INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND GATED COMMUNITIES IN BEYKOZ, ISTANBUL

Öz

   The aim of this study is to investigate the loss of natural areas because of urban expansion through gated communities, the numbers of which are constantly increasing and to determine how the process is developing. The field of the study was Beykoz, which is located in the megacity of Istanbul, which is home to the greatest number of gated communities in Turkey and where the first examples of gated communities appeared. The transformation of forest areas was evaluated through the examples of two different typologies that are located on the outskirts of the city: an exclusive villa community and a private town gated community.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• gated community,environmental sustainability,Istanbul,Beykoz

ÇEVRESEL SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE KAPALI KONUT SİTESİ İLİŞKİSİNİN ISTANBUL, BEYKOZ’DA İNCELENMESİ

Öz

   Bu çalışmanın amacı, kentsel yayılma ile yaşanan doğal alanların kaybının, sayıları her geçen gün artan kapalı konut siteleri üzerinden incelenerek süreç gelişiminin nasıl olduğunun ortaya konulmasıdır.  İnceleme alanı olarak, Türkiye’de en fazla kapalı konut sitesine sahip mega kent İstanbul metropolünde yer alan ve ilk kapalı konut sitesi örneklerinin görüldüğü Beykoz İlçesi seçilmiştir. Kent çeperlerinde yer seçen, iki farklı tipolojide seçkin villa sitesi ve özel yerleşim kapalı konut sitesi örnekleri üzerinden orman alanlarının dönüşümü değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kapalı konut sitesi,çevresel sürdürülebilirlik,İstanbul,Beykoz

Kaynakça

1. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/UN%20WCED%201987%20Brundtland%20Report.pdf (Online: March 1st, 2018)
2. JAMES P., Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability, Routledge Press, London, UK, 2015.
3. AKBULUT A., OZCEVIK O., CARTON L., 'Evaluating suitability of a GIS–AHP combined method for sustainable urban and environmental planning in Beykoz district, Istanbul', Int. J. Sus. Dev. Plann. 13(8), 1103–1115, 2018.
4. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ (Online: February 1st, 2019)
5. BLAKELY E.J., M. G. & SYNDER M. G. Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, USA, 1997.
6. http://theoryandpractice.planning.dal.ca/_pdf/gated_communities/Grant_2003_planning_responses_Glasgow.pdf (Online: March 1st, 2018)
7. KURTULUŞ H., Global Flows and New Segregation in Istanbul: How Cloudy Class Identities Have Crystallized in Urban Space. In R. S. SANDHU, J. SANDHU (Eds.), Globalizing Cities: Inequality and Segregation in Developing Countries, edited by Ranvinder Singh Sandhu and Jasmeet. Sandhu, (pp. 309-338), Rawat Books, New Delhi, India, 2007.
8. LOW S. M., Behind The Gates: Life, Security, and The Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America, Routledge, New York, USA, 2003.

9. BAYCAN-LEVENT T., GÜLÜMSER A., 'Gated Communities in Istanbul: The New Walls of The City', Third Conference of Diversity in cities: Visible and Invisible Walls, 1-18. UCL, London, UK, 2007.
10. ÖZKAN-TÖRE E. & KOZAMAN-SOM S., 'Sosyo-Mekânsal Ayrışmada Korunaklı Konut Yerleşmeleri: Istanbul Örneği', Megaron, 4(3), 121-130, 2009.
11. VELDHUIZEN D.V, MEIER S., 'Modern Castles and Country Houses: The Use of History in ‘Gated Communities’ in The Netherlands', International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(7-8), 818-833, 2014.
12. DAVIS M. City of Quartz, Excavating the Future of Los Angeles. Verso, London, UK, 1990.
13. LANDMAN K., 'Gated Communities and Urban Sustainability: Taking a Closer Look at the Future', 2nd Southern African Conference on Sustainable Development in the Built Environment, Strategies for a Sustainable Built Environment, 1-7. Pretoria, South Africa, 2000.
14. KURTULUŞ H. (2016). Istanbul'da Kapalı Yerleşmeler - Beykoz Konakları Örneği. In H. Kurtuluş (Eds.) Istanbul’da Kentsel Ayrışma(2nd edt.) (pp. 161-187), Bağlam Yayınları, Istanbul, Türkiye.
15. GENİŞ Ş., 'Producing Elite Localities: The Rise of Gated Communities in Istanbul'.,Urban Studies, 44(4), 771-798, 2007.
16. ÖNCÜ A. The myth of ‘ideal home’ travels across cultural borders in Istanbul, In A. Öncü & P. Weyland (Eds.). Space, Power And Culture. (pp. 56–72), Zed Book, London, UK 1997.
17. AYATA S. , 'Toplumsal Çevre Olarak Gecekondu ve Apartman', Toplum ve Bilim, 46/47, 101–127, 1989.
18. GÜVENÇ, M., IŞIK, O., ' Istanbul’u Okumak: Statü- Konut Mülkiyeti Farklılaşmasına İlişkin Bir Çözümleme Denemesi', Toplum ve Bilim, (71), 6- 59, 1996.
19. FİRİDİN-ÖZGÜR, E., 'Sosyal ve Mekansal Ayrışma Çerçevesinde Yeni Konutlaşma Eğilimleri: Kapalı Siteler, Istanbul, Çekmeköy Örneği', (Doktora Tezi) Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Istanbul, 2006.
20. https://maptriks.com/tr/ (Online: December 27th, 2017)
21. ISTANBUL METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, ' 1:50.000 Istanbul Metropolitan Area Master Development Plan Report, Urban Planning Directorate, Istanbul, 1995.
22. ISTANBUL METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, 'Sayılarla Istanbul Raporu', Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul, 2001.
23. YÜKSELİR Ö., Boğaziçi’ndeki Yerleşmelerin Yasal Mevzuat Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Istanbul, 2006.
24. BEYKOZ MUNICIPALITY, Land Use Datas, Reconstruction and Urbanisation Directorate, Istanbul, 2018.
25. ISTANBUL METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY, 1:100000 Istanbul Environmental Plan Report. Urban Planning Directorate, Istanbul, 2009.
26. https://dostbeykoz.com/koylerimizi-taniyalim_1-akbaba-koyu , (Online: June 1st, 2018)
27. https://www.kentselstrateji.com/wp-content/uploads/E-12_Beykoz.pdf , (Online: June 1st, 2018)
28. https://parselsorgu.tkgm.gov.tr/ , (Online: May 10th, 2018)
29. https://www.hurriyetemlak.com/, (Online: June 5th, 2018)
30. Derin-Öncel A., Özaydın G. 'Kapalı Site Olgusunun Değişim Sürecine Bir Bakış: Beykoz Soğuksu Örneği', İdealkent, (6),62-83, 2012.
31. https://www.hurriyetemlak.com/ , (Online: June 5th, 2018)