Lastik üretiminden kaynaklanan yüzey aktif madde içeren atık suların koagülasyon bazlı arıtma alternatiflerinin PROMETHEE yaklaşımı ile değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışmada, araç lastiği üretim prosesinde preslenen hammadde hamurunun birbirine yapışmasını engellemek için kullanılan yüzey aktif madde içeren atık suyun, konvansiyonel koagülasyon ve mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesleri ile arıtımı incelenmiştir. Prosesler Taguchi deney tasarımı yöntemi (L8) ile maksimum kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimini sağlayacak biçimde optimize edilmiştir. Pareto analizi ile mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesinde en etkili parametrenin mikrodalga süresi, konvansiyonel koagülasyon prosesinde ise FeCl3.7H2O dozu olduğu bulunmuştur. Varyans analizi ile iki proses için de belirlenen modellerin kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimini açıklamada anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Optimum deneysel koşullardaki kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderimi, kimyasal çamur üretimi, işletme maliyeti ve proseslerin tercih edilebilirlik seviyeleri dikkate alınarak, çok kriterli karar verme süreçlerinden olan PROMETHEE yöntemi ile en uygun proses mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon olarak belirlenmiştir. Mikrodalga oksidasyonu destekli elektrokoagülasyon prosesinde, optimum şartlarda kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderim verimi, çamur miktarı ve işletim maliyetleri sırasıyla % 66.9, 6.27 g/L ve 1.195 €/L olarak bulunmuştur. Prosesinin seçiminde kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı giderim verimi ve çamur miktarı kriterlerinin pozitif yönde etki ettikleri belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kimyasal koagülasyon
• Mikrodalga
• Elektrokoagülasyon
• Pareto analizi
• PROMETHEE

Evaluation of coagulation based treatment alternatives of wastewater containing surfactant from tire manufacturing by PROMETHEE approach

Öz

In this study, the treatment of wastewater containing surfactant used to prevent the sticking of the raw material pulp pressed in the tire production process, with conventional coagulation and microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation processes was investigated. The processes were optimized to ensure maximum chemical oxygen demand removal by the Taguchi experimental design method (L8). With Pareto analysis, it was found that the most effective parameter in microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation processes is microwave duration while the most effective parameter in the conventional coagulation process was FeCl3.7H2O dose. Analysis of variance found that the models determined for both processes were significant in explaining chemical oxygen demand removal. The appropriate process has been determined as the microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation, with the PROMETHEE method considering the optimum experimental conditions, chemical oxygen demand removal, chemical sludge production, operating cost and the preferability criteria of the processes. In microwave oxidation-supported electrocoagulation process, under optimum conditions, chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, the amount of sludge production and operating costs were found as 66.9 %, 6.27 g / L and 1.195 € / L, respectively. It was determined that the criteria of chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency and sludge amount had a positive effect on the selection of the process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Chemical coagulation
• Microwave
• Electrocoagulation
• Pareto analysis
• PROMETHEE

Kaynakça

1. [1] K. Lawrence, L.K. Wang, Y.T. Yung-Tse Hung, H. Howard, H.H Lo, and C. Constantine Yapijakis, Handbook of Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Treatment. Marcel Dekker Publishing, New York, 2004.
2. [2] J. Kaleta, and M. Elektorowicz, The removal of anionic surfactants from water in coagulation process, Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 34(5-8), 999–1005, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09593330.2012.733415
3. [3] M.J. Scott and M.N. Jones, The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, 1508(1-2), 235-251, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4157(00)00013-7
4. [4] S.M. Mirbahoush, N. Chaibakhsh and Z. Moradi-Shoeili, Highly efficient removal of surfactant from industrial effluents using flaxseed mucilage in coagulation/photo-Fenton oxidation process. Chemosphere, 231(51-59), 2019. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.118
5. [5] M.A. Aboulhassan, S. Souabi, A. Yaacoubi, and M. Baudu, Removal of surfactant from industrial wastewaters by coagulation flocculation process. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 3(4), 327–332, 2006. https://doi.org/ 10. 1007/BF03325941
6. [6] S. Verma, B. Prasad and I.M. Mishra, Pretreatment of petrochemical wastewater by coagulation and flocculation and the sludge characteristics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178(1-3), 1055-1064, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.047
7. [7] A.A. Siyal, M.R. Shamsuddin, A. Low and N.E Rabat, A review on recent developments in the adsorption of surfactants from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 254, 109797, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109797
8. [8] A.G.L. Moura, V.B. Centurion, D.Y. Okada, F. Motteran, T.P. Delforno, V.M. Oliveira, and M.B.A Varesche, Laundry wastewater and domestic sewage pilot-scale anaerobic treatment: Microbial community resilience regarding sulfide production. Journal of Environmental Management, 251, 109495, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109495

