Physical Environment Transformation: The Rebuilding of a Neighborhood

Öz

Over time, changing needs have been reflected in the physical conditions of spaces, leading to small or large-scale transformations. The physical reflections of environmental changes have been the subject of various studies. This research examines the impact of the reconstruction of urban spaces on physical environments. Through a case study, the historical and contemporary physical changes are analyzed in depth using case study methodology and thematic comparative analysis. The aim is to uncover how the area once known as the Merbank neighborhood in Zincirlikuyu, Istanbul, has transformed physically from past to present and how these changes have impacted spatial interactions. The study reveals how urban planning and design shape physical environments. The findings obtained through thematic comparative analysis highlight the importance and the lack of community-centered approaches in urban planning and design. The reactive results of this research will guide future urban transformation projects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• architectural design
• architecture
• rebuilding
• physical enviroment

Fiziksel Çevrenin Dönüşümü: Bir Mahallenin Yeniden İnşası

Öz

Zamanla değişen ihtiyaçlar mekanların fiziksel koşullarına yansımış ve küçük veya büyük ölçekli dönüşümlere yol açmıştır. Çevresel değişimlerin fiziksel yansımaları çeşitli çalışmaların konusu olmuştur. Bu araştırma, kentsel mekanların yeniden inşasının fiziksel ortamlar üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Bir vaka çalışması aracılığıyla, tarihsel ve çağdaş fiziksel değişimler vaka çalışması metodolojisi ve tematik karşılaştırmalı analiz kullanılarak derinlemesine analiz edilmektedir. Amaç, İstanbul Zincirlikuyu'da bir zamanlar Merbank mahallesi olarak bilinen bölgenin geçmişten bugüne fiziksel olarak nasıl dönüştüğünü ve bu değişimlerin mekansal etkileşimleri nasıl etkilediğini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışma, kentsel planlama ve tasarımın fiziksel ortamları nasıl şekillendirdiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Tematik karşılaştırmalı analiz yoluyla elde edilen bulgular, kentsel planlama ve tasarımda toplum merkezli yaklaşımların önemini ve eksikliğini vurgulamaktadır. Bu araştırmanın reaktif sonuçları gelecekteki kentsel dönüşüm projelerine rehberlik edecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• mimarlık
• mimari tasarım
• fiziksel çevre
• yeniden inşa

Kaynakça

1. Agunbiade, M., Rajabifard, A., & Bennett, R. (2013). Modes of housing production in developing countries: the contemporary role of land, labour, and capital in Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9303-8
2. Akalın, M. (2016). Turkey’s Social Housing Policy and TOKİ’s Social Housing Applications. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 1(26), 107–123.
3. Antonenko, N. V. (2022). Spatial and Morphological Transformations of the Vinogradar Housing Area in Kyiv. Regional Problems of Architecture and Urban Planning, 16, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-403X-2022-16-39-47
4. Avaner, T., & Hasanoğlu, M. (2020). Türkiye’de İkibinlerin Başında Kooperatifçilik ve Konut Kooperatifçiliği Politikası Sorunu. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 3(2), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.740368
5. Bayraktar, N., Ayhan, E. S., Uysal, Y. Y., & Şumnu, U. (2014). Sivil Mimari Bellek: Ankara 1930-1980. VEKAM. Choi, M. J., & Yang, W. J. (2018). Physical, Economic, and Social Effects of Commercial Gentrification in Residential Area. Journal of Korea Planning Association, 53(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2018.02.53.1.123
6. Clary, C., Lewis, D., Limb, E., Nightingale, C. M., Ram, B., Page, A. S., Cooper, A. R., Ellaway, A., Giles-Corti, B., Whincup, P. H., Rudnicka, A. R., Cook, D. G., Owen, C. G., & Cummins, S. (2020). Longitudinal impact of changes in the residential built environment on physical activity: findings from the ENABLE London cohort study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-01003-9
7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
8. Das, R., Nag, S., & Mitra, K. (2020). Urban Transformations of Residential Settlements in Colonial Towns: Case Study of Chandernagore and Serampore (pp. 23–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25879-5_2

