Towards sustainable development: Turkish aid strategies, global solidarity, and peace promotion

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 1404 - 1415, 29.09.2024

Rahman Nurdun

https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1487891

Öz

In the post-Cold War era, Türkiye, alongside India, Korea and China, has emerged as a significant player in development cooperation. Following 9/11, shifts in aid focus towards security and conflict resolution have been observed, particularly in the aid strategies of the US and Japan. The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee prioritizes aid effectiveness, coordination and untied aid. Türkiye, as both a donor and recipient country, has strategically expanded its aid efforts over the past decade, aligning with its foreign policy objectives of global engagement. Focusing on sectors like vocational training, agriculture, and health, where it holds comparative advantages, Türkiye has extended aid to regions across Africa, the Middle East, Far East, and Latin America. However, unilateralism and humanitarian crises have influenced aid behaviors negatively. Thus, there's a growing importance placed on fostering partnerships for solidarity and encouraging donor nations to promote a peaceful environment conducive to sustainable development goals. This paper outlines the evolution of development, Turkish perspectives on development aid, and emphasizes the pivotal role of development cooperation in promoting peace and security. It starts with an introduction focusing on the evolution of development, then elaborates on Turkish perception of aid delivery, finally focuses on the importance of promoting peace and security through case studies of development cooperation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye, Aid, Peace and Security, Development

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma yönünde: Türk yardım stratejileri, küresel dayanışma ve barışın teşviki

Öz

Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde, Türkiye, Hindistan, Kore ve Çin gibi ülkeler, kalkınma işbirliğinde önemli birer aktör olarak ortaya çıkmışlardır. 11 Eylül 2001 sonrasında, özellikle ABD ve Japonya'nın yardım stratejilerinde güvenlik ve çatışma çözümüne odaklanma eğilimleri gözlemlenmiştir. OECD'nin Kalkınma Yardımları Komitesi yardım etkinliğine, koordinasyona ve koşulsuz yardıma öncelik vermektedir. Türkiye, hem yardım veren hem alıcı ülke olarak, son on yılda yardım çabalarını stratejik olarak genişletmiş ve küresel katılım hedefleriyle uyumlu hale getirmiştir. Türkiye, mesleki eğitim, tarım ve sağlık gibi alanlara odaklanarak göreceli üstün olduğu sektörlerde, Afrika, Orta Doğu, Uzak Doğu ve Latin Amerika bölgelerine yardım sağlamıştır. Bununla birlikte, tek taraflılık ve insani krizler, yardım davranışlarını olumsuz etkilemiştir. Bu nedenle, dayanışma için ortaklıkların teşvik edilmesi ve bağışçı ülkelerin sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine uygun barışçıl bir ortamın desteklenmesi giderek daha fazla önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışma, kalkınmanın evrimini özetlemekte, Türkiye'nin kalkınma yardımına ilişkin bakış açısını ele almaktadır ve kalkınma işbirliğinin barış ve güvenliği teşvik etmedeki kilit rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca bu çalışma, kalkınma evrimine odaklanan bir analizle başlamakta, ardından Türk yardım algısını detaylı olarak ele almakta ve son olarak kalkınma işbirliği örnekleri üzerinden barış ve güvenliğin teşvik edilmesinin önemine odaklanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türkiye, Yardım, Barış ve Güvenlik, Kalkınma

