Kentsel yayılma yoğunluğunun yüzyıldaki gelişiminin değerlendirilmesi, Konya, Türkiye

Yıl 2024, , 1253 - 1263, 15.10.2024

Gülsüm Eloğlu , Kadir Şahbaz , Aslı Bozdağ

https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1466200

Öz

2023 yılı Türkiye için 100 yıllık bir devlet olma sürecini ifade etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin Konya kentinin 100 yıllık bir kentleşme deneyiminde yayılma süreci analiz edilmiştir. Yayılma süreci 1923, 1945, 1967, 2000 ve 2023 yıllarına ait planlar kapsamında; (1) yerleşik hücrelere bölünen ve bu hücrelerde yaşayan kişi sayısına bağlı yoğunluk ve (2) arazi kullanım verilerine dayalı Ters S ile yoğunluk hesaplaması yöntemleri kullanılarak elde edilen yayılma ölçütleri üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen yoğunluk verileri kapsamında 100 yıllık süreçteki kent; değişen mevzuat, arazi kullanım kararları ve gelişme yönleri kapsamında tartışılmıştır. Kentsel yayılmanın olumlu ve olumsuz yönlerini içeren mevcut durum SWOT yardımıyla analiz edilerek gelecek için mekânsal gelişim politikaları oluşturulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, Konya kentinin ulaşıma yönelik plan kararları nedeniyle homojen olmayan nitelikte belirli yönlerde kentsel yayılma ve sıçramalar gösterdiği ve insan ölçeğinden ve kompakt kentleşmeden uzaklaştığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kentsel yayılma, arazi yoğunluğu, Ters S Kuralı, CBS, GZFT

Assessing the evolution of urban expansion density over a century, Konya, Türkiye

Öz

The year 2023 represents a 100-year period of becoming a country for Türkiye. This study examines the urban expansion evolution of Konya in Turkey over a century of urbanization. The expansion process is assessed through the analysis of urban plans from 1923, 1945, 1967, 2000, and 2023 using (1) density calculation derived from the population divided by built-up cells and (2) density calculation utilizing Inverse S function based on land use data. Considering the calculated densities, the city's evolution over a hundred years is examined concerning evolving regulations land use decisions, and growth trajectories. The existing conditions, encompassing both the advantageous and disadvantageous facets of urban expansion, are examined using SWOT analysis, and spatial development strategies for the future are devised. As a result, it has been determined that Konya has undergone urban expansion in certain directions irregularly, attributed to transportation-focused planning decisions, deviating from human-scale and compact urban development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Urban sprawl, land density, Inverse S-shape Rule, GIS, SWOT

