BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kamusal Alanların Evrensel Tasarımında Halkın Katılımı Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 37 - 47, 20.10.2020

Öz

Kamusal alanların evrensel tasarımıyla ilgili konular, sivil toplum paydaşları ve çeşitli proje tasarım ekipleri arasındaki iş birliği aracılığıyla, mevcut tasarımlar tarafından ihmal edidiğini düşünen marjinal topluluk üyeleri için, son zamanlarda daha iyi tartışılır hale gelmiştir. Düzgün ve yeterli bir şekilde tasarlanmış kamusal alanlar, toplumdaki tüm insan grupları için eşit fırsat sağlanmasına katkıda bulunabilir ve sosyal hareketliliği artırmaya yardımcı olabilir. Sonuç olarak, halkın katılımının desteğiyle tüm insan grupları için uygun kamusal alan tasarımı hakkında çözümler bulmak, toplumsal fayda sağlamak için temel bir ön koşul olmalıdır. Bu kapsamda, evrensel tasarımı toplumun katılımıyla iyi çözümleyen bir yenilenme projesi kapsamında ABD, New York'ta High-Line Projesi'nin bir vaka çalışması olarak analizi değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışma sonucunda özetle evrensel tasarımın, mümkün olduğunca geniş bir yelpazedeki tüm bireylerin kullanımına yönelik kentsel ortamlar yaratarak sosyal sürdürülebilirliği artırmada etkili bir araç olduğu ve halk katılımının bu tasarım sürecinin bir parçası olması gerektiği söylenebilir

Kaynakça

  • Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). The Communicative Turn in Urban Planning: Unravelling Paradigmatic, Imperialistic and Moralistic. Space & Polity, Vol. 6, No. 1: 5–24.
  • Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Zaly Shah, M. (2012). Disabled pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139 (2), 181-192.
  • Barton, H., Grant, M. & Guise, R. (2003). Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality. Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ceylan, A., (2007). Yaşam Kalitesinin Arttırılmasında Kentsel Yeşil Alanların Önemi ve Kentsel Dönüşüm ile İlişkilendirilmesi. İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Applied Sciences, Unpublished MSc Thesis, İstanbul.
  • Davarinezhad, M., & Rahnama, M. (2015). The assessment of urban furniture for the disabled (Case study: Shiraz City and large park). Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 1, 16-21.
  • Eslami, L., & Mahmoudi, M. M. (2016). Universal Design and Social Sustainability in the City: The Case Study of Tehran Iran. Studies in health technology and informatics, 229, 263-273.
  • Healey, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning B, 20: 83-104.
  • Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. Spon Press.
  • Jalaladdini, S., & Oktay, D. (2012). Urban public spaces and vitality: A socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot towns. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 664-67
  • Kart, N. (2005). Emirgan Parki'nda Kullanicilarin Memnuniyet Derecelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 55 (1), 185-208.
  • Korkut, A. B., Şişman, E. E., Özyavuz, M. (2010). Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Tekirdağ-Verda Yayıncılık, (ISBN: 978-605-88381-0-9).
  • Lee, Y. C., & Kim, K. H. (2015). Attitudes of citizens towards urban parks and green spaces for urban sustainability: The case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea. Sustainability, 7 (7), 8240-8254.
  • Low, S. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Mehta, V. (2013). Evaluating public spaces. Journal of Urban design, 19(1), 53-88.
  • Peredo, A.M., & Chrisman, J.J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 309–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208683.
  • Rahim, A. A. (2012). Universal Design in maintaining social sustainability.
  • Reiter, S., & Herde, A. D. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative criteria for comfortable urban public spaces. 2nd International Conference on Building Physics. Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Segherlou, E. N., & Farzin, A. A. (2014). Comparative study of urban public spaces based on the need of disabled with universal design approach (Case study: District 6 of Tehran Municipality).
  • Sisiopiku, V. P., & Akin, D. (2003). Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(4), 249-274.
  • Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. Taylor & Francis.
  • Yousefi, M., & Fardi, R. (2016). Physical responding of the urban public space to citizens' rights. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (3), 167-172.
  • https://www.thehighline.org/. Accessed on August 2020.
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/lifestyle/travel/high-line/. Accessed on August 2020.
  • https://zeroproject.org/. Accessed on September 2020.
  • http://tr.pinterest.com. Accessed on September 2020

A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 37 - 47, 20.10.2020

Öz

Through a partnership between civil society stakeholders and the various project design teams, specific objectives related to the universal design of public spaces are better discussed, with the aim of providing more resources to marginalized community members who feel left behind and exploited by existing design concepts. Public spaces which are properly and adequately designed could contribute to ensuring equal opportunity for all groups of people in the community and help boost social mobility. Consequently, finding suggestions about the appropriate design of public spaces for all groups of people with the support of public engagement should be a basic prerequisite requirement for providing community facilities. Within this scope the analysis of a case study of High-Line Project in New York, USA, as a part of a regeneration project that has utilized the universal design well through the inclusion of the society is evaluated. In brief it can be suggested that universal design is an efficient tool for boosting social sustainability via creating urban environments for the usage of a wide range of all individuals as much as possible and public engagement must be a part of this design process.