9. [9] A. Dhuiib, N. Hamad, and I. Hassairi, Degradation of anionic surfactants by Citrobacter braakii. Process Biochemistry, 38(8), 1245- 1250, 2003. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00322-9
10. [10] C.V. Faria, T.P. Delforno, D.Y. Okada, and M.B.A. Varesche, Evaluation of anionic surfactant removal by anaerobic degradation of commercial laundry wastewater and domestic sewage. Environmental Technology, 40(8), 988-996, 2019. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09593330.2017.1414317
11. [11] J. Huang, L. Zhu, G. Zeng, L. Shi, Y. Shi, K. Yi, and X. Li, Recovery of Cd(II) and surfactant in permeate from MEUF by foam fractionation with anionic-nonionic surfactant mixtures. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 570, 81-88, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.010
12. [12] B. Mondal, A. Adak, and P. Datta, UV-H2O2 advanced oxidation of anionic surfactant: reaction kinetics, effects of interfering substances and operating conditions. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal, 18(6), 1245-1254, 2019. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2019.119
13. [13] F. Aoudjit, O. Cherifi, and D. Halliche, Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant by one-pot synthesized TiO2/layered double hydroxide materials. Separation Science and Technology, 54(7), 1095-1105, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.1527352
14. [14] R.C. Kaggwa, C.L. Mulalelo, P. Denny, and T.O Okurut, The impact of alum discharges on a natural tropical wetland in Uganda. Water Research, 35(3) 795-807, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354 (00)00301-8
15. [15] C. Zhang, K.T. Valsaraj, W.D. Constant, and D. Roy, Aerobic biodegradation kinetics of four anionic and nonionic surfactants at sub- and supra-critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). Water Research, 33(1), 115-124, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98) 00 170-5
16. [16] M.I. Bautista-Toledo, J. Rivera-Utrilla, J. D. Méndez-Díaz, M. Sánchez-Polo, and F. Carrasco-Marín, Removal of the surfactant sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate from water by processes based on adsorption/bioadsorption and biodegradation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 418, 113-119, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.001
17. [17] H. Hidaka, T. Oyama, T. Horiuchi, T. Koike, and N. Serpone, Photo- induced oxidative synergistic degradation of mixed anionic/cationic surfactant systems in aqueous dispersions. A detailed study of the DBS/HTAB system. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 99(3-4), 485- 489, 2010. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.06.041
18. [18] S. Sharma, and H. Simsek, Treatment of canola-oil refinery effluent using electrochemical methods: A comparison between combined electrocoagulation + electrooxidation and electrochemical peroxidation methods. Chemosphere, 221, 630-639, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.066
19. [19] APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edn. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2005.
20. [20] P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering. McGraw Hill Internatioanal, New York, 1996.
21. [21] F. Urfalıoğlu, and T. Genç, Çok kriterli karar verme teknikleri ile Türkiye’nin ekonomik performansının avrupa birliği üye ülkeleri ile karşılaştırılması. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 35, 329-360, 2015. https://doi.org/ 10.14780/iibdergi.201324469
22. [22] M. Gul, E. Celik, A. Taskin Gumus, and A.F. Guneri, A fuzzy logic based promethee method for material selection problems. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 68-79, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.07.002
23. [23] J.P. Brans, P.H. Vincke, and B. Mareschal, How to select and how to rank projects: the promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228-238, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86) 90044-5
24. [24] M. Behzadian, R.B Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdasi, PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198- 215, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
25. [25] J. Behin, N. Farhadian, M. Ahmadi, and M. Parvizi, Ozone assisted electrocoagulation in a rectangular internal-loop airlift reactor: Application to decolorization of acid dye. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 8, 171-178, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jwpe.2015.10.003
26. [26] M. Asem, W.M.F.W. Nawawi, and D.N. Jimat, Evaluation of water absorption of polyvinyl alcohol-starch biocomposite reinforced with sugarcane bagasse nanofibre: optimization using two-level factorial design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 368, 012005, 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/368/1/012005
27. [27] M.M Abdulredha, S.A. Hussain, and L.C. Abdullah, Separation emulsion via non-ionic surfactant: an optimization. Processes, 7(6), 382, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7060382
28. [28] P.S. Bhandari, & P.R. Gogate, Microwave assisted persulfate induced degradation of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 36(12), 200-2007, 2019. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11814-019-0390-z
29. [29] B.H. Park, S. Kim, A.Y. Seo, & T.G. Lee, Evaluation of optimal conditions for anionic surfactant removal in wastewater. Chemosphere, 263, 128174, 2021. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128174
30. [30] E. Gengec, M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, A. Akyol, and K. Oktor, Optimization of baker's yeast wastewater using response surface methodology by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 286, 200-209, 2012. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.desal.2011.11.023
31. [31] G. Tuzkaya, B. Gülsün, C. Kahraman, and D. Özgen, an İntegrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2853-2863, 2010. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.004
32. [32] R.J. Li, Fuzzy method in group decision making. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 38 (1), 91-101, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221 (99) 00172-8