Hibrit savaş: Geleneksel ve modern savaşın kesişim noktasında uluslararası güvenlik

Öz

ÖZ Hibrit savaş, hem geleneksel hem de modern savaş yöntemlerinin bir arada kullanıldığı, çok boyutlu ve dinamik bir çatışma biçimidir. Bu savaş türü, yalnızca devletler arası savaşlarla sınırlı kalmayıp, devlet dışı aktörler, terör örgütleri, siber saldırganlar ve hatta bireyler tarafından uygulanabilmektedir. Geleneksel savaşın cephe çatışmaları, modern savaşın teknolojik ve asimetrik unsurlarıyla birleştirilerek, hibrit savaşın kapsamı genişlemekte ve daha karmaşık bir tehdit yapısı ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu makale, hibrit savaşın uluslararası güvenlik üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Hibrit savaşın, geleneksel askeri stratejiler ile modern siber saldırılar, dezenformasyon kampanyaları ve ekonomik yaptırımlar gibi unsurları nasıl entegre ettiği, uluslararası güvenlik örgütleri, devletler ve devlet dışı aktörler üzerinde ne tür sonuçlar doğurduğu kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alınmıştır. Özellikle NATO ve AB gibi uluslararası güvenlik örgütlerinin hibrit savaş karşısındaki durumu ve hibrit savaşın gelecekteki güvenlik mimarisini nasıl şekillendirebileceği üzerinde durulmuştur. Hibrit savaş, günümüz çatışma ortamında yeni güvenlik tehditleri doğururken, devletlerin ve uluslararası örgütlerin bu tehditlere karşı ne tür önlemler alabileceği de bu çalışmada tartışılmaktadır. Buna göre hibrit savaşın, küresel güç dengelerini etkilediği, uluslararası güvenlik ve uluslararası ilişkilerde dönüşüme neden olabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hibrit savaş
• güvenlik
• uluslararası güvenlik
• geleneksel savaş
• modern savaş

Hybrid war: International security at the intersection of traditional and modern warfare

Öz

ABSTRACT Hybrid warfare is a multifaceted and dynamic form of conflict that employs a combination of both traditional and modern warfare methods. This type of warfare is not limited to inter-state conflicts; it can also be executed by non-state actors, terrorist organizations, cyber aggressors, and even individuals. By integrating traditional military confrontations with the technological and asymmetric elements of modern warfare, the scope of hybrid warfare expands, resulting in a more complex threat structure. This paper aims to analyze the impacts of hybrid warfare on international security. It examines how hybrid warfare integrates traditional military strategies with modern components such as cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and economic sanctions, and what consequences this has for international security organizations, states, and non-state actors. Special attention is given to the positions of international security organizations like NATO and the EU in the face of hybrid warfare, and how hybrid warfare may shape the future security architecture. As hybrid warfare introduces new security threats into the contemporary conflict environment, the paper also discusses what measures states and international organizations can take to counter these threats. Ultimately, it concludes that hybrid warfare affects global power balances and could lead to transformations in international security and international relations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hybrid war
• security
• international security
• traditional warfare
• modern warfare

Kaynakça

1. Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt. D. (1993). Cyberwar is Coming!. Comparative Strategy, 12 (2), 141-165.
2. Aytuğ, K. H. & Pozan, İ. F. (2023). Gelişen Hibrit Savaş Ortamında NATO-AB İş Birliği, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, 20 (77), 1-27.
3. Bachmann, S. D., & Gunneriusson, H. (2015). Hybrid Wars: The 21st Century's New Threats to Global Peace and Security. Scientia Militaria South African Journal of Military Studies, 43 (1), 77-98.
4. Baldwin, D. A. (2020). Economic Statecraft: New Edition, USA: Princeton University Press.
5. Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2020). The Disinformation Age: Politics, Technology, and Disruptive Communication in the United States. USA: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biddle, S., & Friedman, J. A. (2008). The 2006 Lebanon Campaign and the Future of Warfare: Implications for Army and Defense Policy. US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. US Army War College Press.
7. Brett, W. A. (2012). Clausewitz’s Continued Relevance and Foundation for Educating Critical Thinking Skills, Usawc Strategy Research Project, U.S. Army War College, https://apps.dtic.mil, 10/08/2024.
8. Buchanan, B. (2020). The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Harvard University Press.