Kaynakça

  • Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002). The Communicative Turn in Urban Planning: Unravelling Paradigmatic, Imperialistic and Moralistic. Space & Polity, Vol. 6, No. 1: 5–24.
  • Asadi-Shekari, Z., Moeinaddini, M., & Zaly Shah, M. (2012). Disabled pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139 (2), 181-192.
  • Barton, H., Grant, M. & Guise, R. (2003). Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality. Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis.
  • Ceylan, A., (2007). Yaşam Kalitesinin Arttırılmasında Kentsel Yeşil Alanların Önemi ve Kentsel Dönüşüm ile İlişkilendirilmesi. İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Applied Sciences, Unpublished MSc Thesis, İstanbul.
  • Davarinezhad, M., & Rahnama, M. (2015). The assessment of urban furniture for the disabled (Case study: Shiraz City and large park). Journal of Civil Engineering and Urbanism, 1, 16-21.
  • Eslami, L., & Mahmoudi, M. M. (2016). Universal Design and Social Sustainability in the City: The Case Study of Tehran Iran. Studies in health technology and informatics, 229, 263-273.
  • Healey, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans. Environment and Planning B, 20: 83-104.
  • Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive design: Designing and developing accessible environments. Spon Press.
  • Jalaladdini, S., & Oktay, D. (2012). Urban public spaces and vitality: A socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot towns. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 664-67
  • Kart, N. (2005). Emirgan Parki'nda Kullanicilarin Memnuniyet Derecelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 55 (1), 185-208.
  • Korkut, A. B., Şişman, E. E., Özyavuz, M. (2010). Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Tekirdağ-Verda Yayıncılık, (ISBN: 978-605-88381-0-9).
  • Lee, Y. C., & Kim, K. H. (2015). Attitudes of citizens towards urban parks and green spaces for urban sustainability: The case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea. Sustainability, 7 (7), 8240-8254.
  • Low, S. (2000). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Mehta, V. (2013). Evaluating public spaces. Journal of Urban design, 19(1), 53-88.
  • Peredo, A.M., & Chrisman, J.J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise, Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 309–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208683.
  • Rahim, A. A. (2012). Universal Design in maintaining social sustainability.
  • Reiter, S., & Herde, A. D. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative criteria for comfortable urban public spaces. 2nd International Conference on Building Physics. Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Segherlou, E. N., & Farzin, A. A. (2014). Comparative study of urban public spaces based on the need of disabled with universal design approach (Case study: District 6 of Tehran Municipality).
  • Sisiopiku, V. P., & Akin, D. (2003). Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: an examination based on observation and survey data. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(4), 249-274.
  • Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. Taylor & Francis.
  • Yousefi, M., & Fardi, R. (2016). Physical responding of the urban public space to citizens' rights. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (3), 167-172.
  • https://www.thehighline.org/. Accessed on August 2020.
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/lifestyle/travel/high-line/. Accessed on August 2020.
  • https://zeroproject.org/. Accessed on September 2020.
  • http://tr.pinterest.com. Accessed on September 2020
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Evans Kimani Njunge Bu kişi benim

Buket Asilsoy Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Ekim 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Njunge, E. K., & Asilsoy, B. (2020). A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 37-47.
AMA Njunge EK, Asilsoy B. A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. Ekim 2020;2(2):37-47.
Chicago Njunge, Evans Kimani, ve Buket Asilsoy. “A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces”. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 2, sy. 2 (Ekim 2020): 37-47.
EndNote Njunge EK, Asilsoy B (01 Ekim 2020) A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 2 2 37–47.
IEEE E. K. Njunge ve B. Asilsoy, “A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces”, YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 2, sy. 2, ss. 37–47, 2020.
ISNAD Njunge, Evans Kimani - Asilsoy, Buket. “A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces”. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 2/2 (Ekim 2020), 37-47.
JAMA Njunge EK, Asilsoy B. A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;2:37–47.
MLA Njunge, Evans Kimani ve Buket Asilsoy. “A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces”. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 2, sy. 2, 2020, ss. 37-47.
Vancouver Njunge EK, Asilsoy B. A Study about Public Participation in the Universal Design of Public Spaces. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;2(2):37-4.

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır  - Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ, CC-BY-NC lisansı altında açık erişimli bir dergidir.