

1. Abass, B. T., Isyakka, B., Olaolu, I. Y., & Olusegun, F. M. (2014). Effects of two and three-dimensional visual objects on the acquisition of drawing skills among jss1 students in Osun State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/Wje.V4n1p62
2. Altun, M. (2020). Matematik Okuryazarlığı El Kitabı: Yeni Nesil Soru Yazma ve Öğretim Düzenleme Teknikleri. Bursa: Aktüel Alfa Akademi Yayıncılık.
3. Altun, A. (2005). Gelişen Teknolojiler ve Yeni Okuryazarlıklar. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
4. Altun, M., Ülger, T. K., &. Bozkurt, I., (2020). Matematik öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde matematik okuryazarlığına odaklanan makalelerin tematik analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 45(201).
5. Anderso-Pence, K. (2017). Techno-Mathematical Discourse: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Classroom Discussions.Education Sciences, 7(40).
6. Bakker, A., & Kent, P., & Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2005). Techno-mathematical Literacies in the Workplace. Mathematics Statistics and Operational Research. 5. 10.11120/msor.2005.05010016.
7. Burke, T. (2017). Data literacy in digital workplace. Retrieved From: https://www.highcharts.com/blog/tutorials/data-literacy-digital-workplace/.
8. Craft, A. (2010). Creativity and education futures: Learning in a digital age. Stafordshire: Trentham Books. Demir, B., & Sert Çelik, H. (2023). İnovasyon ve Matematik Eğitimi. İnovasyon ve Yaşam (1. baskı) içinde (s. 77-98). Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınevi.

9. Dibujos, B. A. (2009). Religion and the growing mind. Journal Of Educational Review, 11, 75-90.
10. Gainsburg, J. (2007). The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 477–506.
11. Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., & Creely, E. (2012). Creativity and technology in education: An international perspective. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, (23), 409–424.
12. Holum, A., & Gahala, J. (2001). Critical issue: using technology to enhance literacy instruction. Erişim tarihi: 02.03.2023, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480229.pdf.
13. Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodgson, S., & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace. London, United Kingdom: Science, Technology and Mathematics Council
14. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., Bakker, A., & Bhinder, C. (2007). Techno-mathematical literacies in the workplace: A critical skills gap. London, United Kingdom: Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP).
15. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work: The need for technomathematical literacies. London, United Kingdom: Routledge.
16. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2013). Mathematics in the workplace: Issues and challenges. In A. Damlamian, A., Rodrigues, J. F., & Sträßer, R. (Eds.), Educational interfaces between mathematics and industry (pp. 43-50). London, United Kingdom: Springer
17. Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. Bishop, M. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. E. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Jakes, D. (2006). Standards-proof your digital storytelling efforts. Erişim tarihi: 01.01.2023, http://www.techlearning.com/tech/media-coordinators/0018/standards-proof-yourdigital-storytelling-efforts/43347.
19. James, G. (1995). Mathematics matters in engineering. Working Group Report, the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications. Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom: IMA.
20. Kara, N. (2018). Understanding university students’ thoughts and practices about digital citizenship: A mixed methods study. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 172–185.
21. Karunaratne, W. (2000). Case for adult literacy in South East Asia with special reference to Sri Lanka. The Australian Council for Adult Literacy Conference, Perth, Australia, 21-23 September
22. Kartika, H., & Hastari, R. C. (2022). Techno-mathematical literacies in digital age: Which categories are importance for teachers? Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(2), 76-83.
23. Kellner, D. (2001), New Technologies/New Literacies: Reconstructing Education fort he nwe millenium. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, S. 11, s. 67-81
24. Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2000). The visibility of models: Using technology as a bridge between mathematics and engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 61–69.
25. Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2001). Finding a role for technology in service mathematics for engineers and scientists. In The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 395–404). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
26. Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2002). The mathematical components of engineering expertise: The relationship between doing and understanding mathematics. IEE 2nd Annual Symposium on Engineering Education. London, United Kingdom: IEE.
27. Kent, P., Noss, R., Guile, D., Hoyles, C., & Bakker, A. (2007). Characterizing the use of mathematical knowledge in boundary-crossing situations at work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1-2), 64–82
28. Kress, G. (2003), Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge
29. Kurudayıoğlu, M., & Tüzel, A. G. M. S. (2010). 21. yüzyıl okuryazarlık türleri, değişen metin algısı ve Türkçe eğitimi. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, (28).
30. Leikin, R., Subotnik, R., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Singer, F. M., & Pelczer, I. (2012). Teachers’ views on creativity in mathematics education: An international survey. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 45(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-012-0472-4
31. Mandinach, E., & Gummer, E. (2013). A Systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12459803
32. Mcknight, K., O’malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
33. McCrone, S.S., & Dossey, J.A. (2007). Mathematical Literacy- it’s Become Fundamental. Principal Leadership, 7 (5), 32-37.
34. Mete, G. (2020). Okuryazarlık Türleri ve 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu Belgesi. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, (22), 109-120.
35. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections: Enabling research and education in the 21st century. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
36. Niss, M., & Jablonka, E. (2020). Mathematical literacy. Encyclopedia of mathematics education, 548-553.
37. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy, a framework for PISA. http://www. oecd.org/ Erişim tarihi: 11.09.2022
38. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). PISA 2018 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa 2018technicalreport/
39. Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_1
40. Steen, L. A., Turner, R., & Burkhardt, H. (2007). Developing mathematical literacy. In W. Blum, P.L. Galbraith, H.W. Henn and M. Niss (Eds), Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education (pp. 285-294). US: Springer.
41. Van Der Wal, N.J., Bakker, A., & Drijvers, P. (2017). Which techno-mathematical literacies are essential for future engineers? Int J Of Sci and Math Educ, 15(1), 87-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-017-9810- X
42. Wardono, Waluya, S. B., Scolastika, M., & Candra, D. (2016). Mathematics Literacy on Problem Based Learning with Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693(1), 1-10. IOP Publishing.
43. Williams, J., & Wake, G. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 317–343.