Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility

Öz

The present study compares operational and simulated photovoltaic (PV) systems for an industrial facility located in Konya Province, Türkiye, using PVsyst software. The highest radiation intensity was recorded in July, while the lowest was in December. The global horizontal irradiance is 1761.1 kWh/m² per year, while the effective global irradiance is 1661.1 kWh/m² per year. The maximum and the minimum values were obtained in June and October, respectively, with an overall annual difference of 5.68%. The highest and the lowest electricity generation values have been observed for both systems in July and January, respectively. On annual basis, the monthly average electricity generation was 210.2 MWh for the operational system and 201.1 MWh for the simulated system. In both cases, the peak performance ratio (PR) was 0.827 for the actual system and 0.954 for the simulated one in February. The lowest values were obtained in May, with 0.703 for the operational system and 0.656 for the simulated system. The annual average PR values for the actual and the simulated systems were 0.797 and 0.756, respectively. The results demonstrate that the performance of the simulated system closely matches that of the actual system, confirming the accuracy and reliability of PVsyst simulations for evaluating real-world photovoltaic system behavior in industrial applications.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Energy, Photovoltaics, Solar energy, PVsyst

Kaynakça

  1. Y.E. Kiymaz and H. Oguz, Assessment of electricity generation using deep learning on solar power plants, Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering. 6(2) (2024), 289-311. doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2024.49
  2. R. Büyükzeren, M.N. Kaya, A.A. Bacakoğlu, M. Uçar, H.B. Altıntaş, A. Öztürk, and A.Y. Bilici, Yatay eksenli rüzgâr türbinlerinde kule yüksekliği ve türbülans yoğunluğu etkisinin incelenmesi, Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering. 6(3) (2024), 566-582. doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2024.66
  3. B. Akgayev, S. Akbayrak, M. Yilmaz, M.S. Buker, and V. Unsur, Assessing the feasibility of photovoltaic systems in türkiye: technical and economic analysis of on-grid, off-grid, and utility-scale PV installations, Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering. 6(1) (2024), 69-92. doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2024.33
  4. F. Yilmaz and B. Jamil, Parametric and a case study of an innovative solar-driven combined system: Thermodynamic and environmental impact analysis for sustainable production of power, heating, and freshwater, Renewable Energy. 238 (2025), 121768. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2024.121768
  5. A. Moros-Daza, A. Moros-Marcillo, and C.A. Pacheco-Bustos, Greening seaports: Evaluating impacts and policies for renewable energy systems, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 213 (2025), 115475. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115475
  6. M.H. Aksoy and M. Ispir, Techno-economic feasibility of different photovoltaic technologies, Applied Engineering Letters. 8(1) (2023), 1-9. doi:10.18485/aeletters.2023.8.1.1
  7. A. Hafez, A. Soliman, K. El-Metwally, and I. Ismail, Tilt and azimuth angles in solar energy applications–A review, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 77 (2017), 147-168. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.131.
  8. M.H. Aksoy, M. Ispir, and M. Bakirhan, Analysis of the azimuth angles of a medium-scale PV system in non-ideal positions for roof application, MANAS Journal of Engineering. 11(1) (2023), 74-82. doi:10.51354/mjen.1223399.
  9. H. Gunerhan and A. Hepbasli, Determination of the optimum tilt angle of solar collectors for building applications, Building and environment. 42(2) (2007), 779-783. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.012.
  10. R. Tang and T. Wu, Optimal tilt-angles for solar collectors used in China, Applied energy. 79(3) (2004), 239-248. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.01.003.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Deveci, M., İspir, M., Aksoy, M. H., & Göktepeli, İ. (2025). Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(3), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102
AMA
1.Deveci M, İspir M, Aksoy MH, Göktepeli İ. Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility. NEU Fen Muh Bil Der. 2025;7(3):411-421. doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102
Chicago
Deveci, Mustafa, Murat İspir, Muharrem Hilmi Aksoy, ve İlker Göktepeli. 2025. “Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility”. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering 7 (3): 411-21. https://doi.org/10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102.
EndNote
Deveci M, İspir M, Aksoy MH, Göktepeli İ (01 Aralık 2025) Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering 7 3 411–421.
IEEE
[1]M. Deveci, M. İspir, M. H. Aksoy, ve İ. Göktepeli, “Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility”, NEU Fen Muh Bil Der, c. 7, sy 3, ss. 411–421, Ara. 2025, doi: 10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102.
ISNAD
Deveci, Mustafa - İspir, Murat - Aksoy, Muharrem Hilmi - Göktepeli, İlker. “Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility”. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering 7/3 (01 Aralık 2025): 411-421. https://doi.org/10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102.
JAMA
1.Deveci M, İspir M, Aksoy MH, Göktepeli İ. Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility. NEU Fen Muh Bil Der. 2025;7:411–421.
MLA
Deveci, Mustafa, vd. “Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility”. Necmettin Erbakan University Journal of Science and Engineering, c. 7, sy 3, Aralık 2025, ss. 411-2, doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Deveci, Murat İspir, Muharrem Hilmi Aksoy, İlker Göktepeli. Comparison of Actual and Simulated Photovoltaic Systems for an Industrial Facility. NEU Fen Muh Bil Der. 01 Aralık 2025;7(3):411-2. doi:10.47112/neufmbd.2026.102