9. Dayıoğlu, O. (2021). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Yapı Kooperatiflerinin Konut Üretimi Üzerinden Merbank Mahallesi’nin Değerlendirilmesi. Mimarist, 72, 112–119.
10. Feliciotti, A., Romice, O., & Porta, S. (2016). Design for Change: Five Proxies for Resilience in the Urban Form. Open House International, 41(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-04-2016-B0004
11. Harita Istanbul. (2024). https://harita.istanbul
12. Karimi, K. (2023). The Configurational Structures of Social Spaces: Space Syntax and Urban Morphology in the Context of Analytical, Evidence-Based Design. Land, 12(11), 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084
13. Landman, T. (2008). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. Routledge.
14. Maginn, P. J., Burton, P., & Legacy, C. (2018). Disruptive Urbanism? Implications of the ‘Sharing Economy’ for Cities, Regions, and Urban Policy. Urban Policy and Research, 36(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2018.1555909
15. McDonald, K. S., Hobday, A. J., Thompson, P. A., Lenton, A., Stephenson, R. L., Mapstone, B. D., Dutra, L. X. C., Bessey, C., Boschetti, F., Cvitanovic, C., Bulman, C. M., Fulton, E. A., Moeseneder, C. H., Pethybridge, H., Plagányi, E. E., Putten, E. I., & Rothlisberg, P. C. (2019). Proactive, Reactive, and Inactive Pathways for Scientists in a Changing World. Earth’s Future, 7(2), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000990
16. Mezentsev, K. V., Provotar, N. I., & Palchuk, M. V. (2019). Social geography of the public spaces: social environment vs peripherality. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology, 2, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2019-2-15-24
17. Miles, D., & Sefton, J. (2017). Houses across time and across place. Research Papers in Economics.
18. Muianga, E. A. D., KnatzKowaltowski, D. C. C., Silva, V. G. da, Granja, A. D., Moreira, D. de C., & Ruschel, R. C. (2022). Housing transformations and their impacts on the well-being of dwellers. Ambiente Construído, 22(4), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212022000400639
19. Nazmeeva, A. (2021). The City in the Age of Remix. Media-N, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21900/j.median.v17i1.481
20. Osmond, P. (2009). The urban structural unit: towards a descriptive framework to support urban analysis and planning. Urban Morphology, 14(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v14i1.3951 Petersen, A. R., & Nielsen, S. D. (2021). The reconfiguration of publics and spaces through art: strategies of agitation and amelioration. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.1898766 Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Wiley-Interscience. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press. Sayar, Z. (1952). Merbank Mahallesi: Zincirlikuyu. Arkitekt, 11-12 (253-254), 215–224.
21. Şenol Balaban, M. (2019). Hazard-Prone Cities and Recent Challenges in the Case of Urban Transformation Experience of Turkey (pp. 235–259). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_12
22. Shirwani, R. K., Kamran, M., & Malik, A. M. (2019). A Literature Review of Early Housing Units: History, Evolution, Economy and Functions. Journal of Art Architecture and Built Environment, 2(2), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.32350/jaabe.22.04
23. Sonne, W. (2009). Dwelling in the metropolis: Reformed urban blocks 1890–1940 as a model for the sustainable compact city. Progress in Planning, 72(2), 53–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2009.06.001
24. Sulyk, T. (2023). SOCIAL CONTACT AS A COMPONENT OF PUBLIC CITY SPACE. Vìsnik Nacìonalʹnogo Unìversitetu “Lʹvìvsʹka Polìtehnìka”. Serìâ Arhìtektura, 5(1), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.23939/sa2023.01.185
25. Sylejmani, M. (2020). Transformation of living spaces – Changes in functional aspect. Pollack Periodica, 15(1), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1556/606.2020.15.1.23
26. Tavares, A. K. (2023). 150 Years of the Housing Question. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSFVOL22IS8PG1
27. Uzun, N. (2019). Transformation in Residential Areas: Regeneration or Redevelopment? (pp. 151–166). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05773-2_8
28. Weder, N. (2018). Urban Space in Transformation: The Imagined City’s Response to Change in Vladislavić’s Johannesburg. Current Writing: Text and Reception in Southern Africa, 30(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1013929X.2018.1503454
29. Yamei, L., & Chaomin, Z. (2023). The Strategy and Practice of the Reconstruction of Old Residential Area. Journal of Science, Technology and Society. https://doi.org/10.57237/j.jsts.2022.01.003 Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.