9. Clarke, R. A., & Knake, R. (2011). Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About It. Ecco Publications.
10. Clausewitz, C. V. (1989). On War. (Ed. Peter Paret). USA: Princeton University Press.
11. Creveld, M. L. V. (1991). The Transformation of War: The Most Radical Reinterpretation of Armed Conflict Since Clausewitz. Free Press.
12. European Commission (2016). Joint Framework on Countering Hybrid Threats, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/memo_16_1250
13. European External Action Service. (2018). Increasing Resilience and Bolstering Capabilities to Address Hybrid Threats, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/46397_en
14. Galeotti, M. (2016). Hybrid War or Gibridnaya Voina? Getting Russia’s Non-linear Military Challenge Right. Lulu Press.
15. Gilpin, R. (2020). Hegemonik Savaş Teorisi, (ed. Esra Diri), Uluslararası İlişkilerde Anahtar Metinler, 423-441. İstanbul: DER Yayınları.
16. Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015). A Liberal Actor in a Realist World: The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy. Oxford University Press.
17. Gök, A. (2021). Hibrit Savaşlar: Rusya ve İsrail Örnekleriyle, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
18. Grotius, H. (2011). Savaş ve Barış Hukuku, (çev. Seha L. Meray), İstanbul: SAY Yayınları.
19. Henckaerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I: Rules. Cambridge University Press.
20. Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
21. Hoffman, F. G. (2009). Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. Joint Force Quarterly, 52, 34-39. https://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/jfqhoffman.pdf
22. Irwin, D. A. (2017). Clashing over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy. The University of Chicago Press.
23. Johnson, D. E. (2012). Military Capabilities for Hybrid War. Insights from the Israel Defense Forces in Lebanon and Gaza, RAND Corporation.
24. Johnson, R. (2018). Hybrid War and Its Countermeasures: A Critique of the Literature, Small Wars and Insurgencies, 29 (1), 141-163.
25. Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnell, V. (2015). Propaganda & Persuasion, (ed. 6th), Sage Publications.
26. Kahraman, Ö. (2019). Suriye Krizi’nde Lübnan Hizbullah’ının Rolü, Gece Kitaplığı, Ankara.
27. Kalb, M. & Saivetz, C. (2007). The Israeli-Hezbollah war of 2006: The Media as a Weapon in Asymmetrical Conflict. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12 (3), 43-66.
28. Kaldor, M. (2013). In Defence of New Wars, Stability, 2 (1): 4, 1-16.
29. Kaplan, F. (2023). “Hibrit Savaş” Teriminin İkinci Lübnan Savaşı ve Rusya’nın Kırım’ı İlhakı Kapsamında İncelenmesi, Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 19 (45), 393-420.
30. Kott, A., et al. (2015). Cyber Defense and Situational Awareness. Springer Press.
31. Libicki, M. C. (2009). Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar. RAND Corporation.
32. Lind, W. S. et al. (1989). The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation, Marine Corps Gazette, 22-26.
33. Lindsay, J. R. (2013). Stuxnet and the Limits of Cyber Warfare, Security Studies, 22 (3), 365-404.
34. Miskimmon, A., et al. (2013). Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. Routledge Publications.
35. Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict. The RUSI Journal, 158 (2), 40-46.
36. Murray, W., & Mansoor, P. R. (2012). Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present. Cambridge University Press.
37. NATO. (2015). NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats. Retrieved from https://www.ndc.nato.int/news/news.php?icode=886
38. NATO. (2016). Social Media As A Tool Of Hybrid warfare, NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence.
39. Ören, E. (2022). The Just War in Political Thought: from Cicero to Grotius, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 22 (3), 188-204.
40. Pape, R. A. (1997). Why Economic Sanctions Do Not Work, International Security, 22 (2), 90-136.
41. Pirani, S. (2007). Ukraine's Gas Sector. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
42. Rid, T. (2012). Cyber War Will Not Take Place, Journal of Strategic Studies, 35 (1), 5-32.
43. Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press.
44. Schmitt, M. N., & Vihul, L. (2017). The Nature of International Law Cyber Norms, in “International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives”, (ed. Osula & Röigas), NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, 23-47.
45. Singer, P. W., & Friedman, A. (2014). Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.
46. Smith, R. (2008). The Utility of Force in the Modern World. Vintage Press.
47. Starbird, K., et al. (2019). Disinformation as Collaborative Work: Surfacing the Participatory Nature of Strategic Information Operations, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3 (CSCW), 1-26.
48. Tardy, T. (2020). NATO 2030. United for a new era: a Digest. NATO Defence College Policy Brief 23-20.
49. Tikk, E., et al. (2010). International Cyber Incidents: Legal Considerations. NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence.
50. Tikk, E., & Kerttunen, M. (2018). Parabasis: Cyber-diplomacy in Stalemate. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Publications.
51. Vershbow A. R. & Speranza, L. M. (2019). More In The Med: How NATO Can Refocus its Efforts in the South and Italy Can Lead the Charge. Atlantic Council Report.
52. Waltz, K. N. (2018). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.
53. Weigley, R. F. (1977). The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy, Indiana University Press.
54. Wilkie, R. (2009). Hybrid warfare: something old, not something new, Air and Space Power Journal, 23 (4), 13-17.
55. Zagorin, P. (2008). Thucydides: An Introduction for the Common Reader. Princeton University Press.