Kaynakça

• Ş. Kaypak, Modernizmden postmodernizme değişen kentleşme. Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 2(4), 80-95, 2013.
• P. Tunçer, Sustainable urbanization policies and Turkey. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(2), 2016. http:// dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9366
• G. Şaylan, Postmodernizm, Ankara. İmge Kitabevi, 2001.
• E. H. Kaya, and A. T. Susan, Sürdürülebilir bir kentleşme yaklaşımı olarak, ekolojik planlama ve eko-kentler. İdealkent, 11 (30), 909-937, 2020. https://do iorg/ 10.31198/id ealkent.533730
• A. Kayan, The Reflections of urbanization policies before the planning period. International Journal of Social Science Research, 6 (2), 158-183, 2017.
• G. A. Gonzalez, Urban sprawl, global warming, and the empire of capital. New York, ABD: State University of New York Press, 2009.
• S. Öztürk, and H. Çalışkan, Kentleşme gelişiminin ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Iğdır Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17, 677-694, 2019.
• H. Blumenfeld, On the growth of metropolitan areas. Social Forces, 28, 59-64, 1949. https://doi.org/10.2307 /2572099
• R. Lopez and H.P. Hynes, Sprawl in the 1990: measurement distribution, and trends. Urban Affair. Rev. 38, 325–355, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078 0874 022388
• F. Terzi and F. Bölen, İstanbul’da şehirsel saçaklanmanın ölçülmesi. İTÜ dergisi/A Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım 9 (2), 166-178, 2010.
• D. Sezgin and Ç. Varol, Ankara’daki kentsel büyüme ve saçaklanmanın verimli tarım topraklarının amaç dışı kullanımına etkisi. METU JFA, 29 (1), 273-288, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2012.1.15
• C. Z. Çavuş and A. Başaran Uysal, Çanakkale’de kentsel gelişme, yayılma ve kırsal alanlarla etkileşim. Planlama Ek 1, 105-117, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1474 4/planlama .2018.85547
• European Environment Agency, Urban Sprawl in Europe: Joint EEA-FOEN Report. 2016, https://www .eea.europa.eu/publications/urban-sprawl-in-europe , Accessed 24 January 2024.
• G., Hayrullahoğlu, Y., Aliefendioğlu and H. Tanrıvermiş, Kentsel yayılma alanları ve bu alanlardaki konut talebi üzerine nitel bir araştırma. İdealkent, 12 (34), 1413-1439, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealk ent.873343
• A.-F, Morote and M. Hernández, Urban sprawl and its effects on water demand: a case study of Alicante, Spain. Land Use Policy 50, 352–362, 2016. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.032
• K. Karabacak, Türkiye'deki Büyükşehir belediyeli şehirlerde kentsel yayılma. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 60 (1), 158-178, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2020.60.1.9
• M. P. Johnson, Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ. Plan. A 2001, 33, 717–735. https:// doi.org/10.1068/a3327
• L. Liu, Z. Peng, H. Wu, H. Jiao, Y. Yu and J. Zhao, Fast identification of urban sprawl based on K-means clustering with population density and local spatial entropy. Sustainability, 10 (8), 2683, 2018. https://doi. org/10.3390/su10082683
• M. Bosch, J. Chenal and S. Joost, Addressing urban sprawl from the complexity sciences. Urban Science, 3 (2), 60, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci30200 6 0
• W. Zhou, M. Jiao, W. Yu and J. Wang, Urban sprawl in a megaregion: A multiple spatial and temporal perspective. Ecological Indicators, 96, 54-66, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.035
• M. Steurer and C. Bayr, Measuring urban sprawl using land use data. Land Use Policy, 97, 104799, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104799
• Q. Feng, and P. Gauthier, Untangling urban sprawl and climate change: a review of the literature on physical planning and transportation drivers. Atmosphere, 12 (5), 547, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos1205054 7
• A. Frenkel and M. Ashkenazi, The integrated sprawl index: measuring the urban landscape in Israel. Ann. Reg. Sci. 42, 99–121, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0 0168-007-01 37-3
• W. Yue, L. Zhang and Y. Liu, Measuring sprawl in large Chinese cities along the Yangtze River Via combined single and multidimensional metrics. Habitat Int. 57, 43–52, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitati nt.2016.06.009
• L. Tian, Y. Li, Y. Yan, B. Wang, Measuring urban sprawl and exploring the role planning plays: A Shanghai case study. Land Use Policy, 67, 426–435, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.002
• M. K. Jat, P. K. Garg and D. Khare, Modelling of urban growth using spatial analysis techniques: A case study of Ajmer city (India). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29 (2), 543–567, 2008. https://doi.org/10.108 0/01431160701280983
• R.H. Ewing, Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: a literature review. In Urban Ecology; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, pp. 519–535, 2008. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_34
• B. Bhatta, S. Saraswati, D. Bandyopadhyay, Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Appl. Geogr. 30, 96–111, 2010. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.08.001
• S. Encarnação, M. Gaudiano, F.C. Santos, J.A. Tenedório, J.M. Pacheco, Urban dynamics, fractals and generalized entropy. Entropy, 15, 2679–2697, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3390/e15072679
• X. Xu, and X. Min, Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban expansion inChina using remote sensing data. Cities, 35, 104–113, 2013. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.002
• L. Jiao, Urban land density function: A new method to characterize urban expansion. Landscape and Urban Planning, 139, 26-39, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.l andurbplan.2015.02.017
• J., Yang, G. Song, and J. Lin, Measuring spatial structure of China's megaregions. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 141, 04014021, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) UP.1943-5444.000020
