EXTERNAL VOTES AND TRANS-NATIONALIZATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES

Yıl 2023, , 457 - 469, 31.03.2023

Mehmet Köse

https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1228531

Öz

The initiation of the voting practice abroad for Turkish citizens living outside national borders has opened a new aspect for the diaspora political participation. Turkish diaspora had shared and submitted its issues and demands from homeland government and political parties, and most were included in the government and party programs. However, the inexistency of the effective use of vote and representation in the political arena had put the limitation on the efficiancy of the diaspora’s impact on the implementation of the policies. But the high turnout of Turkish voters abroad, 1.5 million and 50 % turnout external voting comperatively significant as diaspora homeland voting, has dramatically changed the agenda of the political parties. Programs and promises for external voters have been included in the party programs and the candidates with diaspora background were added in parliamentary election list. The existence of a significant number of external voters involved in the political processes within the borders of the nation-state enforces political parties to adjust themselves into the new situation. This study analyzes ground and the status of political parties in Türkiye by considering the transnationalization process of political parties through conceptual background and some examples from other countries. Literature review, document analysis and elite interview methods were employed in this study to develop concept and policy recommendations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diaspora, Diaspora Political Participation, External Voting, Political Parties

YURT DIŞI OYLAR VE SİYASİ PARTİLERİN ULUS-ÖTESİLEŞMESİ

Öz

Yurt dışında yerleşik Türk seçmenlerin bulundukları ülkelerde oy kullanmaya başlaması, diasporanın anavatan siyasal katılımında yeni bir pencere açmış oldu. Uzun yıllar Türk diasporası, gündemlerini ve taleplerini Türk hükümeti yetkililerine ve siyasi partilere iletmiş, bunlar partilerin ve hükümetlerin programlarında yer almıştır. Ancak seçme ve seçilme hakkını etkin bir şekilde kullanma imkanından yoksun diasporanın siyasal alanda etkisi de sınırlı olmuştur. Diasporaların genel olarak oy kullanma eğilimleriyle kıyaslandığında Türk diasporasının 1,5 milyonu geçen ve yüzde elliden yüksek oranda seçimlere katılımı, siyasi partilerin diaspora ve yurt dışı seçmen gündemini belirgin bir şekilde değiştirmeye başlamıştır. Yurt dışı seçmenlere yönelik programlar seçim beyannamelerinde yer almakta ve diaspora geçmişi olan adaylara milletvekili seçim listelerinde yer verilmektedir. Ulus-devlet sınırları dışında ülke içindeki siyasi süreçlere dahil olan önemli sayıda seçmenin varlığı siyasi alanın temel aktörü olan partilerin yeni şartlara uyumunu zorlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, siyasi partilerin ulus-ötesileşme sürecini kavramsal arka planı ve dünya örnekleri üzerinden ele alarak Türkiye’deki altyapının ve siyasi partilerin durumunu analiz etmektedir. Literatür incelemesi, doküman analizi ve elit mülakat yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı bu çalışma hem kavramsallaştırma hem de politika önerileri ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diaspora, Diaspora Siyasal Katılım, Yurtdışı Oy Verme, Siyasi Partiler

