The Institutionalization of the Constitutional Court in Turkey

Öz

The purpose of this study was to examine the level of institutionalization of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey. With institutional disruption occurring on global and local levels, the significance of institutionalization has been emphasized in political science studies. It is being questioned whether institutions can fulfill their functions and it is accepted that they must meet certain criteria as an institution. The study will employ the rational institutionalism method and examine studies that focus on institutionalization, proposing a specific institutionalization model for Turkey. The level of institutionalization achieved by the Constitutional Court will be assessed through the criteria and indicators established in this model. We will focus on the autonomy, differentiation, and durability criteria as the primary factors of institutionalization. These factors will be evaluated based on indicators such as the selection of court officials, the court's physical location, date of establishment, internal capacity for specialization, internal regulations, the court's budget, salaries of officials, decision-making autonomy, the EU accession process, and international support. Consequently, this analysis will examine the judiciary's institutional development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Institutionalization
• Constitutional Court
• Autonomy
• Differentiation
• Resilience

Kaynakça

1. Arslan, Z. (2002). Conflicting Paradigms: Political Rights in the Turkish Constitutional Court, 11 Critique. Critical Middle Eastern Studies, Spring: 9–25.
2. Arslan, Z. (2016). Inaugural Speech on the 54th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Constitutional Court. Access Address: https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/tr/baskan/eski-baskanlarin-konusmalari/zuhtu-arslan/konusmalar/anayasa-mahkemesinin-54-kurulus-yildonumunde-yapmis-oldugu-acis-konusmasi/ Access Date: 13 April 2024.
3. Arslan, Z. (2023). AYM Başkanı Arslan: Bireysel başvuruyla birlikte Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi bir paradigmatik dönüşüm yaşadı. Anadolu Agency. Access Address: https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/aym-baskani-arslan-bireysel-basvuruyla-birlikte-turk-anayasa-mahkemesi-bir-paradigmatik-donusum-yasadi/2778586 Access Date: 13 April 2024.
4. Atar, Y. (2008). Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin Yeniden Yapılandırılması. Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, 25: 93-115.
5. Bayrakcı, E., & Koçman, M. A. (2023). BİLGİ GÜVENLİĞİ VE ELEKTRONİK HARP. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı), 184-206.
6. Bumin K. M. (2015). Determinants of Judicial Institutionalization: A Study of the Post-Communist Constitutional Courts. Journal of Power, Politics & Governance, 3 (1): 1-25.
7. Bumin K. M., & Randazzo K. A. & Walker, L. D. (2009). Institutional Viability and High Courts: A Comparative Analysis of Post-Communist States. Australian Journal of Political Science, 44(1): 127-153.
8. Çemrek, M. (2004). The EU Impact on the Political Culture of Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey. Journal of Foreign Policy of Moldova, EuroJournal.org- Journal of Foreign Policy of Moldova, 7. Access Address: http://www.ceeol.com. Access Date: 13 April 2024.

9. Fukuyama, F. (2000). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. The Free Press: New York.
10. Frye, T. (1997). A politics of institutional choice: Post-communistpresidencies. Comparative Political Studies, 39(5): 523-552.
11. Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years?. Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 115-44.
12. Huntington, S. (1965). Political Development and Political Decay. World Politics, Volume 17, Issue 3: 386-430. IMF Report. (2024). World Economic Outlook Database Groups and Aggregates Information April 2024. International Monetary Fund, Access Address: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/April/groups-and-aggregates. Access Date: 13 April 2024.
13. Keohane, R. O. (1969). Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly: International Organization, 23 (4): 859-896.
14. Koç, Ş., Mercan, B., & Gömleksiz, M. (2023). Türkiye’de Bilgi Taşmaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı): 207-221.
15. Levitsky, S. (1998). Institutionalization and Peronism: The Case, the Concept, and the Case for Unpacking the Concept. Pacific Affairs, 4 (1): 77–92.
16. Mainwaring, S. (2018). Party Systems in Latin America. London, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. McGuire K. T: (2004). The Institutionalization of the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Analysis, 12 (2): 128-142.
17. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. St Louis, Washington University.
18. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
19. Özbudun, E. (2007). Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi'nin Yargýsal Aktivizmi ve Siyasal Elitlerin Tepkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 62 (3): 257­268.
20. Özbudun, E. (2009). Türk Anayasa Hukuku. 10. Baskı. Yetkin Yayınları: Ankara.
21. Özşahin, Ş., & Şahin, T. (2023). 1960 Sonrası Türkiye Ekonomisinde Askeri Harcamalar ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkinin Nedensellik Analizi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı): 52-76.
22. Polsby, N. W. (1968). The Institutionalization of the U. S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review, 62 (1): 144-168.
23. Şahbaz, A., Koç Ş. & Ceylan A. (2022). Demokrasi ve Dışa Açıklığın Vergi Gelirleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri İçin Panel Veri Analizi (1980-2018). Fiscaoeconomia, 6 (3): 1367-1388.
24. T.C. 1961 Anayasası. Access Address: https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/tr/mevzuat/onceki-anayasalar/1961-anayasasi/. Access Date: 13 April 2024.
25. T.C. 1982 Anayasası. Access Address:: https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/tr/mevzuat/anayasa/. Access Date: 13 April 2024.
26. The World Factbook (1995). Access Address: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/. Access Date: 13 April 2024.
27. The World Factbook (2002). Access Address: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/. Access Date: 13 April 2024.