• H. Taubenböck, J. Ferstl and S. Dech, Regions set in stone—classifying and categorizing regions in Europe by settlement patterns derived from EO-data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6, 1–27, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390 /ijgi6020055
• H. Akseki and M. Ç. Meşhur, Kentsel yayılma sonucu yapılaşmaya açılan verimli tarım alanları: Konya kenti deneyimleri. Megaron, 8 (3), 165. 2013. 10.5505/ME GARON.2013.99609
• H. Öncel and M. Ç. Meşhur, Konya kentsel alanının büyümesinde kentsel saçaklanma ve nedenleri. Planlama, 31 (2). 2021. https://doi.org/10.14744/planla ma.2021.04127
• M. B. S. Aydın and E. D. Kahraman, Kompakt kent ölçütlerinden biri olan yoğunluk tespiti ve değerlendirmesi: Türkiye kentleri (İl merkezleri) Örneği, Planlama, 29 (2), 171-193, 2019. https://doi .org/10.14744/planlama.2019.86547
• M., Güneş, Hücresel otomat tabanlı sleuth model kullanılarak kentsel büyümenin tarım alanları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya Teknik Üniversitesi, Konya, Türkiye, 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13091/5079
• United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
• A. Schneider and C.E. Woodcock, Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud, 45, 659–692, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980070 87340
• B. Singh, Urban Growth Using Shannon’s Entropy: A Case Study of Rohtak City. Int. J. Adv. Remote Sens. Gis, 3, 544–552, 2014.
• H. Halaç and H. Akdağ, SWOT analysis method for creating strategic plans of immovable cultural assets; Mardin Kasımiye (Sultan Kasim) Madrasa Sample. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 4 (1), 65-77, 2018.
• S. Tsenkova, Reinventing strategic planning in post-socialist cities: Experiences from Sofa. European Planning Studies, 15 (3), 295–317, 2007. https://doi .org/10.1080/09654310601017133
• F. A. Halla, SWOT analysis of strategic urban development planning: The case of Dar es Salaam city in Tanzania. Habitat international, 31 (1), 130-142, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.08.001
• M. Pazouki, S.A. Jozi and Y.A. Ziari, Strategic management in urban environment using SWOT and QSPM model. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 3 (2), 207-216, 2017. https:// doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2017.03.02.009
• P. Ramaloo, C., Siwar, C.Y. Liong and A. Isahak, Identification of strategies for urban agriculture development: A SWOT analysis. Planning Malaysia, 16, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i7.521
• U. Kramar, D. Dragan, and D. Topolšek, The holistic approach to urban mobility planning with a modified focus group, SWOT, and fuzzy analytical hierarchical process. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6599, 2019. https://doi .org/10.3390/su 11236599
• J.S.D. Eugenio-Vela, X., Ginesta and M. Kavaratzis, The critical role of stakeholder engagement in a place branding strategy: A case study of the Empordà brand. European Planning Studies, 2019. https://doi.org/10.10 80/09654313.2019.1701294
• S. Jayaprakash and V. Swamy, Spatial SWOT analysis: an approach for urban regeneration. in international conference on civil engineering trends and challenges for sustainability Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2021, 21-38.
• O.C. Ferrell and M.D. Hartline, Marketing strategy (5th ed.). Cengag Publishing, 2011.
• T.L. Wheelen and J.D. Hunger, Strategic management and business policy. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.
• A. Bozdağ, A spatial analysis for sustainable planning of tourism impacts using GIS: Çesme (Cyssus), İzmir, Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25 (9), 9877-9902, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1066 8-022-02464-7
• N. Brenner, The hinterland urbanised?. Architectural Design, 86 (4), 118-127, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002 /ad.2077
• Y. Cen, P. Zhang, Y. Yan, W. Jing, Y. Zhang, Y. Li, D. Yang, X., Liu, W. Geng and T. Rong, Spatial and temporal agglomeration characteristics and coupling relationship of urban built-up land and economic hinterland—A case study of the lower Yellow River, China. Sustainability, 11 (19), 5218, 2019. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11195218
• C. Liang, J. Zeng, R.C. Zhang and Q.W. Wang, Connecting urban area with rural hinterland: A stepwise ecological security network construction approach in the urban–rural fringe. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108794, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.ecolind.2022.108794
• A.J. Tatem, A.M. Noor, C. von Hagen, A. DiGregorio, S.I. Hay. High resolution population maps for low income nations: combining land cover and census in East Africa. PLoS One. 2 (12), 1298. https://doi.org/10.13 71/journal.pone.0001298, 2007. 5
• V.A. Alegana, PM, Atkinson, C. Pezzulo, A. Sorichetta D. Weiss, T. Bird, E. Erbach-Schoenberg and A.J. Tatem, Fine resolution mapping of population age-structures for health and development applications. J R Soc Interface, 12:20150073, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1 098/rsif.2015.0073
• B. Calka, J. Nowak Da Costa, and E. Bielecka, Fine scale population density data and its application in risk assessment. Geomatics, natural hazards and Risk, 8(2), 1440-1455, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2 017.1345792
• URL 1: https://www.worldpop.org/ , Accessed 01.04. 2024.
• K. Başol, Demografi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yayınları, İzmir, 1984.
• E. Yılmaz and S. Çiftçi, Kentlerin ortaya çıkışı ve sosyo-politik açıdan türkiye'de kentleşme dönemleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10 (35), 252-267. 2011.
• R. Keleş, Kentleşme politikası, İmge Yayınları, Ankara. 2008.
• İ. Tekeli, Modernizm, modernite ve Türkiye’nin kent planlama tarihi, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009.