Kaynakça

• Arab News (2017), “Turkish aid agency offers a lifeline to Rohingya Muslims,” https://www.arabnews.com/node/1157041/middle-east
• Avey, Paul C. (2012), “Confronting Soviet Power: U.S. Policy during the Early Cold War”, International Security Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 151-188, The MIT Press
• Brown, Stephen & Grävingholt, Jörn & Raddatz, Rosalind. (2015). The Securitization of Foreign Aid: Trends, Explanations, and Prospects. 10.1007/978-1-137-56882-3_11.
• Çam, Serdar, “Mazlumlara Sahip Çıkan Güçlülerle Müzakere Eden Ülke TÜRKİYE”, 09/09/2017, https://www.serdarcam.com.tr/bloglar/makaleler/sayfa/16
• Chandler, D. ( 2007), The security–development nexus and the rise of ‘anti-foreign policy’. J Int Relat Dev 10, 362–386. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800135
• Development Initiatives (2022), “Donors of humanitarian and wider crisis financing,” Global Humanitarian Assistance Report, Chapter 3, https://devinit.org/resources/global-humanitarian-assistance-report-2022/donors-of-humanitarian-and-wider-crisis-financing/#section-3-2
• Duffield, Mark (2007), Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples, Polity Press, 143-150.
• Eftekin, Cahit (2023), Türklerde Vakıf Kültürü, Bilgeoğuz Yayınları
• Fricas, John (1980) “Greece and the Truman Doctrine,” /https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA085149.pdf https://my.southsouth-galaxy.org/en/solutions/?search=TIKA
• https://sdgs.un.org/goals
• https://unsouthsouth.org/2021/07/07/good-practices-in-south-south-and-triangular-cooperation-for-sustainable-development-in-sid-advancing-samoa-pathway-and-achieving-sustainable-recovery/
• https://unsouthsouth.org/2021/10/12/good-practices-in-south-south-and-triangular-cooperation-for-sustainable-development-vol-3-2020/
• https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:miwbQ-uiv2gJ:https://www.southsouth-galaxy.org/partner-of-the-month/tika/&cd=3&hl=tr&ct=clnk&gl=tr
• https://www.csis.org/news/csis-statesmens-forum-president-somalia-hassan-sheikh-mahamud.
• HURIGHTS OSAKA (2008), “Mindanao Conflict: In Search of Peace and Human Rights” https://www.hurights.or.jp/archives/focus/section2/2008/12/mindanao-conflict-in-search-of-peace-and-human-rights.html
• Khadka, Narayan (Spring, 2000), “U.S. Aid to Nepal in the Cold War Period: Lessons for the Future”, Pacific Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 1, University of British Columbia
• Phillips, Keri (2013), “the history of foreign aid,” https://reliefweb.int/report/world/history-foreign-aid
• Quirk, Patrick and Caitlin Dearing Scott (2023), “Maximizing US foreign aid for strategic competition”, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/maximizing-us-foreign-aid-for-strategic-competition/
• Relations between Türkiye and the Philippines, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkiye-and-the-philippines_.en.mfa
• Respect For Diversity”, 19-25. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Discussion%20Paper%20-%20Preventing%20Violent%20Extremism%20by%20Promoting%20Inclusive%20%20Development.pdf
• Satterthwaite, Joseph C. (1972) “The Truman Doctrine: Türkiye,” https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/67096/10.1177_000271627240100109.pdf?sequence=2/1000
• State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China (April 2011) “China's Foreign Aid”, Beijing Review, http://www.bjreview.com.cn/document/txt/2011-05/19/content_359254.htm#
• Taffet, Jeffrey F. (October 2018), Foreign Economic Aid, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.500 The Associated Press (2006), https://nationalpost.com/news/world/colombia-government-farc-rebels-sign-peace-treaty-ending-50-year-conflict-that-left-220000-dead
• The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan (n.d.), https://history.state.gov/departmenthistory/short-history/truman
• TRT World (2017), https://www.trtworld.com/americas/Türkiye-opens-school-in-columbia-367373
• Türkiye to start first foreign aid distribution in Myanmar (2017), https://www.reuters.com/article/world/turkey-to-start-first-foreign-aid-distribution-in-myanmar-idUSKCN1BG11X/
• UNDP(2016), “Preventing Violent Extremism Through Promoting Inclusive Development, Tolerance And
• Wasuge, Mahad (2016), Türkiye’s Assistance Model in Somalia: Achieving Much With Little”, the Heritage Institute for Policy Studies,Mogadishu.
• Yediyıldız, Bahaeddin (April 1996) “Place of the Waqf in Turkish Cultural System”, paper presentation at Habitat II, Istanbul, https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~yyildiz/placeofthewaqf.htm.