Kaynakça

• Abadan-Unat, N., Çidam, V., Çınar, D., Kadirbeyoglu, Z., Kaynak, S., Ozay, B., ve Tas, S. (2014). Voting Behaviour of Euro-Turks and Turkey’s Presidential Elections of 2014 :. Ankara/Istanbul: Friedrich-Ebert-Stitung.
• Ahmadov, A. K., ve Sasse, G. (2016). A Voice Despite Exit: The Role of Assimilation, Emigrant Networks, and Destination in Emigrants’ Transnational Political Engagement. Comparative Political Studies, 78-114.
• Anaz, N., ve Köse, M. (2020). Diaspora Seçim Coğrafyası. Ankara: GAV Perspektif.
• Anaz, N., ve Köse, M. (2021). An Analysis of Turkish Overseas Electoral Districts: Opportunities and Challenges. İçinde E. A. Bekaroğlu, ve G. K. Osmanbaşoğlu, Turkey’s Electoral Geography (pp. 182-200). Londra: Routledge.
• Barabantseva, E., ve Sutherland, C. (2011). Diaspora and citizenship: Introduction. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 1-13.
• Bauböck, R. (2009). Stakeholder Citizenship and Democratic Participation in Migration Contexts. In J. P. John-Erik Fossum, The Ties that Bind : Accommodating Complex Diversity in Canada and the European Union (pp. 105-128). Brüksel: Peter Lang.
• Bauböck, R. (2017). Political Membership and Democratic Boundaries. İçinde A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, ve M. Vink, The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship (pp. 60-82). Oxford University Press.
• Bogdan Popescu. (2012). Out-of-Country Voting–Participation in Elections of Romania Diaspora. Political Science and International Relations , 94-110.
• Burgess, K. (2014). Unpacking the Diaspora Channel in New Democracies: When Do Migrants Act Politically Back Home? Studies in Comparative International Development, 13–43.
• Burgess, K., ve Tybursk, M. D. (2020). When Parties Go Abroad: Explaining Patterns of Extraterritorial Voting. Electoral Studies.
• Ciornei, I., ve Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2020). Transnational turnout. Determinants of emigrant voting in home country elections. Political Geography, 102-145.
• Ciornei, I., ve Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2020). Transnational turnout. Determinants of Emigrant Voting in Home Country Elections. Political Geography, 102-145.
• Collard, S., ve Webb, P. (2019). UK Parties Abroad and Expatriate Voters: The Brexit Backlash. Parliamentary Affairs, 856-873.
• Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley ve Sons.
• Francesco Ragazzi, ve Balalovska., K. (2011). Diaspora Politics and Post-Territorial Citizenship in Croatia, Serbia and Macedonia. CITSEE.
• Friedman, A., ve Kenig, O. (2021). Parties Beyond National Borders: Exploring The Activities of Israeli Political Parties Abroad. Comparative Migration Studies, 1-15.
• Gherghina, S., ve Soare, S. (2020). The Organization of Romanian Parties Abroad. In T. Kernalegenn, ve É. v. Haute, Political Parties Abroad: A New Arena for Party Politics (pp. 96-114). Londra: Routledge.
• Goldberg, A. C., ve Lanz, S. (2021). Living Abroad, Voting as If at Home? Electoral Motivations of Expatriates. Migration Studies, 279-310.
• IDEA. (2022, Ekim 06). Voting from Abroad Database. Adresinden alındı: www.idea.int: https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voting-abroad
• Karamustafaoğlu, T. (1965). Yurt Dışındaki İşçilerimizin Seçme Hakları. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 97-104.
• Katz, R. S., ve Mair, P. (1993). The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. The American Review of Politics, 593-617.
• Kernalegenn, T., ve Haute, É. v. (2020). Political Parties Abroad: A New Arena for Party Politics. London: Routledge.
• Kernalegenn, T., ve Haute, É. V. (2020). Why Study Political Parties Abroad? Diasporas As New Arenas for Party Politics. In T. Kernalegenn, ve É. V. Haute, Political Parties Abroad. A New Arena for Party Politics. New York: Routledge.
• Kernalegenn, T., ve Pellen, C. (2020). En Marche, French Expatriates! The Booming Emergence of A New Political Actor Among French Residents Overseas in the 2017 Elections. In T. Kernalegenn, ve É. V. Haute, Political Parties Abroad: A New Arena for Party Politics (pp. 96-114). Londra: Routledge.
• Keskin, H. (1977). Çözüm Bekleyen Sorunların Kilit Noktası: Seçme-Seçilme Hakkı. Özgür İnsan(50), pp. 42-45.
• Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems. In J. LaPalombara, ve M. Weiner, Political Parties and Political Development (pp. 177-200). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Knott, E. (2017). The Extra-Territorial Paradox of Voting: The Duty to Vote in Extra-Territorial Elections. Democratization, 325-346.
• Lafleur, J.-M. (2013). Transnational Politics and The State: The External Voting Rights of Diasporas. . Londra: Routledge.
• Lafleur, J.-M. (2015). The Enfranchisement of Citizens Abroad: Variations and Explanations. Democratization, 840-860.
• Laguerre, M. (2013). Parliament and Diaspora in Europe. Springer.
• LaPalombara, J., ve Weiner, M. (1966). The Origin and Development of Political Parties. In Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton University Press.
• Mégret, F., ve Girard., R. (2015). Diasporas, Extraterritorial Representation, and the Right to Vote. Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 185-221.
• Mencütek, Z. S. (2015). External Voting: Mapping Motivations of Emigrants and Concerns of Host Countries. Insight Turkey.
• Mirjana Kasapović. (2012). Voting Rights, Electoral Systems, and Political Representation of Diaspora in Croatia . East European Politics and Societies , 777-791.
• Nostitz, F.-C. v. (2021). Party Expats? Mapping Transnational Party Branches of French, German and UK parties. Comparative Migration Studies, 1-21.
• Okyay, A., ve Baser, B. (2015). How Does Expatriates’ Enfranchisement Reconfigure Transnational Politics? Analyzing the Recent External Voting Experience of Turkey and Its Diaspora. SSRN Papers.
• Østergaard-Nielsen, E. (2003). The Politics of Migrants’ Transnational Political Practices. International migration review, 760-786.
• Østergaard-Nielsen, E., ve Camatarri, S. (2020). Styles of Representation in Constituencies in The Homeland and Abroad: The Case of Italy. Parliamentary Affairs, 1-22.
• Østergaard-Nielsen, E., ve Ciornei, I. (2018). Political Parties and The Transnational Mobilization of The Emigrant Vote. West European Politics, 618-644.
• Paarlberg, M. A. (2017). Competing for The Diaspora's Influence At Home :Party Structure and Transnational Campaign Activity in El Salvador. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 539-560.
• Pekin, H. (1979 ). Yurtdışında Bulunan Türk Vatandaşlarının Türkiye Parlamento Seçimlerinde Oy Kullanmaları. Ankara: Çalışma Bakanlığı.
• Piccio, D. R. (2020). Italian Political Parties and Their Organisation beyond National Borders . Parliamentary Affairs, 918–933.
• Rashkova, E. R. (2020). The Party Abroad: A New Modus Operandi for Political Parties. Parliamentary Affairs, 839–855.
• Rashkova, E. R., ve Staak, S. v. (2020). The Party Abroad and Its Role for National Party Politics. Security and Human Rights, 108–132.
• Rhodes, S., ve Harutyunyan, A. (2010). Extending Citizenship to Emigrants: Democratic Contestation and A New Global Norm. International Political Science Review , 470-493.
• Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., ve Blanc‐Szanton, C. (1992). Towards a Definition of Transnationalism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , 1-24.
• Semra, S., Mekik, C. S., Blais, A., ve Çakır, S. (2020). How do Turks abroad vote?. Turkish Studies , 208-230.
• Staak, S. V., ve Rashkova, E. R. (2020). The Party Abroad, the World of Professional Electoral and Democracy Assistance, and the Way Forward. Parliamentary Affairs, 1-8.
• Turcu, A., ve Urbatsch, R. (2015). Diffusion of Diaspora Enfranchisement Norms: A Multinational Study. Comparative Political Studies, 407-437.
• Vertovec, S. (2001). Transnationalism and Identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 573-582.
• Waldinger, R., ve Duquette-Rury, L. (2016). Emigrant Politics, Immigrant Engagement: Homeland Ties and Immigrant Political Identity in the United States . RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 42-59.
• Weber, M. (1946). Politics as a Vocation. In H. H. Gerth, ve C. Mills, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77-128). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Wellman, E. I., Allen, N. W., ve Nyblade, B. (2022). The Extraterritorial Voting Rights and Restrictions Dataset (1950–2020). Comparative Political Studies , 1-33.
• Yener-Roderburg, İ. Ö. (2020). Party organizations across: Top-Down Satellites and Bottom-Up Alliances. The Case of AKP and HDP in Germany. In T. Kernalegenn, ve E. v. Haute, Political Parties Abroad: A New Arena for Party Politics (pp. 218-237). Londra: Routledge.